AND THEN A SKELETON POPPED OUT!!!

ye

The most accurate summary to date.

Demons:... That didn't help at all. Doom Slayer: It's not supposed to.

oh boy. this deserves t-shirts with official doom logo. i like this comment so much you would not believe:)

*freddy fazbear laughs*

@@nolanprice4704 warhammer 40k laughs

@@nolanprice4704 how old r u?

@@toroh07 12

@@rickyrackey7930 halo isn’t more metal than doom. Stop it

1) Can you please tell where the "sister of the mother demon" comes from? 2) yup after that) yep, RK tells this, just in other words :-)

@@antonmorozov9939 in the re-release of DOOM 64 which came out the same day as DOOM Eternal , there are a few new levels , or just one , I don't know , but at the end , you fight a boss which is supposed to be the sister of the Mother demon. And then there's some narration about how her death opens a rift which gets the Slayer to Argent D'Nur.

soooo.... the champion titan is an even bigger and stronger titan than maligog? i mean, the skull looked big in titans realm in 2016, but fuck look at maligog, that guy is like 5 times bigger, the icon is an ant in comparison

@@Malik-ul2sk well, titans real is a BIG fuckin level, so yeah the champion is most likely as big as maligog

@@djordjepopovic7568 i believe she's called the Sister Resurrector

*yes*

so he became kratos with shotguns and bfgs

Ahh yes capitalism Cuz u know he got hired as a space marine

Thanks pal! I really appreciate it!

Doom Lore lol.... angry man kills demons.... wow, such a huge lore

the demons backstory? the gods? how humans got carried by angry dude?

you do what every day?

No he is literally immortal as per the codex entries and Hugo martin

@@zacrackedgamergg1261 no they killed his rabbit, he is now too angry to die

@@baconboi4482 he literally canonicaly had a wife and son along with his pet rabbit and they were all killed. Doom Slayer was also already a doom/space marine at this point.

@@baconboi4482 When they killed the rabbit they knew... they fucked up. 🤣

@@baconboi4482 Too angry to die lol

Are you saying doom guy is going to pull a Kratos?

@@radicalravioli316 most likely but there won't be anyone to take that from him

This implies that Davoth isn’t God like most people said he is.

@@sussygussy5457 or he isn't the highest ranking God or heck maybe these beings to put him away as well since they feared him

@M.M.A.C AYYYYYYYYY

Shit, you may be on to something.

This would also explain the horror atmosphere of D3--the main character isn't a killing machine like doomguy, he's just a normal marine trying to survive.

well maybe it is but the marine who goes missing is the guy you find in mars city just before demons start invading. So it can't be doomguy. But i'm not sure since at the end of doom 3 doomguy kills the cyberdemon and closes the portal.

No, it was a separate Earth dimension. That is the only way to reconcile Doom 3 with the other games. There was a deleted line from Eternal where the Khan Maykr states there are multiple Earth dimensions and we are not in that one. Additionally, a codex entry from Doom Hunter Base says that the Aggadons predate all known complex life at 80 million years old. We know that complex life has existed far longer than that on our world. If you look at the sky box in "The Holt" as you get to the top you will see a shattered Earth in the sky. It's obviously Earth as the the Indian subcontinent is clearly visible. All this put together provides a lot of evidence the there are multiple Earth dimensions

Doom 3 is a reboot, it has no connection to the rest of the Doom games. That random marine on the Doom cover, is just a random marine. If you have ever watched that G4 video about the making of Doom 3, it should be clear that the events in Doom 3 happen as if the first games never happened. Doom 3 was id's attempt at a Doom game done with modern tech, a hard reboot of Doom. Why name it "Doom 3" then? No idea, but that "3" does not mean "sequel", it's more like "the 3rd Doom game" or something like that.

Maybe 18:35 ?

...wrong timestamp...

Your surname troubles me... You're not a corrupt robot scientist, are you?

True, that doesn't mean i don't like Master Chief by saying true

@@McBloccguy0 no not at all! Like I said, I love Master Chief too. But I'm just stating a fact. I wouldn't want to see Doom Slayer rip him apart... I'm just saying I know what would happen lol

I agree. And I a a huge Halo fan. John-117 is a badass, he destroyed a whole fleet, nuked a Halo ring and saved the known galaxy from the Forerunner's intergalactic Hula-hoops! But Doom Slayer is on a whole other level entirely, hell, He's practically a Demi-God in the 2016 reboot, and has fought Hell for eons. Just in combat experience alone, Slayer wins.

