И вие сте Балканци, така че можеш да се прибавиш и себе си към тюрките, щом твърдиш така. Кой ти позволи да ни диктуваш собственната ни история.

Listen Kosovo-Albanian piece of political disaster. WE ARE NOT TURKIC we do not have MONGOLIAN eyes for god's sake, cant you understand it once and for all?!?! We got less than 1 % Turkic features....stop this nonsense now! This is insulting us, is this the way you are making a diplomacy?! I can call you negros or asians or indians or even aborigens if that's gonna make you fill better, and make me feel equal. Are you okay with that, negro? NO YOU ARE NOT! That is why you must STOP THIS!

@@user-iw5pu6mu6i Прав си само не обиждай сърбите, те са наши братя въпреки всичко което са ни правили на нас и ние на тях. Тези са платени от Албания, а Албания е платена от Америка....толкова е просто, че няма на къде!

@@aleksandars.4690 The documentary says Turkic tribes and it is written history right mate study history not propaganda

@@thomaszioudros181 This is the propaganda, greek dude. The propaganda starts many centuries ago, but today's propaganda comes from the decision that we were Tataric people, so we could easely be assimilated by Russia, although we gave BIRTH to them, by giving them our civilization that is why we are brothers with russians and all so called "slavic" tribes, which comes as a word from the Russian Queen or Tsarina Ekaterina, who is actually GERMAN WOMAN! Second this propaganda is making other nations open to take our lands that is why it is a propagand. The truth is we are here from the whole beginning....we just spread ourselves across the Black Sea, due to the invasion of the Roman empire. I REALLY don't wanna teach you history, you are already brain washed by the official history which is a DOCTRINE, NOT A HISTORY! The people who command the financial world today, give the order what history, to whom should be given. They could invent ANYTHING in ANYONE's history. And this here is just a small part of it. The propaganda ofcourse is not obvious it is entertwined or implemented, injected into the truth and real events, so you could easely believe the lies. Everything else is a bullshit. And ONE HUMONGOUS LIE is such as that we are turkic AKA we are mongol or stretched eyes, yellow or dark yellow skinned and small....which is a HUGE LIE! The average bulgarin was and still is mostly brightly brown haired or just brown haired, white but not pale skinned with anthropomorphic features of the modern european men! Our genes gave birth to much of Europe modern men, our culture, language, believes, our WHOLE civilization gave birth to the Eastern Europe aswell with the so called "Eastern Roman Empire Christianity Civilization" - we were rivals, and we did privail. THAT IS WHY today I understand very easely, lots of words, habits and way of life of most of slavic countries today in whole Eastern Europe! That is so extremely simple, and when we put to the test our genome......dude we own this place.....we EARNED by winning battles this land and even more on the Balkan Peninsula, but we just had the worst leaders for the last 100 years....so, don't tell me "official history" stuff, this is so ridiculous I can't even stand this pathetic video! IT insults my pride, my dignity, my honour and my people!

Can't you feel the serbian infiriority complex and racism in the channel ?

@@allsource1998 it's ok. they get brainwashed from the time they are kids about history. they read their own version created for serbians.

@@thatisme3thatisme38 and we all laugh at them as well.

What do you mean there was no Serbian chetniks in Macedonia? Search about Serbian Chetnik Organizations which operated mostly in Vardar region from 1903-1908, and later during the Balkan wars and WW1.

@@Akcija1930 yes and? We are discussing 1885 here. And no chetniks come even later than 08. They come after serv occupation of macedonia.

It’s the truth

Video is legit imo

We were a tatar vassal between 1285-1299 but we were never a Serbian vassal

За кратък период сме васал на Златната орда, дори ни слагат монголец за цар.

Всъщност сме били.. макар и да сме горди не може да отречем че голяма част от историята ни е прекарана или във васалство (това не означава робство.. гугълни го ако искаш) или РОБСТВО... Византийско, Османско.. След освобождението сме управлявани от руска администрация (това донякъде е васалство)... като цяло не сме много специални.. единствено 681-1018 (първа българска империя) са ни великите години...

You literally had a bulgarian dynasty called terter(terteroba- which means tartar clan in cuman turkic) lmao

Kama Jiu-jitsu I think 2 of them were Tatars

Better than your fake history fakedonian

It is a Serbian propaganda mate ,of course based on hate against Bulgarians . Serbian is a diagnose !

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ocWqZsSlqtbdpKs.html

fakedonian How about your pathetic country You don't produce anything but hatred of your neighbors

Since 1989, Bulgarian nationalism continues to live off cosy reminiscences of the ‘Revival Process’ ideology. Anti-Turkish rhetoric is now reflected in the theories that challenge the thesis of Turkic origin of the Proto-Bulgars. Alongside the ‘Iranian’ or ‘Aryan’ theory, there appeared arguments favouring an autochthonous origin... The ‘parahistoric’ theories, very often politically loaded and have almost nothing to do with objective scientific research in the field of Proto-Bulgarian Studies, could be summarized in several directions:...3)‘Aryan roots’ and the ‘enigmatic Eurasian homeland’. Meanwhile, another group of authors is looking eagerly for the supposed homeland of the ancient Bulgarians in the vast areas of Eurasia, perhaps by conscious or unconscious opposition to the pro-Western orientation of modern Bulgaria. At the same time, with little regard for consistency, they also oppose the Turkic theory, probably because this is in sharp contradiction with the anti-Turkish feelings shared by nationalistic circles. (Dobrev 2005; 2007.) in Claudia-Florentina Dobre, Cristian Emilian ed., Quest for a Suitable Past: Myths and Memory in Central and Eastern Europe, Central European University Press, 2018, ISBN 9633861365, pp. 142-143.

@@papazataklaattiranimam LOL Bulgarians are Iranic just like the Ashina Dynasty

Hello my dear Aryan/Iranian brother. We in Iran love the Bulgarian people and we wish we could unite into one country called The Median - Achaemenid Empire! Our enemies and our traitors are trying to divide/split our Aryan/Iranian people up into pieces and states. Hugs and kisses to our most beloved Bulgarian brothers and sisters.

Amen Brother, Bulgarians were Sarmatians They worshiped the Iranian Rider God Siavush Read the work of our scholar Dr. Zhivko Voynikov on the Bulgarian god Siavush/SIva Bog

Fun Fact: Nobody is interested in Bulgarian historical revisionism

@@petertodorov9540 I've read multiple books on the topic and all say a different thing. How do u know your book is true lol Stefan Tsanev's book, Gancho Tsenov's books ect.

@@petertodorov9540 but one thing is clear. Genetic research says it all. I can send u the video if u want. Genetic research completely debunked the turkic origin theory.

@@georgimihalkov9678 Send me the links Brother, The problem with the Thracian/Autochthonous theory is that it doesn't explain the Volga Bulgarians And the Bulgarians of Vund in Armenia and the Caucasus from the 1st century AD spoken about in Armenian sources Also all the names of the Bulgarian Bats and Kanasubigis are Iranian

Ahhh lill Tim you lost

So, Bulgaria and Serbia hate each other?

@Ilir Cami 😂

@_ Bulgarian Mapper _ ahh.. If you try to imagine history nowadays you'll see it all so crazy.. There's a Serbian I talkred with and she told me, neighboring countries with serbia hate each other like albania.

@@justinvillar7008 Thanks to Russian geopolitical agenda through to the Tito!

fakedonian Imagine how pathetic your little life is just motivated and inspired to hate

@@HomoUniverzalis wdym

@@HomoUniverzalis no only one won by serbia the rest by us

Serbian channel,don't you know that serbian is a diagnose ?

​@@allsource1998then don't come to eat our food.

Yes, with the Ottomans.

Абе, нали трябва да кажат, че сме кенеф и да излъжат... Само върху смотаните загуби са се фокусирали.

Видя се докаде се докараха накрая с лъжите си. Изгубиха даже собствените си земи и всички ги заплюха

vas bugarski jezik je iskvareni srpski jezik.

@@gfdfgaadfgadfg2309 Пиеш ли си хапчетата редовно изкривен :D :D :D

@@peterurilski714 razumeo si sta sam rekao,to je vazno :D

Hanim Your moving to Germany shows that you’re anti Turkish You can’t stand living with your own people

Nice Turkish propaganda. Now let's use some real sources: US National Library of Medicine - "...the Y-chromosome gene pool in modern Bulgarians is primarily represented by Western Eurasian haplogroups with ∼ 40% belonging to haplogroups E-V13 and I-M423, and 20% to R-M17. Haplogroups common in the Middle East (J and G) and in South Western Asia (R-L23*) occur at frequencies of 19% and 5%, respectively. Haplogroups C, N and Q, distinctive for Altaic and Central Asian Turkic-speaking populations, occur at the negligible frequency of only 1.5%...".

@SRkr Ayyr No my friend Bulgarians are not and never were Turkic Bulgarians have only 2% Turkic genetics

@SRkr Ayyr Nope , Bulgarians are not Turkic and never were. Bulgarians have 2% Turkic genetics Genetics doesn't lie

Bulgarians never used the title Khan but used Kanasubigi

Khan is a Yeniseian title en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khan_(title)#cite_note-vov-7

@@petertodorov1792 So Bulgarians are Iranic by origin?

@@Todor-BG Нещо не ти разбрах тезата. Аз понеже съм бил корав трябва да направя нещо за което теб те е страх или..? Или е опит за ирония, с арнаутите си и отричаш престъпленията им?

