congrats man on hitting the 100k milestones..mind sharing the play button image? 😁

Damn, looks like the old editor is getting kicked out for the callout XD

No problem bycloud :)

Yo. I just added you on discord. If you still need a video editor, let me know!

Q: Text to video timeline and impact

Essentially making advertisers money fall into the hands of social media companies without providing any service. 🤔

They don't need us anymore :D@@carlpanzram7081

Making money without doing anything is what capitalism is all about baby! @@carlpanzram7081

Nonsense. The ultimate irony is and remains humans drawing trees on paper. That and the National Organisation for Women's logo being an actual clothing iron. That one honestly made me fall of my chair the first time I noticed it.

hey man they're just sucking up all the fake printed cash using fake ads and getting traction through fake followers. its beautiful

People used to fear the AI singularity would be the product of a new type of "Manhattan Project", revolving around usage as a weapon. Look at where we are now.

Not really. It's all they do all day, besides watch anime 😂 if you spent all day doing something, you'll be good at it.

@@AdrianMark what a bullshit. you never had passion for anything.

@@Tera_GX I'd not to be too concerned about that. If you are interested in why, read a book called The Myth of Artificial Intelligence (why computers can't think the way we do). It presents an insiders view of the real state of AI.

@@AdrianMark If you spend all day watching anime, you'll only be good at watching anime, not creating AI for generating anime.

I beleive that comes from the 47 "rules of the internet" a now famous list I first saw around the year 2000. #34. There is porn of it, no exceptions #35. If no porn is found at the moment, it will be made

Cavemen absolutely drew boobs with a stick.

​@@thebull3206 I think nearly everyone knows rule 34 by now...

It mostly leads to us slaughtering our own brothers

Imagine inventing cure to cancer and then watching as cancer statistics absolutely don't change but instead somehow porn and military technologies advance yet again

Wich one?

Whats her @ asking for a friend

​@@lukadragar4596ur mom

​@@Dindonmaskershe's the same in all styles, somehow, the photorealistic asian girl who has abnormally huge eyes

It's always the same girl, I know which one you're talking about lol 😆. Even if you generate Cleopatra, even her face becomes similar to that common Asian girl we all know about.

They didn't explain it, they just explain at a surface level what it's destroying by stealing and generating copies of itself onto itself. AI is a cancer that should have been heavily regulated and controlled before being unleashed. It's an absolute fucking end-game disaster.

i mean he didnt really explain it. i understood quite a bit since im studying this stuff but he barely scratched the surface

...or just prompt - a car made of chocolate ... SD just fail , SDXL make it perfect

its still terrible since the text encoder is like 800m parameters while decent llms are around 10x that

Yeah but it just uses so much more storage. If most uses are met with 1.5 then it won't be adopted any time soon.

@@incription Dalle-3 is supposed to be using GPT as CLIP. But there are obviously different aspects to this, because merely being accurately expressive is just one aspect of an image generation model. For example, people are now also getting good at using very specialized SD1.5 models to "refine" standard MJ generations, to amazing results. The idea is basically using MJ's compositional quality and combining it with the detail rendering quality in a finetuned SD model. SDXL basically already does that, and it shows. Also, it is possible to add expressiveness and specificity to SDXL through LoRAs and embeddings, as people have done with 1.5. Comparatively speaking the CLIP in SDXL now is miles beyond what 1.5 used to be, and with StabilityAI getting into LLMs themselves, I have high hopes that the next version of SD will actually feature a much stronger CLIP to compete with Dalle. For the mean time, SDXL is king with its detail generating quality combined with its expressiveness and compositional quality, especially given the availability of LoRAs, NSFW capabilities, controlnet, and other opensource tools like animation extensions and in/outpainting capabilities. The open community surrounding it is what makes it strong, and MJ and Dalle3 will forever live in its shadow.

@@zxbc1👏👏👏 human intelligence underrated. Compute overrated 😥

UV unwrapping nightmares beyond my comprehension? Sign me up!

@@quazar-omega you have the UV first, then project

@@hugoruix_yt995 ohh, that's great actually

Can you share the name for any of the models that do this?

I used this for maya> cgmGrAIBox @@sirtimatbob

Trump-fans can finally show their hero like a muscular superhero of their dreams, as opposed to the fat slob he's really like.