@@RockRedGenesis I agree. It's just best a keep them in separate universes. Let them be their own legends! They don't need to brawl since they are both badasses

@@codytisdale9064 THAT, THAT IS A FAX, we dont want them to brawl, we want them to be the heroes,the saviour of their own humanity,and not to fight with each other just to see who could be the fearsome, both of them is already fearsome to their own enemy so it will be pointless fighting each other

In the ancient gods there's even a shattered earth that can be seen in urdak

Honestly I truly never gave too much of a shit about lore in video games that are very much action focused, but I have to admit once I delved into the lore that Hugo and Marty spearheaded, I was absolutely in love with it. I don't know why or how but the story just somehow doesn't feel unnecessary or stupid to me, it feels like the game simply could not hold together without it. It sets up intregue and gives the game a sort of weight that makes the experience feel so badass. Somehow with context the game is so exciting. But that's just me.

@@derezzed5588 I honestly love lore and story in games, for me DOOM Eternal doesn't really hold up the excitement, DOOM 2016 story is awesome tho, it shows how badass the Slayer is more than Eternal does. I'm most interested in Half Life lore, it has basically infinite story

If you want it dumbed down so much, just stick with the originals. The "complex shit" adds to the story and universe in spectacular fashion. How can anyone consider this a bad thing?

That's pretty much how it is from Doomguy's perspective

@@bfgcell4864 wat

Well he was never human, he is a Clone of the Devil

Yeah, I made an attempt to fit doom 3 and all the 'unofficial' titles into this timeline, bit I would've had to stretch a looot of things for it to make sense

The best "No" I ever heard.

I dont think anyone know how he was teleported to argent D'Nur. It is possible that Davon, through his influence, had the slayer transported to the planet to get things in motion, and ensure the prophecy gets fulfilled. Remember what he mentioned in the video, where davon influences the maykers to create the divinity machine, so who is to say that he didnt influence someone in hell to get him to the planet?

@@wazscience I knew and I put it in my video when the info came out. But alot of people don't seem to research it more to find the answer. (which is not in the game actually)

The demons sent him there didn't they? Or one of the priest did? They had to get him out of hell asap!!!

@@You-Tube-FBI Which Demon 😜, Not the Hell Priests.

@@AcidGlow unsure.. I'll have to replay the first part of the game again. So what were the circumstances of his arrival on Argent D'nur.

It's the same icon, but resurrected by the Khan maykr With how angry the slayer is at the start of doom 2016, I would imagine that he is quite familiar with the situation that's happening

@@RK_Koala Not the same. The one from Doom II: Hell On Earth is the Baphomet, the one from Doom Eternal is the Icon of Sin. For Final Doom, the one from TNT: Evilution is the Demon-Spitter, and the one from The Plutonia Experiment is the Gatekeeper.

@@flamsey But they might be the same species. Because well they look the same. Maybe "Icon of Sin" is a title as well as "Gate Keeper" and others. So they are just high ranking deamon lords. Or they are in fact one and the same being just ressurected time and time again. As the authors of Doom stated "The reason why the Doomslayer broke his curcible was to seal the Icon of Sin and avoid it being ressurected yet again", implying that every time we as the player killed it we mearly temporarily did so.

@@flamsey Literally none of what you just said comes from a cannon source. Sounds like it came from a wiki, which any wiki that isnt Wikipedia is not a reliable source.

@@Brucifer2 it came from john romero. also, its spelled canon

I’ve only played 2016 (because eternal isn’t on ps4 at least I couldn’t find it) and this also helped me understand a lot

@@themastergluesniffer bro it released on ps4 the day the game was supposed to come out...

doom 3 is in the same multiverse, connected by hell, but not in the main timeline i think

@@jeremieh5009 Yes and in doom 3, in hell, you can see a big demon skull which might be the titan that doomguy killed.

@@urosstankovic3498 yeah

"You can see in doom 3 on the ancient scribblings a drawing of doomguy holding the soulcube." Dude... Do you even know what an easter egg is? You cannot force canon with easter eggs lol. Doom 3 is a hard reboot of Doom, it has no connection with the rest of the Doom games. Have you watched the G4 video about the making of Doom 3? Tim Willits himself tells us that the events in Doom 3 happen "as if the first games never happened". I will never understand this. The Doom community will shit on Doom 3 at every chance they get, but at the same time want to force it to be canon? lol.

"Out of that spear came the rapes that released magic"

I always thought it was a separate universe, like it exists in the Doom universe but its in another earth realm

i mean he did forget Final Doom

@@jeremieh5009 True, but the plutonia experiment and TNT doesn’t matter much because it’s ridiculous that there would be two more icon of sins.

@@guydoom2778 they’re not icons of sin they just have the same textures. They’re the demon spitter and gate guardian in tnt and plutonia respectively

@@jeremieh5009 I get that but what I’m saying is it’s a bit strange.

@@guydoom2778 yeah

Thank you so much funi penguin! Appreciate it!

When hmmmp says “mate” you know he means it

お前いはも死んでいる。

One thing you forgot. In Doom3, the Asian scientist mentions "The Devil is real, I know, I built it's cage" Who was he talking about exactly, the Dark Lord?