@@Todor-BG чак се дразниш че не съм им написал правилно името. Сложил си си българско знаме на профила, едно време знаеш ли как са наричали българите които са с рязаните ислямистити, с арнаутите. Ти с тях ли си, арнаутски гювендия ли си?

Peter Urilski Romania is Hungary!

@@The.steppenWolf Много си забавен. Айде лягай си

канала се казва KosovoReport, естествено че е правен от сърби

Nino Jevtic we need to sort our country’s out together we can kill the mafia together

I AGREE! Greetings from an American descendant of ethnic Bulgarians from Aegean Macedonia and Pirot! No more fighting between Orthodox Christian and Slavic brothers!

@Golden brother YES!

The Macedonians who are separate people to the Greeks during and before Alexanders time, during the Roman Empire when Greeks joined Romans to fight against the Macedonians, and as a result during bible times separate lands and people as mentioned in the bible... they’re the same Macedonians (who were not Greek) that were already in the Balkans before these Bulgars came strolling down to the Balkans. The Macedonian Cyrillic alphabet was developed in Solun/Thessaloniki by Macedonians during the beginning of the Macedonian dynasty of the Byzantine empire. If you look at the Bulgarian empires, at no time did they ever control Solun/Thessaloniki. Also history records that during tsar Samuels Macedonian kingdom from Skopje then Prespa and Ohrid, during that time the Bulgarians and their empire was defeated and under Byzantine control, so tsar Samuels “Macedonian” kingdom could not have been Bulgarian.

@@WatchmanofMKDN The Cyrillic alphabet was created in Bulgaria in the city of Preslav, look it up: "Preslav Literary School". It is a Bulgarian alphabet devised by Bulgarian monks. And i m speaking facts here that anyone can look up on the internet and learn for himself. Those Bulgarian monks such as Naum and Clement were students of Sts.Cyril and Methdius and have traveled with them on their journy to Great Moravia.

Hanim Bulgarians are as Turkic as your Caliph Erdogan is🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Nice Turkish propaganda. Now let's use some real sources: US National Library of Medicine - "...the Y-chromosome gene pool in modern Bulgarians is primarily represented by Western Eurasian haplogroups with ∼ 40% belonging to haplogroups E-V13 and I-M423, and 20% to R-M17. Haplogroups common in the Middle East (J and G) and in South Western Asia (R-L23*) occur at frequencies of 19% and 5%, respectively. Haplogroups C, N and Q, distinctive for Altaic and Central Asian Turkic-speaking populations, occur at the negligible frequency of only 1.5%...".

The maker of this video is a wanna be a Bulgarian he has a Serbian inferiority complex.

Pan-Turkic Nationalist the evidence is compelling. It is called genetics. The Turkic people are Mongolians with Asian genetics. Bulgarians are with Indo European genetics. I have never seen Asian looking Bulgarians in Bulgaria.

​@Pan-Turkic Nationalist There is no proto-Bulgars , the name is Bolgar here you go buddy spisanie8.bg/рубрики/история/2252-какво-все-пак-е-това-bolgar.html (4th to 5th century,Vinica,Macedonia) bg.wikipedia.org/wiki/Файл:Bolgari_sclavi_teracota_Vinitza_FYROM.jpg use google translate if you dont know bulgarian. Capital of danube Bulgaria is pliska, hmmm i think that is in the so-called slavic language?(but there was no slavs in the balkan during Constantine between 306 and 337 AD(his rule).Here is a text that literaly states that Pliska was done by Constantine , www.documentacatholicaomnia.eu/20vs/203_CSHB/1828-1897,_CSHB,_15_Georgius_Codinus_Excerpta_de_Antiquitatibus_Cpolitanis_[Bekkeri_Editio],_GR.pdf (page 43) picture for quicker: imgur.com/a/lLeY2BI All this nonsence proto-bulgars is Russian ,Austro-Hungarian , German falsification , they never proved tangra, Khans(not a single fucking document or artifact to proved it yet they teach us this shit), or anything asian ever.

He didnt say bulgars were turkic but the word bulgars's origin.

Finally someone else said something important instead of lies of Serbian perspective. It looks like Serbian history is more messed up than ours. :D

@Pan-Turkic Nationalist The Bulgars had nothing in common with the turkic tribes besides some cultural and genetic influence. Here the largest genetic and anthropological study on those so called Bulgars and the Modern Bulgarians yet The research has been approved by the Ethics Committee for Clinical Experimentation of the University of Pavia, Board minutes of the 5th of October 2010. Geographical and genealogy information were ascertained by interview after having obtained their written informed consent. Reasearch: We found that the Y-chromosome gene pool in modern Bulgarians is primarily represented by Western Eurasian haplogroups with ∼ 40% belonging to haplogroups E-V13 and I-M423, and 20% to R-M17. Haplogroups common in the Middle East (J and G) and in South Western Asia (R-L23*) occur at frequencies of 19% and 5%, respectively. Haplogroups C, N and Q, distinctive for Altaic and Central Asian Turkic-speaking populations, occur at the negligible frequency of only 1.5%. Principal Component analyses group Bulgarians with European populations, apart from Central Asian Turkic-speaking groups and South Western Asia populations. Within the country, the genetic variation is structured in Western, Central and Eastern Bulgaria indicating that the Balkan Mountains have been permeable to human movements. The lineage analysis provided the following interesting results: (i) R-L23* is present in Eastern Bulgaria since the post glacial period; (ii) haplogroup E-V13 has a Mesolithic age in Bulgaria from where it expanded after the arrival of farming; (iii) haplogroup J-M241 probably reflects the Neolithic westward expansion of farmers from the earliest sites along the Black Sea. *On the whole, in light of the most recent historical studies, which indicate a substantial proto-Bulgarian input to the contemporary Bulgarian people, our data suggest that a common paternal ancestry between the proto-Bulgarians and the Altaic and Central Asian Turkic-speaking populations either did not exist or was negligible* . Read the full research www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3590186/

😂

Well Slavic language is sister language of turkic languages

@@youknowmyfirstlastname3206 Bullshit!

@@youknowmyfirstlastname3206 they don't have any relation believe me

@@kila200 you don't have any relation ,pal Turkish are not Turkics but stole that identity

Turkish lies and misinformation. US National Library of Medicine - "...the Y-chromosome gene pool in modern Bulgarians is primarily represented by Western Eurasian haplogroups with ∼ 40% belonging to haplogroups E-V13 and I-M423, and 20% to R-M17. Haplogroups common in the Middle East (J and G) and in South Western Asia (R-L23*) occur at frequencies of 19% and 5%, respectively. Haplogroups C, N and Q, distinctive for Altaic and Central Asian Turkic-speaking populations, occur at the negligible frequency of only 1.5%...".

Nice Turkish propaganda. Now let's use some real sources: US National Library of Medicine - "...the Y-chromosome gene pool in modern Bulgarians is primarily represented by Western Eurasian haplogroups with ∼ 40% belonging to haplogroups E-V13 and I-M423, and 20% to R-M17. Haplogroups common in the Middle East (J and G) and in South Western Asia (R-L23*) occur at frequencies of 19% and 5%, respectively. Haplogroups C, N and Q, distinctive for Altaic and Central Asian Turkic-speaking populations, occur at the negligible frequency of only 1.5%...".

you will visit a beautiful country :)

Raul, US is a sinking ship. leave the US and don't look back!

Bularians in America, come home! america and the west is about to become a titanic. Come home and be safe!!! America is not for Bulgarians!!! dont beslaves to a murderer america that screws everything and everyone she comes in contact with. You will be homeless and jobless ! you will be replaced by robots leaving you a slave to murdering USA

Can't wait to visit California, greetings from Bulgaria:)

@@georgimavrodinov4500 DONT BOTHER.

Neither should your country Vardaska Banovina

Veto for Bulgaria!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Nice Turkish propaganda. Now let's use some real sources: US National Library of Medicine - "...the Y-chromosome gene pool in modern Bulgarians is primarily represented by Western Eurasian haplogroups with ∼ 40% belonging to haplogroups E-V13 and I-M423, and 20% to R-M17. Haplogroups common in the Middle East (J and G) and in South Western Asia (R-L23*) occur at frequencies of 19% and 5%, respectively. Haplogroups C, N and Q, distinctive for Altaic and Central Asian Turkic-speaking populations, occur at the negligible frequency of only 1.5%...".

It is a serbian hate propaganda and disinformation

not to mention he totally depopulates serbia. all the serbs were resettled in moesia and the few that escaped this ran to what is now bosnia.

Dushan was half bulgarian himself. The servs never like to mention this. He owes his title of tsar to his bulgarian royal lineage.

This channel is actually racist channel focused hiddenlly against Bulgarians.

@@thatisme3thatisme38 serbians are also Bulgarians ,do not get over wet

@@allsource1998 lol. Not quite

bro I find your comment everywhere

Nice Turkish propaganda. Now let's use some real sources: US National Library of Medicine - "...the Y-chromosome gene pool in modern Bulgarians is primarily represented by Western Eurasian haplogroups with ∼ 40% belonging to haplogroups E-V13 and I-M423, and 20% to R-M17. Haplogroups common in the Middle East (J and G) and in South Western Asia (R-L23*) occur at frequencies of 19% and 5%, respectively. Haplogroups C, N and Q, distinctive for Altaic and Central Asian Turkic-speaking populations, occur at the negligible frequency of only 1.5%...".

Toi e Srb bahahahah

Serbian Propaganda

@@HomoUniverzalis No what ?

