The Brilliance of Modern Gyrocopters

  Рет қаралды 52,256

Electric Aviation

Electric Aviation

6 күн бұрын

In this video we will look at modern Gyrocopters and how electrification is helping to elevate their performance.
We look at:
1. Modified Rotor blades
2. EDF
3.Powered Rotors
4.Regeneration
5.Lift from Wings

Пікірлер: 145
@gormauslander
@gormauslander 4 күн бұрын
The lack of love in the world for the rotodyne is one of the great injustices
@pdibbs11
@pdibbs11 5 күн бұрын
Aviation has alway been a delicate balancing act between efficiency, redundancy, speed and safety. I like the redundancy that a hybrid electric gyro could provide as we try to introduce air mobility into the future of traveling.
@ElectricAviation
@ElectricAviation 4 күн бұрын
Well said!
@ianross225
@ianross225 4 күн бұрын
Let’s hope the eco zealots/puritans don’t kill this off along with any other form of enjoyment!
@maickelvieira1014
@maickelvieira1014 5 күн бұрын
Really interesting, i always thought they were just a gimmick, didnt expect them to have this much potential for the future.
@johndemeritt3460
@johndemeritt3460 4 күн бұрын
Gyrocopters -- or autogyros -- have been part of the homebuilt and utralight market here in the States since before the FAA had regulations regarding what we now call ultralights. The problem, as noted here, is that autogyros have been notoriously slow and short ranged. I'm particularly interested in whether any of the new generation of gyrocopters sport multiple rotors. I recall seeing and hearing Hughes/McDonnell Douglas helicopters with six blades producing significantly less noise than Bell and Sikorsky machines. The Hughes machines were also fast and efficient. Anyone got any ideas?
@maickelvieira1014
@maickelvieira1014 4 күн бұрын
@@johndemeritt3460 You got me interested in the multirotor thing, i dont know nothing on the topic so when I searched i got confused, what i see is or two "pushers" rotors side by side or two of the big rotors overhead, so i wanna know what you mean when you say "multirotor" since i am confused now kk.
@johndemeritt3460
@johndemeritt3460 4 күн бұрын
@@maickelvieira1014, I'm sorry if I gave the wrong impression: I meant helicopters with more than two or four rotor blades. The Hughes 500 had five or six blades as I recall . . . Looking at the Wikipedia page for the MD-500 series aircraft (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MD_Helicopters_MD_500), the MD-500 had a five blade main rotor with a diameter of about 27 feet (8.33 m). This allowed the rotor to turn so the blade tips didn't reach supersonic velocity, making for a quiet helicopter.. That said, I can see where a twin side-by-side mast, intermeshing rotor design, like that on the Kaman I-Max or the HH-43 Huskie of the Vietnam era would be effective.
@ianross225
@ianross225 4 күн бұрын
These machines are simple and very cheap to run. They have none of the issues that helicopters have with complex rotor tilting mechanisms or drive. My father always said that the military never used them because they were too cheap!
@andrewbaillie6291
@andrewbaillie6291 5 күн бұрын
Yes! Finally! Making it Hybrid and all props electric will be, from my point of view, the way to go.
@michaelglenning5107
@michaelglenning5107 4 күн бұрын
Yes, a rotax/electric generator would add range, lower cost, still allow silent take off and landing, add powered landing during engine out event.
@abvmoose87
@abvmoose87 Күн бұрын
I couldnt agree more
@cliddily
@cliddily 5 күн бұрын
I've been flying gyros in the UK for some 10 years. The attitude people have towards these machines only makes us gyronauts feel special😅 The magnetic reduction of rotor speed in high speed flight would be a very helpful development imo.. AutoGyro of germany have had an electric gyro available (cavalon) since 2010, but it doesn't have any such rotor control system.
