Did you look into the study made by the university of Alaska to begin with?

This is 100% bs, shame on you in a nice but bad try misleading the population. Said by a guy with a top Mensa IQ and Sir Isaac Newton agrees.

Looking forward to this as so many people use WTC 7 as "proof" of a conspiracy. I don't get it personally as a collapse of two 110 story buildings would compromise the structure of buildings near by from the vibrations alone and that's ignoring falling debris and fire.

I'd suggest everyone to unsubscribe until he looks at the study made by the University of Alaska. It seems like the guy behind Lesics has become desperate for clicks.

FAIL ... it was NOT an actual university study BY the university ... but instead a PRIVATE COMMISSION by the morons of Richard Gages wee fourteen year old online pretend petition that PAID an ALREADY believe to find what he was PAID to find.@@ziad_jkhan

Haven't watched the video yet i wonder what's the context of why a hulk is represented in a 9/11 video

Trying to appeal to a younger audience and make a joke out of it so they don't realise they're being brainwashed.

@@truesurrealist i think you re digging a little too deep with this

@@ButterDog42069 there’s only dust to dig through, created by controlled demolitions . End of story

@@Matt-pt6rl watch a lecture by Dr Judy Wood and ask yourself if it was controlled demolition was the rubble pile big enough? Or thought exercise: how could you rig a 110 storey 1million ton building for demolition without a massive civil engineering undertaking that thousands would remember? Use your brains guys

will they dare?

You sound open minded

All those buildings were controlled Demolitions ! Done by you know who !

he should do a video on tower 5 how the center of the building was hallowed out but remained standing...

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/sLigdtp8t9SwYYE.htmlsi=VbgSC6B7oi-0ZPSS

And is just as much of a fictional cartoon as the entire video is! What a complete pile of BS- LIES LIES LIES!!!

These graphics suck lol

Swear it’s a total war animation as well

George Bush shouldn't have made the Hulk mad.

If you can acknowledge that trivializing one of the most important events in history is at best naive, that would be good for you. Do some research. Start with terms like building 7, thermite, Larry Silverstein, and NORAD.

Everyone talking about fake plants 🪴🪴🪴🪴🪴🪴🪴🪴🪴🫡🫡🫡

Okay. A LOT of work went into making this video talking about pure, unbelievable bullsh*t. Happy? Where did all the debris go? Did it melt into the earth?

​@@jpeterson1488 yes.

So crazy... the videos of the towers falling AT FREE FALL RATE, building 7, prove that were brought down with controlled explosions yet people just blindly believe what their told. Even the builders of the towers even said the buildings were designed to withstand 100 planes flying into them - what a world we live in...

No wonder why you started your life as a scientist and currently are a Uber driver 😂😂😂😂😂😂

Where did you get "current" from that sentence?@@Cailo4

@@Cailo4 🤣😆

And let me guess, you have 41 years of experience

Well stated and on point. Ppl still believe it was the planes, and according to majority of the know it alls I seen, was that supposedly a part of one of the towers fell onto building seven (even this CGI shows how the towers fell). It does not add up at all.

Debris from the WTC1 and WTC2 collapses damaged the buildings around them, including WTC7, and started major fires which were left to burn for seven hours. The heat weakened internal core steel columns in one part of the building failed vertically. And then the now unsupported adjacent columns failed laterally. The debris from the steel frame collapsing pierced the now freestanding outer shell near the base and it finally collapsed.

😂👏

ALL the columns in bldg 7 collapsed at the same time, not just the few which were hot from a fire. The columns which fireman were standing right next to just 5 minutes earlier were not surrounded by flames.

@@martoto77 LMAO🤣🤣🤣

‼️🪴🪴FAKE PLANT ALERT‼️‼️🪴🪴

What does fake plant alert mean?

@BenMosesGames I share in your skepticism

Benmoses, it’s called the nutter conundrum.

@@dikranovichk5889DIGGLER PLEASE ‼️‼️‼️

The planes engines blew through the towers. Heavy components took out or distorted many core columns, the others descended by being dragged down by the external walls _through_ the top hat truss. It was my first thought too - but I am an engineer . . . and thought again.

I did not expect that Gmod💩! 😏

Certainly “seems” logical. Yet the inconvenient truth remains. Never forget even the experienced news casters that day said the phrase “controlled demoIition”

The steel core remained for a few minutes before also giving out, likely from joints no longer being within tolerance and also falling like a house of cards. You can see it happen in real time with the NBC coverage of the collapse. Once the smoke clears a little bit, you can clearly see the cores failure.

@@CoercedJab what a difference the words *_like a_* make when omitted . . . 😎

Fire will do that…

@@catfishcave379No it won’t.

@@johnbruce4003 So Sorry, it was Col Mustard in the conservatory with building demolition caps. I was stupid to believe all the footage of the roaring fires and several partial collapses. When facts get in the way - go conspiracy!

​@@catfishcave379fire makes controlled free fall demolition? No need for explosions then?

@@pse2020 Bingo! Spot on... fire can't create a free fall collapse of that building. To those who doubt: then why did the construction crane NOT melt, that was closer to the Towers than Bldg 7? Yet B7 collapses?? We need an explanation that includes the obvious use of demolitions. You are spot on.

I get a sickening feeling when I see three videos . The first Is of the towers exploding into dust as they fall from the sky . The second and most revolting Is Larry Silverstein confessing to his part in ordering the demolitions . Lastly this video and it’s farcical attempt to change what we all saw on 9/11

It also takes a "special" kind of person to destroy such things.

@@jkm1611 Larry Silverstein confessed to it. He wasn’t that special , sociopathic maybe

As somebody who works in construction, You get used to it pretty quick, also we follow monumentally detailed safety programs. As long as you're practicing basic situational awareness you'll be fine.