@@HomoUniverzalis Serboslavia is no more. Even Montenegro did not want to be with you serbs

@Delaram Salmassi Lol old Bulgaria is Turkic not Iranic... Nowadays Bulgarian people just mixing with slavs, but they ancestors tatars, Turks, Mongols,

@Delaram Salmassi wtf? Dude don't talk with me pls

@@emrebayram1778 WE ARE BULGARIANS NOTHING ELSE WE ARE ONE OF THE FIRST NATIONS WE WERE NEVER TATARS

Bulgaria was superpower empire because of Turkic Bulgar Warrior rulers not because of natives.

At least they had Serbian rulers

@@papazataklaattiranimam , Ancient (proto-) Bulgarians have long been thought of as a Turkic population. However, evidence found in the past three decades shows that this is not the case. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26416319/

@@sonyastefanova5785 you sent unreliable cherrypicking source from bulgarian nationalist what we call pseduo-science. Population genetic analysis indicated that Conquerors had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars. Neparáczki, E., Maróti, Z., Kalmár, T. et al. Y-chromosome haplogroups from Hun, Avar and conquering Hungarian period nomadic people of the Carpathian Basin. Sci Rep 9, 16569 (2019). Thus supporting the view that Tatars may be descendents of ancient Bulgars. Suslova TA, Burmistrova AL, Chernova MS, Khromova EB, Lupar EI, Timofeeva SV, Devald IV, Vavilov MN, Darke C. HLA gene and haplotype frequencies in Russians, Bashkirs and Tatars, living in the Chelyabinsk Region (Russian South Urals). Int J Immunogenet. 2012 Oct;39(5):394-408. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-313X.2012.01117.x. Epub 2012 Apr 20. PMID: 22520580. Onogur-Bulgars had been part of the Hunnic people, and after the death of Attila’s son Irnik, European Hun remains fused with the Onogurs. Mitogenomic data indicate admixture components of Central-Inner Asian and Srubnaya origin in the conquering Hungarians Neparáczki E, Maróti Z, Kalmár T, Kocsy K, Maár K, et al. (2018) Mitogenomic data indicate admixture components of Central-Inner Asian and Srubnaya origin in the conquering Hungarians. PLOS ONE 13(10): e0205920. However, given the common Turkic genetic background of the Bulgars and Khazars, these ethnicities may be difficult to tell apart either archaeologically or genetically. Mikheyev, Alexander & Qiu, Lijun & Zarubin, A. & Moshkov, Nikita & Orlov, Yuri & Chartier, Duane & Faleeva, T. & Kornienko, Igor & Klyuchnikov, Vladimir & Batieva, Elena & Tatarinova, Tatiana. (2019). Diverse genetic origins of medieval steppe nomad conquerors. 10.1101/2019.12.15.876912. The Volga Tatars live in the central and eastern parts of European Russia and in western Siberia. They are the descendants of the Bulgar and Kipchak Turkic tribes who inhabited the western wing of the Mongol Empire, the area of the middle Volga River. Malyarchuk B, Derenko M, Denisova G, Kravtsova O. Mitogenomic diversity in Tatars from the Volga-Ural region of Russia. Mol Biol Evol. 2010 Oct;27(10):2220-6. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msq065. Epub 2010 May 10. PMID: 20457583. Science, 14 February 2014, Vol. 343 no. 6172, p. 751, A Genetic Atlas of Human Admixture History, Garrett Hellenthal at al.: " CIs. for the admixture time(s) overlap but predate the Mongol empire, with estimates from 440 to 1080 CE (Fig.3.) In each population, one source group has at least some ancestry related to Northeast Asians, with ~2 to 4% of these groups total ancestry linking directly to East Asia. This signal might correspond to a small genetic legacy from invasions of peoples from the Asian steppes (e.g., the Huns, Magyars, and Bulgars) during the first millennium CE." Around 4% of Bulgarian genes are derived outside of Europe and the Middle East or are of undetermined origin (by 858 CE), of which 2.3% are from Northeast Asia and correspond to Asian tribes such as Bulgars,[13] a consistent very low frequency for Eastern Europe as far as Uralic-speaking Hungarians.

@@papazataklaattiranimam , I will point out two or two factors that refute the theory that Asparuhov's Bulgarians are Turks - the Bulgarians had a distinctive feature that no other ethnic group has - incredible battle bows. Ours was shorter and more convenient for shooting than the horse, in addition, it could shoot up to 12 arrows in one minute, while the Byzantine emergency shooters gave only 5 - 7. The technology for making Bulgarian bows was kept secret, as and the composition of the binder resins and adhesives that imparted the specific properties of the weapon. Many neighboring peoples of the Bulgarians - Chinese, Mongols, Turks and Slavs tried to copy this type, but the Bulgarian models remained unsurpassed. It was these bows and the original cavalry tactics that allowed the Bulgarians to rule vast territories, to defeat armies of Chinese, Mongols, Turks, Arabs, Byzantines and Slavs larger than them. Second - the Bulgarians were extremely tall. The physical type of the ancient Bulgarians (proto-Bulgarians) has long been no secret, as archeological excavations in the necropolises (cemeteries) in Northeastern Bulgaria have shown that the height of the skeletons is 175-180 cm. This is a high growth even for modern people, and in the Middle for centuries the Bulgarians looked like giants. Because the average height in Europe and the Middle East was 155-160 cm. An Arab geographer from this era wrote: "Bulgarians are giants, ten of our fighters can not beat a Bulgarian in hand-to-hand combat." The skeleton of Tsar Kaloyan proves that he was 2 meters tall and had no Mongoloid features.The Bulgarians were a numerous people and settled everywhere - Tatarstan, Chuvashia, Kabardino, Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, claiming to be descendants of the ancient Bulgarians. Sources of European origin also point to the relocation of proto-Bulgarian groups to Bavaria, Lombardy, and Hungary. You know that name - Bolkar Dagh. There were Bulgarians there too who later converted to Islam like the Bulgarians in Volga Bulgaria.

It is made by The next serbian

This channel is runned by serbian nationalists. So you can imagine how incorrect it’s content are.

Turkic languages were spoken by the warrior *aristocracy of the Hunnic, Avar, and Bulgar khaganates, coexisting with the Indo-European tongue of their subjects. In the Bulgar khaganate, *inscriptions were written in Greek using Greek characters or in the Bulgar language using Greek or runic characters. Oliver Nicholson, The Oxford Dictionary of Late Antiquity, Oxford University Press, 2018, ISBN 0192562460, p. 200 The greatest obstacle to the empire's revival was the presence to the south ofthe Danube of the Bulgar khaganate with its capital at Pliska and a southern frontier in the Hebros/Maritza valley only three days march from Constantinople. In 780 the Bulgar state had survived in close proximity to Byzantium for almost a century, taking advantage of the empire's internal problems and wars against the Arabs, and this survival had hardened it into an extremely tough political entity. Its Turkic ruling elite combined the military ferocity of the steppe people they had been with the agricultural resource base of the Slav peasantry they dominated and with the skills of civilization acquired from Greek traders, captives, and defectors. Mango, Cyril A. 2002. The Oxford history of Byzantium. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p.172 For a long time, the Bulgharian state retained a Turkic organisation, which gradually adopted elements borrowed from Byzantium. Some of the titles have still not been deciphered, but kavhan, boy/a, khan, kolovur, bagatur, tarkhan and sampsi are Turkic in origin, or were at least used by Turkic peoples. In the meantime, the leading Turkic class gradually diminished, and became assimilated in to the Slav population. By the end of the 7th century, bilinguality was wide spread. Omurtag's three sons (also) had Slavonic names (Vovin. Zvinitsa and Malamir). The linguistic effect of Turkic-Slav coexistence is also reflected in inscriptions. Among the titles of court office bearers was, för example, the ichirgu boy/a, the 'internal boyla' of which parallels are attested in Turkic sources of Central Asia. From a Cyrillic inscription of around 969 it is known that at the end ofthe era this would be approximately uttered as chregubilya. The second element of the title is the origin of the Hungarian name Béla, used by several kings of the Árpád dynasty. R., 1999. Hungarians and Europe in the early Middle Ages. Budapest: Central European University Press, p.228. At some point during the second half of the early eleventh century, after living for a long time among Turkic populations and studying their languages and traditions, Mahmud al-Kashghari produced a well-documented work about the "Turks." According to him, only the Qirqiz, the Qipchaq, the Oghuz and five other tribes spoke a pure Turkic language, while the languages of the Bulgars, Suvars and Pech enegs Bačänäk), while undoubtedly Turkic, had been altered by foreign influences. Mahmud al-Kashgari believed that initially there were very few differences between all those languages, all phonetical." He saw the linguistic fragmentation as a natural phenomenon, given the vast area, between the Byzantine and the Chinese frontiers, in which those peoples lived. Spinei, V., 2009. The Romanians and the Turkic nomads north of the Danube Delta from the tenth to the mid-thirteenth century. Leiden: Brill, pp.181, 182.