@ElectricAviation
@ElectricAviation 5 күн бұрын
They really need to upgrade the eCavalon with better batteries and powered rotor. Yeah there is a negative attitude towards Gyros even though its a very practical flying machine
@dvfreelancer
@dvfreelancer 2 күн бұрын
Excellent overview of modern gyrocopters.
@jomansur
@jomansur 2 күн бұрын
As an engineer and aero nerd, it's not often I learn something from YT videos, this was great, thank you
@ElectricAviation
@ElectricAviation Күн бұрын
I hope you see other videos on this channel too
@jeffcauhape6880
@jeffcauhape6880 4 күн бұрын
It never occurred to me that going electric on a gyrocopter would open the door to such possibilities. Wow. I hope to see this develop further. Now if only you could bring the price down to make them affordable....
@tapist3482
@tapist3482 Күн бұрын
Cuz the power weight ratio of electric motors had only came to the point that it can replace many mechanical transmissions since recent years.
@deezynar
@deezynar 4 күн бұрын
Once the craft is off the ground, you can't power the rotors without spinning the fuselage in the opposite direction. If your propulsion motor goes out while in flight, you cannot turn on the rotor motor to bring you down because the fuselage will spin. Just come down with autorotation.
@maxwellmatches
@maxwellmatches 3 күн бұрын
Couldn't you add a small electric tail rotor?
@pisoiorfan
@pisoiorfan 3 күн бұрын
those with dual pusher propeller/fans should be able to compensate for the main rotor torque. Well depending on which pusher motor does fail, it might need to reverse thrust, that's odd (pushing backwards) but doable with any remaining pusher motor.
@deezynar
@deezynar 2 күн бұрын
@@pisoiorfan There are few that have two pusher props, but your point is right. Manufacturers may decide to build their gyrocopters with two pusher props just to get that ability.
@whitneylake2107
@whitneylake2107 4 күн бұрын
I love this channel because it is demonstrating what is actually happening. Thank you
@okgo8315
@okgo8315 2 күн бұрын
I think a lot of this is virtual/theoretical, still exciting stuff though.
@rjung_ch
@rjung_ch 5 күн бұрын
Very interesting, especially the view of recuperating energy during flight. That is very sensible and with new technology such questions can now be addressed and solved. Thank you 👍💪✌
@ElectricAviation
@ElectricAviation 5 күн бұрын
Yes, exactly
@manofsan
@manofsan 4 күн бұрын
@@ElectricAviation - People have told me Luminati is run by a bold con-artist who bilks investors with tall promises and never delivers anything
@badrinair
@badrinair 3 күн бұрын
I've always loved gyros. Really hope to see them flying about
@slartibartfast7921
@slartibartfast7921 5 күн бұрын
Always a joy watching your videos mate.
@ElectricAviation
@ElectricAviation 4 күн бұрын
Much appreciated
@VideoconferencingUSA
@VideoconferencingUSA 3 күн бұрын
Been a fan of gyrocopters since the early 80s when I bought the plans for a Benson Gyro, then in the late 80s I was able to fly some gyros, but then got scared of their safety record and put the idea up on the shelf. The idea of electric Gyro fascinates me again.
@CptFugu
@CptFugu Күн бұрын
Great video, thanks.
@robcuthbert8257
@robcuthbert8257 5 күн бұрын
Very well done, as always. Thank you
@ElectricAviation
@ElectricAviation 4 күн бұрын
Thanks again!
@DiHandley
@DiHandley 4 күн бұрын
An electric gyrocopter is a no brainer. Very exciting!
@rickrimington2760
@rickrimington2760 9 сағат бұрын
Great Video ! thanks
@fredford7642
@fredford7642 4 күн бұрын
Thank you for a great and informative video. I rally enjoyed it.
@ElectricAviation
@ElectricAviation 4 күн бұрын
So glad!
@marcv2648
@marcv2648 5 күн бұрын
Excellent info as usual!
