I was in my 60s before I actually saw one. Yet I'd been around them all my life growing up and never let myself realize it! I'd seen the structures, the glyphs, the nests, the arch ways and felt their presence when I'd walk alone in the woodlands around our farm. Finally, in 2017, the Matriarch of the Xanue Clan here stepped out of the trees across the way while I sat on my front porch steps, swayed, grinned at me, and I blinked. Then she was gone! Later I learned that she was my age and had grown up shadowing me. I think she grew weary of me not paying attention and her bucket wish was to get through to me that they existed. It's been a wild adventure in the 7 years since!

I absolutely believe Patty is a legit Sasquatch 💯

I'm a complete believer. My ancestors spoke of them many centuries ago. When there was no Hollywood, no costume designers.

The simple fact is, there have been too many sightings by credible witnesses for it not to exist.

I saw one in 2007 in Michigan on public lands in the middle of a field that was surrounded by forest. It was smaller, maybe 4 feet tall and was standing still peering over some tall field grass at me. The face was that of a human mixed with a chimp. It was covered in short hair except on the face. Skin was all black. It would duck down then pop back up almost as if it was wanting to play. After about 1 minute, it took off running and all I could see was it's head and shoulders moving extremely quickly through the grass in a straight line directly away from me. I was so shocked at what I just witnessed that I couldn't move for the next 3 minutes. What scared me the most though is that it left in the same direction that I had to take to get back to my car. Will never forget it.

Long story short, I've locked eyes with one in the wild. They are real, and quite sneaky for their size. Too bad the literal ground shakes when they run by you XD. Thats what alerted me to it, and when I looked out of my tent, it was peeking at me from behind a tree. I left my whole tent and everything, grabbed my wife an we got out of there. They are just curious and want to be left alone, I truley believe there are colonies of these creatures everywhere, but they specialize in hiding and avoiding humans. They know the kind of carnage we're capable of and want no part of us. But yea, anyone who's an outdoors person and has camped outside many of nights has a weird unknown creature bigfoot type encounter, cuz they are REAL!

If that’s a female, imagine how big a full grown male would get…

We were camped at a place called Salmon La Sac, in the Washington Cascades around 1954. I was just 4 years old when we were approached by three Bigfoot 's. My father and I had been fishing earlier. I caught nothing, but dad caught four. We took them back to camp and we're in the process of cleaning them, when we were approached three Bigfoot One was male and another was female , and there a small child. I don't know how tall they were, but way taller than my dad So dad gave them three of our fish as one was being cooked. These creatures left as quietly as they had approached. Dad told me not to say anything to anyone, because he didn't want them hunted.........

I doubt that if someone were to fake a big foot sighting that they would put breasts on the costume.

For all the people bringing up the guy who supposedly came forward, claiming the Patterson film was a hoax, and claiming he was the one wearing the suit, that guy has been completely debunked and exposed as a fraud. First off, the guy couldn't even get to, or give directions to the Bluff Creek area where it was filmed, yet he claims he was there. Also, in older interviews he claimed that the suite had a plastic chest plate with abbs and pectoral muscles, basically claiming it was a male ape suit. He didn't expect the technology to advance the way it did, or for them to get the film cleaned up and stabilized and zoomed in as well as they did. Turns out that, not only does it not have a plastic chest plate, or plastic pectoral muscles, but the thing has huge bouncing and swaying breasts, covered in hair making it a female. So he couldn't get to, or give directions to the film sight, and completely miss explained what the suit even looked like, or how it was designed and made, yet were supposed to believe it was all a hoax, and he was involved and wearing this imaginary suit? No, this guy saw how much attention and fame Patterson and Gimlin were getting, and was jealous, so he made up a story to get his own attention, and never thought the film would get improved enough to expose him as a liar. Now, this still doesn't make the film, or creature real, but that guy is a complete fraud. 99 times out of 100, when you watch a human in an ape suit walking and moving around, it's very obvious that it's a man in a suite, even with today's Hollywood caliber suites you can still tell the difference. Yet when I watch this Patterson film, it just doesn't look like a man in a suite to me. These two guys weren't high level, Hollywood special effects artist's, and not even Hollywood had access to ape suits this good back in the 1960's. Heck the best high budget Hollywood special effects artist's had when this was filmed was the old Planet Of The Apes show. I mean, have you seen that show.... those suites don't look real at all, or as good as this. I don't know if this is a real creature or not, but considering I live right in the middle of an area they are reported to be, in the middle of Appalachian mountains and forest's, I hope I never run into one.