There are two direct references to Tangra as a Bulgar deity in the sources.One is found in an Ottoman manuscript where it is stated that the name of god in Bulgarian was “Tängri” (Bułghar dilindžä Tängri der).201 The other is in a badly-damaged inscription (carved on a marble column) which commemorates a sacrifice made by Omurtag“to the god Tangra” (κὲ ἐπύησ]εν θυσ[ήαν ἠς τὸν θεὸ]ν Ταγγραν).202 The inscription was found at the rocky cliff of Madara, a site that is commonly associated with the Tangra cult. It is worth remarking that according to ancient Inner Asian religious traditions, the favour of heaven had to manifest itself in the possession of “sacred mountains”. There the qaghan was thought to be closer to Tängri; he could therefore conduct “privileged conversations with him” and receive or transmit his orders.203 It is not unlikely that the site of Madara played a similar role in Bulgaria.204 To be sure, below the relief of the horseman archaeolo gists unearthed the foundations of a complex comprising of what seems to have been a pagan shrine (built on top of a three-aisled church dated to the sixth and seventh centuries), as well as a building with three divisions, which has been interpreted as a dwelling Amongst other things, it has been sug gested that the latter was a kind of private quarter for the ruler from which he seems to have directed the cult of Tangra, the ceremonial sacrifices and. quite possibly, the collective prayers. While Tangra is very likely to have been worshiped by certain Bulgar groups/clans before their migration to the Balkans, his promotion to the supreme god of the elite and. in a sense, the official religion of the Proto bulgarian state coincides in time with the gradual centralization of political power, a process that is rightly connected with Krum's and Omurtag's reigns in the early ninth century. Indeed, the ideology associated with the wor ship of Tangra was bound to enhance monarchical rulership. Just as Tangra was the supreme celestial being, the khan-his reflection-was regarded as rightfully the sole sovereign on earth or, at any rate. in the Bulgar state (an idea which finds clear expression in Omurtag's building inscription from Catalar). The ideology of a strong, divinely-sanctioned leadership clearly bears much of the credit for the survival of the khanate during this period. The certainties which this system of beliefs and values presented to the warrior aristocracy, if not to the entire population, the aura of sanctity surrounding the ruler, the awareness of heavenly support granted to military undertakings (an awareness reinforced through the regular performance of religious ritu als and ceremonials while on campaign)." all immeasurably strengthened the unity of the state and the political will of its subjects to survive. Another factor operative in the transition to Tangrist henotheism at this time may have been the fear of Byzantine imperialism. Foreign influences, as scholars have long pointed out, often paved the way for the adoption of a more sophisticated faith among nomads. However, this was rarely the reli gion of their imperial neighbours, for such a course invariably implied sub mission to the authority of the rulers of these states." The Bulgars, realizing that conversion to Islam or Judaism was not a viable option, and mindful of the influence the Byzantine Church could exercise on the khan's Christian subjects, had little choice but to promote Tangra as their supreme deity." It is important to emphasize that the late eighth/early ninth century marked the period of transition to henotheism only for the upper strata of the Bulgar society. Vigorous polytheism and totemism (i.e. the existence of an intimate, "mystical" relationship between a group or an individual and a natural object), both of which were incapable of furnishing a principle of spiritual (and political) unity, proved to be persistent and strong among the masses." This is also true of shamanism, a complex belief system espe cially common in Central and Inner Asian societies, but also discernible in the khanate in the pre-conversion period. Shamanism has been defined by anthropologists as a technique of ecstasy. By mastering this technique and reaching a state of trance the shaman was able to mediate between the world of humans and that of spirits. He thus functioned as a magician, prophet and healer who, among other things, had to "descend to the underworld" to find and bring back a sick person's soul. Given that most aspects of daily life in Eurasia were directly linked with the spiritual world-for instance. the life-supporting economic activities, from hunting to husbandry to agri culture, were thought to be protected by spirits-the role of the shaman was bound to be extremely important." Before we proceed any further, a piece of essential explanation: shaman ism has been a popular subject of accounts and research since the early eighteenth century. Although it is correctly believed that the shaman's technique of ecstasy and mode of operation are basically uniform through out Central and Inner Asia, it is impossible to construct a uniform model of shamanism as an institution. Further (and partly as a result of the above). it would be perilous to equate the modern "ethnographic shaman" with the religious specialists noted among historical Eurasian peoples. In this light. any attempt to investigate the development of this phenomenon in medieval steppe-nomad societies, including Bulgaria, is bound to be inconclusive. We have only fleeting glimpses of Bulgar shamanism in our sources. Sophoulis, P., 2011. Byzantium and Bulgaria, 775-831. Leiden: Brill, pp.84, 85, 86, 87.

@@papazataklaattiranimam 🤡🤡🤡

@@papazataklaattiranimam ABSOLUTE NONSENSE I have been to Madara There is no Tangra to be read in the inscription Have you been to Madara? I doubt it

@@BGBolyar Thank you for the great post Brother We all know Bulgarians are of Sarmatian/Iranian origin The Turkic theory is a compete fake The Ashina dynasty is an Iranic dynasty Their first Turkic dynasty is not even Turkic🤣🤣🤣🤣

Nice Turkish propaganda. Now let's use some real sources: US National Library of Medicine - "...the Y-chromosome gene pool in modern Bulgarians is primarily represented by Western Eurasian haplogroups with ∼ 40% belonging to haplogroups E-V13 and I-M423, and 20% to R-M17. Haplogroups common in the Middle East (J and G) and in South Western Asia (R-L23*) occur at frequencies of 19% and 5%, respectively. Haplogroups C, N and Q, distinctive for Altaic and Central Asian Turkic-speaking populations, occur at the negligible frequency of only 1.5%...".

Slavic civilization was removed from their land by the ghots. In the 3-5 century in the territory of today Romania-ucraine reigned the goths and created with the grabbed/exploited slavic women a slavic nation with the gothic paternal decendance. Many goths with their slavic children were pushed by the huns, entered the balcans (many kept to stay under the hunic control and became sclavens on the Greek map of 6th century). This moment is very well documented in the Greek chronicles. The Greeks provided a territory for the goths, and there are only the understanding and questioning how the slavs appeared. There is a complete anomaly that the specific slavic genetic R is so low in balcans, but so high the gothic one, but the historical events explane that. From that periode, the name of the exploited nation brought the meaning of "slave" for germans or "sclavens" for Greeks or "serb/serf" (servant) for latins. The exploitation of slavs by the goths was extremely wild. They sold the thousands at constantinipol and thousands exploited for themselves.

No !!!!! BULGAR PEOPLE ARE OGHUR TURKS TURKISH PEOPLE ARE OGHUZ TURKS KAZAKH PEOPLE ARE KIPTCHAK TURKS ETC. TURK COUNTRYS = 🇰🇿🇹🇲🇰🇬🇦🇿🇹🇷🇺🇿 AND SLAVIFIED TURK COUNTRYS = 🇧🇬🇲🇰 AND MOST TURK POPULATION = 🇷🇺🇨🇳🇦🇫🇹🇯🇮🇷ETC.

Tatar is not an insult Tatars are a real people unlike you fakedonians What are you fakedonians? Are you gypsies? Are you Greeks? Are you Albanians? No you are the direct descendants of the marriage of Alexander the Great and Hephaestion

If it makes you feel good saying it, great.

Sword of Erdogan Be proud of the GREATEST TURKIC KHAGANATE ERDOGAN KHAGANATE WILL REIGN A THOUSAND YEARS

Bu jewtube bile bile yorumumu silmiş :D

Dat Gaming Comrade ne attın ki

@@papazataklaattiranimam Kanka işte aynı konuyla ilgili o yanıt vermeye çalıştığım kişiye yazdığım uzun detaylı bir yorumdu bu. Her tekrarında yeniden kopyalayınca gene birkaç saniye sonra aniden yok oluyor. Demek ki youtube hoşuna gitmediği gerçeklerin ortaya çıkmasından korkuyor :D (Hatta hiçbir küfür bile yok)

@@fatihal488 NONSENSE 1. Give PRIMARY SOURCES that show the name Bulgarian comes from bulgamak? 2.Give PEIMARY SOURCES that show tengrinism in Bulgaria

US National Library of Medicine - "...the Y-chromosome gene pool in modern Bulgarians is primarily represented by Western Eurasian haplogroups with ∼ 40% belonging to haplogroups E-V13 and I-M423, and 20% to R-M17. Haplogroups common in the Middle East (J and G) and in South Western Asia (R-L23*) occur at frequencies of 19% and 5%, respectively. Haplogroups C, N and Q, distinctive for Altaic and Central Asian Turkic-speaking populations, occur at the negligible frequency of only 1.5%...".