@ElectricAviation
@ElectricAviation 5 күн бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@SuperYellowsubmarin
@SuperYellowsubmarin 3 күн бұрын
Interesting proposition but I feel you made a few shortcuts. All gyros have pre-rotators, they are necessary because the rotor needs some initial rotational speed to accelerate with relative wind during ground acceleration. What makes jump gyros different, is they have a collective pitch system, while conventional gyros have simpler fixed collective pitch rotor heads. This allows jump gyros to accelerate the rotor on the ground at full speed without generating lift with low pitch, then disengaging the rotator to avoid torque effects, and then only, effectively jumping by increasing collective pitch abruptively. This is done only on rotor inertia !
@tapist3482
@tapist3482 Күн бұрын
I was thinking about the same. The jump looks pretty much like how a helicopter does and there must be some rotor pitch changing in the progress. I feel like in a pitch changing rotor would also serve like flaps in conventional aircrafts.
@jimpike7445
@jimpike7445 4 күн бұрын
I remember the AVIAN which was developed by ex AVRO employees laid off after the ARROW interceptor was cancelled. Many other AVRO employees went to the NASA space program to work on the MERCURY and GEMINI space capsules. I saw the AVIAN at a nearby airport but never saw it fly.
@pch1147
@pch1147 4 күн бұрын
Wonderful news and update of current gyro environment.
@lankaat
@lankaat 4 күн бұрын
Lovely video.
@MyFluffyClouds
@MyFluffyClouds 5 күн бұрын
Could the battery and / or maybe some super capacitors be boosted from a ground based electricity supply to achieve the initial rotation speed for the 'jump' takeoff? This would relieve the drain on battery for forward flight.
@ElectricAviation
@ElectricAviation 5 күн бұрын
Its a good idea. A powered tether can do the job that detaches
@MyFluffyClouds
@MyFluffyClouds 5 күн бұрын
@@ElectricAviation Even if it's a very short power tether that just spins the rotor blades up enough to provide the initial jump. This energy is not then taken from the onboard battery. The system could be installed at regional air taxi hubs.
@markthomasson5077
@markthomasson5077 4 күн бұрын
@@ElectricAviationhaha, my comment
@Allan_aka_RocKITEman
@Allan_aka_RocKITEman 3 күн бұрын
The _Fairey Rotordyne_ has entered the comment section.
@z_actual
@z_actual 4 күн бұрын
that is good news, because we need to see this potential brought forward as Im sure it will provide a safe VTOL personal vehicle, and has variations in scale too such as Fairey Rotodyne. Likewise we have learned that we can avoid the speed cap imposed due to retreating blade stall by the wings shown in your examples. This could see 300 mph vehicles which will have an impact on range. Cheers
@ElectricAviation
@ElectricAviation 4 күн бұрын
The 11 seater Linx P9 looks promising. It is 2 crew and 9 passengers
@clivestainlesssteelwomble7665
@clivestainlesssteelwomble7665 3 күн бұрын
As soon as you mentioned a switchable motor on the main rotor.... I thought yes 💭 Regen in flight 😁 Some exciting prospects there... Well done 👍🏻 Sir
@PeterAcrat
@PeterAcrat 5 күн бұрын
Thank you 🌟
@ElectricAviation
@ElectricAviation 5 күн бұрын
You’re welcome 😊
@shawnhollahan590
@shawnhollahan590 4 күн бұрын
Another excellent and inspiring video essay !!
@ElectricAviation
@ElectricAviation 4 күн бұрын
Thanks again!
@user-qf6yt3id3w
@user-qf6yt3id3w 4 күн бұрын
You could power the main rotor for vertical takeoff from ground based batteries.
@angellestat2730
@angellestat2730 5 күн бұрын
I always saw gyros as the most efficient VTOL solution, now with these new developments, they secure that spot. The only way other VTOL options can compete is at higher speed, maneuverability and depending their design; they may land on more closed or urbanized places, but with the drawback of higher energy consumption, cost and noise.