Patterson and Gimlin weren't searching for a missing person. They were searching for Bigfoot.

I've got a friend that has the best photo ever. Taken from a dive bombing Piper over the tundra of Alaska. It's so good, people think it's fake. So it's hidden from the world because of persecution. But I know him as an honorable man

If they are real and intelligent enough to be that elusive for this long then I'm sure they bury their dead.

I showed 3 of the still images from this film (as the subject is walking into the woods with it's back turned) to a couple of Primate keepers when I worked at a UK Zoological Park. I did not tell them where the images were from or what they were meant to show but instead asked them what it was. Both went back and forth from Gorilla to Chimp with with a confused look on their faces, at NO point did either of them say "Person in a Suit" or Hoax" etc. The moment they focused on the Foot close up however they seemed very rattled. When I told them what the Pictures where meant to show, they laughed nervously and no longer wanted to discuss the matter. I found their reactions interesting to say the least.

U can 1000% tell that it's NOT a man in a suit. Even a movie production costume wouldn't look like that. Especially back in those days. You can clearly see the muscles as it walks, and the way the fur clings to the body as it moves, the bigger frame and longer arms. And the face! You can tell that ain't no mask. The neck is telling too. When it turns its head. That is not a human being! Big foot exists!

Great photo, but I still think the Patterson film was the best ever capture of a Sasquatch, as it is in motion. To the cynics/skeptics. 'no amount of evidence is ever enough to persuade an idiot'. The sheer amount of witness testimony, (from all over the World), footprints, tree structures, whoops and wood knocking is more than enough to prove 100% these beings are as real as you and me

I remember seeing a documentary about this video of Bigfoot, they analized it any compared the stature gait etc to humans and the match was not that of a human in a suit or anything else

Even if such a costume could have been made in 67, which professionals say wasn't possible, they wouldn't have given it tits!

I grew up near there, saw one myself maybe 40 miles towards the coast in the redwoods, never seen anything like it before or since

It's not complicated. Bigfoot exists. I'm down with that.

The PGF is the most authentic peice of visual evidence to date. Once they cleaned it up and showed the muscle structure and Especially the hemmorage in her thigh as she walked too? Nobodies faking that in 1967. You could have a still shot from this year, and it makes no difference. This is a segment exhibiting movement, locomotion, gait, muscle structure and so much more to prove that this is infact a real Sasquatch.

There is no 9ft human walking around the forest in a mokey costume

I live in Oregon the people who don't believe in Big Foot have never been out of the city and have never seen a living wild mammal in their lives.. I know enough to stay out of the deep rain forest.

The Paterson/ Gimlin film is still the only one I believe. By far!

In this age of AI rendering, it’s difficult to give credence to anything modern. This presented photo is well-composed with a rather posed-seeming left knee bend. PG film I believe in 100%.

I gotta say, I'm still on the fence about Bigfoot, but I'm definitely keeping my mind open to it's existence. With that said, I was really bothered by the narrator's reference to it as a "monster"! We are all living beings, and as such, deserving of respect for one another. I see an intelligent being...one very similar to us. One needing of food, shelter, family and peace. Let's not degrade ourselves by referring to others that are not exactly like us, as monsters.

There is a small minority of people,who get a kick from producing fake film footage.This does nothing to help the real investigation into this phenomenon.

Pattie is the real deal. A suit would have been easily proven long ago.

If you look up thinker thunker's body proportion rules in regards to the Patterson Gimlin film creature VS any other picture or video you can find of these things the arms and legs should be relatively the same length and the legs should not be %30 longer than the arms like the human in an ape suit in 2nd picture. Pause the video and do it yourself with paper and pen for both pictures of Patty and the guy in the suit in the 2nd part of the video and you'll see. Patty's Body proportions do not match any living human on the planet

Hard to fake a film in 1967 I doubt there was a person just walking around in a costume still one of the best proof of Bigfoot 👊🤟💪😎

I become a knower at nine years old I'm sixty two years old now you see one you will never forget ever

Im addicted to Sasquatch and ufo 🛸 vids. Someone help me, I need intervention 😸

The best way to figure out the veracity is by gathering up as many people who have seen Sasquatch and asking their opinion.