Bulgars (< Turkic bulgha- ‘to mix, stir up, disturb’, i.e. ‘rebels’) A Turkic tribal union of the Pontic steppes that gave rise to two important states: Danubian-Balkan Bulgaria (First Bulgarian Empire, 681-1018) and Volga Bulgaria (early 10th century-1241). They derived from Oghuric-Turkic tribes, driven westward from Mongolia and south Siberia to the Pontic steppes in successive waves by turmoil associated with the Xiongnu (late 3rd cent. ... ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-820 Kubrat (Gk. Kobratos, called Kurt in the Slavo-Turko-Bulgar Imennik or Name-List of Khans, 20, derived from Turkic quvrat ‘to bring together’) Ruler of the *Onoghurs (Ononghundur) *Bulgars (c.605-42/65?). *John of *Nikiu (120, 47) reports that he became a Christian in ... ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-2674 Utrigurs (Utighurs) Oghur-Bulghar Turkic group, located south-east of the Don River, near the Sea of Azov, and traditional enemies of the related ... ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-4918 Bolgar, Tatarstan/Russia (Bulgar, Bulgar al-Cadid, Kuybyshev) By the 15th century it was known as Bulgar al-Cadid ‘New Bulgar’ after the Turkic-speaking Volga Bulgars. www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780191905636.001.0001/acref-9780191905636-e-8397 Bulgars, Turkic, also Proto-Bulgarians, Pra-Bulgarians, a pastoral people, originally living in Central Asia. Swept westward in the great movement of steppe peoples ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780195046526.001.0001/acref-9780195046526-e-0850 Kuvrat (Κοβρα̑τος, according to Moravcsik, Byzantinoturcica 2:161f), khan of the Onogur Bulgars; died after 642. Patr. Nikephoros I mentions his revolt against the Avars and alliance with Herakleios; Kuvrat was granted ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803100045529 Kubrat , of the royal Duloclan, ‘lord of the Ononghundur-Bulgars and Kotrags [Kutrigurs?]’ www.oxfordreference.com/search?q=Dulo+clan&searchBtn=Search&isQuickSearch=true The Volga Tatars live in the central and eastern parts of European Russia and in western Siberia. They are the descendants of the Bulgar and Kipchak Turkic tribes who inhabited the western wing of the Mongol Empire, the area of the middle Volga River. academic.oup.com/mbe/article/27/10/2220/963437 Chuvash is the sole living representative of the Bulgharic branch, one of the two principal branches of the Turkic family. oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/mobile/view/10.1093/oso/9780198804628.001.0001/oso-9780198804628-chapter-28 Many Slavic tribes lived within the boundaries of the state, together with the proto-Bulgarians, a tribe of Turkic origin that had settled in the Balkan Peninsula at the end of the 7th century. www.britannica.com/biography/Boris-I The language of the European Huns is sometimes referred to as a Bulghar Turkic variety in general linguistic literature, but caution is needed in establishing its affiliations. www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/4CBA0E2CB74C8093EC1CA38C95067D55/S2513843X20000183a_hi.pdf/_div_class__title__Early_nomads_of_the_Eastern_Steppe_and_their_tentative_connections_in_the_West__div_.pdf In the Hunno-Bulgarian languages /r/ within a consonantic cluster tends to disappear projects.iq.harvard.edu/files/huri/files/vvi_n4_dec1982.pdf The Bulgars were a Turkic tribal confederation that gave rise to the Balkan Bulgar and Volga Bulgar states.The ethynonym derives from the Turkish bulgha-,”to stir,mix,disturb,confuse.” books.google.com.tr/books?id=c788wWR_bLwC&pg=PA354&redir_esc=y&hl=tr#v=onepage&q=Bulgars&f=false (Harvard University Press) Turkish tribes who founded a kingdom (9th-12th century) in the region between the Volga and the Kama. www.larousse.fr/encyclopedie/divers/Bulgares_de_la_Volga_et_de_la_Kama/110545 The Bulgars,,Turkish people who were formed on the Don. www.universalis.fr/recherche/l/1/napp/23625 Although the Bulgars were originally a Turkic-speaking people from Asia, they merged with the Slavic tribes whom they conquered in the 7th cent. www.infoplease.com/encyclopedia/arts/language/linguistics/bulgarian-language The Volga Bulgars, a Turkish tribe then living on the east bank of the Volga River, ... the laws of Islam to the Bulgars, who had recently converted to the religion. www.bookrags.com/research/ahmad-ibn-fadlan-ued/#gsc.tab=0 Eastern Bulgars , Bulgars Ancient Turkic people originating in the region n and e of the Black Sea. www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/balkan-states Volga Bulgaria was a northeastern European Turkic state that formed during the 9th century and continued into the first four decades of the 13th century. www.readcube.com/articles/10.1002/9781118455074.wbeoe009

Population genetic analysis indicated that Conquerors had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars. www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-53105-5 hizliresim.com/stAHqu (Bulgar genetic proximity) Thus supporting the view that Tatars may be descendents of ancient Bulgars. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22520580/ Onogur-Bulgars had been part of the Hunnic people, and after the death of Attila’s son Irnik, European Hun remains fused with the Onogurs. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/250688v1.full However, given the common Turkic genetic background of the Bulgars and Khazars, these ethnicities may be difficult to tell apart either archaeologically or genetically. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2019.12.15.876912v1.full.pdf Most Tatars trace their descent to Volga Bulgars, a medieval Turkic people who have inhabited the Middle Volga and lower Kama region. online.ucpress.edu/search-results?page=1&q=Bulgars from the fifth century BC, well before Bulgars (a Turkic tribe) or Slavs online.ucpress.edu/search-results?q=Bulgars%20a%20tribe&fl_SiteID=1&qb={%22q%22:%22Bulgars%20a%20tribe%22}&page=1 Population genetic results indicate that they had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193700/ Population genetic results indicate that they had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars. journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0205920&type=printable Onogur-Bulgars had been part of the Hunnic people, and after the death of Attila’s son Irnik, European Hun remains fused with the Onogurs. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193700/ Around 4% of Bulgarian genes are derived outside of Europe and the Middle East or are of undetermined origin (by 858 CE), of which 2.3% are from Northeast Asia and correspond to Asian tribes such as Bulgars,[13] a consistent very low frequency for Eastern Europe as far as Uralic-speaking Hungarians. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_studies_on_Bulgarians Science, 14 February 2014, Vol. 343 no. 6172, p. 751, A Genetic Atlas of Human Admixture History, Garrett Hellenthal at al.: " CIs. for the admixture time(s) overlap but predate the Mongol empire, with estimates from 440 to 1080 CE (Fig.3.) In each population, one source group has at least some ancestry related to Northeast Asians, with ~2 to 4% of these groups total ancestry linking directly to East Asia. This signal might correspond to a small genetic legacy from invasions of peoples from the Asian steppes (e.g., the Huns, Magyars, and Bulgars) during the first millennium CE." www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4209567/figure/F3/

@Peter Todorov я ми прати фейса да я видя

@@pompacitokmakci Fatlinda Islami You are not a Turk so why do you pretend to be a Turk? You are a 12 year old Albanian girl who lives with her mommy in Gostivar

The Serb Nationalist macedonia was always mixed, many Old Serbian churches built there

@Znik yеs 10% еthnic sеrbs livе in macеdonia. But thе ancеstors of еvеryonе who considers himsеlf a "macеdonian" usеd to consider thеmselvеs Bulgarians. Thе makеdonist propaganda was pushеd only to еthnic Bulgarians in order to dеstory their Bulgarian identity

+Bulgarian empire mapping The Mijak and Brsjak tribes in FYROM are ethnically Serbian and their territories are historically almost 1/2 of FYROM And the communist propaganda also oppressed many ethnic Serbs in macedonia so today many of them say they are "Macedonians" and make a fake "macedonian church" from the Serbian church

​@@historyrhymes1701 Tito's propaganda was pushed to everyone (besides the Albanians) in Macedonia. Also, as a side note, Macedonian is just a highly differing dialect of Bulgarian (same with the made-up language of the Montenegrins). The more nationalistic Macedonians just abused the fact that dialect was so differing to make it a language. It wouldn't be so hard. After all, Tito invented Montenegrin despite it not exactly being a dialect. Anyways, Bulgaria tried to re-introduce Bulgarian into Macedonia and that failed. The nationalists just had to abuse the newly created Macedonian language and produce outrage amongst its speakers (those who do not believe it's a dialect) against Bulgaria. And they did. Now they had their ethnicity, so that Tito could abuse it later on.

I am sorry but Serbia wasnt more than tribal dependent principality before the 1200s when the the kingdom was established. The Bulgarian empire was 15 times larger than it. And those "tartar" Bulgarians wеre 10 times more civilized than the slavs. Type "Pliska" and "Preslav" and you ll see that these people had stone cities way before the other slavs. Even the Byzantines called The first Bulgarian state "Great old Bulgaria.

Yes Bro, We are Erdogan's frontline soldiers in the fight to make Bulgaria Turkish again. ERDOGAN=NEW OSMANLI EMPIRE 2021

He is just a Serbian lier

Got his facts from Crusader Kings

@@TwistedAlphonso1 lmao

Bella Dimova but love chalga Kuchek and kiofte and kebeche rakia perde chickmije charshaf muhabet marhmuluk

Nothin Turkish there

Aide

Kumshija

Bash taman bakshhish

BRO ,WE TURKS WILL TAKE BACK BULGARIA BECAUSE WE HAVE ERDOGAN ATATURK ERDOGAN =GLORY OF THE TURKS

WE ARE BULGARIANS NOTHING ELSE WE ARE ONE OF THE FIRST NATIONSWE ARE BULGARIANS NOTHING ELSE WE ARE ONE OF THE FIRST NATIONS

@@moeharvard Nigga, grow a foreskin.

WE ARE BULGARIANS NOTHING ELSE WE ARE ONE OF THE FIRST NATIONS never been tatar never been turk

Turkic Oghuric Bulgars possibly descendants of great Scytho-Sarmatians which were proto turkic too and not Iranic !

@@yenidenturktarihtezi NONSENSE Sarmatians and Bulgarians were Iranic

@yaşa you are the one thats dumb because they teached us that we are BULGARIANS

@yaşa are you fucking stupid? If Bulgarian is an English word for Bulgar than why do you use "Bulgar" when talking in English?

Bulgarians and Bulgars are wrong versions of B'gari/Bl'gare.

