The Etruscans were Europeans not Middle eastern.

@@baldwintheleper8290 he knows

Well, considering Etruscans had predominantly R1b U152+ Y-DNA, there's clear impetus from Indo European males.

@@crypticreality8484 - R1b-116 (of which U152 is the "Alpine" or "Eastern" subclade) is NOT Indoeuropean for sure: it spread apparently with the Bell Beaker culture (or associated phenomena such as Artenacian culture maybe) which is continuous with Dolmenic Megalithism and spread the Basque-like genetics through Western Europe (as opposed to both Indoeuropean and early Vasconic or Sardinian-like genetics). It also shows a clear centrality in or near Aquitaine and not the lands then belonging to Indoeuropeans East of the Rhine and North of the Alps. It is a pre-Indoeuropean but also pre-Tyrsenian lineage in the context of Italy. All the rest is bordeline racist nonsense speculation: "I want so badly to be part of the master Indoeuropean race that I cling to every burning nail, lest I discover my real ancestors were on the losing side and only became Indoeuropeans by adoption/promotion". Racist thought is so pathetic! I presume you're referencing Posth et al. 2021, right? Well, I'm just looking at it (supp. table 1) and only two Etruscan samples were sequenced which produced Y-DNA R1b-U152, while another produced G2a. Nothing of this is Indoeuropean at all: we should expect R1a rather (or maybe R1b-Volga, which never really expanded with the Indoeuropeans even it it dominated their origins, but not R1b-Western). And I say this because R1a (of Ukrainian derivation) is very clearly the overwhelmingly dominant haplogroup sequenced in Corded Ware and its clear unadmixed descendants (Eastern Bell Beaker, Unetice and even their Vucedol offshoot further SE). I'm surprised that there is no J2 but I guess it's either older or more research is needed, because this haplogroup was absent in both ancient Vasconics (EEF-derived, incl. BB, etc.) and ancient Indoeuropeans (and also among Paleoeuropeans) but is clearly strong in Italy and was also clearly spread westwards bu the Roman Empire, strongly paralleling the known Roman/Italian settlement (also documented as autosomal DNA for example in Iberia, where Italian ancestry may be as large as 20% in Andalusia and La Mancha). More research is clearly needed (which may be hard to come because of the Urnfields tradition of burning the corpses, which lingered into the Roman era and was adopted by the Etruscans as well). It's likely, I guess, that the Etruscans became allied with the Italian Aborigines (Vasconics of the Sardinian/EEF type) against the Celto-Italics of Urnfields culture, which had ravaged the center-north of the peninsula in the previous centuries and would later also expand to the South (Samnites and such) and that would explain extensive pre-Indoeuropean genetics anyhow. But we'll only find out with much bigger datasets.

PS: I want an Etruscan woman :)

Time machine, anyone?

Nicolas Cataldo I totally agree with your statement. are you by chance on Roman Army Talk?

Sorry Eliza, but your link is nothing more than some fringe-cruft totally rejected by historians/linguists. The Etruscan language is lost - all we have are a few place names and other words. The grammar is totally unknown. Until some sort of breakthrough discovery is made, it will remain that way. There is no connection between English and Etruscan beyond both being Indo-European. That website is as ridiculous as others that try to show how Turkic is "Sumerian" or that Hungarian is "Sumerian."

Nicolas, the loss of Claudius' work - as is the loss of any historical work - is a tragedy. However, we have no idea of what it contained, and therefore its relative worth is unknown. It might have been extremely useful, or it might have been filled with myths and erroneous data.

7777Scion Sorry mate but you are misinformed. The writing of Etruscans is in the Coelbren language. You can find the cypher preserved in Britain. !!!!!

You may find some answer here: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/nbSElLCqurbKc2w.html

The twins or brothers theme, often at odds with each other, and often ending up in murder, is part of many Mediterranean mythologies. Osiris and Set, Cain and Abel, Jacob and Esau, and many Greek twins too.

Rome was an Etruscan city. They rebelled and started their own dynasty.

cybersasho etruscan had sarcofagus and theocratic religion then arrived micenean and the double axe culture

Neldidellavittoria dualism now we have trinity ....