Balls. It takes people with balls. The female workers have to have balls too.

My dad worked across the street delivering to WTC1 and WTC2 frequently, he quit 6 months before the towers collapsed. I was 5

Having survived 9/11 only because of a layoff… wow, I would imagine that was probably life-changing for you! I never worked in the towers but whenever I was on foot in the city, I would stop to look up at the tops of them. Even from a block away, I would have to bend my neck and arch my back to the point that it felt as if I were looking up at something BEHIND me in the sky!

How do you know somebody worked in the WTC buildings? Don’t worry they’ll tell you.

Unless, you know.

@TheNJDirector I don't know you but I'm glad to be able to read your comment. Thank God you made it. Go have a amazing year(s).

Thats because he was not contacted/funded by the feds so he was free to use his brain.

Really? Apparently your professor never heard of progressive collapse or maybe he made his misinformed comments before seeing videos that clearly show the floors pancaking into the basement.

@@marcpowell5893 Watch the actual video. The building collapses from the bottom, not the top. The top of the building in intact until it hits the ground. debunking the pancake theory.

@@marcpowell5893 And the buildings were designed to withstand an impact of an airliner.

@@scottcraig2569 The graphics in this video are flakey but the theory it mentions is fairly accurate. After collapse initiation, the connections of the floors to the columns progressively failed resulting in the floors pancaking. That is what caused the sequential dust and debris ejections from windows seen in multiple videos. Claims by designers that the buildings could withstand aircraft impacts without severe damage were merely engineering hubris. The buildings obviously could not.

🪴🪴🪴🪴🪴

@@Matt-pt6rl You already said that, oh, your "supervisors" are REALLY mad at you, huh?

@@mooneyes2k478🪴🪴🪴🍕

open air designs turned out to be more uncomfortable in an office environment one look in the wrong direction and suddenly your presence in the room becomes very awkward this incentivizes workers to keep their eyes glued to the screen and use privacy filters on their monitors

I am amazed how few people seem to have noticed it

@@WildMatsu the live footage shows shattered steel beams being jettisoned away from the towers as they explode into dust as they fall during the demolitions on 9/11 . This video doesn’t explain this phenomenon

@@Matt-pt6rl Did the steel beams sound like Destruction_Metal_Pole_L_Wave_2_0_0.wav when they hit the ground?

@@WildMatsu I’m half deaf so I only noticed that steel beams had been reduced to stick sized pieces as they flew into the air . The pulverizing concrete had created such a wave of dust as the towers fell that it almost hid the steel fragments shooting sideways from the collapse

Getting seventy likes for such a useless comment is crazy fake. Nice avatar. I have one just like it on FB.(A jet couldn't demolish a wrecking ball.)

I’m so sorry to hear of your loss. I visited NY for the first time this summer and saw the WTC memorial. It was nice how they did it and of course has all the names of those who were lost. her memory will live on. Stay safe

I’m sorry to hear of your loss. I hope there’s a real investigation because of people just like your granddaughter. This video is a lie and a slap in the face to her, you and all of us who really care about what happened that day. People need to hear the real truth before it’s lost in history and forever a lie.

@@NickkaDUB dude you have no humanity in you right? They are sharing their experience about how they lost a relative, which is very tragic, and you're here just spewing your conspiracy theory? Shame on you. Also, saying "no uh, this is a lie!" after the video shows and demonstrates with ALOT of evidence how the tower may have collapsed, just shows how purposely ignorant you are.

I'm so deeply sorry for your loss of your granddaughter. Kind regards from Copenhagen, Denmark.

I hope the collapse of te towers didnt collapse your heart. R.I.P.

The video does, but not very well since it is both obvious and not that important. Pay special attention at #10. 1. Plane hits building causing massive structural damage. The plane is completely destroyed in a fraction of a second, but this in no way implies no damage to the building. Large fires break out across multiple floors simultaneously with no fire fighting or fire suppression in an unprecedented fire event. 2. What happens to steel when you heat it? The steel gets softer. The longer you heat it and the hotter it gets the steel starts to _bend_ 3. Bent steel is not as strong as straight steel. 4. The steel floor trusses start to bend (sag) from the heat and the weight of the concrete floors, furniture and equipment. 5. Sagging floor trusses pull some of the surviving perimeter (outside) columns inward, causing them to bow by up to five feet. 6. Bent steel is not as strong as straight steel. 7. The perimeter columns bend until they buckle (best seen in the Gary Pollard video of the South Tower collapse linked in the description above). 8. Columns - which carry ALL of the gravity loads - above and below the failure point are *no longer aligned* 9. The falling upper mass drops _past the columns_ below, NOT onto them. THIS BIT IS IMPORTANT!!! 10. Tens of thousands of tons of debris falls _down_ through the open office space *within the four outer walls* . As that debris hits the next floor, that floor fails when the pair of bolts connecting each truss to the core and perimeter columns shear off. The debris then falls the next 12 feet with the mass of the newly failed floor added to it and hits the next floor, which fails. Rinse and repeat x90. This proceeds through all the floors one by one until the floors are all gone. 11. Rate of collapse increases as the collapse progresses. The collapse accelerates from zero, slows only very slightly with the first impact, speeds up again (this time not from a starting point of zero) and as the momentum and mass increases, the slow down with each impact decreases. There was exactly as much resistance as there should have been. _average_ rate of collapse for this stage was 0.65 of GA. 12. The perimeter columns, no longer attached to the rest of the building and thus lacking critical lateral support fall away - peel. 13. The central core columns, damaged by the falling debris and with no lateral support from the perimeter columns fall last. 14. The Twin Towers were an integrated structure. None of the three major components - core system, perimeter columns and long-span floor truss systems - could survive without the others.