"Art websites" hahahahaha.

That's inevitable with any new technology. Somebody is going to use it for evil. But we shouldn't let that stop us who use it for good and enjoyment.

as someone who's been out of the AI scene for 6 months, I have to disagree with you. This one short video helped me catch up with what's changed. (A LOT)

Thank you for saying that, at the 6 minute mark I had just exclaimed "this means absolutely nothing to me" :D

​@@vytros12The scary thing is that there's so much fucking BS going on out there right now, that people legitimately just can't keep up. Not even the people supposedly engineering these tools know wtf or how TF a lot of them even work anymore. Some of the main AI/ML engineer teams have admitted openly to not knowing how some of their models even arrive at the conclusions that they do. Humans have naively unleashed absolute chaos into the world, and they just keep making it worse. I don't know wtf timeline this is, but we are absolutely fucking screwed. AI/ML has already been consumed by companies looking to absolutely gut the financial sector. Things like real estate are already being ravaged by AI literally telling realtors and landlords to push for as high of prices as possible (and they're listening and going YEA YEA MONEY MONEY). Just wait until hackers and cyberwarfare organizations really get going on AI infiltration. People are absolutely fucked, and we're all going to suffer because of some greedy morons pushing all this shit. There's a reason the 'inventor' of AI quit and said you're all insane earlier this year.

@@vytros12 right, I thought AI art was gonna make it easier to just get a nice picture quickly but it seems immensely complicated.. all of this info makes me feel like every random internet user must have an IQ of 2000 and I'm stuck here not understanding anything

This has been my experience. I got interested in it for illustration and game dev reasons, but its such a pain in the ass to get something good, predictable, and that also doesn't look like all the other AI art that can immediately be IDd as AI. Now that its everywhere, the internet has been flooded with these types of images and its trendy and I don't like following trends and I don't want my art to look like everyone else's. I decided that wasn't worth it, and instead have been teaching myself 3d modeling and digital illustration which has been very difficult but FAR more rewarding than the tedium and disappointment of prompting plus I don't really like the fact that so many people aren't getting compensated for having their work trained into it. I also worry about 1) backlash from having used assets that were created using AI 2) getting into trouble down the line where copyright laws are updated and then all the assets I generated are no longer legal to use in a commercial product. Nah, I think I'd rather just learn a new skill which is far more rewarding in the end. This doesn't actually end up saving me that much time, unlike 3d animation which solves a lot of the problems around 2d cel animation and instead just replaces one headache for another.@@slaveNo-4028

I'm a university student and had my first introductory courses into implementing AI earlier this year. The thing you need to understand is how an individual neuron works in a neural network. Everything they do here is just repetition of that on a massive scale (say hundreds of millions or low billions of neurons).

This is terrifying for artists, this isnt a tool to help artists, its a replacement

NOTHING TO FEAR BUT FEAR ITSELF. What do we all fear ? the unknown. We deal with it in many negative ways, like believing non truths, or disbelieving something right in front of us. Subconscious self programming basically.. copium. Some data we just don't understand. Ever hear about the first ships that came over the horizon and the natives couldn't see them ? the visual data was something completely outside of their daily reality. In smaller ways this happens all the time. Anyway.. finishing up my essay reply back soon