The romans would have been the better without their perversion. Here a true piece of historical mastery kzfaq.info/get/bejne/opmTgqSBsqmbXWw.html

This is their "dawn" (the Villanovan culture), at their apogee they were high civilization without any doubt, teaching Romans all they learned about architecture and sanitation, among other things (writing even).

The title is "The Dawn of the Etruscan".... it means it wants to speak about the beginning of Etruscan civilization..... the Villanovian culture.

Probably cutting throats was the real objective, and shaving just benefitted by extension.

Kyle Stephens cremation was uses among indians etruscans was connect to minoics and the bull Τhe tyrrenus was those who stole the pharaohs maps....the esodus was from pirates who moved

Good spot! There was a lot of cultural contact through trade with Celts living in Northern Italy (Known to the later Romans as Cisalpine Gaul).

Robert Williams I would say they are rather unique, but more was taken from Greeks then celts but I can see the similarly in the crested helmet and motefortinio helmets.

I wonder about those prongs on the front. It seems to me like they might have had something attached to them, perhaps a badge of some kind? A carved stone, perhaps of alabaster (it was worked in Etruria and still is in Tuscany).

Before the Greeks came into Italian peninsular, Italic and Celtic cultures shared many similarities.

Ken Chalk no they are not

Mickael Prevost You mean modern Gallic (French) or ancient Gallic? Ancient Gauls loved beer more than wine, according to some theories the Etruscans were the one who introduced the use of wine in France 😀

+Kyon Yes the old Gaul is the thing I wanted to say :)

agreed, also the in costume re enactment look more like a people barely out of stoneage. I think Etruscans live are much more comfortable life than the video portrays. Their artifacts proves it.

This is true. If the people had the time to make elaborate pieces of artwork (pottery, decorated bronze armor) they weren't doing bad for themselves.

If the average Etruscan were to view this video, they would not understand it. Because it's in English. Also, they would freak out, and assume they were in some sort of weird hell with bizarre magical machines that show images. They would then get very upset and try to kill everyone, and start smashing the demon machines. Then they would run down the street, attacking people who are walking their strange looking dogs and cats on leashes. The police would then have to tazer the Etruscan. and hose them off in a jail cell, because the Etruscan had not had a bath in a month. Eventually, the Etruscan would become a celebrity, and do the talk show circuit. Like an unfrozen caveman lawyer, only different.

then the Etruscan has to enroll in an anger management class as part of his probation after being released from jail. After failing 3 attempts he is enrolled in a mandatory english class at the local night school, puts his profile up on plenty of fish.....

Macho? Oh dear, you drank the feminist poison.

An year ago they've found that Otzi's spear was made from metals coming from Tuscany, however the Etruscan civiliziation started more than 2.000 years after his death; he could have been an ancestor of the Etruscans but definitely not one of them.

No. His genetics make him similar to modern day Sardinians and also to what most Europeans were in terms genetic back in the Neolithic. Etruscans on the other hand are closer to modern Italians, notably modern Tuscans, although they seem to tend somewhat towards the Aegean, where they probably originated. In the Bronze and Iron Ages, Italy (and other parts of Europe) experienced very deep changes via invasion-migrations, mostly by the hand of Indoeuropeans, who had already altered the human landscape East of the Rhine and North of Greece in the late Chalcolithic (Copper Age). Thanks to Ötzi we know this was not yet the case in Italy in the Chalcolithic but it did happen at a later date, surely in the Bronze Age, as the Italic Indoeuropeans invaded. It's probable that these invasions, first restricted to the North of the peninsula, were actually expanding southwards when the proto-Etruscans of the Villanova culture arrived, surely as "exiles" from the Aegean turmoil of the Bronze Age collapse. And they probably clashed right away, the Italics managed to take parts of Central-South Italy but the Etruscans also managed to carve their own niche in Tuscany. IMO the Siculi/Shekelesh were displaced first to Central Italy and then to Sicliy, where they also left a Levant-like genetic legacy that is otherwise very difficult to explain. Ötzi probably spoke something related to Basque, as Sardinians themselves surely did until Romanization, as evidenced by the massively Vasconic toponimy and other legacies. Most likely there was a time around 4000 BCE when almost all Europe west of the Kiev-Warsaw-Göteborg line spoke Vasconic (Basque-related) languages.