The Paterson Gimlin film will 4ever be thee go 2 Bigfoot/ Sasquatch film the world goes to 2 look, 2 see, 2 analyze a real Bigfoot / adult female !

Bigfoot saw me once but nobody believes him.

1967 picture of big foot is real

Idk...breast are never hairy on mammals. The babies feed from them. They don't have hair on them.

I've not seen Hollywood match anything like the Patterson film. The latest picture on this video looks like a ape from the recent planet of the apes movie photo shopped to the scene. Still a believer... just not of the still pic.

1967 film & story looks pretty real...

Also, As a Sasquatch I'm horribly offended by this video . Humans keep saying we smell bad, While I couldn't even begin to count the people I've run across stinking of Pachouli and Sandalwood in the forest. We Smell Like Sweat, You guys cover up your scent with things that Literally Smell Worse Than Your Own Sweat! If you folks just can't stand the way we smell then stay out of our property!

The suffocating stench of bigfoot will silence even the hardiest of animals...

I remember watching a video about a scientist who was an expert in analysing the movements of people and animals and after putting all the film into a computer program he said no human could match the way the creature walked, he declared it was a legitimate video and wasn't a trick to fool people, I just wish I could remember who did it. If it is mentioned later in this film then you will see what I mean.

The claims by socalled special effects experts saying they could make a suit just like the Patterson, Gimlin suit is laughable one guy didn't even get the feet right, they all look like what Princess Leia called Chewbacca, walking carpets.

Bigfoot is real, but this new 'photo' is definitely AI generated.

The BBCs 1998 recreation is ridiculous 🙈

The cool thing about the Patterson-Gimlin Film is that it has held up to every single litmus test posed against it for being a legitimate piece of film discovery evidence and it has not only survived, it has thrived, and it has stood the test of time. Since the 53-second film was captured on 10-20-1967, how many other comparible videos have been taken since? Especially today, when our planet is so much more populated and even children now carry mobile phones with camera, video, and zoom function capabilities, why still no further convincing evidence, amounting to equal or better content? On every occasion when a new bird species, a new dinosaur species, a new hommimid species, a new insect species, and a new fish species are discovered the scientific community flocks to and commits to additional documentation and research. But, why is the scientific community so prejudiced about the existence of Bigfoot/Sasquatch, especially with all the First Nations oral traditions and the documented news reports by present day victims and witnesses from the past 150 years? Why don't we know more about these beings, their language, and their social structure along with how many species and sub-species exist today? If they have existed for as long as they have been included in oral traditions and governments have not already forced them to submit to society's laws and to being taxed, then perhaps, governments are fearful of these free beings. What does our government already know about these beings that they do not wish to truthfully disclose to us?

Did your recording get stuck in a loop ? Its repeated several times , re the "kentish ape man "

Am I somehow replaying portions or is he repeating himself every once in awhile?

Can't say for sure, but I was watching an old rerun of "Kolchack - Night stalker" from the early 70's the other night and an episode about a "man-ape" creature was the subject of the episode and the laughable example that Hollywood gave then and in all other examples I can recall of that era from other Tv and movies couldn't hold a candle to the Patterson subject. To think that the Patterson creature is a man in a suit when you compare it to the best hoaxing filmmakers of that time is well... makes you feel stupid - If you keep looking at both examples ( the BEST of then Hollywood and the Patterson subject) and think about it. The Patterson production if fake could have been used in movies and tv for loads of money since it was FAR better than anyone else's product in the whole of Hollywood of that time.