@jason8ification
@jason8ification 4 күн бұрын
They probably could have specific air taxi stations for VTOL vehicles and perhaps they could use fuel cells instead. Fuel cells might improve energy to weight ratios and range.
@angellestat2730
@angellestat2730 4 күн бұрын
​@@jason8ification for any air vehicle who wants to achieve more than 90 min of nominal power and fast recharge, hydrogen is a must. But for widespread adoption to replace a percentage of cars, noise reduction is still the hardest thing to accomplish.
@caspargroenen4363
@caspargroenen4363 5 күн бұрын
Nice !
@ElectricAviation
@ElectricAviation 5 күн бұрын
Thanks!
@anthonywestbrook2155
@anthonywestbrook2155 4 күн бұрын
Crazy idea that probably wouldn’t work, but I want to put out there. Some sort of, for lack of a better word, extension cord that supplies the rotor with the large amount of electricity it needs for vertical takeoff, without having to have that much more battery weight. After it reaches a specified height, the cable disconnects and the copter goes on its merry little way.
@tapist3482
@tapist3482 Күн бұрын
EVA vibes!
@williamzk9083
@williamzk9083 4 күн бұрын
The most obvious application is an electric motor to pre-spin the rotor before takeoff. The second is the ease of implementing Fly By Wire and Throttle By Wire to create anti torgue to allow a small amount of rotor power during takeoff and landing.
@mikesmith2905
@mikesmith2905 4 күн бұрын
The Kurds in Northern Iraq adopted gyro-copters for their traffic police as when they land there is no prop-wash stirring up clouds of dust and causing accidents. That was about a decade ago now, I can't remember the make but they seemed to like them at the time. Given their greater efficiency I am surprised it has taken this long for ducted fans to catch on.
@gormauslander
@gormauslander 4 күн бұрын
Greater efficiency? That depends on a lot of things, but pound-for-pound, a large open rotor is more efficient than a closed small one.
@mikesmith2905
@mikesmith2905 3 күн бұрын
@@gormauslander I based that statement on a conversation with a friend who makes radio controlled model aircraft, he's a big fan of the ducted propeller. Ducted fans have been adopted for airships, although at relatively low speeds drag is less of an issue. They have started adding similar shrouds to ships propellers (well they did in the 1980s, I came ashore in the early 1990's) 'to increase efficiency', but of course on ships weight is less important and at 10mph drag is negligable. This chap has a video on prop designs that suggests there are potential advantages to adding a duct but I am not a mechanical or hydraulic engineer. Modern advanced propellers such as those used on the A400 transport aircraft don't seem to be common, perhaps due to manufacturing costs
@gormauslander
@gormauslander 3 күн бұрын
@@mikesmith2905 In trying to come to a conclusive answer about what scenarios they are actually better, I found no conclusion. Intuitively, it seems to me that no matter your prop size, disallowing the air to spread sideways and forcing it to continue out the back must necessarily waste less energy and convert more movement into propulsion. But people keep not using them, so there's gotta be something i'm missing
@SystemLordNemo
@SystemLordNemo 5 күн бұрын
What if a electric VTOL plane would takeoff with cable power?
@ElectricAviation
@ElectricAviation 5 күн бұрын
I have explored those options in a video. They can be connected to a power tether, that detaches after lift
@gormauslander
@gormauslander 4 күн бұрын
Yep. Rotors are kinetic energy storage, and can be charged before takeoff so that the battery isn't used at all
@markthomasson5077
@markthomasson5077 4 күн бұрын
The beauty of electric motors is a very high power to weight. This is especially so if you only run for a short time at maximum, as in a jump take off.
