Yes!!!!

Man if we only knew the direction that build would go huh? A giveaway! But they still have large Torso Leo's Pro R they could put a kit on

X10

I'm not a hater. I just don't believe everything on the internet. And when I put up a post questioning the legitimacy of the build and point to some technical resources to back up my doubt about it, only to have said post deleted within the hour....TWICE....well, in my opinion, THAT ANSWERS MY QUESTION. You believe what you want.

I'm sorry, but anyone who goes on someone's youtube channel which they use to advertise their product to earn a living and say that there is no way they're doing what they are filming and posting is precisely a hater. It's one thing to doubt something you see and completely different to publicly discredit someone's accomplishments. I am in no way associated with these guys and this was the first video I've seen of their's but felt like some comments are completely unnecessary that's all. But I'm sure if you wanted to line up next time in glamis against them they'll have no problem serving you a nice warm Gapplebees dinner.

@@turbotony7967 Ok, then I guess by your definition of "hater", I'm a hater. I disagree, but I don't care. It's your opinion, which honestly doesn't matter to me. Facts, on the other hand, matter. To be clear: I didn't discredit them, unless you agree that the information I provided does in fact disprove their claim. Is that the case? At ANY time, LaRue could have replied with more evidence and details on the build, and if that made sense to me, I would have apologized right here, IN PUBLIC. They chose not to. In fact, they deleted my original post, very quickly. And my second post, very quickly. THAT'S my real issue now, because it's SUSPECT, and why I continue to post in this video. In fact, here's a screenshot of my second post, which is very similar to my original post: imgur.com/a/eBo4s4Q I gave my opinion. I provided information to back it up. I gave an opportunity to address my doubt with facts and evidence. TWICE. And, they deleted it quickly. TWICE. They still have the opportunity to be transparent and post more details about this build and how they've managed to keep the engine, transmission, belt and driveline from blowing apart from all that power. And I'm not the only one who doubts their claim, I'm just the only one to provide evidence that makes the claim seem unlikely. This is why I chose to make my 3rd post a reply to Mr. Glock858, who pointed out the lack of transparency as well. Notice LaRue has not addressed his doubt either? I also didn't say that there was "no way" they were making the claimed power either. In fact, I said it was possible, just not likely. Maybe go back and re-read my comments so you can get your facts straight. Thank, and have a nice day.

Stock block and head is more stout than a K. Structure can take it.

lol we got some cool clutch things in the works right now! 👍

If it has a stock bottom end I’d be blown away.

Keep wondering! Gonna be awhile

not 100% positive but i heard from more heard from more than one person its not the original engine anymore, meaning they blew it up at least once and the new motor is built... who knows if its true but I'm sure it wont ever get owned.

Nope

phx speed would smoke this thing

It's been a few years now still going strong! 👍

Those LS sand rails may be bigger but they still don't weigh much and make 1500hp😂 he's gonna need more power than what he has

@@BillieHQ 1500 is a tall order. That may be their claims, but I’d seriously doubt it.

Comparing a 60k engine package to a 60k utv is not comparable but the majority of the ls sandrails are probably around 300 whp

He does I've rode in this car in Idaho and he does beat those cars.. it a beast

@@dcboys0701 then why not show that?

Exactly what internals, same block or billet, etc, etc? What’s the actual build not just saying original motor.

I don't buy that they are making the claimed 643 to begin with, regardless of what they've done (which hasn't been disclosed, even more suspect). The pinnacle of modern racing engines are Indycar engines, and if these guys are in fact getting 643 at the wheels (means close to 700 at the crank), then they are matching or outperforming the current 2.2L twin-turbo V6 Indycar engines running 24psi boost to get 700BHP. Possible? Of course. Likely? NOT. Indycar racing has millions of dollars in R&D budgets to develop the best of the best. These guys certainly don't. So, if the claim is true, they are geniuses and should be working for one of those teams. Take it to another dyno shop and have an independent 3rd party run it, see what happens.

And I'll be surprised if this comment from me stays up; they've deleted the last 2 within an hour. I have the second one screen-shot as proof.......as well as this one now.

@@mx3727 New Koenigsegg Gemera is making 590 hp out of a 3 cylinder with a warranty and passing emissions.

@@mx3727 Do you know what a Honda K20 can do? People have been pushing 1000whp+ on those motors for years now. 650+ is not uncommon on 4cyl motors. IndyCar is limited on the amount of power they can make, they can't just make as much power as they want. It's all sanctioned for professional racing and a horrible comparison to this.

They may be junk but far better than Can-Am garbage.

We hear ya and we're working on our own clutch set up, stay tuned! 👍

Polaris front diff can't handle stock power on a hard dig lol

@@garyenglish9338 nether could my Can Am with 300 whp! I’d have to hit the whoops in 4wd otherwise I’d break rear axles! Blew the front diff seals and both rear axles at the same time lol