I agree. Not sure why people keep spreading that. People want to put down Bulgarians and claim they are Turks when they have nothing in common with Turks. I think only thing is, Turks may have some Slavic influence knowing they brought tons of people from Slavic lands to modern day Turkey who then mixed with the ME people, East Asians, and some North Africans. So we can say modern day Turks have been influenced by Slavs. Some Bulgarians may have influence from Greeks, Latins (Romanians and Italians) and some from native people who lived here from long ago such as Thracians ect. To me Bulgarians are Slavs just like Croatians, Slovenians, Bosnians, Serbs, Montenegrins ect. No different. Kind of sad Serbian channel is spreading this false narrative.

The Bulgars were a Turkic tribal confederation that gave rise to the Balkan Bulgar and Volga Bulgar states. The ethnonym derives from the Turkish bulgha-, "to stir, mix, disturb, confuse." The confederation appears to have taken shape among Oghur tribes in the Kazakh steppes following the migrations that were touched off by movements of the Hsiung-nu. Later Byzantine sources (Agathon, Nicephorus Patriarchus, Theophanes) closely associate or identify the Bulgars with the Onoghurs, who were enemies of Sassanid Iran in the late 4th century. When or how this connection developed is unclear. If we discount several (most probably) anachronistic notices on the Bulgars in Moses Kliorenats'i (Moses of Chorene), the earliest references to them are perhaps to be found in an anonymous Latin chronograph of 354: "Vulgares." They are absent from Priscus's account of the migration, ca. 463, of the Oghuric Turks into the Pontic steppes, but by 480 they are noted under their own name as allies of Constantinople against the Ostrogoths. Amity with Byzantium was short-lived. By 489 the Bulgars had initiated a series of raids on Byzantine Balkan possessions. Their habitat, at this stage, appears to have been in the eastern Pontic steppes stretch-ing into the Azov region and North Caucasus. It is here that Jordanes and Pseudo-Zacharius Ithetor place them in the mid-6th century. Shortly afterward, they were overrun and subjugated by the Avars and then the Turks. When Turk rule weakened, sometime after 600, the Avars appear to have reestablished some control over the region. It was against Avar rule that the Bulgars-under their leader Qubrat, whom Heraclius had been cultivating for some rime (he and his uncle were baptized in Constantinople to 619)-revolted ca. 631-632 and founded the Onoghundur-Bulgar state. Some time after Qubrat's death (660s), this Pontic - Maeotun Bulgaria, whose Balkan descendents would also claim Attilid origins, came into conflict with the Khazar khaganate, successor to the Turk empire in western Eurasia. The Khazars emerged victorious from the contest, and parts of the Bulgar union broke up and migrated. One grouping under Asperukh in 679 crossed the Danube into Moesia and, having subjugated a local Slavic confederatton, there laid the foundation for the Balkan Bulgarian state. Yet other groups joined the Avar state in Pannonia (where some would prove to be rebellious subjects or took up restience in Italy around the five Rasennate cities, to live as Byzantine subjects.The other Bulgars either remained in the Pontic steppe zone the (the “Black Bulgars” of Byzantine and Rus’ sources) or later migrated (perhaps as early as the mid-7th century or as late as the mid-8th to early 9th century) to the middle Volga region, giving rise there to the Volga Bulgarian state, which remained, however a vassal of the Khazars. Balkan Bulgaria soon became an important element in Byzantine politics, on occasion supporting contestants to the throne and also helping to defeat the Arab attack on Constantinople of 717-18.The iconoclastic Emperor Constantine (741-775) began a series of wars against them that remained a constant theme of Byzantine-Bulgarian relations until the destruction of the first Bulgarian empire by Basil II (976-1025).In 864 the Bulgarian king Boris, outmaneuvered by Constantinople, converted to Christianity. Thereafter, the Turkic Bulgars underwent Slavicization, and Balkan Bulgaria became one of the centers of medieval Slavic. The Volga Bulgars, however, converted to Islam in the early 10th century and created a highly sophisticated, urbane, mercantile Muslim society that, after stout resistance, was conquered by the Mongols in the early 13th century. Bowersock, Glen W. & al. Late Antiquity: A Guide to the Postclassical World pp.354 Harvard University Press, 1999. ISBN 0-674-51173-5.

​@@papazataklaattiranimamnope !.

​@@papazataklaattiranimamTurk, kwork is an Armenian.word for gypsies and sheppereds

@@Crxyzen1 Why does Turkey betray the Uighurs?

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/nbChe6dhmsC3lo0.html&ab_channel=WION

Ike this American guy knows nothing

@@Crxyzen1 Why does Turkey betray the Uighurs?

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/nbChe6dhmsC3lo0.html&ab_channel=WION

Hanim Without PRIMARY SOURCES your Turkic theory is just fantasy like a Disney movie 1. Give PRIMARY SOURCES that show Tengrinism in Bulgaria🤣 2. Give PRIMARY SOURCES that show the name Bulgarian comes from Bulgamak😂

Book of Jasher chapter 10 dismenatals all your claims 😂😂😂

Nice Turkish propaganda. Now let's use some real sources: US National Library of Medicine - "...the Y-chromosome gene pool in modern Bulgarians is primarily represented by Western Eurasian haplogroups with ∼ 40% belonging to haplogroups E-V13 and I-M423, and 20% to R-M17. Haplogroups common in the Middle East (J and G) and in South Western Asia (R-L23*) occur at frequencies of 19% and 5%, respectively. Haplogroups C, N and Q, distinctive for Altaic and Central Asian Turkic-speaking populations, occur at the negligible frequency of only 1.5%...".

fakedonian Both Goce and Tsar Samuel were Bulgarian You are a fakedonian

NO

Yes.

No

Bulgarians have Slavic ancestry whereas Bulgars had Turkic

Of course, it is obvious when you see a blond guy with blu eyes, the present prime minister of Bulgaria, you are sure to see a real Mongolian, ha ha ha.

Pseudo history lovers=Bulgarians

@@Crxyzen1 🤣🤣🤣

@@Crxyzen1 Your funny dream version

@@OrthodoxBulgaria Bulgars’ Turkness comes from historical facts and academic reality not from fringe/based bulgarian historians🤣🤣