Web3 fixes this. Decentralized identifiers (DID) and watermarking for artists to sign their artwork with their private key. The current state of identity solutions is very user UNFRIENDLY because you have to protect a set of words or a long string of hex chars. Far too easy to lose, or be extorted/kidnapped etc. After a lot of research and academic verification, patents for new hardware were filed, and it has been 7 years of waiting.. the hardware is not finished yet. 2024 timeline on track still, event devices might already be in use, physical high security locations will be all using it sooner or later, no doubt. The first ever tamperproof identification with attack countermeasures, and ZERO DATA storage. Quantum safe too, every transaction is it's own block and uniquely encrypted, noone can access it without "signing" the transaction with their finger. If you are stressed, or have no pulse, the scan will not allow you to get robbed! social engineering is all we will have to deal with. Things are getting complex, people need a new internet safe by default.. and human verification for eg TWITTER is long overdue.. verified accounts doing scams.. charging for a checkmark is just a band aid, and now can give a false sense of security ! Botnets are the biggest problem with social engineering attacks, creating countless new accounts on socials for years and trying to look like real users. MANY have convincing looking history in isolation, only by association can they be confirmed as bots, eg participating in one of those long back and forth "financial advice" bs comment threads, tells you an account is owned by the scammers. Archethic Foundation in Switzerland.. we aren't far off getting this security. DID identity ? AE will let us have eg our BITCOIN private key, as a child in a DID tree. Your finger will control access over BTC as well, and value limits for whether a finger scan is required is also easy. Smarter Contracts they call it. Creating new DID identifiers as child pseudonymous identities for various sites is possible, but because those are all clearly ONE human the chain can automatically give a website the option "1 human 1 account" or "no interactions between identities with the same human parent... but the website ? static websites can be deployed on chain, testnet has that already. AEmail coming next.. that could be handy huh ? zero spam by default ! Wouldn't it be great if every AI would get their own DID. It isn't finger generated, so it can't be a human... anyone who wants to pretend.. has to be the parent of the DID tree. So eventually we could just put a scanner in every court room (any device works for any person). The deterrent factor would quickly become self fulfilling. No-one can ever hide if they are summoned to testify ! it would be as simple as.. raise your hand.. ok never mind just scan your finger for the jury. Computer is this the human biology parent of the accounts in question. Y/N. See that on the news one day.. you would take notice ! I expect it will happen one day, people always push their luck and think they are smarter than the defenders.. organized crime has had well over 20 years leveraging the crap internet, finally defenders will have the upper hand. The only thing that will limit adoption is fear. I would post the reveal video and the 2017 Viva Tech conference interview but this is already plenty long enough and might get deleted by the KZfaq panic basket that ignores all the actual scammers..

@@goldnutter412 quit the zaza

You're saying we shouldn't be afraid of AI... by referencing the indigenous people of America, who were mostly wiped out by invaders?? You're accidentally correct; the technological progress will happen, but it won't benefit any current artists. It'll benefit the people who are trying to eliminate artists. "But AI can be used to help artists" Sure, and the colonists could've helped the natives develop technology themselves. But the colonists were there colonize, just like tech companies invested all that money so they could reap the rewards

Ai will make the porn industry billions of dollars in the next couple of years 😂😂😂

Have you seen Facebook ads? AI-gen'd BS is already making them billions. @@garygarcia3142

fr

To some extent I get what you're saying but on the other hand I see so many "how to make a game/website/App without coding experience" but never a "How to make a game/website for programming/maths people with no visual design sense or artistic talent whatsoever" and not being able to actually make much use of my years of math and coding practice outside of a terminal due to having such a low artistic/design ability is somewhat demoralizing. While I understand as an artist you would be annoyed by this I feel that we need the art equivalent of a low-code/no-code tool and I'm glad we have one.

So? It's gonna be like when we built canals and disrupted the artisans and drove off the farmers from the countryside. It's simply the artists' turn now.

​@@salazar1554 These aren't equivalent. That's a tool that helps. The equivalent here is "how to make a game without a developer." Before even getting into the fact that game/web creation tools are products made by groups that are providing their knowledge of the fields knowingly/willingly. Whereas AI to anything near its current state doesn't exist without massive art theft.

@@OatmealTheCrazy Okay that's fair actually.

Unless you have a genuinely creative mind then 'AI art' is like Photoshop on acid. It's borderline limitless already and it's only improving. But yeah, it's just a tool. It's only ever going to be as powerful as the craftsman. And that's what separates the wheat from the chaff :)

Do not worry. You will be assimilated or recycled very efficiently.

@@Dowlphin Pipe down with your edgy BS, mlp pfp.

@@olivercharles2930 Its not edgy anything, its whats happening in real time. All you need to understand, is that this system is based completely on profit. Thats the only info you need, to understand whats happening and whats going to happen. I hope AI takes everyones jobs, So people can finally stand up and rebel this trash system we live in. Humans are meant for so much more, then being glorified slaves.

how'd you decide on that prompt?

Most likely you only tried models in free acess. Midjourney and especially DALLE-3 are still not perfect, but scary good at understanding what do you want from them.

Maybe you didn't use the right prompt - simply explain in details what do you expect... It can't read your mind (yet)...