Yea... he also conveniently left out the fact both buildings had 2 reinforcement sections that were there specifically for this purpose. Look at pictures when the towers were standing and you can see where they were

He does at 9:58 he said the floors above the damaged area weighed as much as the titanic. The only problem is in the animation after it looks like the building is collapsing from ground level when in reality it collapsed from the top down.

Fake comment by Fitz

@@Matt-pt6rl Stupid comment by you.

@@mooneyes2k478at least I never accused the FDNY of complicity in Silverstein’s DemolitionDerby on 9/11

@@Matt-pt6rl Incidentally, repeating the same stupid shit in multiple places doesn't make it any less stupid, you are aware of this, right?

@@mooneyes2k478your thousands of replies proves your point!!

Absolutely true, so there will be more death people in the near future linked with this disaster than actually on paper

Most of the fire retardant spray on material is asbestos material. I’m not sure if it’s still in use today but it’s literally everywhere and not just spray foam insulation but loads of other materials as well.

Yup, they were told they had to update the buildings prior to 9/11. The cost was estimated at morethan the two towers' value. The owner made around 4 billion in insurance when they fell as well.

You are incorrect. Only the North Tower had any asbestos in it at all and only below the 40th floor. The SFRM used in the rest of the North Tower and ALL of the South Tower contained no asbestos material. Plenty of toxins floating around that site. Why people have to just jump to assumptions about asbestos and ignore true and relevant facts boggles my mind.

The construction companies that built the towers was owned by the Italian mafia they pocketed the money that the building developers gave to them and brought CHEAP METAL NOT STEAL !!!!….

same bro

What? 91 years of being a structural engineer in college? You’re like 110 and never graduated?

See people, _that_ is how you troll.

how much did the tower weigh and the jet.. concrete. how can an alluminum balloon jet destroy iron steel and concrete the heat energy from the jet fuel can be measured in the external fireball image. that fact then determines the heat energy within the building u explain that the material within the building was fuel to expand the fire damage melting at some point all the heat energy was absorbed from then un burned frame.. same effect at the pentagon why no destruction there? next time your got nothing to do look at an image of the pentagon and a ukraiin missel striking a building.. the lies shankswberg pa no piece of anything look at images of plane crashes there is stuff everywhere no cameras laughable

@@cmike956 - Never heard of punctuation or sentence structure, eh?

Yep. You and I must be masochists cause I’ve been watching 9/11 documentaries all day.

You don’t think because you didn’t watch . Your pain is as nonsensical as your comment

@@Matt-pt6rl ??????

@@ref8632 watch the demolitions if you’ve got ?????

@@Matt-pt6rl if it was a demolition or not doesn't have anything to do with feeling disturbed by the tragedy of the people that died.

That was not the purpose of that demonstration. FFS 🤦‍♂🤦‍♂

​@@KZfaqSucks_1

‼️🪴‼️FAKE PLANT ALERT

That wasn't the point of that demonstration. To be clear, I know the official report is not an adequate explanation and that there are multiple weird falsehoods in the official story, so I'm not criticizing you for the implication of a conspiracy, I'm criticizing you for being dumb.

@@levicraig6016 - Please list the alleged _multiple weird falsehoods in the official story_ and explain why _the official story_ (by which I presume you mean The NIST Twin Towers Building Performance Report) is _not an adequate explanation_ given its mandate. I won't wait up,

I believe he meant fly them into buildings on purpose like gigantic cruise missiles. The engineers were thinking more along the lines of an accident.

@@lurch789I’d rather have to Bush’s than the tard we have now

It was assumed until that day that when terrorists hijack a plane, they do it to use the passengers as bargaining leverage - they want something and will trade passengers to get it. That is why the standard procedure for passengers was to not try to fight the hijackers: you are worth more to the hijacker alive than dead, unless you start to cause problems for them. So what was not imagined was terrorists hijacking a plane not to get the passengers but to get the plane itself. This is why the 9/11 terrorists chose flights that typically had low passenger volumes. As soon as the passengers on United Flight 93 found out that they were not being taken hostage, but that the terrorists were going to kill everyone, the calculus changed and they heroically fought back. They gave their lives to save those at whatever the fourth target was. We all know now that if we are on a plane that someone tries to hijack, we all get out of our seats and overwhelm the hijackers with superior numbers.

@@Murph_gaming They defiantly had terrorism concerns at the time of construction. That still doesn't mean they thought it would happen.

Well presidents don't always know history very well. Remember our current president said cannons were illegal when the 2a was written, which is wrong cannons always and still are legal. They are just elected officials and not always the smartest people.

Lmao hulk 2003

Gee, so happy I had a cartoon character demonstrate that for me.

Seems more credible than the explanation in this video.

​@@sulandelemere Pffft!!! Facts don't matter, eh?

More believable than the official narrative tbh

What the f... are you talking about?

@@ThomasDanielsen1000 watch the video, around the 10min mark he says the weight of the building kept increasing as it collapsed.

@@J.T.19134 That's the weight of the COLLAPSING PART of the tower that increases!! God, is it so hard to grasp???

the buildings didn't get heavier as they collapsed. Wtf are you going on about?

OK, so misunderstood. Didn't know there was so many engineers on KZfaq. Still doesn't make sense, IMO. If the top 15 floors collapsed, causing catastrophic damage to the floor below, OK, but thats 1 floor, even say 5 floors. If the trusses where compromised by the plain, then the fire, heat rises, so what exactly made the bottom half not hold up, youse are saying the weight along of each floor collapsed the next??

and why the boss had an appointment at that day and why was there a new ensurance for a asbestos soaked building?