@@biscolataman In your dreams🤣

The Volga Bulgars were a Turkic-speaking people who established the second Muslim state in Europe (after the Emirate of Córdoba) in the early fourth/tenth century and ruled over extensive lands and a wide array of people around the middle Volga and Kama Rivers between the second/ninth and early seventh/thirteenth centuries. The Bulgars acted as middlemen between Central Asian merchants and the Rus, and the northern, mainly Finno-Ugric tribes whose main trading commodity was fur, which was greatly valued as a luxury item throughout the Islamic world. *Mako, Gerald. “The Conversion of the Volga Bulgars: Aḥmad b. Faḍlān b. Al-ʿAbbās b. Rāshid b. Ḥammād (Fl. Fourth/Tenth Century).” Conversion to Islam in the Premodern Age: A Sourcebook, edited by Nimrod Hurvitz et al., 1st ed., University of California Press, Oakland, California, 2020, pp. 156-159.* The period is marked by the migration of the final “permanent residents” of the Balkan Peninsula to the region: these were, most important-because eventually most numerous-the Slavs, but also the Turks (first Bulgars and then Ottomans) *Wachtel, Andrew. “Early Balkan Everyday Life.” Everyday Life in the Balkans, edited by DAVID W. MONTGOMERY, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana, 2019, pp. 9-21.* The Samara is the last westward migrations and military campaigns of, first, the significant tributary of the Volga; past the Samara, the rivers Turkic-speaking Bulgars *Mochalov, Oleg D., et al. “Historic Records of the Economy and Ethnic History of the Samara Region.” A Bronze Age Landscape in the Russian Steppes: The Samara Valley Project, edited by Oleg D. Mochalov et al., Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press at UCLA, 2016, pp. 63-70.* The Volga Bulgars , a settled Turkic people, were a society that practiced Islam on the Eurasian steppe *“Siberia in Eurasian Context.” The Merchants of Siberia: Trade in Early Modern Eurasia, by Erika Monahan, 1st ed., Cornell University Press, 2016, pp. 71-104.* The Turkic Bulgars were among the first to benefit from the region’s commercial advantages by settling it in the fifth century c.e. and found- ing the city of Bolgar *“THE KAZAN SCHOOL.” Russian Orientalism: Asia in the Russian Mind from Peter the Great to the Emigration, by David Schimmelpenninck Van der Oye, Yale University Press, New Haven; London, 2010, pp. 93-121.* The confluence of the Volga and Kama rivers, to the east, was inhabited by the Bulgars, a Turkic people, and the southeastern steppes by the Khazars, another Turkic people who had formed a strong state in the seventh century, *“Russian Expansion in Kievan Times.” Eastward to Empire: Exploration and Conquest on the Russian Open Frontier to 1750, by George V. Lantzeff and Richard A. Pierce, McGill-Queen's University Press, MONTREAL; LONDON, 1973, pp. 21-30.* The Huns of the Western Steppe appear to have formed an element of the later Danubian Bulgars, a Turkic people who, under Asparukh, moved into the Balkans in 680 and founded *“The Age of Attila the Hun.” Empires of the Silk Road: A History of Central Eurasia from the Bronze Age to the Present, by CHRISTOPHER I. BECKWITH, Princeton University Press, Princeton; Oxford, 2009, pp. 93-111.* In the mid- ninth century Khan Boris ruled a pagan Bulgaria that was composed of both Turkic Bulgars and Slavs. *“The Micro-Christendom of Rus'.” Reimagining Europe, by Christian Raffensperger, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England, 2012, pp. 136-185.* the Turkic -speaking Volga- Kama Bulgars *“Muslims in Europe: Precedent and Present.” Muslims of Europe: The 'Other' Europeans, by H. A. Hellyer, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 2009, pp. 101-120.* the Bulgars( Turkic speakers who invaded the Balkans in the seventh century) *“Round Two: The Rise and Spread of Agricultural Societies.” The Next World War: Tribes, Cities, Nations, and Ecological Decline, by ROY WOODBRIDGE, University of Toronto Press, 2004, pp. 49-58.* served as the secretary of an embassy sent by the Caliph al- Muqtadir to the king of the Turkish Bulgars then living on the lower reaches of the Volga River north of the Caspian Sea. *“THE BIG CHILL.” Cotton, Climate, and Camels in Early Islamic Iran: A Moment in World History, by Richard W. Bulliet, Columbia University Press, NEW YORK, 2009, pp. 69-95.* Turkic -speaking Bulgars into the region now known as Bulgaria failed to alter its predominantly Slavic char- acter. The Bulgar ruling class eventually abandoned its Thrkic language and adopted Slavic so completely that no trace of Turkicspeech patterns can be found in any Old Slavic texts. *“Languages and Literatures.” East Central Europe in the Middle Ages, 1000-1500, by JEAN W. SEDLAR, University of Washington Press, Seattle; London, 1994, pp. 421-457.* Byzantine power was challenged by Thrkic-speaking Bulgars from the Ukrainian steppe who carved out a tribal state from the empire's Balkan lands. *“Foreign Affairs.” East Central Europe in the Middle Ages, 1000-1500, by JEAN W. SEDLAR, University of Washington Press, Seattle; London, 1994, pp. 362-400.* When the Turkic -speaking Bulgars first occupied their present *“Nobles and Landholders.” East Central Europe in the Middle Ages, 1000-1500, by JEAN W. SEDLAR, University of Washington Press, Seattle; London, 1994, pp. 58-83.* and with the Turkic people, the Bulgars , on the east bank of the Volga. *“Conclusions.” Eastward to Empire: Exploration and Conquest on the Russian Open Frontier to 1750, by George V. Lantzeff and Richard A. Pierce, McGill-Queen's University Press, MONTREAL; LONDON, 1973, pp. 221-230.* alleged to be constructions of the Turkic Bulgars , are notable. *Pundeff, Marin. “Bulgarian Historiography, 1942-1958.” The American Historical Review, vol. 66, no. 3, 1961, pp. 682-693.* They colonised areas of the eastern Balkans and in the seventh century other Slav tribes combined with the Proto-Bulgars, a group of Turkic origin, to launch a fresh assault into the Balkans. *Crampton, R. (2005). THE BULGARIAN LANDS FROM PREHISTORY TO THE ARRIVAL OF THE BULGARIANS. In A Concise History of Bulgaria (Cambridge Concise Histories, pp. 1-8). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.* In my lecture I emphasised the fact that the ear liest written record the of the Bulghar- Turkic sound shift к > / could be traced even in the early Turkic loan-words of the Hungarian language. Róna-Tas, András. “WHERE WAS KHUVRAT'S BULGHARIA?” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, vol. 53, no. 1/2, 2000, pp. 1-22. followed by the Avars (Turki invaders of sixth to eighth centuries AD who were eventually evicte from Hungary by Charlemagne), the Bulgars ( Turkic speakers who invaded the Balkans in the seventh century) “Round Two: The Rise and Spread of Agricultural Societies.” The Next World War: Tribes, Cities, Nations, and Ecological Decline, by ROY WOODBRIDGE, University of Toronto Press, 2004, pp. 49-58. Bulgars (Turkic bulgha-'to mix, stir up, disturb', i.e. 'rebels') A Turkic tribal union of the Pontic steppes that gave rise to two important states: Danubian Balkan Bulgaria (First Bulgarian Empire, 681-1018) and Volga Bulgaria (early 10th century-1241). They derived from Oghuric-Turkic tribes, driven westward from Mongolia and south Siberia to the Pontic steppes in successive waves by turmoil associated with the Xiungnu and subsequently by warfare between the Rouran/Avar and northern Wei states. in Oliver Nicholson, The Oxford Dictionary of Late Antiquity, Oxford University Press, 2018, ISBN 0192562460, p. 271..

@@Nomadicenjoyerplus Fatlinda Islami What does this have to do with a 12 year old Albanian girl like you who lives with her parents in Gostivar?

@@petertodorov9540 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/aMqfjNuGypnNnJs.html&ab_channel=Dookumoftherookbrook

Davis (2008:39) translates Ouyang Xiu's statement "當是時，西突厥有鐵勒，延陀、阿史那之類為最大" into "Among the Tie'le tribes of Western Tujue, at the time, the Yantuo and Ashina were the largest subgroups".

The “TERM” Ashina😂 not tribe itself

Hanim Ashina is an Iranic name NOT turkic

@@petertodorov1792 May God Almighty bless you my dear Aryan/Iranian brother and may God bless all our Aryan/Iranian people. Brother do you know who build the Buddha statues in Afghanistan and Pakistan? Was it the Iranians who build the Buddha statues in nowadays Afghanistan and Pakistan? Afghanistan and Pakistan were also a part of The Median - Achaemenid Empire!

@@petertodorov1792 By the way my dear brother did you call Gæbrias because he so much wish to talk with you?

At the time,the new Khazar qaganate was expanding westward,squeezing out the Onogurs,or Bulghars as they begin to be named. One of the Kuvrat’s sons,the Asparuch (Asparux,Isperih) now celebrated as the founder of Bulgaria,forcibly crossed to the Danube arpund 679 to occupy imperial territory Moesia after defeating the forces of Constantine IV (668-685). The event is recorded in the preserved text of a Hebrew letter of a Khazar qahan,who wrote that the Vununtur(=Onogurs=Bulghars) has fled across the Duna,the Danube. Even if numerous for the steppe,Asparuch’s pastoralist warriors and their families were of necessity relatively few as compared to the agricultural Slav population that lived south of the Danube,and thus the Turkic-speaking Bulghars were assimilated linguistically by the Slav majority to form the medieval and modern Bulgarians. This particular ethnogenesis occuree gradually over a period of more than two centuries: there was the Turkic qan (or khan) Krum (803-814),Qan Omurtag (814-831),Qan Perssian (836-852),then the wan who converted Boris I (852-889);then came Tsar Symeon (893-923), Tsar Peter I (927-970),and so on.But this transformation of Turkic shamanists into Slavic Christians did nothing to diminish the warlike character of the empire’s new neighbours. Because even warlike neighbours can be useful at times,the relations between the empire and the new Bulghar qaganate encompassed every possible variation,from intimate allience to all out-war,as exemplified by the career of the Bulghar qan or khan Tervel (or Tarvel-Terbelis in our Greek sources),the successor and probably son of Asparukh who ruled for some twenty-one years within the period 695-721,extant chronologies being inconsistent. “Bulghars and Bulgarians.” The Grand Strategy of the Byzantine Empire, by EDWARD N. LUTTWAK, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England, 2009, pp. 173 The strategic and economic importance of this juncture is clear: in an age when much long-distance travel was by water, the confluence of the Volga and Kama rivers provided a three-way maritime link between Europe, the Near East, and East Asia. The Turkic Bulgars were among the first to benefit “THE KAZAN SCHOOL.” Russian Orientalism: Asia in the Russian Mind from Peter the Great to the Emigration, by David Schimmelpenninck Van der Oye, Yale University Press, New Haven; London, 2010, pp. 93-121. The confluence of the Volga and Kama rivers, to the east, was inhabited by the Bulgars, a Turkic people, and the southeastern steppes by the Khazars, another Turkic people who had formed a strong state in the seventh century, barring alike the westward movement of other nomadic tribes “Russian Expansion in Kievan Times.” Eastward to Empire: Exploration and Conquest on the Russian Open Frontier to 1750, by George V. Lantzeff and Richard A. Pierce, McGill-Queen's University Press, MONTREAL; LONDON, 1973, pp. 21-30. The Bul- gars, a Turkic people, unlike the Slavic Croats and Serbs, moved south ofthe Danube in 679 and soon created a state, in which the numerically small Proto- Bulgarelement in due course became completely assimilated with the Slavic majority “Antecedents and Antipodes.” The National Question in Yugoslavia: Origins, History, Politics, by IVO BANAC, Cornell University Press, Ithaca; London, 1984, pp. 21-140. The word boyar is of Turkic origin, introduced into the Balkan Peninsula by the Bulgars in the 7th century. As the Turkic -speaking Bulgar conquerors became Slavicized, they joined with the Slavic clan chiefs “Nobles and Landholders.” East Central Europe in the Middle Ages, 1000-1500, by JEAN W. SEDLAR, University of Washington Press, Seattle; London, 1994, pp. 58-83. " Bulgar " originally designated a Turkic -speaking people; now it designates the Slavic-speaking people who assimilated them. “National Symbols and the International Recognition of the Republic of Macedonia.” The Macedonian Conflict: Ethnic Nationalism in a Transnational World, by Loring M. Danforth, Princeton University Press, PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY, 1995, pp. 142-184.