They are 100% real and they're either interdimensional or not always here physically. Many native tribes described them as being between two worlds. My favorite bigfoot channel, Swan Lake Bigfoot, has some of the best captures out there. Recently he was out in one of his spots and could hear and sense they were around and going through his footage later he caught one that was directly in front of him on his sunglasses yet he never saw it in person. He's been going back through a lot of his older footage and already found more in his sunglasses. Our thoughts, feelings, and intentions play a large role in having experiences with them. Last fall, my very first time actively searching for them, I found a road I'd been up many times before but with new eyes on the this topic I quickly realized it was littered with structures/tree glyphs and knew it was a great place to start. That first time, and everytime I visited over the next 6 weekends, I had encounters with them, all during hunting season on less. Instead of fearing them I put out feelings of peace, love, gratitude, acceptance, etc and told them my intentions, that I knew they existed, that I was fascinated with them, and that I just wanted some kind of encounter. I didnt carry a weapon, left out a gifting bowl and talked to them as if they were an old friend and asked them questions. Basically I tried to be as respectful as possible while in their home. I heard countless knocks, some very loud and close, and some in immediate response to questions I asked. Also heard vocals, lots of close footfalls and branches snapping, various animal mimicry, some kind of intense incredibly loud noise which was either a tree pushed over or a huge rock thrown from up high, as well as the whoosh and force of a large stick being thrown and it crashing into 3 different things before hitting the ground. They also took a huge stripped bite out of the middle of the apple I left, just like a human would only larger. I also dont think its a coincidence that the day I did multiple meditations to raise my vibrational frequency and to ground and connect to the earth/trees was the day I easily had the most activity.

Imagine getting a photo of Bigfoot and you post it and no one gives af 😂

I grew up with my grandparents, who built a log cabin on a hundred acres of woodland. I spent a lot of time in the woods, playing, hiking, riding go carts. I used to imagine what it would be like to happen across one of these spectacular creatures. I’ve always had the sense that they’re not usually violent in nature, just territorial and want to be left alone by us humans. Now that I’m older, I can totally understand why they might not want to engage with humans, being that we seem to destroy most things we come into contact with. But I would still love to sneak a peek at one!

Yeh the arms look very long ( longer than a human ), and yet the elbow remains in the middle of the arm, ruling out the possibility of a hoax. If hand extensions were used in a costume, then the elbow would appear higher up on the arm.

You only need to look at MK Davies' years of video analysis to see that Patty is the real deal.

Bigfoots helped my Blackfeet tribe defeat giants. Bigfoot is the watchers of this earth. Some Good watchers some bad.

Even if that picture is fake (the thumbnail that actually showed in the video😂), it's spot on to what I saw when I was a kid from my 2nd story bedroom window just a bit slimmer and more "youthful" to me. I lived next to a forest and I had trouble sleeping. He just seemed kind of teenager lanky even never seeing another I got the impression it was a young teenager, but still huge. I measured the tree it hugged, I think like 6' something but this was 30 years ago. I don't KNOW age or sex, but just got that feeling. It knew I was peeking after I noticed it. It hugged a huge 40+ foot tree at the edge of the forest preserve and made it sway far left and right slamming into the other trees. It's legs were spread like a huge person as it was very windy and the other trees were swaying in almost unison as they do, but this one was all the large hairy creature as it was just swinging wildly to and fro. It was a full moon or close to it with sparatic clouds so I got good light from 150 yards with then 15 15 vision. At the end of that it looked directly at me I'm even getting tingles now with those yellow eyes and I got scared and ducked away and never looked back. I had VERY good vision & I'm not crazy, I just saw a thing that changed how I look at the world from a young age that I will never forget and can see it like yesterday. I never told anyone then, I would've been put in a hospital. I played in those woods, but not for a while after that. Over the years when I was out there I heard sounds in the brush near me and from afar (no bears, not deer), got acorns thrown from over thick brush areas, once even a tree I was just whacking on with a hatchet was the next day broken a couple feet above my chopping. Just like splintered just broken, no scratch marks from an animal just snapped. I'll even say it, the "Thorn Creek Woods" area in Cook/Will county(s) in Illinois. The structure of the forest preserve system in Illinois is meant to allow and encourage wildlife to transverse the often densely populated Chicagoland area to maintain as much wildlife as possible. I later had farmer friends 45 minutes south that told me they were for sure real and were just whatever never really had a huge issue with them and it was rare to actually see one. The dogs just acted different they said, they also said something about it was a bad idea to leave them food but I don't remember why as this was 20 years ago. They were taller than the corn is what I was told, "well the adults anyway" yes there were kids. Infact the close friend, that's all she ever saw was once a kid about 4 feetish that when my friend screamed it dissappeared into the edge of the corn. Again, you just can tell by movement and just general body in most animals... the face especially in these instances. Her dad that died a few months later confirmed it, he didn't wanna talk about it but he said "yea they're there, don't fuck with them they won't fuck with you. I shot at one once but I don't think I hit it I was trying to scare it away. They don't like the dogs, I think they killed one for that and it was done." That kinda hit when he said that, he was a very no nonsense no bs guy. This is a random word vomit post I know, take it for what you want but my recollections are not imagined. I see pictures of bigfoot like creatures all the time like the others in this video, but rarely do I get inspired more driven to get it out. This was alot to type, my thumbs are cramping, but they are real, respect the forests. If you read this far, respect.