See, this is what totally made me realize that it was planned. You're telling me, a giant skyscraper, which burned for about 7 hours, just collapses? There wasn't even smoke or anything like that billowing out, and the skyscraper that caught fire in Hong Kong, didn't collapse despite it burning for 9 hours, and it was a lot less wider than WTC 7, which other buildings around did catch some fire, but were okay. Can't make this nonsense up, two trillion dissapeared on the same day as well? Yeah, what a conspiracy, the government would never do anything wrong to the people.

@@SquidCena where are the turbines? Where is any debris at the Pentagon?

Finally someone else asked this question besides me.

Lesics is doing a video on WTC 7 next. (Spoiler alert: It collapsed due to fire.)

Did you notice that he is wielding a scimitar. It was the curved sword used by arabs during warfare.

@@AlbanSombreval8686💀

@@AlbanSombreval8686

*Evil Tobey McGuire music*

I didnt even notice that the first time I saw it and now I cant stop laughing

I was looking for this

😂😂

Sounded like it was in French

Ik

@@kimmys2982me too

My condolences on your loss.

@@mooneyes2k478 thank you! It was hell watching him go through 2 rounds of chemo/radiation and 2 surgeries, only to see it destroy his immune system and keep coming back. He's not in pain anymore, but he had to be in constant pain in order to be free of it.

@@bronwentillman8385 Cancer is the modern plague, and it crushes not only the victim but those around them.

Death is a temporary state: Job:14:12-15: So man lieth down, and riseth not: till the heavens be no more, they shall not awake, nor be raised out of their sleep. O that thou wouldest hide me in the grave, that thou wouldest keep me secret, until thy wrath be past, that thou wouldest appoint me a set time, and remember me! If a man die, shall he live again? all the days of my appointed time will I wait, till my change come. Thou shalt call, and I will answer thee: thou wilt have a desire to the work of thine hands. Ec:3:20: All go unto one place; all are of the dust, and all turn to dust again. Ec:12:7: Then shall the dust return to the earth as it was: and the spirit shall return unto God who gave it. Ec:9:10: Whatsoever thy hand findeth to do, do it with thy might; for there is no work, nor device, nor knowledge, nor wisdom, in the grave, whither thou goest. This vid is one of the first ones to start linking companies that were in the WTC: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/g7mpeadmltyyj2g.html&pp=ygUUd2hvIHNob3Qgam9obiBvJ25laWw%3D WKJO: Who Killed John O'Neill?

😓

공격자들은 타워에 들어갈 수 있는 가장 큰 비행기를 고속으로 추락시켰습니다. 그 이후에 일어난 일은 그 이후에 일어났습니다.

​@@KZfaqSucks_1

​@@KZfaqSucks_1Why don't you translate your "expert" explanations of the collapse of the tierrsc& wtc7. I'm sure the OP would appreciate you going to such effort to give them a good laugh.

@@shillhunter4380

🪴🪴🪴🪴🪴‼️‼️

My observations as well.

Yeah.. It's hard to animate the steel core failing for no reason. :) Lets just sink it all into the ground.. nailed it

This is completely inaccurate. This video is actively engaging in the Terr orism.

Exactly, none of the animations match reality.

Naysayers refuse to acknowledge that fact the the interior of the structure was moving and collapsing at a different rate than the exterior exoskeleton. Because of this oversight, conspiracy theories abound by feeble and shallow minds and will continue to do so in perpetuity.

Shhhhhh.... you'll wake the sheep.

Because two entire towers fell onto it? And the jet fuel didn't melt the beams, but the beams still became more malleable by the heat. Metal doesn't just instantly transform from cold to melted, it slowly weakens. The beams got hot and became easier to bend, which allowed the weight of the building and the plane to put enough pressure on them for them to snap.

Bingo! I bet you he doesn't have an answer.

Anybody who passed grade school physics classes has the answer.@@rickyt11

It was loaded with backup diesel generators. Once WTC 7 was hit by the collapse, a fire started and spread to the fuel storages.

Clear and informative cartoon?

@@malachi- It was an animation illustrating what happened, not a cartoon!

@@ThomasDanielsen1000 Why are you so defensive... hmmm....

@@malachi- Well what do you think? Probably because I'm paid by the CIA...

Very clear and informative? it shows them colapsing from the bottom at ground level, this shite will be allowed to stay up for ever by the powers that be and it is not even correct

Interesting observation: It took hours for people to move between the same locations that took seconds for some inert object to move through itself, even though the force created by an accelerated mass is only applicable between locations (MxA=F); because the path of greatest resistance is always through oneself, whether it's as poorly constructed as a pillar of cigarette ash or as strongly constructed as a wrecking ball.

Fake plants 🪴🪴comment and reply

“Never trust the fake plant 🪴” is what the firefighters say

@@liarfire101 Ohh ffs, so now it's suspicious that a building collapses faster than people can evacuate a building? Just when you thought twoofers couldn't get any dumber...

@@ThomasDanielsen1000 *Just when you thought twoofers couldn't get any dumber* 👍

I noticed that too. Very strange.

Nano Thermite

@@feralzi8930 did you watch the video

It looks like they didnt actually animate a collapse they just made the model move down and have ruble move upwards from the ground

@@vuurkip2491 i did watch the video but but you know what's very strange is that the towers were engineered so that it can withstand a 707 crash. You think fuel from 707 coming from the middle east will have a tank full of fuel? Most of the fire exits through the hole the plane makes and some of the fuel can spill out. So it's dumb and illogical to say that just plane fuel can collapse a building after 1 hour of the towers withstanding it. There is definitely external interference occuring that cause the building to basically freefall

Know that the whole tower turned to dust. Not only the asbestos.

Why were the towers dustified on the way down instead of instead of in giant floor sections and walls like a normal pancaking collapse? Why did everyone in the lobby and basement report bombs having gone off prior to the planes hitting?

@@Turdfergusen382 Yeah, especially the core, just one tube standing there? ...

