Asalamualaykum warahmatullahi wabarakatu

masha_ALLAH sister.

true. Mashallah, an amazing lecture ! inshallah the glorious Dajjal will come soon and establish the deen in all its truth and magnificence

Asalamualaykum warahmatullahi wabarakatu

Nothing happens without Allah`s will obviously, Dajjal`s anger and ability to break through the chains are obviously under Allah`s will.

Mannan Teo but it not nessecry that he will emerged as soon as the chain will loosen

Asalamualaykum warahmatullahi wabarakatu

The confusion may be in the meaning of the word "christ". It is not equivalent to "cross" in any way, but comes from the greek "christos" which means 'messiah'.

xX MoAzrael1 Xx breaking cross may means that he will announce that Christianity is not correct n he didn't die in the cross

You're confused with what is explained because you're a Christian and have a confused thinking of Jesus (Eisa) the Messiah son of Mary. First of all, the Jesus in which we Muslims believe is the true messenger, prophet sent by Allah to the children of Israel whom they reject until this present day who is not God nor part of a triune god. When it is said that when he returns to break the cross and kill the pigs it means that he will destroy the cross to put an end to the false belief that he died and was nailed into the cross by his enemies and a false claim by the Christians and the killing of the pigs because he never commanded his followers to eat the pig meat, flesh, etc. In the end he will call the remaining Christians to Islam because there will be no acceptance of anything but Islam (complete submission to Allah) in the end. Please do not become subjective and emotional because our prophet Muhammad only spoke the truth and not of his own desires but through the revelation of Allah. Jesus will return to kill the dajjal, he will not return back as a prophet because he fulfilled his role as a prophet when he came in the past but he will follow the law brought down by prophet Muhammad and he will implement it. His mission this time is to kill the dajjal and to stablish peace and become a just ruler from Jerusalem. There is many things that you do not understand but may Allah guide you to Islam and give you understanding.

Skin colour doesn't matter

That's because we Muslims don't make up stories like the non believers do. We stick to Quran and sunnah. We cannot say something which is not in the Quran or sunnah. if you are here for folklore stories you will be disappointed.

If you already knew all this, perhaps seeking out videos on KZfaq isn't beneficial for you. Question: What were you expecting?

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/q9aBfbOQvqe7loU.html kzfaq.info/get/bejne/hN5zarqb2avFpIk.html

Yes look at the trees that grow from the ground and water in the oceans. The bees that pollinate the flowers. These r put here for us from God.

​@@Lina333pa So your verifiable evidence for the existence of a god is the trees, oceans, bees and flowers were put the by god. First of all, that is all just an argument, not evidence. Argument is argument. Evidence is evidence. They are not the same thing at all. But to make it worse, your argument that god exists because "god put those things there for us" is a basic fallacy called "circular reasoning.". Google that phrase. Do you have verifiable evidence for the existence of a god?

@@JoeHarkinsHimself actually the prevailing explanation for the existence of creatures and other natural phenomena was God, this is true regardless of which culture you came from If you contend with that explanation, then the burden of proof is on atheists to show that these phenomena were not created by God and by extension came about by random chance.

@@abubakr7920 Before we go further, let's be very clear. I asked a question whose honest answer is binary. You either have verifiable evidence for the existence of a god or you do not. You are avoiding the question. Your avoiding makes a series of philosophical mistakes. 1) "actually the prevailing explanation for the existence of creatures and other natural phenomena was God, this is true regardless of which culture you came from" So what? This is the same "prevailing explanation " that said, for most of human existence, that the world is flat. It's the same "prevailing explanation " that said that the sun and all of the universe orbits around the earth. 2) "If you contend with that explanation, then the burden of proof is on atheists to show that these phenomena were not created by God and by extension came about by random chance." At least you had the courtesy to start with "if" - I never mentioned that claim until you brought it up as just one more thing you claim without any evidence. You are arguing with your own invented claim. 3) then you say, "then the burden of proof is on atheists to show that these phenomena were not created by God and by extension came about by random chance." The burden of proof is on the party making a claim to support the claim. I made no claim of anything. You just simply repeated your mistaken idea that atheists make claims. All I did, as you can clearly see, is ask for you evidence for your existence of a god. Now let's try one more time. Do you have objectively verifiable evidence for the existence of a god? yes or no?