@@AstralTraveler "simply explain in details what do you expect" Pretty sure he expected "city on wheels".

Just google Ron Herron. Bro got you covered with his citys and yes, slave trade is also implied.

I'd argue it's good for two other things: 1) automated brainstorming for idea specifics, and filling in for beginner artist skill deficiencies for those of us who are learning to draw digitally, but still prefer to produce good images instead of crap during the process. I've found much, much more motivation to continue practicing when suddenly 6 months ago I discovered that I was able to skip my utter crap drawing stage and see what my scribbles could be with some skill. And even now that I can draw much more on my own, the AI can still help generate ideas when I am considering composition directions and details. I'm sure to an experienced artist these things seem like crutches, but I would respond that crutches have their uses, too. Oh, and upscaling old terrible-quality images, though that's more of a utility. That said, I totally agree nothing should go from AI to sold directly.

@@admthrawnuru Good points. I skipped the whole drawing one and iterating for me is quicker if I do it in my head, though that´s probably different for people without ADHD as well, so I might be a bit biased here. I usually work with reference from other people in the client´s team or sometimes ask my gf if I´m feeling like getting stuck. Probably doesn´t matter much anyway when companies start incorporating AI as a standard in the workflow.

These are both excellent points and it sounds like you two are using it as a tool (and inspiration) like it probably should be. Where I get concerned is that it's essentially an evermore sophisticated content imitator that, by its nature, has to steal others' inspiration to exist. And it's big $$ b/c it can also be a tool for displacing the most creative people.

@@NotSoMuchFrankly Absolutely valid concerns, though there´s other possible outcomes, too. You technically _can_ ethically train AI with your own portfolio or free data, depending on the context. You don´t need 10 Million pictures of big booby anime girls from Art Station, to train an AI that generates realistic tree textures. And it will not replace real creativity either, because creativity isn´t just kitbashing random ideas together. It requires fundamental understanding of art, ideas and real world context, which aren´t the strengths of soulless machines. You are spot on about corporations *trying* to replace/reduce artist in their workflow though, but I personally hope that will only lead to creatives fleeing the industry and flooding the indie market. I see 2 potential problems where it can really go south for us from here, one being Governments not able to regulate AI into the existing law framework. The other is consumers just accepting crap quality so copy paste products become the new standard. Let´s call it the "Marvel Syndrom." Otherwise the majority of creatives should be fine, especially when they do not let themselves be pushed around by the big corpos.

thank you fr. ai was used before this horrendous trend started and never used other people's work without their permission

Just more study 😊

They aren't doing actual research though for the most part, just fine tuning models for their specific needs.

@@games528 So... they are doing actual research.

​@@olivercharles2930 It's not research to download a bunch of pngs and click on a button that trains an AI model of them.

@@games528 Which is, doing, actual, research

@@callmeandoru2627 They're not the ones with a PhD researching and writing papers on generative AI models. They're spending 10 hours writing a prompt to create sexy anime girl.

the age of machines has begun

This isn't the future I want...

@@joelrobinson5457 As long as the technology exists it's better than the alternative.

​@@futurestoryteller what's the alternative?

@@usernameluis305 Is this confusing? A world where people with no talent succeed through sheer ubiquity, flooding the market with low effort sludge powered by autonomous "content generators" and the only people who really make money are greedy tech bros, who've proven they literally don't know art from NFTS Clear enough? Another way to put it is we _currently_ live in a world where your artwork is theoretically protected... as long as you are an _actual_ artist.

@@futurestoryteller You are the reason I don't like most of humanity. You're that guy. The "I will squeeze myself into this tiny bottle and I will force myself to like it, because that's how things are now."

touch grass nerd

@@krishp1104 k, now what?

​@@ginqus I take a blade of grass and EAT IT!

@@ginqus now talk to a women

a "women" @@krishp1104

Blud u are thinking that you can outpace a GPU on your dreams lmao

@@flynntaggart7216 Yes, easily

well AI art excells in some topics and the amount of detail is often impressive. I wonder how's that even possible

Pace has nothing to do with imagination. And imagination isn't just mean complete random and chaos.@@flynntaggart7216

Brain is a pretty weak tool, you gotta accept that sooner or later.