I fully agree

I have seen the sarcophagus of Seianti Hanunia Thlesnasa, and I highly doubt that she lived in a grass hut... not plausible

This is about the dawn of the Etruscans, i.e. the Villanova culture of c. 1100-700 BCE. The apogee of the Etruscan civilization is after that date.

There is a lot wrong with the portrayal of Etruscans in this video.

The truth about many historical nations is hidden by the ruling powers of the time. Children world wide are and were schooled in history in a way designed to be complimentary to the current ruling power. I find it exciting to investigate as far as possible individual families, -preferably common or middle class- because it uncovers the real living conditions and customs of the majority of people. I would love to explore the history of the people in the Eastern Block areas. I am sure there is a wealth of fascinating information about these people which has been hidden by the political bureaucrats. Study powerful or royal European families and you are overwhelmed with the depressing accounts of genocide, murder, corruption and destruction. Accompany this with an absolute evident lack of respect or feeling for human life and you get a sinking feeling in your gut. Africa historically was a continent of rich resources. The continent was ruled by Kings, Emperors and Nobles and held strong trading links with Europe. The Nubian and Abyssinian kingdoms were powerful and lucrative. In the research of mummification done in Egypt I looked at the Nubian mummy and was impressed that he seems to be not only the best preserved but the most handsome of the mummies known. I obviously cannot say for certain; but the Etruscan demise seems to have stemmed from the fact that they were a passive people and probably easy to overcome. If they had evolved into a sophisticated and rich society, this could have meant others would have wanted that wealth. Is there any evidence of attacks carried out on these people to steal both wealth and territory.

Romans and Celts mostly.

Also, a brief introduction to the Etruscan pantheon of major Gods and Goddesses: www.ancient.eu/article/1025/etruscan-pantheon/

Ditto. They notably venerated a supreme god called Tinia. Other of their gods are detectably similar to Roman ones. For example Nethuns is Neptune and curiously sounds similar to the Egyptian goddess of the Nile waters, Neith. Yet other deities resemble Greek ones: Charun and Charon notably.

I'm half Greek and I even know that's totally wrong. Now the script and language may have been influenced by Greek, but Greek was also influenced by earlier languages.

Greek was an indoeuropean language, Etruscan was not.

CAPITIVS1897 greek is not an indoeuropean language is a matematic language indian speak hindi not sanskrit is the opposite dont exist indoeuropeans people was moved there and mixed and in the piracy times we have intrusers Greeks had cities there thousand years ago they dint even exist the islands exept is not true the dates we have more than 5000 years oscurity and still speak for 2000 bc and noah and muhamad etc exist different disaster in greek mythology exist deucalion disaster aegean vulcanic disaster etc geography was very different

Art .f​ Iol "matematical language" is not a liguistucal group, Greek was and is an indoeuropean language...

Kolton- so enlighten us, moron !

John Kerr Etruscans, formerly Trojans, formerly Hebrews - Summerians - their lineage includes the Basque (linguistic reference) and Catalans, and from Basque the lineage continues to include, the Celts/Gauls, Pics, Welsh, true English (Not British or the Germanics, Anglo Saxons) and the Irish. There are a number of geneticist and linguistic references and the research is accepted by the American Academy of Sciences. ☘

KEKALEM,KEKATEN.KEKAL-GOSPODINI.KALUSK-KALOZ GOSPODINJA.-DE KAL=BO GOSPODINJA=DEKLE.

Dusko Kovacevic correct!!!

Yes and not. Obviously Etruscans were not "Serbian" nor Slavic in any way, they were not even Indoeuropean. However I do think they originate in the Anatolian-Balcanic group of cultures, which I broadly call Pelasgian, that included the pre-Serbian culture of Vinca, as well as others (Dimini-Rakhmani in Thessaly, Tell Halaf in Syria-Kurdistan, quite possibly Troy and some of its allied Asians too). These pre-Indoeuropean people of the Aegean were surely involved in the complex wars and migrations of the period of the Trojan War and the Sea Peoples, what is called the Late Bronze Age Collapse, and seem to have ended up in Italy, IMO because they were attracted to that area by the ongoing wars between Indoeuropean Italics, then invading from the North, and aboriginal Italians akin to Sardinians (the Sherden of the Sea People's narratives). So, as they say over here: "by mere chance a donkey played a flute". There is no connection that we know of with Rashka (a single word coincidence is always that: a coincidence) and the Slavs were at that time (if they were at all) an obscure people from the swamps of the Upper Dniepr, but there may be a indirect connection after all.