It's actually in a completely different universe

For me its more like a Perspective of another marine

Thx for the like

@@oliverthgibson4018 You only got two likes only. Yes this koala did a great job loo

Hello Dr Coomer!

@@RK_Koala One of the basic pieces of furniture, a chair is a type of seat. Its primary features are two pieces of a durable material, attached as back and seat to one another at a 90° or slightly greater angle, with usually the four corners of the horizontal seat attached in turn to four legs-or other parts of the seat's underside attached to three legs or to a shaft about which a four-arm turnstile on rollers can turn-strong enough to support the weight of a person who sits on the seat (usually wide and broad enough to hold the lower body from the buttocks almost to the knees) and leans against the vertical back (usually high and wide enough to support the back to the shoulder blades). The legs are typically high enough for the seated person's thighs and knees to form a 90° or lesser angle.[1][2] Used in a number of rooms in homes (e.g. in living rooms, dining rooms, and dens), in schools and offices (with desks), and in various other workplaces, chairs may be made of wood, metal, or synthetic materials, and either the seat alone or the entire chair may be padded or upholstered in various colors and fabrics. Chairs vary in design. An armchair has armrests fixed to the seat;[3] a recliner is upholstered and under its seat is a mechanism that allows one to lower the chair's back and raise into place a fold-out footrest;[4] a rocking chair has legs fixed to two long curved slats; a wheelchair has wheels fixed to an axis under the seat.[5] Etymology Chair comes from the early 13th-century English word chaere, from Old French chaiere ("chair, seat, throne"), from Latin cathedra ("seat").[6] History Main article: History of the chair Five three-legged chairs around a low-legged table from Sliven 19th Century Lifestyle Museum Early 20th-century armchair made in eastern Australia, with strong heraldic embellishment The chair has been used since antiquity, although for many centuries it was a symbolic article of state and dignity rather than an article for ordinary use. "The chair" is still used as the emblem of authority in the House of Commons in the United Kingdom[7] and Canada,[8] and in many other settings. In keeping with this historical connotation of the "chair" as the symbol of authority, committees, boards of directors, and academic departments all have a 'chairman' or 'chair'.[9] Endowed professorships are referred to as chairs.[10] It was not until the 16th century that chairs became common.[11] Until then, people sat on chests, benches, and stools, which were the ordinary seats of everyday life. The number of chairs which have survived from an earlier date is exceedingly limited; most examples are of ecclesiastical, seigneurial or feudal origin.[citation needed] Chairs were in existence since at least the Early Dynastic Period of Egypt (c. 3100 BC). They were covered with cloth or leather, were made of carved wood, and were much lower than today's chairs - chair seats were sometimes only 10 inches (25 cm) high.[12] In ancient Egypt chairs appear to have been of great richness and splendor. Fashioned of ebony and ivory, or of carved and gilded wood, they were covered with costly materials, magnificent patterns and supported upon representations of the legs of beasts or the figures of captives. Generally speaking, the higher ranked an individual was, the taller and more sumptuous was the chair he sat on and the greater the honor. On state occasions the pharaoh sat on a throne, often with a little footstool in front of it.[13] The average Egyptian family seldom had chairs, and if they did, it was usually only the master of the household who sat on a chair. Among the better off, the chairs might be painted to look like the ornate inlaid and carved chairs of the rich, but the craftsmanship was usually poor. Hello Gordon!

Me neither

Is Final DOOM canon?

@@alejandrolizarraga3924 Yes. Those were further attempts by Hell to invade Earth after the events of DOOM II. Doomguy at that point was leading the marine deployment.

Wait what new doom comic?

@@fleetdoesstuff3175 yes its a lore book

@@yourfatboy5359 what's it gonna be called

@@fleetdoesstuff3175 we don't know yet. All we do know is that it will explain the events between 2016 and eternal. Such as where Hayden sent the Slayer, how he got to the Fortress of Doom, how he made his new suit and how he killed Deag Ranak's guardian and got its sentinel token. Hugo Martin announced this in one of his Doom Eternal streams.

@@indiananock6477 Yeah, Hugo Martin said it was basically gonna be a Codex bible

Thank you for the response brother!

@@RK_Koala No problem. It was great and i like to see quality lore videos :)

We all know that Doom 3 is canon. Hugo Martin conformed himself

Its an inconsistency in what is sadly a poorly written lore that constantly retcons and over complicates itself. Like the idea of Davoth being Hell's Doomguy, doesnt go anywhere and is immediately just "Nah, youre a copy" Then gets over complicated with the fact they mixed time travel to the past, time skipping to the future. Which wouldnt be bad if they kept it in the same universe of earth...but then Hugo went and said its an alternate universe of earth...then what was even the point of time traveling then time skipping to the future? Its all bad man, which is a bummer because its one of my favorite franchises.

These two bullet points are simply plotholes, Hugo even admitted that you'll need to stretch a lot of things to explain the second point about the gate of divum