@@Nomadicenjoyer31 Coward, Did you know that the Uighurs are Turkic? But instead of helping them you worry about what happened 1000 years ago kzfaq.info/get/bejne/m5ySg6qdlpanpKc.html&ab_channel=BBCNews

@@petertodorov9540 get a life kid 🤣🤣 and stop following me everywhere like an idiot

@@Nomadicenjoyer31 www.voanews.com/east-asia-pacific/turkey-cracks-down-uighur-protesters-after-china-complains

@@Nomadicenjoyer31 Sonny, it is you who need to get a life Can't you see how small minded you panturk trolls are ? While you worry about what happened 1000 years ago Your Turkic brothers the Uighurs are disappearing right now In front of your face So what have you done to help the Uighurs?

No,almost %100 true

@@papazataklaattiranimam hey. I am a Bulgarian. You can lie all the world about it but not someone native who knows it's country history. Delite it or I will report you for misleading information.

Miroslava Hristova Video is true but some nationalist bulgarians don’t like it :)))

Miroslava Hristova Which part is false?Tell it.

@@Littleheaven777 Truth hurts. However, a Turk doesn't care whether a Bulgarian is Turk or not. Who cares your pathetic history? lol

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ocWqZsSlqtbdpKs.html

no

Mihail Nikoloff Maybe not back then but post WWll Serbians were encouraged to move to Macedonia and marry Macedonians, obviously this would bring them closer with Serbia and further away from Bulgaria (Tito's object was to suppress the Bulgarian influence in Macedonia and eradicate Bulgarian national chauvinism)... anyway greetings from Australia:)

Mihail Nikoloff Etnik Bulgaria are Turcik people!!! Macedonians are not Bulgars!!!! Stop laying ,Ancient Serbs are INDIGINUS PEOPLE OF Balkans!!!! People of Macedonia are Slavic and ancient!!!!!

Mihail Nikoloff hahahaha Serbia and Greece (allied) both worked towards suppressing the Bulgarian character in Macedonia, the funny thing is "Macedonia" was used as a weapon to achieve this, now it's biting them back in the ass (especially Greece)...no negativity but I'm not sure how Bulgarians could ever mend friendship with either Serbia or Greece, both these idiotic states divided the Bulgarian people and turned them away from one another! (it's almost like an outside force telling you to hate your brother or sister)

Mihail Nikoloff BULGAR came from Turkmenistan!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It is not turkish, it is turkic.

H Λ Я Я I S there’s a big difference in modern day country turkey and Turkic tribes...

Turkic tribles are very old and rise from Central Asia area a couple of thousand years ago.

Its not turkish, its turkic. For example hunns, kipchaks and scyths were turkic tribes.

@@mymailkz What? the scyths are turkic? lmao, you fools do you even know what scythia means in what you call slavic? It means its a place where you can move around,roam wander aka nomadia. www.dict.com/bulgarian-english/скитам

Why does Turkey betray the Uighurs?

@@petertodorov9540 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mrqZqpuYqr2rkaM.html&ab_channel=WION

Turkish -90% mixed genetics ,first name of their state Roman Sultanate ,created by Rome ,the word Turk banned of use up ro the end of Ottoman Empire . So clearly we can see that Turkish STOLE IDENTITY OF TURKICS . Turkics- from 70 up to 95% european genetcis ,europeans that speak in twisted mongolic language ,nothing in common with Turkish people .

Because you are Slavs, not Bulgars which are Turkic. You are Slavised like Tatars, Bashkirs and so on.

You guys used to be turks nowadays both ethnically and culturally more slavic

savaş alpay Bulgars were 3 to 4 % Turkic by genetics 🤣🤣🤣🤣

@@yaqubleis6311 this is what it is today not it was in yesterday. Slavs are not Bulgars. Real Bulgars are Turks.

BONESAW IS READY they were not Turkic at all Bulgars were predominately Turkicized Iranic Samartians and Alans. It seems the Bulgars predominated the Central Asian Iranic Caucasoid type with a small mongoloid admixture of possibly 3 to 4 % on average with a few or minority being more Mongoloid than the average especially with the males. They were almost physically indistinguishable from the Samaritans and Pamiri Tajiks 😂🤣🤣🤣🤣 historians of Bulgarians origin saying this 🤣😂🤣🤣 ANTHROPOLOGICAL STUDY OF MEDIAEVAL CEMETERIES NO. 1 AND NO. 3 NEAR DEVNYA (BULGARIA) P. BOEV, L. KAVGAZOVA and D. PIPERKOVA North-Iranic racial types, characteristic for the Alanians, have been found. This shows that at Devnya were present besides proto-Bulgarians are Alano-Sarmatians whose mixed breeding had already started. 🤣😂🤣😂😂🤣😂🤣🤣 END OF ARGUMENT 🤣😂😂 thank you to Bulgarians historians to make your history weak again the Turkic origin of Bulgars has been dead since more 20 years now 😂😂🤣🤣🤣

Your mother has an identity crisis, you bitch. Bulgarians are the oldest nation on the Balkans our identity is based on real history unlike yours.

@@mihailnikoloff2554 even balkan name is turkish lk aslkdklasfklakfakfklaf

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mrqZqpuYqr2rkaM.html&ab_channel=WION

@@petertodorov1792 Well said my dear Bulgarian brother. I wish we could unite all our Aryan/Iranic/Iranian Peoples into one country!

Fatlinda Islami You are not a Turk so why do you pretend to be a Turk? You are a 12 year old Albanian girl who lives with her mommy in Gostivar

turkish tribe in 6th century :)? attaturk wasnt born there turifiled greek :)

@@Crxyzen1 Why does Turkey betray the Uighurs?

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/nbChe6dhmsC3lo0.html&ab_channel=WION

If this is true Why don't you show the source?

Peter Todorov Watch Volga Bulgar Language/I love languages Then books.google.com.tr/books?id=apGfDwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=&hl=tr&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi41LzF3I_rAhUKzaQKHXV6CX0Q6AEIJzAA#v=onepage&q=Bulgar&f=false

@Delaram Salmassi Yes sister , The Bulgars, Slavs, Thracians, Scythians, Sarmatians and Alans were all IndoEuropean not turkomongol

Peter Todorov Bulgars were well known Turkic peoples from Oghur tribes not mongol or indian

@Delaram Salmassi Yes sister,All those people are Iranic except the Thracians who are a Baltic people and IndoEuropean. The BaltoSlavic group are Cousins to the Iranian group all indoEuropean

Bulgars are turkic people . They are still alive and they live in Tatarstan .

Delaram Salmassi You are just idiots who steal names just like Macedonians. Real macedonians are not slavic. And real Bulgarians are not slavic either. Give your country a different name. It could be Thracia or yugoslavia. Stop stealing the name of the real bulgarians. Real bulgarians live in the Volga region of Russia. You can research “Volga Bulgars”. Maybe your ignorance decreases.

Delaram Salmassi bulgars are turkic . I don't fuckin care about others

Delaram Salmassi Read in your own language, ignorant! fa.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/بلغارها

Delaram Salmassi fa.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/بلغارستان_ولگا

1885?

I'm from Bulgaria

@@mariastaneva193 честито

conveniently omitted. they are not too proud of it :)))

@@HomoUniverzalis Not a point in Serbia's favor.

nope we didnt assult we created a country of liberal people and we didnt betray anybody :)

Turk is not Turcie Turcie Osmano Arab halifate Osmano Turcie DNI Greek,Armenian,Kurds ,This is Osman Turcie asemile Armenian Greek,Kurds!

@@user-jp9nu7dn7t stfu brainless

@@Nomadicenjoyerplus Zonja Fatlinda Islami You are not a Turk so why do you pretend to be a Turk? You are a 12 year old Albanian girl who lives with her parents in Gostivar

@@petertodorov9540 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/aMqfjNuGypnNnJs.html&ab_channel=Dookumoftherookbrook

@Cuni Lagjes wow you guys really go deep into *MAKING* *UP* your own history since you lack it ALOT

kosovo is macedonia

lol @Няма такъв канал никаде

its not bulgaria now u tar tar@Няма такъв канал никаде

Kosovo is Bulgaria.

PREDI DA GOVORISH ZA IRANTSI - PERSI NAU4I KOI SA . 6-7 VEK PERSITE SA OTSEDNAL NAROD I NE TI4AT NAPRED-NAZAD NA KONE I NE JIVEIAT V IURTI . TOVA E KULTURA SAS SOBSTVENA PISMENOST I KALENDAR . SRAVNI PRABALGARSKIA I KITAISKIA KALENDAR I TOGAVA GOVORI . kutiGURI onOGURRI SA VSE TIRKSKI < OGURSKI < PLEMENA OPISANI 1020 GODINA OT KASHKARLI MAHMUD V KNIGATA < DIVANU LUGATI ET TURK < KATO 24 PLEMENA . PRABALGARSKIA ZNAK IYI E TOTEMNA DAMGA NA RODA KAYI OSNOVATEL NA OSMANSKATA IMPERIA bg.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9A%D0%B0%D0%B9%D1%8A

@@ganatyukogeorgi4192 хехе малко е смешно помаците и турците да говорите за нас че сме се цигани. Едните без собствена държава, наименование и култура. Другите-копелета. Смес от какви ли не народности, дето никой не ги знае какви са

Why does Turkey betray the Uighurs?

www.voanews.com/east-asia-pacific/turkey-cracks-down-uighur-protesters-after-china-complains

@@petertodorov9540 Love to our Aryan/Iranian Bulgarian brothers and sisters. God bless our Aryan/Iranian people and hugs and kisses to all our Aryan/Iranian people. Wish we could unite ALL Aryan/Iranian people into one country called The Median - Achaemenid Empire!