"ETRURIA JE SRBIJA", lol, get outta here

I agree as I am among those who do not believe in "Slavs" occupying this territory in 6-7 century.If so,who had lived here?surely this had not been an empty area.But,evidence says otherwise.Everyday findings support it...Even if some people had lived before Slavs (for those who believe in such theory) what happened with them?They just vanished without a trace?!?Even if they had fought with "Slavs" where is the evidence such as massive findings of some kind of weapons of that time?people from our area doing DNA analysis say that its written that they origin is Balkan territory for more than 10000 years!Ende :-)

Unknown 10.000 years?! Indo-European had barely started their expansion out of the Eurasian steppe back then. What people inhabited the balkans before Slavs came about? Illyrians, Dacians and Thracians mainly. Coastal Thracians were assimilated by Greeks, while Inland Thracians were later assimilated by Turkic Bulgars. Dacians mixed with their Latin conquerers and later with Southern Slavs becoming modern Romanians. Coastal Illyrians were assimilated by Romans becoming modern Dalmatians (now assimilated by Croats), inland Illyrians survived untill the sixth century, when faced with Slavic migrations, either moved south in the Byzantine empire or stayed and got slowly assimilated by southern Slavs. That's were pre-Slavic Balkanians ended up

Inferring from Romans, who surely learned that also from Etruscans (as almost everything Romans are famous for), they should have used a sponge on the tip of a stick, previously humidified with water running through the excellent Etruscan sanitation works.

yeah, probably Roman sponge style. ...sigh... If some1 pushed me into a time machine and I found myself in such an era, I would not poop. At all. Ever.

Even some British sources claim that our origins were from Trojan refugees. Desperate attempts to claim a classical connection where there was none. At least the Etruscans were almost certainly influenced in some way by the classical world, Academics just Can't accept that Non Classical native cultures developed on their own without the help of the Greeks or Egyptians .

Ken- were you there, moron !!!!

aloha, Aeneas and his Dardanians were at Troy (Ilium). Homer lists everyone but the Etruscans in this World War. The Etruscans were certainly had the most powerful army and navy in the Med. Sea. There could be no reasonable justification for their lack of appearance at/ in Troy by the Etruscans. They had to have been at Troy. They must have had a different name in the western area of the Med. Sea. Aeneas and his followers left Troy at the battle's conclusion and seemed to take 5 years to get the okay to settle near the Etruscans.

aloha, in my opinion the Etruscans were the most advanced in the Mediterranean: in shipping, finding resources (it may have been the Etruscans not the Minoans in locating the silver mine in Norway), advanced metallurgy and the biggest civilizing force advanced hydraulic engineering. Where would the Etruscans learn this? Why go to an area Dardanus built a. colony then left? Resources. The idea was to co-opt the trade of Central Europe which the Greeks had the major share.

They were probably if not from Troy itself from somewhere nearby in Western Asia Minor. A closely affiliated language was still spoken in historical times in the island of Lemnos, right in front of where Troy once stood.

The horse was domesticated long before the Scythians. Also we now know it had two independent centers of domestication: (1) the Western-Central Eurasian steppe (that would be later the Scythian homeland but no Scythians yet) and (2) the Iberian Peninsula.

Coco Luxe oh yes off course.. and you speak the same way i think..

Etruscan is not related to Basque at all, nor to Hebrew (Semitic) nor to Sumerian (single "m", it's not a season). They are the last known remnant, along the closely affiliated Lemnians (Lemnos island, near Troy) of an ethnic group that does not exist anymore. IMO they are probably part of the Halaf-Vinca-Dimini cultural group that expanded in Asia Minor and parts of the Balcans c. 5000 BCE. At least in Thessaly they survived until the Indoeuropean (Mycenaean-Greek) invasion of the Bronze Age (Rakhmani culture). Legends support a Pelasgian persistence in that region of Thessaly but Greek legendary "ethnography" is very confusing.