Technology is always like that lol

Loser always like that

Is it really work if you are doing something you enjoy? I buy and sell motorcycles as a hobby. I may spend an entire day going and getting and bringing home a bike. Some would say thats a lot of work. I don't consider it work. I consider it entertainment and adventure. I will then do work on it such ad changing body fairings, changing the oil, tires, etc. Again for some thats lot of work. I don't consider it work. I consider it putting together a puzzle. Playing with these AI generators and seeing what you can get out of them for many is not work but entertainment. Its not the end result but the ritual of process and learning that is the reward.

@@spartanx169x Preach!

@@lolvanced Do you buy your own groceries? Personally, I forage for my food like a chad, anything else is the loser way

It doesn’t need to have sOuL. does brush have soul? No

@@TheShinorochiThe artist using the brush does though 🤦‍♀️

@@poodled7794 the same

The immortal soul does not exist in ai

@@poodled7794 Sorry, but still wrong. There is no such thing as "soul".

Yes it does.. and still not enough people are taking the huge problems it will cause in the future serious enough.

Yes, you are applying critical thinking. AI is a net negative for the world, but most people are so enamored with it they can't project out a few years.

AI will affect everyone, but because most people are not affected yet, therefore people will kept wishing people that were affected to be screwed by AI. until before they know it, they finally become the victim as well. what those people didn't know is that AI doesn't need them, AI already collected ton of Prompts from people to the point that they could just generate their own prompt that was way superior than yours. that's why those people are so generous, giving everyone free AI generator, to farm your Prompts, so that they could disrupt you and makes AI function without you in the future Free AI generator was used as a bribe, so that they thought that they're the special one, they thought that the ability to write a prompt makes them better and more open minded than people with university degree or phd. when in reality, everyone can write a prompt, even a baby can write one. therefore, everyone will get disrupted in the future, it's just a matter of when. remember that AI didn't need human to function.

creatives and influencers do not matter

@@Magicwillnz I wish I could go back in time and stop the automotive revolution... Just imagine all those people affected by it... Losing their jobs... Horse trainers, horse sellers, carriage builders, horse saddle manufacturers... Truthly, combustion engines and automotives were a net negative for the world

Creativity would find a place. And the fakes and lies will eventually be deal with somehow. At the end of the AI is confined to the digital space... at least for now. Giving normal people the ability to make "art" by themselves is actually good, more freedom to everyone. Artists would probably adapt somehow, art can go beyond the "beautiful thing jaja".

yea comfy is so much better

You should be depressed that you make such shitty arguments lol AI is not abusing anything besides people's tendency to be paranoid about the future.

lol i am doing a degree in ai

@@cpp705 what field are you specialising in?

waifu gen. @@TheAkdzyn

It also helped push voice cloning. All the SVC tech used for AI singing covers was created by Chinese weebs

​@@KingMertel this made me happy 😂

What, they literally don't look like the "stolen" images the AI trained with. Idk where you anti-ai bros get all your goofy ass arguments from.

No it has to always do with speed of fashion. Beauty standards change from generation to generation. Example. Compare beauty from the 80's with 2023, or the 1920's. As we got better tech, we ended up with faster fashion trends that quite frankly don't mean much. It's like movies. Back then, it took time to get a feature movie, today we have a gluttony and nothing is special.

@@SSingh-nr8qz ok

Human= maths(all kinds of neural bullshit) + art (neural bs + external bs) 0 hardware (the brain and all that shit idk)

I don't think it can. SDXL is very different from SD 1.5 so a LoRA trained for 1.5 would not work. Also sometimes LoRAs created for different checkpoints of SD 1.5 doesn't work very well on every checkpoint. LoRAs usually work best for the checkpoints they were created for.

