Body Art Let's include Body Paint, Piercings, Nail Art, Make-up, Hairdressing, and Fashion.

tattoos are degenerate

@@qualifying2359 no u

@@qualifying2359 Imagine unironically thinking tattoos = bad in 2021. 😂

Another very valid question is... What is land art and what is environmental destruction? I'm not making a judgement. Just asking. And it's a question all land artists should ask before starting on any large scale project. I can see how this could at times, in a few specific places, become a problem. Some environments are much too beautiful to have man's hand laid on them. I would hope that artists would be more sensitive than the average person to this issue. But what about the people who only think they are artists, but are not? There are already too many of them! A permit should be required for anything large scale. I realize that would spoil things to a certain extent. But in my mind and heart, protecting the land, sky, and water comes first. The vast majority wouldn't need a permit anyway, and the majority of those applied for would recieve one anyway. Just the very large and damaging things or eyesores would be refused. The more natural the project, the less likely it would be to get refused, or to need modification. And before people jump all over me, I'm sick to death of hearing about your rights to free speach. Your right to wreck a beautiful pristine landscape doesn't supercede my right to keep the landscape untouched. If it's public land, I have as much right to enjoy it untouched. If it's private land the owner has the right to choose. In most cases I think land art is the coolest thing ever, and the most beautiful art ever! But I can also envision idiots who saw this going out and hiring bulldozers, and ripping stuff up. So in any case, the owners of bulldozers or of companies that have earth moving equipment, or that can place huge peices of stuff, should be liable for damage, and criminally charged for disturbing nature if permanent damage is done. (Concrete is extremely toxic, and very ugly IMHO.) That still leaves a lot of leeway. Remember the old adage for camping and hiking, take nothing but pictures, leave nothing but... ? What was it? Footprints? Because as well as the increasing amount of garbage tossed out tossed all over the place, there has actually been an increase of "art" peices installed in natural spaces all over. ❣💜 💙

+

I agree whole heartedly! I love the Art Assignment series, but excluding Andy from this topic… I know, I know… there are far to many to mention all, but for me, Andy Goldsworthy is the finest example of “Artist in the landscape” he’s one of my personal favorite of all artists, sans categories!

Yeah. Me too!

Xenolilly I strongly agree with this statement.

and inspiring!

True.

So much 🤩

this is so cool! :)

Hannah had a very cool, creative aunt! ❤

✔️ On the list

Been there 😉

That sounds like a pretty cool trip! Was it at university, high school/secondary, elementary?

art school;)

They don't have the same message that land art has, but technically, yeah.

yeah sure- It's a spectrum init. But I suppose it'd be closer to the like of Stonehenge and garden design than the artists above as it kinda doesn't have the same purpose as the stereotypical land art defined by the video. Looking at the 6:02 time stamp I guess it falls under the Marked Sites-Landscape-Site Construction side of the octagram. xxx

yes

that's shit

@@37H662 This dude is just mad he don't got the skills to draw his own fanart of his favorite waifus.

It was completely inadvertent, and--in retrospect--strange. Apologies! I meant no Goldsworthy shade.

The Art Assignment Thanks for the answer. I understand how it can happen. Also, I was very happy you included Anna Mendieta. Her work gives me chills!

A land-art video without Andy Goldsworthy is like a Cubism video without Picasso.

@@alsayre3 spot on!

heroine

YESSSS! PLEASE!

+WashingtonRain How did the experiences compare to your expectations?

+Alex Beraza the next video we'll release is Art Trip: Marfa. Plenty of Judd in your future!

Had to get it in there! How was it in person?

Honestly, way too hot. But we arrived during the golden hour so it was pretty fantastic - and photogenic. The painted rock looks very majestic and interesting from afar, but when you're standing next to it, it kinda feels a little like a mini-golf attraction. I'm not super sure what to make of that thought - but there it is.

How about Francis Bacon

How was it?

The Art Assignment It was cool. The artist used all natural volcanic rock from the surrounding area so it feels really natural. It would probably be cooler when the water level is higher like in the video but it would be hard to plan a trip around that.

You should look at Rosalind Krauss's text that Sarah refers to in the video. It's called "Sculpture in the Expanded Field" and it's an insightful and easy read.

Your comment made me think of the classic Mathematica exhibits by Charles & Ray Eames... they are arguably more design than art, but they are quite artful expressions of math. I just did a search and found this brief documentary of it's permanent installation in NY: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/brl1bKukxp3KioE.html

@@studiocurtis I love land art !! I have a channel about it kzfaq.info/get/bejne/aNuEfdOIps2UoYk.html

I have three for you: 1. Louisiana Channel. This is of one of my favorite art channels. It's based out of a museum in Denmark (most videos are in English). They interview leading artists, architects, musicians, and authors from all over the world: kzfaq.info 2. Brilliant Ideas (a subset of the Bloomberg channel in the UK). These are amazing, highly produced short-form documentaries on contemporary artists around the world. Here is their playlist for that series: kzfaq.info/sun/PLqq4LnWs3olUpaD8oXCF7IlLikGBY7HFg 3. Tate Shots. The Tate (a massive collection of museums in the UK), produces this lovely series of short-form documentaries on leading contemporary artists from around the world: kzfaq.infoplaylists

Anarchitecture? Absolutely love his work.

@@theartassignment Me too (that I love his work) -- but, really -- how would his "subtract-itectures" fit into Rosalind Krauss' "Expanded Field" diagram?

michael wiggs what is Toyism?

agustin venegas www.toyism.com

As wonderful as Hennessy Youngman's video (kzfaq.info/get/bejne/edtdn5icuMvFpGw.html) is, it's not exactly something I can share with everyone ...

Hi :)

Hi!!

Hi (:

That's true - these terms are pretty narrow! Such a painting would probably need to be: 1. Comprised largely (if not entirely) of materials that an artist sourced from the original "site" and 2. Refer directly and specifically back to the site from which those materials came -- that is, the site (versus, say, a storyline about a princess or a bank or a cat) would be THE central subject matter of such a painting. That said, non-sites don't NEED to cover a lot of, ah, territory... there's plenty of room for other kinds of art in the world ;-D

Typically the artist acquires a deed - either time-limited or permanent - to the land on which the work is executed.

eyyy luisito xddddd soy richard