Since the footage hasn’t been debunked after all these years that should tell you something. For all you skeptics out there, please go to the areas where they’ve been spotted so you can see for yourself…

Why do you need 46 minutes to show a picture?

I know Bigfoot exists, but I’m honestly a bit skeptical with this photograph

Believe the Patty film is real, this new picture look like a drawing or computer image, not an actual live photograph. I've tried making my foot come up that high and flat like in the Patty film, no way could I. Damn near pulled my achilles trying to mimic it.

I wish the narrator would not refer to the Patterson Film as a “video.” Regardless of what you think of it, it was shot on 16mm movie film, not a video camera. There is a huge difference.

I’m a believer, and have been interested in them for years. My mind always seems to go the same questions many others have. What are they? Are they more Man than Ape? Why haven’t we been told that they’re real? How dangerous are they?

I was living off grid in a camp I built in the forest a little ways south of the Grand Canyon, right near the edge of one of the offshoot canyons that comes from the Grand Canyon. About once or twice a month something large would be walking around in the woods near my camp. I would step out, and whatever it was would hit the trunk of trees with a big rock it sounded like. Not throwing the rocks, but hitting one against the trunk of a tree repeatedly. It always seemed to be purposely to get my attention it felt like. I worked in the town of williams az a ways away and a native guy I worked with said I lived in Bigfoot territory when I told him where I was camped. I didn't say anything about Bigfoot before he said that. He said his tribe believes a Bigfoot lives in the Canyon area I was camped in.

Living in the PNW we have smelled that horrible smell. Seen foot prints, had rocks thrown at, and heard tree knocks.

What does everyone think about the Sierra sounds? 🌲

The horse fell on Patterson and pinned him to the ground? Let's just makes things up to make the story more dramatic.

Approximately 1970 my mom took me to our small town movie theater and we saw a movie about this , Ive been a fan ever since. Awesome mothers ❤

I believe they're real, but why the heck is the best video footage from 50+ years ago???? Makes no sense.

youre not doing yourself or the subjwct any favors by filling the video with AI bigfoot art @unexplained mysteries

I've seen three of these people one night a male a female and a child they were standing side by side with the child standing in front of the parents in a small birch tree stand by a creek my car car headlights caught them this was ten years ago in blountville Tennessee on a back road

Time mark 28:50... The encounter described is almost identical to my own encounter. Although their encounter happened in the UK, with a creature known as the "Kentish" (?) Mines creature, its description and its actions are eerily similar to what happened to me, in the far northeastern border of the US, not far from the Canadian border. It sounds as if their encounter happened in the 1940's, although the narrator doesn't state the year. But he does mention the "War effort" with the natural assumption being WW2 in the 1940's. Sadly, the elderly couple were only laughed at upon their reporting it. Over 60 years later, fearing the same reaction, I only told family and a few close friends of my encounter at the time, and even my friends laughed at the thought of it! When you experience something as traumatic as seeing one of these creatures as close as 20 feet away, and having a stare down with it as they did and I did as well, when someone laughs at the dreadful fear and PTSD you're suffering from, lets just say it puts a HUGE damper on wanting to tell anyone about your unfortunate experience again!!

I know they exist l saw one. The ignorant people that call them selves sceptics can't except that fact l feel sorry for them

Oh and another thing I would like everyone to think about seriously. Ask yourself do all human beings look alike?????? Well guess what if Bigfoot is real I'm pretty sure they are different heights different hair colors different weights walk different and all that maybe no 2 are alike unless they twins lol But I said that to say stop comparing one picture of Bigfoot to the next cuh I'm pretty sure they don't look anything alike at all

Are you the same people who also believe in God's, Devil's, Demons, Ghosts, and Angels?

"It's alive! It's alive! It's alive!".Jean Wilder 'Young Frankenstein '

What comes to my attention is how human his eyes are encircled in what appears to be human skin

That photograph is blurry as shit. But the pine tree looks good.