@henrik_worst_of_sinners
@henrik_worst_of_sinners 4 күн бұрын
yes
@ericwilson5203
@ericwilson5203 22 сағат бұрын
I want to know SOOOO much more about this! Doing some napkin math here... take sport copter 2 gyro but use the engine to run a generator. Replace the turbo fan with a pair of electric ducted fans that run off the generator. Add a small wing and the brilliant motor on the main rotor described in the video. ChatGPT reckons that could be twice the performance?
@tomellis4750
@tomellis4750 5 күн бұрын
As per MyFluffyClouds post below, I would suggest mains power could be applied to a VTOL, for tens of metres after takeoff from a skyscraper, by having a pole run down the inside of the building. This would have a electrical power connection to the aircraft, and be raised up, by mechanical or electrical means, to match the rate of climb, thus not adding to the take off weight. If sufficiently substanstanial, it could even push the VTOL upwards.
@ElectricAviation
@ElectricAviation 5 күн бұрын
Brilliant Idea
@tomellis4750
@tomellis4750 5 күн бұрын
A hole could be drilled into the ground to install the pole.
@tomellis4750
@tomellis4750 4 күн бұрын
Brain storming now - maybe for landing also, pole raised with some means to connect to VTOL, maybe the aircraft's connector hangs below, and is guided to the pole's connector by a cone.
@gormauslander
@gormauslander 4 күн бұрын
This seems like a lot of engineering for a marginal gain. A simple quick-disconnect cable would do the trick
@ianross225
@ianross225 4 күн бұрын
The ducted fan is an obvious thing that doesn’t seem to be used as much as I’d expect especially on turbo prop aircraft or even drones where the improved efficiency and noise reduction would really matter. The Harrier Jump Jet was the most obvious use of a ducted fan and the simplest VTOL aircraft ever developed by the military.
@Allan_aka_RocKITEman
@Allan_aka_RocKITEman 3 күн бұрын
*I ❤️ GYROPLANES*
@dolgo79111
@dolgo79111 4 күн бұрын
Have you ever flown a Gyrocopter? I have often and I can say, that it is absolutely noting for urban traffic !
@echomande4395
@echomande4395 Күн бұрын
Maybe something like the Fairey Rotodyne should be revisited with more modern technology. Change the propulsion to turboprops and drop the rotor tipjets for an electric motor.
@ElectricAviation
@ElectricAviation Күн бұрын
Electric motor can handle the torque required to moved that blade
@VacuousCat
@VacuousCat 5 күн бұрын
In some specific wind conditions, can an autogyro get energy from the rotor with regenerative braking and be useful?
@ElectricAviation
@ElectricAviation 5 күн бұрын
Yes while on ground when its resting and also when is slowed down for forward flight
@zenzen9131
@zenzen9131 3 күн бұрын
Bring back the Fairey Rotodyne but in electric form :)
@mandrakejake
@mandrakejake 4 күн бұрын
Either powering or generating with the rotor whilst in flight causes a moment torque, how do you manage that without a tail rotor? Just rudder?
@ElectricAviation
@ElectricAviation 4 күн бұрын
If you watch the video, I have shown two videos of Gyro's doing jump take-off (nearly vertical). The torque is managed by the rudder.
@mandrakejake
@mandrakejake 4 күн бұрын
@@ElectricAviation whilst you're on the ground it's possible to power the rotor, but ad soon as it's airborne the torque reaction is too large to be useful
@WildKard123
@WildKard123 4 күн бұрын
@@ElectricAviation you have not done your research. Jump gyros disconnect their transmissions before jumping. Half your video is bunk.
@tomarmstrong1281
@tomarmstrong1281 4 күн бұрын
I wonder how many of your followers remember the Fairey Rotodyne? Is there a chance, incorporating the advances in technology, that such a machine could make a comeback for local urban mass transport?
@ElectricAviation
@ElectricAviation 4 күн бұрын
I had made a video on that 3 years ago. It would been a great machine
@grahamkearnon6682
@grahamkearnon6682 4 күн бұрын
Good video Sir, have been wondering why no single seat battery gyros around, the torque alone from battery would make a lot of sense for a jump start. Just a simple auto blade angle of attack adjuster needed!