There were 100,000 tons of steel in each tower. Even without the insulation how hot could the core columns get in two hours? Where is the data on the tons of steel and tons of concrete on each level? Including the 6 basement levels.

@@psikeyhackr6914 Well I’m not sure how…. But somehow hot enough to be molten metal in a pile at the bottom for three months after even though they were spraying water on it constantly….

damn why didnt u born before bro

So this is all your fault. You got blood on your hands

So you’re responsible for 9/11

So Leslie Robertson didn't design for a 767 to fly into the buildings at 500mph. You're saying the man is a failure?

Bro, the buildings were designed fine and it was impressive they lasted how long they did. No architect or engineer designs a building to withstand an airplane crash.

The animations and statements are unfactual in several cases does that matter at all? Or what makes all the sense to you?

@@spookedspooks Better to remain silent than remove all doubt....bro.

@@BonsaiBurner what are you even saying)

That's some deep meme knowledge and pattern recognition.

@@Materialisimo DUDE THERE IS NO WAY TH ACTUAL MATERIALISIMO REPLIED, DUDE YOURE MY IDOL

@@Materialisimo I remember watching your MLG edits on my grandpa's Sony VAIO 2009 PC with windows XP as a kid, simpler times :'D

@@Materialisimooh my god there is no way (you posted some of the best videos ever)

one of the most tragic events in american history, not human history ;)

Thought it was 5 dancing Israelis

@@HK00088dog whistle

Jesus had Moses raise his staff and poof. Jonah tried warning everyone before hand, but nobody listened.

well eyewitnesses of Jehovah say it was Godzilla

@@kendexter Godzilla is REAL unlike god

you can blame your own government - RIP

thank you Silverstein jew phuck and thank you Bush... deep state keeps effing us over. buckle up for more

@@vaughnmcintire4015 > *"you can blame your own government"* You mean for not identifing the terrorists before they committed the 9/11 terrorist attack?

@@BullToTheShit no, he means blaming cia for sponsoring terrorists.

@@BullToTheShit I talked to civilian pilots - they all said that such a maneuver is very complicated - the probability that they would hit the center of the building with their plane - is very small. Everyone claims that the pilots were incredibly skilled - where did the terrorists train the pilots, and on what planes ?

Just one passport, found blocks away on the street along with thousands of other items that had been blown out of the North Tower _during the impact_ of Flight 11 - such as Lisa Frost's Air Miles card. Odd how no one ever brings that up.

Obviously planted.. they couldn’t even find the black boxes

​@@KZfaqSucks_1😂

@@rikomanaro It's amazing what you can find, when you're "specifically" looking for it.

Such believable evidence of ...well you know.

I'd like to see you explain your comment. Why do you think a plane cannot fly close to the ground....you suggesting they don't take off or land? No money was missing but go ahead and try and logically explain that theory. Explain how the largest robbery in world history took place and not a single person gives a $hit and looking for the money? Explain why a plane would be needed to cover it up?

2.3 trillion.

@@Shamino1 and now they've 'lost' another 4.6 trillion. The military has the worst accountants

the 2.3 trillion announced missing the day before 9/11

we are just conspiracy theorist...even if there was 80% of the plane missing. also jet fuel just this time melted steel beams...

🤣🤣

godzilla is kind ! ... (but the vast majority of muslims are kind too, maybe that was your point.)

Godzilla would definitely be more plausible than this theory.

@@patheticmediastudios8868lol the whole US airforce couldn't knock them buildings down. So they called Luke Skywalker out 😂🤣😂🤣

Well he made a video so there is no need for further questions.

That's impressive, considering there was no such thing as a 747 when the towers were built. Not to mention, of course, that no-one has ever, before or after, "specifically designed" for anything of the sort.

No it was not designed to handle a 747. How do you even design a skyscraper to "handle a 747"??? Why do you twoofers lie constantly?

people believing the official story are clinically stupid and don't understand physics.

It’s called weight and gravity

it was so "hot" that there were survivors from within the impact location. The extreme heat is bullshit. All jet fuel burned up in the fireball on impact.

3 towers…. Never forget..

​@@Matttskikzfaq.info/get/bejne/kKtmibihuM3caYU.htmlsi=_LayOZ3ma2Mkx9S6

the dancing israelis didn't find it surprising

Minoru Yamasaki was the architect of wtc, and he was notorious for designing buildings with catastrophic flaws.

The Towers were NOT concrete reinforced.

Again, one of you "truthers" fails in their premise, therefore making any conclusion laughably false. *World trade center towers did not have any reinforced concrete.* They were made of steel plate boxes (down to quarter inch thin at upper floors) and I-beams, all sprayed with loosely adhering fire retardant foam. Upper floors had original, asbestos based, crumbly foam. Scenario where heavy airplanes at full speed hit the buildings and initiate a sudden multistorey fire fueled by office combustibles was WAY BEYOND THE SAFETY DESIGN LIMITS and the fact they stood for so long goes to show how well they were designed. Contrary to this video's false idea, any other classical steel building with evenly spaced columns would fall very fast or almost immediately from the impact alone.

@@Cpt.PickHardThat is pure slander and idiocy. Yamasaki was the architect, not the structural engineer. You don't even know what those jobs are.

Why would you think that...the accent?

@@BonsaiBurner ????

You are the fakest plant ‼️‼️‼️🪴🪴🪴🪴out there

Yeah.... that wouldn't make any sense.

@@TheMiddleClassholes ‼️🪴‼️🪴‼️🪴 FAKE PLANT ALERT ‼️

Explain the 52 story build that free fell with no plane hitting it or jet fuel?

What the hell does that even mean-@@hiddenintheshadows530

​@@hiddenintheshadows530Your comment had no correlation to his comment. Typical.

Even more genius: alu plane crashing steel columns.