@Beth Bartlett, Etruscans have absolutely NOTHING and no genetic link whatsoever to Hebrews, Sumerians, Basques or Catalans. All the racial sludge you just spewed out come from the degenerate demonic bloodlines of which you belong to, all of which have Rhesus Negative Blood type.You belong to the race of the jews. Nothing to do with Etruscans.

No. The Etruscan alphabet is a modification of the Greek alphabet and is transitional towards our own Latin alphabet (almost identical, except that they tended to write from right to left).

Also what you say of genetics is pretty much nonsense.

@@LuisAldamiz Some archeologists think Vinča culture is a mother even of a Greek culture.We have lots of sites but many have been flooded ,intentionally I believe, to build dams,hydro power plants etc. to hide our rich history

DanciBL: You are confusing Vinca (pre-Indoeuropean) and Vucedol (Indoeuropean). Vucedol is indeed a likely candidate for the origin of Indoeuropean Greek elite invaders, which would reach Northern Greece c. 2000 BCE, a major reason is the famous "megaron" (a typically Greek structure otherwise) of Vucedol itself, where the "blacksmith king" lived. Vinca belongs to much older invasion of c. 5000 BCE, apparently derived or closely related to Tell Halaf in Syria, as well as to Can Hassan in Turkey and the long-lived Dimini-Rakhmani culture of Thessaly. They also penetrated into Bulgaria but that area was "reconquered" by (likely Vasconic) peoples of the first Neolithic wave coming from the North, producing the extremely advanced Karanovo-Gumelnita culture (also the related Varna group, Gradesnita-Krivodol group, and the more northernly Cucuteni-Tripolje one). Karanovo-Gumelnita was the first civilization to smelt bronze ever, 1000 years before anyone else did. Vinca gets the fame but it's only because of contact, surely not always peaceful, with Karanovo-Gumelnita, a much less known culture but extremely impressive in everything. Around 3000 BCE (loose date, each place has its own chronology) Indoeuropean invaders flood both areas and all Central and Northern Europe (Corded Ware culture), and that produces Vucedol around modern Belgrade and Ezero culture in Bulgaria (seemingly direct ancestors of Thracians). It was not a mere elite conquest but there was also a significant population replacement judging on archaeogenetics. No further major demic changes have happened since then in those areas (although minor ones surely did), so later invasions were mostly elite invasions (and I think this is a characteristic of the Metal Ages, as warrior elites become a thing, people who did not want anymore land to work themselves but land with workers to exploit them instead).

No, it's just a legend invented by Herodotus.

aloha phuck y'all, Herodotus claims at least 18 years in Asia Minor. After 18 years of drought, Herodotus says they then moved to Tuscany. Geneticists conclude the Etruscans were NOT Italian and have 11 minor markers from Asia. This suggests a short stay in Asia. Their language is atypical of the Indo-European of Anatolia. so, where did they hail from? Since they were the only people after the Minoans to have advanced hydraulic engineering this group might have been fleeing Crete, the Dorians were coming. The world was in a catastrophic situation but the more advanced cultures rebuilt their world. Once the pathetic Long Chronology (or the Christian Creationist Chronology) Is finally tossed out these connections might prove illuminating.

We can read Etruscan, it's almost our own alphabet, what is sometimes harder is to UNDERSTAND Etruscan because no affiliated language has survived.

Etruscan is the ancient Coelbren alphabet which we still have the cypher for, it translates into welsh. You're welcome. You should check it out.

LOL "Coelbren alphabet" is A FORGERY! >> en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coelbren_y_Beirdd

And that is why you will never learn any true history.....

If it was forged in the 18th century, why are there written examples of 4th, 5th and 6th century stones written in the language ? Why were the two copper scrolls found with all the other Gnostic gospels at Qumran written in the language ? Why did a 15th century writer preserve the cypher ? Forgery my arse, You know nothing of consequence.

Commercial texts and Etruscan has nothing to do with the Phoenician. The Etruscans were traders and made treaties for the sale of iron with the Phoenicians / Greeks and the Gaul. We found beautiful Etruscan sites in Montpellier in France And the Etruscans introduced viticulture in France in the 5th century BC

Devin Sword Or maybe it was just traslated using the right English words that would rhyme together.