@ecomandurban7183
@ecomandurban7183 5 күн бұрын
🤗🤗🤗🤗💯💯💯💯
@markthomasson5077
@markthomasson5077 4 күн бұрын
If you slow the rotor, will you not suffer from a lack of lift on the rearward side? I guess you could / should have larger winglets on that side.
@pyeitme508
@pyeitme508 3 күн бұрын
Woe
@josedearimateiayjesus2178
@josedearimateiayjesus2178 4 күн бұрын
Girocopter !!!
@Liithiumbob
@Liithiumbob 3 күн бұрын
I love the way these companies put an electric motor in an aircraft and call them "Silent". That is such BS. Anyone that's seen in person an electric motor driven prop or EDF knows this is not at all the case. Quieter than a turbine or piston aircraft, yes, but not even remotely silent.
@My-Opinion-Doesnt-Matter
@My-Opinion-Doesnt-Matter 5 күн бұрын
1:25 you mean low disc loading?
@ElectricAviation
@ElectricAviation 4 күн бұрын
Yikes...you are right. It is supposed to be low disc loading.
@gsestream
@gsestream 3 күн бұрын
or just fixed bi-plane high-lift sail-type delta-wing as ultra-light glider
@StepDub
@StepDub 4 күн бұрын
Why not power the main rotor from a grounded cable for the purpose of take off? This could be detached or retracted once suitable height is achieved.
@ElectricAviation
@ElectricAviation 4 күн бұрын
Yes a powered tether can be used for take-off
@kenjisakaie6028
@kenjisakaie6028 4 күн бұрын
Then you're hauling extra motor(or extra gearing) but it's a very interesting idea that I hadn't heard before this video
@user-rh5jp2sh4s
@user-rh5jp2sh4s 3 күн бұрын
If the Rotar is powered by motor while being in FLIGHT, meaning it is not free spinning as usually for Gyrocopters. Wouldn't there be a need for an extra tail rotar? Wouldn't that add complexities ?
@andreschapero3615
@andreschapero3615 5 күн бұрын
What about electric paramotors and flex wings ?
@jamesengland7461
@jamesengland7461 4 күн бұрын
This is easily possible, but they're pretty inefficient, and batteries don't provide much range anyway
@jamesdeath3477
@jamesdeath3477 5 күн бұрын
Great stuff as always, though I do have to laugh when people use "groundbreaking" to describe an aircraft. That's not usually what I'm looking for in an aircraft.How does that Luminati thing generate lift without it's rotors? It has no wings.
@ElectricAviation
@ElectricAviation 4 күн бұрын
It has tiny wings
@denissy-qn6xz
@denissy-qn6xz 5 күн бұрын
Is it possible to make an electro-turbine?
@jamesengland7461
@jamesengland7461 4 күн бұрын
Ducted fan is all you need.
@Preciouspink
@Preciouspink 4 күн бұрын
Noise
@DinoAlberini
@DinoAlberini 4 күн бұрын
Ah, the gyrocopter… let me guess, the next brilliant idea will be the ekranoplane? There is a reason gyrocopters are not used in commercial aviation, and the reason isn’t that they are too good.
@Patiboke
@Patiboke 4 күн бұрын
1:29 A gyrocopter doing vertical takeoff? 🤔
@ElectricAviation
@ElectricAviation 4 күн бұрын
Yes if you power the rotor during take-off
@Patiboke
@Patiboke 4 күн бұрын
@@ElectricAviation Yes, but then it's kind of a helicopter. I suppose if it's just for takeoff you can still call it a gyrocopter, but doesn't it need all kinds of controls for the blades? The takeoff could get uncontrollable with just a 'dumb' rotor.