​@hiddenintheshadows530 The fuck you mean? There are literally photos of wtc7 on fire, and also why comment here, there's other videos that you can spread your message.

Indeed so. Another consideration is that the 767 is very similar in both size and weight to the largest of the Boeing 707's - the intercontinental version. In fact, at the fuel loads of the two airplanes that hit the WTC, their weight would have been around the same as, or a bit less than, that of a fully loaded 707. Although the 767 is a twin aisle airplane, and thus has a slightly wider fuselage, it is fairly close to the overall size of the 707 dimensionally. So the testing done during the development of the WTC was not as far off the mark as many may think.

@@anthonyvallillo422 theyre not the same planes.

Of course. My point is that they are very close in size and weight.

But yet the engine that landed on Murray st. Was not from a 767 😂

@@thatonesnowboarde and you cannout get any of those videos anymore, they have all been erased, you know the ones

Fight, flight, freeze, and fawn... the four categories of fear response. I personally fall in the freeze type, unfortunately

@@mikero6225DIGGLER PLEASE ‼️‼️‼️

Joan you seem to be more of a fake plant 🪴 than a physics student

So Leslie Robertson is a lair?

No they were not! No civilian building in the world is or can be made to withstand being hit by a 130 ton airliner moving at mach 0.5

[rest of my comment]: Nice gaslighting!

its made of aluminum for all the dis believers out there

Exactly lightweight rigid aluminium firm ridged perfect for fly but on impact to mega thick steel columns it would just crumple how did the huge steels collapse faster than a pool ball falling it just doesn't make sense how a demolition expert can say it was a perfect demolition all on its own

That one stayed intact. The one in Pennsylvania and the one in DC vaporized. Hmmm.

Yeah, this vid is BS. Too many things signifies so.

This is because this whole thing is fake. There were 100s of reasons exposing the whole thing as a lie. What crashed into the towers was not the passenger jets. If you dig in you find reason after reason after reason the official story was a fake. Perhaps the easiest to listen to was the air hostess who deduced from the clues given what actually did happen to the passengers and where they were taken.

And IRL too. Even the tips of the wings were able to slice through structural steel, if you like lesics, believe the official story.

@@JohnSmith-pn1vv the 9/11 conspiracy theory is the most cringe thing to ever happen...

@@edofluit6568 12 seconds means free fall speed which is impossible for a structure. Clearly the building did not fall, no debris on the ground. We can see that it actually turned to dust starting at the top.

You have to be fully retarded to believe the narrative of Building 7 and the pentagon strike narrative… every single physics/structural engineering model shows that the only way building 7 collapsed was by the simultaneous failure of all the supports, and multiple witnesses reported hearing a sequence of explosions. If you believe the “non-conspiracy” explanation of building 7 then YOU are the actual conspiracy theorist man.

Exactly, it is an explination on what happened that will be seen for ever on YT and it shows the buildings cloapsing from the bottom at ground level

@@EssentialComment the only video worse than this is the cowardly blacksmith who allows comments on every video he makes except for his shameless shill for the farcical collapse narrative

Agreed. It's so obvious that it may be a limitation of the simulation software.

thats your only problem? The nose of the plane contains Radar equipment and is literally the weakest part of the plane and she shows it slide right like a jackrabbit on a date. This is not physics, this is narrative.

@@uselessagent7342 They should have made the planes with passport materials. Very strong!

@@uselessagent7342 This was a simulated illustration, not a recorded documentary. If you focus on the minor imperfections you will lose sight of the larger and more important points. I understand your point about the radar dome. However, that dome had 120 tonnes of airplane right behind it.

Great video

Average metal pipe 219x6 enjoyer

🗿

🗿

🗿

🗿

Whoooooops! That's an uncomfortable topic

_"Would love to hear how the wings and engines magically evaporated without a trace or leave any mark on the building "_ You can see damage and walls blown in to the left and right of the fuselage hole. Look at some photos.

Cruise missile I have the footage

Or even better - if the temps were high enough to evaporate titanium and steel (approx 4000 degrees), how did they get DNA samples identifying the passengers (which evaporate at 500 degrees) ??

or : why do all conspiracy theorists use the same picture while there are quite a few showing the trace was actually big, like the size of a plane !

Damn Elsagate infiltrating them education videos!

💀💀💀💀

It’s about as realistic as the towers collapsing due to a “controlled demolition” as some weirdos like to believe.

@@MrSoccerball100 “EX PLOS IVE EVI DENCE: “EX PERTS SP EAK OUT”. Then let’s talk.

​@MrSoccerball100 you are saying that thousands of building engineers with decades of experience in their field are weirdos? They signed letter with thousands of signatures stating that official report is simply a lie. Aluminum plain can't make holes in steel like that and jet fuel can't do what they say. Put patriotism aside and use just your brain. How the h... did wtc 7 collapsed???? Same as both towers?? Wasn't hit by plain ,Wasn't splashed with furl and still managed to go down in free fall,pancake in 4 seconds..common man😂😂

I wonder if 9/11 was a follow up attack that was successful 🤔 and why do you think the twin towers were targeted? Probably because they hold so many people.

The FBI literally supplied him the bomb.

I'm not sure I would agree with that.

@@WHATISTRUTHTVTrue.

a LOT more to the kill count if it fell sideways...

​@WHATISTRUTHTV They wanted to hurt New York, Not cripple it. Would have ruined the financial centers falling through through the city

There is no convincing explaining of how they went down just like a planned destruction. And thats both of them

@@WHATISTRUTHTV Anybody with the word 'truth' in their username ironically seem to have zero concern for truth, only conspiracy. Why is that? The terrorists never thought the towers would fall so what do you mean, fell as planned? Are you one of these crackpots who thinks this was a controlled demolition against the word of literally every demolition expert on the planet? Lol, but you guys know better 😉👍🏽

💀

💀

thats what happened

the one that left a 16ft hole before the roof collapsed?