Kyon this is what im saying. The likleyhood that there would be any "right english words that ryhme" and would still accurately represent the origonal words is very slim. A differant context would be like adding numbers in decimal then adding the same numbers in binary, two differant languages that you can preform the same opperation with but the numbers in each will look nothing like the numbers of the other, if you see what im getting at

Seriously doubt they were black. They were indoeuropean people.

They weren't black you're so dump

because they were not mate they were Europeans

Yes, they come out of the salient tribes of Gaetuli. The Etruscans come out of the Ludim.

If that the case, why are northern Italian all white ? Did the so call black Etruscans decided to pack up and go to africa ? Hahha..Ma va fan culo va.

@@markapiua1289 even the original Britains were black. Life for humans started in Africa. So the original humans were Black. Not sure where the rest came from Hahha.. Errone Par Ma Et Tu Suffrant

I was wondering when someone would say this i came a long way jus for this comment. And for the doubtful people just remember they prayed to the sun Gods Ra just about pre dates all the known Gods. How did dod this knowledge get that far north i wonder. 🤔

no.. they were green

In your dreams bro

in 1965 turkish professor Kazim Mirsan translated the etruscan language. He can speak easliy 7 turkic languages.

Are the bigger words etruscan examples?

о,боже! Там скорей Русский язык)

+michaeladam caira, I'm not sure that you are correct, but I'm no expert. They did use the same alphabet as the greeks (from what I've read and watched on multiple documentaries), but the language was different. From what I've heard, the experts are easily able to translate Greek writing from the time, but they are limited in the number of words they can translate from Etruscan writing. By Greek accounts they were great traders. It could be that they had an older written language that they replaced with the Greek alphabet like the modern Philippines has with the English alphabet. On the other hand they may have not had a written language and adopted the Greek alphabet much as the ancient Kingdoms of Korea had adopted the Chinese written language. Another possibility might be that the Greek alphabet was originally Etruscan and it was the Greeks that adopted the Etruscan's writing system. Since so much has been lost about the Etruscans it is hard to say (especially with my limited exposure to the subject). If I was a betting man, I would guess the third case. This is based on them being great traders, as accounted by the Greeks. If you are a great trader, you would want to have some way to keep accurate accounts of your trades in order to be most prosperous. Those few that had great memories, could just memorize everything, but that could possibly lead to contested deals. I am making the assumption that they were traders prior to making contact with the Greeks. On the other hand, they could have learned their merchant skills from the Greeks and made improvements on it. In this case, it would make more sense that they adopted their writing system from the Greeks. From my understanding, written language was usually developed for trade. Cultures that specialized in the pursuit of knowledge (like the city state of Athens, for example) usually passed their knowledge on through oral means until language was developed and then found the advantage of writing their knowledge down once egos got out of the way. Cultures that pursued trade, usually, early on found the need to develop and keep records to expand their trade. This was why the written language was developed in China, from my understanding, and spread to each of its trading partners that didn't have a written language. In scholarly pursuits, knowledge is power. In economics, exchange is power, especially in the long term. We can still see this in the modern age.

+Saruman The White, one metal slab doesn't show proof. Just as using a writing system that somebody else uses, doesn't mean that they don't have their own spoken language. Just as calling it the Greek alphabet doesn't mean that they invented it. They could use Greek letters without using Greek words, which is in evidence in what almost all the other artifacts that has writing on it shows. Just as I can use English letters to write of the Korean words that I've come across, the Greek writing and English writing systems are adaptable that way. Despite how brilliant the Korean writing system is, I'm not able to write as many English words with the Korean writing system. It is dependent on the phonetic options available in the writing system and whether it offers. Since the Etruscans were so well known as merchants, that metal slab could be a result of their trade dealings. It is possible that they adopt the writing system of whoever they are doing business with (I'm not sure how likely that would be). The problem is so much has been lost from that culture, we may never know, unless some archeologist out there gets really lucky. So far, from my understanding, the linguists don't understand what they wrote, despite the familiar Greek alphabet.

aloha, if I'm right that a large portion of the Etruscans were Minoans fleeing Crete then the closeness btwn the Greek and Etruscan would show similarities. Both Greeks and Minoans had a script, Linear A and Linear B which shows trade connections at the very least.

michaeladam caira

How so?