I've never heard a Bigfoot account where they said its face was completely covered with short fur except the eyes, nose and lips, like Patty. They also didn't say its mouth stuck out like a gorilla, they said it looked like a human face and had grey skin.

Why isn't that picture more famous though?

Arms aren’t long enough. Supposed photo is grainy and looks CG.

Ok, Big foot is real and does exist. But, what are they and how do they live and where did they come from?

My encounter was in 1965 when I was 8 years old , I remember it so clearly even at 66 years old even though the whole episode only lasted 30seconds or so ,

I think the photo could very well be genuine. It certainly has all the right hallmarks. I have no doubt these beings exist, so much so that I will never go into the deep woods again, due to an experience with one in 1986. What I'd like is to see or hear an interview with the person who the photo. That would tell us a great deal.

They are NOT primates. 2 sightings here. 2 different states. They are hominids from way back.

"I think bigfoot IS blurry, and thats the problem. Its not the photographers fault. Bigfoot is blurry, and thats extra scary to me." - Mitch Hedberg

He looks like starting fastfood diet

What I hate is when we get those idiots that make fun of the phenomenon. That just makes people think it's a joke. There are definitely fakes out there that are just looking to get attention, but this photo in this video looks like a super tall muscular ape like creature, Other than the Patterson/Gimlin photo. It's not that I believe 100% but I've seen too much for it not to be real.

Clearest Bigfoot Photograph In Existence Better Than The Patty Film? I think NOT! real video footage looks a hell of a lot better then sketches. 🙄 🧐

Looks AI generated

People often ask why we can't get any clear shots of Sasquatch. Consider this, the camera used by Patterson was not as advanced and did not use infrared light. The cameras used today do. All animals, even domestic animals, can see infrared from quite far away. Most animals avoid it for some reason.

This photo was probably snapped by a trailcam ,I think the sasquach would have seen a human before a person sees it.

Does he think nobody notices when the same exact portions of the video are repeated again in the same video....WTF

@14:05 . . . My arms hang down past mid-thigh just like Patty's. Am I A BIGFOOT??

If you look at the joints and areas where costume pieces would be attached, you can clearly see where they are fastened together and how the hair is just overly overlapped to hide it. Pretty much way over the top for what you'd expect. You look at the hips and thighs, the shoulder and OMG that big ass collar of fur poking up in the back of the neck, not to mention the poor comb over above it's ears. The dark and light areas makes it look to matted, to many glued on random uneven patches, like the worlds worst haircut. The squared off area around the eyes and nose, yet nothing around the mouth or nips.

I live in Maine. They definitely are here. People may ask "how come we don't see bodies?" Well, for the same reasons you don't randomly find a bear body in the woods. The only way you are going to find a bear body, is when a hunter takes one. You'll never randomly find a bear carcass. Never

The head is missing the sagittal crest that many other photos and videos have. The head seems too small and round. Interesting.

My biggest problem with the picture is that this elelusive creature that is such a masterful forester has unwittingly stepped right in front of some doufus's camera thirty feet away and doesn't even notice? It's a good picture, but I don't trust it. There will never be a good enough picture, I'm afraid.

Consider an individual with Hypertrichosis, a condition characterized by excessive hair growth, who chooses to live in seclusion. Historically, people with such conditions were often subjected to mistreatment and exploitation, being displayed in circuses as curiosities. If a person with Hypertrichosis were the first in their community to have this condition and lacked an understanding of it, they might perceive themselves as a creature of the wild rather than recognizing their condition as a medical anomaly. This self-perception could lead them to retreat into what they perceive as their natural habitat. Now, imagine a child with Hypertrichosis who is abandoned in the woods by their family. If this child somehow survives and grows to an impressive size, similar to that of Shaquille O'Neal, observers might interpret sightings of such an individual as evidence of a humanoid creature or an ape-like species avoiding human contact. This scenario could easily give rise to folklore and myths, such as those of Sasquatch, the Yeti, or Bigfoot, as societies create stories to explain these rare and enigmatic encounters.

0:38 that's an alleged juvenile sasquatch foot compared to a cast of an adult I believe. I haven't seen this comparison before! Love it...Amazing

They are not of our World..Just look at her face ..That’s either from a different Dimension or it Extraterrestrial , or they made them..Just my opinion..