@@10percent4DaBigGuyThe pentagon has the most cameras on a building in the world. Proof it and release the images. They won’t, because you know why…

That was a missile

The shame of this video! So insulting

A missile flew over DC? Nobody saw it? You are aware, like the busiest hwy on the east coast goes right past the pentagon?

He's a bastid

Yes it did, due to severe structural damage from being hit by the North Tower collapse, whose penetrating flaming debris started fires in World Trade Center 7, fires which NYFD realized they could not control, and would not control due to fear of the building possibly being mortally damaged. Fire weakened the steel in WTC7 just as it did in the twin towers.

And he also said if u "WATCHED" til the END!!! You would of heard him say "wtc 7" collapse will b covered next week so all will b explained!!!

Suicide not allowed

Wrong, I remember seeing a complete explanation of how it happened from engineers a year or so after it happened. Not sure if it was on the Science Channel or Discovery Channel. Pretty much every explanation in this video was the same as the the one that I watched back then.

@@MrMADMILO69 It was in 2006. A NOVA presentation on PBS.

🤣@@Ed_Stuckey

@@baird5776mullet I made no comment on the veracity, only the source.

A highly ranked funded comment praising this propaganda piece. Nice.

Detailed? Steel buildings don't collapse onto themselves like a house for cards.

😮​@@WillConley

@@Riley_rolo This pice of shite showed it colapsing from the bottom at ground level, they are trying to re write the event

@@EssentialComment notice the OP never responded? This comment section is a greenhouse of fake plants! 🪴🪴🪴🪴🪴🪴, don’t waste a keystroke on it . Buildings don’t turn into dust midair and debris piles aren’t 99%dust from building collapses.

They didn't, but why does that matter?

@@KZfaqSucks_1 His name is Minoru Yamasaki & yes, he did. All it takes to verify that is a simple google search.

@@KZfaqSucks_1 it matters because the Empire State Building wasn't designed to do that, yet when it was hit with a plane, it's structure wasn't compromised. The twin towers were both designed specifically to withstand that, & both of them collapsed in free-fall speed. Not to mention the steel structure of building 7 which also collapsed in free-fall speed because it was... hit by debris?? Also, the black boxes melted, but the passports somehow survived the point of impact You can make all the cool animations you want, but none of it makes any sense to anyone with a functioning brain.

@@bobbyd6040 - Not what I asked. What do you mean by _designed the Towers to withstand a jetliner collision_ ? What sort of jetliner in what scenario? What about the Towers was specifically designed for that circumstance? What bearing does any of that have on the 9/11 attacks, particularly since both Towers obviously survived the jetliner _impacts_ ? Doesn't the fact both Towers were still standing after the impacts mean they survived the jetliner collision, that there are other factors at play in Twin Towers collapse besides impact damage alone? What are those other factors. No whataboutisms or deliberately evasive off-topic derails please. Just answer the questions posed. And since I already know the answers, no 🐂💩. If you start just making shit up, pulling it out of your ass _I will know_ I eagerly await your evasive non-answers.

@@bobbyd6040 - The Titanic was supposed to be unsinkable and the Twin Towers should withstand the _impact_ of a commercial jet (whatever that means). Are you baffled when grazing an iceberg sank the Titanic as you are with the Twin Towers collapsing after being hit by a plane each? For the record: *The Twin Towers were never **_designed_** to withstand any sort of aircraft impact, however one may choose to define that* (and there are many ways to define what that actually means). This was not a requirement of the customer or of NYC building code and you will see no mention of it in the building plans. What is true (apparently) is the _accidental_ impact of a jet lost in fog while on landing approach (light and slow) was studied at a crude level in a 3-page memo of hand-worked calculations. What was NOT studied was what happened on 9/11/2001 the intentional high-speed Kamikaze attack by a much larger aircraft moving at full tilt. This crude study was performed AFTER primary design work on the Twin Towers had been was completed (after the time for any major changes was past), with the precedent being an _accidental flight collision_ along the lines of the July 1945 Empire State Building crash. The scenario studied was a narrow-body Boeing 707 (then the largest aircraft in service) on landing approach (light and slow - about 200 mph and low fuel load) lost in fog. This study did NOT consider the 9/11 scenario of a larger, heavier and high fuel load wide-body passenger jet being intentionally accelerated to maximum speed in a kamikaze attack. Those are two very different animals. The calculations and methodologies used in the original airplane impact analysis circa about 1964 have not been found. We have only anecdotal accounts that they were done and what they concluded. So exactly what impact dynamics and damage the Twin Towers were expected to withstand can not be determined. However, given the rudimentary nature of modeling capabilities in the 1960’s (calculations done by hand with pencil and slide rule, not 3D computer graphics and AI), it is doubtful that the analysis would have been conclusive and, at any rate, it did not include the effects of _the resultant fires which are what ultimately brought down the Towers_ . Such effects are exceptionally difficult, expensive and time consuming to model even today and at any rate, given the 1964 scenario would not have informed us much about the very different circumstances of 9/11/2001. As Leslie Robertson, the lead engineer on the Twin Towers building project said after 9/11: _To the best of our knowledge, little was known about the effects of a fire from such an aircraft, and no designs were prepared for that circumstance. Indeed, at that time, no fireproofing systems were available to control the effects of such fires_ . For some reason *this part is always ignored by conspiracists* They bang on about “designed for impact”, forgetting to note they were not designed for the subsequent multi-floor fires. And there is the rub. Collapse of the Twin Towers was due to just one factor (physical damage from aircraft impact) but to four (4) factors, of which commenters all too commonly only consider one, maybe two, but _never_ all four. Impact Damage does not = collapse. Both Towers survived the _impacts_ obviously. Fire does not even = collapse. Not by itself. It was a combo platter; *Impact Damage + Fire (heat) + Time + Gravity = Collapse* Remove any one (1) of those four (4) elements and there is no collapse. They work together. Ignore _any_ of those four (4) elements and you will never understand the collapse. They work together. Unfortunately that is four (4) elements which is at least three (3) more elements than many people who opine on this topic can handle at once. So often the discussion is stuck at the level of _impact damage_ *OR* _fire_ (time and gravity never even come up). Impact damage alone obviously insufficient to immediately induce collapse, as evidenced by the fact both Towers were still standing after being hit and remained standing for a considerable amount of time. In fact, both towers survived _impacts_ that were 4 to 5 times greater in terms of _impact energy_ than the scenario considered back in the 1960’s. The planes certainly did not survive the impacts. They were decelerated from over 500 mph (Flight 175) to 0 in a fraction of a second and converted into millions of bits. *That in no way implies the Twin Towers should come out unscathed or that they cannot succumb to additional accumulating damage over time* later. Some people seem to get this bizarre belief that _survive impact = zero damage_ which is of course obvious nonsense. That is why it is so important to qualify these things. *Fire* induces further weakness of the structure but that *takes time* to accomplish, it is not immediate. Over time and more and more of the structure gets weaker until it is no longer able to support the weight of the structure and *gravity* does what it does. Columns begin to bend as they get hotter and lose strength. We know (or at least should know - if you don’t then you shouldn’t even be in this discussion) that a straight column has more load carrying capacity than a bent column. Bend the columns too far and they will fail in Euler buckling. And that is exactly what happened to initiate the collapses of both Twin Towers. Now you know.