No. There is no compatibility between 1.5 and SDXL. However, the most human intensive part of lora training is putting together the training data and getting it all tagged up properly, so in theory, the creator of the lora could take their training data, make some settings adjustment for SDXL training, and then cook up a new SDXL lora. In practice though, most won't bother, and you'll want higher quality training data for SDXL to match the higher resolution, so there would likely be some work going back and reworking the training images (usually cropped and downsized from larger images anyway). Also, SDXL doesn't yet have high quality model variants to train on like SD 1.5. They're getting there (like the mentioned Waifu Diffusion for SDXL), but most early loras being trained now will have bad quality compared to what comes later. With SD 1.5 there was a long period of model variants battling it out for the king of various spaces (mainly realistic, illustration, and anime). Once some high quality leaders were established, lora training had a better base to work off of. So yeah, you're a spot right now where SDXL can't use most loras (since they're SD 1.5) and the loras that it's getting are lower quality than what they could be, and most often, lower quality than SD 1.5's loras. Civitai is pushing SDXL hard with contests giving away GPUs and such, but SD 1.5 is still dominating. Give it a year I guess. SDXL has some big technical advantages, but a deficit of training. A year from now, 12gb and 16gb GPUs should be more prolific and SDXL will have much better tools and model variants to work with.

@@archgaden Thabks so much for your reply mate. SDXL is understandably slower than 1.5 but so much better and easier to use. Speed is a bottleneck. I have a 3090 and I’m complaining. 😅

Sounds like there is a great opportunity for whoever creates a process that can convert SD1.5 loras to SDXL. @@archgaden

Would you begin learning with SD1.5 or SDXL? @@archgaden

Depending on how much cost is a factor, you could mess with the beta of Photoshop that includes AI features. I haven't used it yet, but it looks very straight-forward and also easy to put into workflows (since it is PS).

​@@ShawnFumoyep adobe dragonfly (the ai tool in photoshop beta) is very easy to use and extremely powerfull and intelligent. Just selecting something you want to remove and generating without a prompt will most of the time do exactly what you had in mind or better so that's a cool change in normal workflow.

@@ShawnFumo for me it's both cost, unsupported OS and ideology, so no thanks. Besides, Stable Diffusion is open source, why would I want a crippled version that was tailored to Adobe's taste and politics?

That's why I'm letting it ride and just keeping an eye on it via channels like these. Eventually it'll get to the point where capabilities 100x better than what was shown in this video are just baked in to an ez to use app/platform that I don't gotta spend a weekend troubleshooting just to set it up and a month to figure out how to actually use.

@@ShawnFumo I am gonna guess that since its Adobe, the AI they use will be censored to shit to avoid copyright and other problems, so it would be a very bad idea. Plus Adobe is a horrible, atrocious company, do not give them money unless you're positively sure there are no other options or alternatives.

real

?

i kinda wanteed it too :(

That's nothing new, people have been following fake celebrities and influencers since Instagram's creation. People who pretend to be rich by renting expensive cars for 1 hour to take 20 photos or going to fake private planes. Everyone is trying to blame AI for this, but humans were always like that. Past writers, such as Lovecraft, died in poverty and were only discovered after their death. Today, many talented musicians are unknown, but some wannabee gangster singing nonsense on autotune is filthy rich. Don't blame AI, blame humans.

Don’t many artists also have a problem with AI art because the original training data is more-or-less always created without the permissions of artists? So it’s like getting one’s job taken by someone who stole their work.

@@amberwingthefairycat Which makes no sense considering artists have been doing the exact same thing for centuries now. No artist asks for permission before picking out patterns from an art piece and studying it (which is basically a fancy version of what AI does). So why the double standard?

Probably just the scope of the training. Humans could never learn from this many different artists. @@olivercharles2930

Welcome to the desert of the real.

u could also achieve that with CGI before current AI era too. ai is just another way to do it

While this may muddy the waters for sure, it's no different than photoshop which can be extremely convincing as well as CGI and visual FX. That's why we have the concept of corroboration, which is the gold standard in the court system (though imperfect, it's still valuable). No what worries me is people willfully refusing to accept corroboration of facts, empirical evidence, and eyewitness testimony and replace reality with their own version of it. This is already starting to fracture society in irreparable ways, just look at the whole cult of Trump and their refusal to accept evidence and facts such as the very clear winner of the 2020 election which was litigated endlessly in court and shot down by a number of judges who Trump himself appointed. Society will eventually bifurcate between those who accept the concept of factual reality, and those who don't. I'm not just talking about people who disagree on how to move forward on sociopolitical and economic issues, but people who disagree if the earth is flat or spherical. Scary times indeed.

@@darkwraithcovenantindustries Who was the legitimate winner of the 2016 US presidential election?