Dude, all of these languages are related. None of them stole anything from each other.

Why 80% of the words (root) can be explained only in Serbian language?

They all, including Serbian, have a common ancestor.

zelenkov damjan tell me serbitch what can u explain with serbian language give me sole examples

By the way: en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%CE%A3%CF%89%CE%BA%CF%81%CE%AC%CF%84%CE%B7%CF%82#Ancient_Greek en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Pescara#Italian en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%E1%BF%AC%CF%8C%CE%B4%CE%BF%CF%82#Ancient_Greek en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Berlin#German en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%E0%A4%B5%E0%A5%87%E0%A4%A6#Sanskrit Verona is of unknown meaning, and Preveza is POSSIBLY from a Slavic root. Brandenburg is of uncertain meaning, probably West Slavic (Polabian), much like Berlin.

they were white people, Greeks + Kurdish + Armenians who converted to Islam = Turks. I do not want to offend anyone. Étroussat is a misnomer, they called themselves Raseni, Étroussat small group Rasen dealing with medicine

What are you talking about

you are like the black saying they were black, they were not turkish, u guys didnt even come to being at the time.

They called themselves Rasna, not Raseni. en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%F0%90%8C%93%F0%90%8C%80%F0%90%8C%94%F0%90%8C%8D%F0%90%8C%80#Etruscan

Ersin aktaş Well done! Etruscans, formerly Trojans, formerly Hebrews - Summerians - their lineage includes the Basque (linguistic reference) and Catalans, and from Basque the lineage continues to include, the Celts/Gauls, Pics, Welsh, true English (Not British or the Germanics, Anglo Saxons) and the Irish. There are a number of geneticist and linguistic references and the research is accepted by the American Academy of Sciences. ☘

Deli Kanli that doesn't make them Turkic. "Turks" are just Anatolians that speak a Turkic Language. Turkic people are more of an Eastern Asian stock vs a Mediterranean Caucasian Stock which is what Anatolians and Etruscans were.

Turks are asians and originally from Eastern of Asia like Mongolia , Kazachstan. Etruscans have the same blood and DNA like modern turks now. We have 42 different turkic tribes . If you are italian, sorry to say, but you are originally turkic. Go and study history my friend.

Deli Kanli Actually it is you that needs to study your own history. How come Turks look Caucasian and not Mongolian like the rest of the Turkic people in Central Asia? It's because the population just adopted the language but remained Anatolian in genetics. That being said the hypothesis is the Etruscans left Anatolia wayyy (>1000 years) before the Turkics even made it to Anatolia, and that hypothesis is reaching. To then add to that say that the Etruscans were Turkic is just retarded and I can't even believe you would unironically believe such bs.

If you want to understand the origin of the etruscans, you have to learn at least 4 turkic languages. Etruscans language cant be translated in other languages besides turkic language. If you dont know it, you cant Judge about it. Alberto Piazza discovered a residual genetic link to Turkey. And a different study found that a local breed of cattle also shared a genetic link with Turkey in 2007. You cant admit, because you are originally turkic. You dont want to hear the scientifical provements, you just want to hear what you like to hear

Look then at the Alphabet of the Etruscans! That was not a greek alphabet. They called it later greek alphabet. This letters of Etruscans could only translated from people in turkic tribes. People in Kazachstan understand there language very well. Etruscan letters are not alphabet. Its called 'TamGaz' . Etruscans are turkic gokturks. You cant deny that in italy was not a turkic civilasiotion. in anatolia there was 10000 years ago a turkic civilisation. around 3000 years ago there was a turkic civilsation in italy , they build rome (romulus turkicc wolf ). Western people like you tries to hide this truth. Very pathethic and sad !

Yeah and so were the Vikings

beefcakepantiehoes Yup. That's true. I have a book about it.

+Negus Menelik yeah and the people who built Stonehenge were actually native americans

beefcakepantiehoes No Stonehenge was built by a black man named "Morian". Gerald Massey confirmed this in his writings. Also the original Celts were black.

+Negus Menelik no dude I have a book about it. Also the Great Wall of china was built by Mexico I have a book about it