Damaged by the two towers that collapsed.

@@EchoAccord Where and how?

@@EchoAccord It was damaged on the roof, yet collapsed from the bottom. Try and 'logic' your way out of that.

@@redpillaware5101 Have you ever wondered why buildings beneath the world trade centers were destroyed after the collapse?

Climate change

Santa is more believable...

3 months later.

@@fknbastages Right? Thermite because it was an inside job. Architects and engineers for 9/11 truth has lots of info and experts thag agree

Thermite. No planes caused the collapse of the towers, it was a controlled demolition

Something melted the steel without heat which is why it's stayed molten.

@@wayland7150 something wouldn't be thermite as that would make me conspiracy theorist, antivaxer, flat earther, Trump supporter, Putin lover, Palestine apologist etc.

pretty sure this is bunk and it was an inside job bud. i, like you, wish it werent so

@@ETIC-U Pretty sure those claims have been completely & utterly debunked mate so don't worry about it. The government can be ar5eholes & pretty corrupt at times, but they don't fly planes into skyscrapers to murder thousands of their own citizens.

But the height of hulk is 8 feet in his ultimate form. This video makes it look like he’s as tall as wtc. Fucking fake news man

@@AmazingRofa Spam

B767 is a relatively big plane but B757 is a single aisle narrow body aircraft which was as big as B707..

Footage clearly shows it did.

the top is going first to a side, and then 'somehow' straight down...

It doesn't work like that. Many hundred ton steel structures are designed to carry a vertical load and resist lateral wind loads while firmly supported at their foundations. Lean the structure even a few degrees from vertical and especially without full and even support from its base or foundation and it will crumble like so many toothpicks.

Man, the laws of physics don't change. If one side goes first, it should come down a little on it's side. It doesn't have to lean and fall sideways but at least it should come down a little on it's side. Not perfectly down like some one squashed it from the top. Ever seen those failed demolition videos where not all the TNTs blow up, and the building ends up falling on its side?@@holdernewtshesrearin5471

@@sspanjersbergNewtons law of motion explain this behaviour. Once the top part of the building is no longer connect to the bottom part, the bottom part of the build can no longer apply a force to the top. That means the only force acting on top part of the building is gravity and gravity acts straight down, and the body then moves in the direction of that force.

Entire planes disappeared but a passport survived, riiiiggghhht

@@alanchilds1456That's a pretty silly comment - the planes didn't disappear. They broke up and threw bits of plane and contents all over, including outside the towers. A passport isn't really destructible by blunt force and probably would survive unless it was burned. And if the passport happened to be in the cockpit at the time it would probably have a better chance there than anywhere else of being thrown outside the building. I get that the conspiracy theory is always more fun to believe but the passport surviving really isn't as improbable as you think.

@user-rf9mx4qf7z can you explain why the media reported building 7 had collapsed while looking at a live shot of 7 still standing or how about the dancing Israelis

@@user-rf9mx4qf7z blunt force my God you you are blind

lol...good one.

"Barely fly a single jet plane"?? They had gained commercial pilot licences! 🤣 All they had to do was steer the planes, they didn't even have to concern themselves with taking off & landing, the only difficult parts to flying. Steering is easy, crashing is even easier. Explain to me how the baggage handler who has ZERO flying experience managed to take off & perform loop the loops & barrel rolls yet the guys with commercial pilot licences in your eyes didn't have the skill to crash an already airborne plane? As for your box cutter remark, airport security was very different back then & you were actually allowed to take a small blade on board without issue. That day changed everything.

Mohammed Atta and Marwan Al Shehhi had both earned their FAA Commercial Pilots Certificates and were grossly overqualified to crash a plane - the easiest thing any pilot can do. Atta flew in a straight line. Al Shehhi made a left hand descending turn. Not sure what "calculated maneuver" you are referring to. Blades under 4" long were not contraband on 9/11/2001. Back in those days I frequently carried a Swiss Army Knife on planes and never gave it a thought. You seem poorly informed and rely too much on false starting assumptions, ignorance-fueled personal incredulity and stupid shit you found on the internet and just accepted without any due diligence.