Donald Trump, why? He won by razor thin margins in a number of swing districts in traditionally Democrat held firewall states, supported by people who wanted to try out something different and whose populist economic message was heard and felt by. Because of the nature of the Electoral College, which was the result of a compromise between slave owning states and northern states when the Constitution was first ratified, it is possible for a candidate for US President to win an election without capturing the popular vote, something that has happened 2 times since 2000, and 5 times in US history. Why the fuck are you quizzing me on civics lmao?@@bpj1805

Not much different from a real one given the depth of the content tbh

Dang, I'm getting too old for this 🤕😅

Yeah, that's the reason why artists are quite upset with the situation.

@@WallySketch *artists without a distinct style.. they are a dime a dozen anyway.

@@phattjohnson Not at all. Artists with styles that have been heavily used in dataset suffered the most. What you now see as "generic AI style" or "anime AI style" is the style of some very influent digital artists whose work were stolen to build datasets. Sometimes you can even see their signatures appear on AI generated images. It seems generic now because of how many images were generated with their style. You can even specify the name of an artist for the AI to copy. There are google sheets out there with a list of artists names to use when prompting for Midjourney. Knowing the AI can only copy their work because it was stolen and put in its dataset is disgusting. Some AI are even trained to copy specific artists.

Hey if you make a video of it, Please put the link here.

I have 16Gb Ram and 128 Mb vRAM

​@@Jadon_WYSE128 MB VRAM? What year are you from?

@@romantroman6270 probably 2015 integrated graphics

Then you're stuck with using the CPU to process. And it sounds like that would take forever too. You're pretty much stuck with using the cloud until you upgrade your PC. @@Jadon_WYSE

Obviously it will be the second option so it will give them more money and less people will have jobs. :D But even if someone will be able to produce a film or a tv show with a hit of a button, then no one will pay them a cent because everyone can do it so ultimately there will be just less options to earn money from your craft and more meaningless content will fill the web.

​@@naniyotaka Imagine remaking the Matrix 2 & 3 according to fan plot rewrites/reshuffles! Or Game of Thrones. Or Pyromancer's vision for World of Warcraft. - Adûnâi

more money for corpos, extremely small amounts of content with meaning and substance, boring mass culture etc

​@@angamaitesangahyando685that's theoretical... but even if it reaches that potential, Don't worry the corporations won't let that happen... and eventually buy it if it's a independent project and either keep for themselves or hmmm monetize until it breaks...

@@abba9881 @@abba9881 Except it would be the exact opposite. Less money for corpos (who tf is going to pay when they could easily make what they want? Especially with stuff like stable diffusion setting a precedent for free open source AI). Higher amounts of content with meaning and substance (AI has pretty impressive quality now, imagine what it will be in the future). Boring mass culture (bro, do you seriously think mass culture now is not boring?)

I'm starting to see people on civitai deleting their own models. So I'm downloading the ones I'm interested in using (in the future) including information and putting them on an external hard drive. Just in case.

@@psyou7713 Very wise idea. Censorship is a nasty trend, and once it starts its unlikely to stop unless it is forcefully stopped. I suspect that will happen sooner or later.

@@Mythhammer Yup. And I'm switching to Linux. More privacy focused. I've realised that I clicked to easily in the past on agree regarding apps/ software TOS's. Data collection is getting out of control.

@@psyou7713 It's FAR out of control. Remember Edward Snowden? It's much worse now .

@@psyou7713 I'm very uncomfortable with the increasingly prevalent mindset that archiving stuff on the internet is immoral, because the original poster didn't give a permission to publish the content in question anywhere else. Good luck making a public backup archive in an atmosphere like that, so it sadly is every man for himself. A random forum advice is morally treated as a copyrighted creative work and archived username with post history is a horrible breach of privacy, while Google keeps logging how many times a day you go to pee as a technical necessity for bare functionality of their services. What a world we live in...

SD 1.5 being trained on porn makes total sense. I once tried to generate body pillows with cute animal designs on it and the results were true horror.

@@Sunlight91 Did you asked for animals with cute body designed to plow? Sure thing, here is some for you... =D If you need further help with your "Dakimakura" pillow, let me know i'll be happy to help you with a non traumatising prompt.