@ElectricAviation
@ElectricAviation 4 күн бұрын
@@Patiboke Yes and no. It will go on rotation due to forward thrust once it has climbed, so that is how its different
@ankursahu269
@ankursahu269 3 күн бұрын
please increase your technology please sir please
@ericseidel4940
@ericseidel4940 4 күн бұрын
I suppose you've never been onboard a gyro. Among pilots we call them "petrol to noise converters...." Modern Gyros have sacrified everything to speed and handling. The result flies well trough tubulence like an anvil, gets as much speed as it could, BUT has such a poor efficiency. A 500kg gyro glups 25 liters an hours of gasoline, with its engine almost at full throttle all the time (you can't fly "cool" in these). For sure converting these to electric is a DUM idea, unless you want even less range compared to a normal airplane (wich will not be practical before batteries reach 500wh/kg at least). In theory you could make a better efficiency gyro, with a vey large rotor but in this case no pilot would want to fly it, because you would have awfull gyroscopic reactions, vey poor handling, manoeuvrabbility, and you would be shaken by gusts like crasy.
@SmoochyRoo
@SmoochyRoo 3 күн бұрын
Precisely said, a helicopter and quad copter are much more efficient than a gyro because at least the power that goes to lifting them also goes to propelling them forward, these things fly as if they're paragliders with a wing that makes as much lift induced drag as possible, all the lift of the rotor comes from the engine pushing it through the air which means the rotor takes away so much of the potential flight efficiency this thing would have to begin with. There's a reason most companies tackling urban air mobility are going the multi rotor route, and are using an insane amount of redundancy in lieu of autorotation.
@mullergyula4174
@mullergyula4174 3 күн бұрын
He did mention that gyrocopter development has been neglected for a long time, hopefully the new developments are to improve the problems you mentioned.
@jamesbonander
@jamesbonander 3 күн бұрын
rotodyne failed for a reason, maintence and fuel cost. it is just not competitive. jet fuel is 45mj/kg and li ion batteries are at best 1.7mj/kg
@currentfaves65
@currentfaves65 2 күн бұрын
1:29 is NOT a gyrocopter
@mrnickbig1
@mrnickbig1 2 күн бұрын
Not a "Gyrocopter" or even "Autogyro (or Autogiro)". This type of autorotaing aircraft is called "GYROPLANE".
@ElectricAviation
@ElectricAviation Күн бұрын
Thank you
@metricstormtrooper
@metricstormtrooper 4 күн бұрын
URBAN AIR TRAVEL MAKES ZERO SENSE, WHETHER ELECTRIC OR NOT.
@gormauslander
@gormauslander 4 күн бұрын
Never tried driving in LA have you
@abvmoose87
@abvmoose87 Күн бұрын
Have you seen my commute? God forbid they would broaden the highway with 1-2 extra lanes ever. Air travel is messy but there comes a point where the environment cultists have impeded, hindered and regressed development of road infrastructure in an metropolitan environment to such just plain dumb degree, when driving your commute have become so stupid, that air travel, how cumbersome it may be, starts to look appealing an even affordable.
@EIGYRO
@EIGYRO 2 күн бұрын
1:30 in, and unmitigated crap. Gyros are great fun. I flew mine for 10 years. They are utterly useless for 'urban air mobility'. They are very power-hungry and inefficient and all the bullshit in the world will not change that. Your pretty renderings do not, and will not, exist. The pictures are pretty, but pure fantasy.
@abvmoose87
@abvmoose87 Күн бұрын
I dont know, compared to todays gas prices in any country, besides the U.S. who enjoy petrodollar privilege, and with city tolls, X ammount of energy addon taxes, carbonemission taxes that are on a retarded level like in feminized countries like Sweden where people never object, compared to that is it really that much difference in price? Arent prices for driving commute for non-americans starting to approach a level where you might as well just pay for aircraft travel for your commuting?
@garyfrancis6193
@garyfrancis6193 3 күн бұрын
Batteries are stupid for electric, flying vehicles. You need hydrogen fuel cell electrics. Hydrogen can be stored in metal hydrides that don’t need heavy containment tanks. America hss enough natural hydrogen for 200 years and it could be generated using hydrolysis with electricity from using geothermal sources of heat. That would create a complete green energy loop of hot underground water creating electricity to produce hydrogen in vehicles that extract the energy and turn the hydrogen back into water and also clean the air which must be filtered to be used on the fuel cell. This is the perfect power plant for electric flying vehicles like these gyrocopters. I wonder what big energy corporations might not want you to know or think of this?
@Rostol
@Rostol 4 күн бұрын
this is kinda ridiculous, there is nothing to compensate for the rotating torque of the rotor's motor. the moment you turn that motor on and the wheels are off the ground you'll spin out of control and die.
@jamesengland7461
@jamesengland7461 4 күн бұрын
No gyrocopter has ever had this problem, and if the gyro rotor has added power in flight, this can be compensated for by differential thrust from two propellers or by the rudder. Torque to the gyro rotor won't be a lot.
@ElectricAviation
@ElectricAviation 4 күн бұрын
Normally rudder over comes it
@EarthCreature.
@EarthCreature. 4 күн бұрын
Lilium is far superior to this
@abvmoose87
@abvmoose87 Күн бұрын
Limium is cool but it cant auto rotate you back to ground line most of these can. It had redundant battery but what do you do if some weather phenomen or other unforseen event just knocks out electricity completley? The Lilium has wings so i guess it wont drop straight down like a rock but gliding it down will be as successful as most airplanes who try to glide down when their out of fuel. I love lilium n joby but being able to autorotate is a pretty big deal fir safety. Thats why i like the Jaunt Air Mobility aircraft. Not as sexy as Lilium but the best next gen e-vtol imo
The Unexpected Genius of Contra-Rotating Propellers
11:39
Ziroth
Рет қаралды 103 М.
Pivotal Helix (Former Opener's BlackFly) Available for Purchase
5:22
Electric Aviation
Рет қаралды 10 М.
你们会选择哪一辆呢#short #angel #clown
00:20
Super Beauty team
Рет қаралды 38 МЛН
路飞被小孩吓到了#海贼王#路飞
00:41
路飞与唐舞桐
Рет қаралды 64 МЛН
Smart Sigma Kid #funny #sigma #comedy
00:25
CRAZY GREAPA
Рет қаралды 17 МЛН
Me: Don't cross there's cars coming
00:16
LOL
Рет қаралды 15 МЛН
Synergy Prime : The most advanced and efficient family aircraft
11:58
Electric Aviation
Рет қаралды 133 М.
15 MIND-BLOWING TECHNOLOGIES OF A COMPLETELY NEW LEVEL
17:28
Innovative Techs
Рет қаралды 43 М.
You'll fall in love with the Dyke Delta
10:28
Aircraft Adventures
Рет қаралды 885 М.
Puller vs Pusher Aircraft - Which is More Efficient?
11:57
DarkAero, Inc
Рет қаралды 249 М.
We Were Wrong About Gold's Origin
13:02
Dr Ben Miles
Рет қаралды 653 М.
The Most Underrated Ancient Projectile
14:49
Archaic Arms
Рет қаралды 194 М.
Aircraft Transformation Technology
10:04
Electric Aviation
Рет қаралды 64 М.
YOTAPHONE 2 - СПУСТЯ 10 ЛЕТ
15:13
ЗЕ МАККЕРС
Рет қаралды 184 М.
ИГРОВОВЫЙ НОУТ ASUS ЗА 57 тысяч
25:33
Ремонтяш
Рет қаралды 348 М.
Первый обзор Galaxy Z Fold 6
12:23
Rozetked
Рет қаралды 313 М.
После ввода кода - протирайте панель
0:18
Up Your Brains
Рет қаралды 1,2 МЛН