If you are in a United States history course and you don't know about this critical election between William McKinley and William Jennings Bryan then come test day, you best be staying home son.
Пікірлер: 101
@scottaznavourian5403 жыл бұрын
Grover cleveland was awesome. Not only did he win 2 non consecutive terms and the popular vote 3 times, it seems he won a presidential election in 1882, when there was no election
@milesjolly61734 ай бұрын
Ok he made a mistake, There was no presidential election in 1882 (Cleveland was first elected president in 1884), but there were the midterm elections. Also Cleveland was elected Governor of New York in 1882. But yeah Keith probably should have checked his years there.
@victoriajesus67 Жыл бұрын
You are the best, I really could understand what happened in the 1896 elections. .
@NewNameNoah5 жыл бұрын
Very enjoyable episode. Thanks for making these.
@NickDupree9 жыл бұрын
EXCELLENT! Love how you explain the William Jennings Bryan-Democratic realignment...
@jvp38737 жыл бұрын
"Living in a van down by the River" Too classic Keith, now I know for sure we think alike/very similarly. Thank you for the education and the wit. it's Gr8 that each time I leave here it's with a smile and an additional point on my intelligence quotient. Thanks again for the post, James, San Diego, Ca.
@gonebamboo41165 жыл бұрын
Point is: the rich controlled the gold. That is why the founders instituted two metals, unlikely they could control it all. Bootom line is there is no problem with Fiat currency such as the tally stick. It is only interest barring Fiat that incurs debt such as we have today.
@rosieforshort4 жыл бұрын
6 years later. Hi lol funny story, I was reaching for something in the microwave with airpods on, just as I was about to grab the bowl of queso the first zap of electricity from the video went off in my auditory receivers and I instantly froze lol thanks for the heart attack Hip Hughes. This Campaign of 1896 gave me a buzz 😂
@Deltasquad3829433 жыл бұрын
As soon as I read about the zap of electricity, I then heard the zap of electricity.
@jimkinkade69192 жыл бұрын
Extremely interesting!
@wesleymercer74968 жыл бұрын
thanks Keith. your a friend. I. can't do it alone. your books for dummies, inspired me to teach others. precious friend. please keep teaching?
@alexsuarez4854 жыл бұрын
Follow the yellow brick road.the gold standard.
@saskoilersfan3 жыл бұрын
I followed the yellow brick road that's now painted red from blood. It appears to leave earth. I found the dead Disney associates and followed them. President mckinnley and wizard of Oz leads to president Kennedy and the wizard of Oz.
@glenna.jaspart13913 жыл бұрын
So basically if we accept the idea that The Wizard of Oz is a representation of McKinley, does it also mean that McKinley was a fraud?
@saskoilersfan3 жыл бұрын
So basically , if we accept the idea that the wizard of Oz killed Kennedy with magical trajectories ..... You see the death of Lee Harvey Os mirrors president mckinnley. The wizard of Oz assasination on JFK. The wizard of Oz assasination on mckinnley. Our Dorothy is Dorothy kilgallen. JFK and Oz...not Os... In JFK , don't go chasing wizards or rabbits..
@heatherbogle20037 жыл бұрын
Sweet. This really helped me clear up the confusion of the two Williams. Gonna subscribe now.
@hiphughes7 жыл бұрын
Boom. #Winning for both of us. Visit the Video Index for easier browsing of titles! docs.google.com/document/d/1X-t3fPhfpmONu3D82GNYGeZr8svg0Q6TgrTTisQsRUY/edit?usp=sharing
@rockstarsharma537 жыл бұрын
Keith Hughes why did you put Dorothy Gale on the thumbnail instead of William Jennings Bryan or William McKinley ? Was Dorothy the secret candidate of 1896 ?
@HistoryNerd8086 жыл бұрын
Nipun Sharma Because as he mentioned in the video, a common interpretation of the Wizard of Oz is that it's an allegory for this election
@rockstarsharma536 жыл бұрын
Michael Hill oh
@saskoilersfan3 жыл бұрын
Dorothy kilgallen is part of the Kennedy wizard of Oz assasination.
@toastedgoast5084 жыл бұрын
And who got the last laugh? The anarchist who shot McKinley to death.
@oaa-ff8zj3 жыл бұрын
Roosevelt
@saskoilersfan3 жыл бұрын
My name is Derrick Wilson. I can explain the mckinnley Oz enigma. I can explain the Kennedy Oz enigma. I can explain both wizard of Oz stories. In JFK , they kill Dorothy too. The death of Os wald mirrors president mckinnley death. The death of JFK mirrors Fran's and Sophie.
@chadvogel35947 жыл бұрын
this is my favorite election.
@APOCALYPSE_X-MEN7 жыл бұрын
William McKinley won 51 percent of the popular vote, the first candidate to win a popular majority since 1876, and the first winning candidate and first Republican to get a popular majority since 1872.
@soupy40999 жыл бұрын
Perfect timing! Men Who Built America was on last night!
@jcjcc19605 жыл бұрын
Soupy my aunt did tested our DNA William Jennings Bryan is her 5th cousin im a direct descendant of William Jennings Bryan
@kristinabryan35294 жыл бұрын
JC JCC same-ish here. But I think I’m a bit more distantly related.
@12KevinPower9 жыл бұрын
What is interesting is that the modern day Republican Party isn't mostly about manufacturing nor tariffs nor protectionism. I know there are some, but the vast majority are pro-trade, anti-tariffs, and pro-outsourcing (if big gov interferes with manufacturing). Those issues isolationist/manufacturing ideals have gone into the Democratic Party.
@hiphughes9 жыл бұрын
McKinley actually adopted a pro free trade platform in his last speech in Buffalo, right before the bang bang.
@12KevinPower9 жыл бұрын
Keith Hughes I never knew that. So pro-tariffs and pro-trade? thanks! Is it possible to do a video on shifts of political party ideology over the hundreds of years? it seems to me that both major parties had liberal, moderate, conservative factions. I think you have done this with the party realignment video, but excellent work and info though! :)
@jakeplays19956 жыл бұрын
Then trump happened
@jakeplays19956 жыл бұрын
Republican idea again
@12KevinPower6 жыл бұрын
Yep. New Democrats/NeoLiberals are essentially modern day Bourbon Democrats.
@iammrbeat9 жыл бұрын
FREE SILVER!
@iammrbeat8 жыл бұрын
Awesome! I learned a lot from the legendary Mr. Hughes :)
@alexsuarez4857 жыл бұрын
I get it.but what about the cocky midgets and the flying monkeys?great work guys.
@mauriliovargas66826 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the razor sound to focus my attention, I was being distracted by some cute girl sitting in front of me.
@derickwalk32677 жыл бұрын
Mr. Hughes, why did'nt Cleveland run again against Bryan in 1896 to try to face McKinley for a third presidential term ?
@GoTfan-eb8tk7 жыл бұрын
There was a push to have him run on the so-called "Bourbon Democratic" ticket, because he was a gold standard conservative Democrat.
@jcjcc19605 жыл бұрын
Brandon Korner i am direct descendant of William Jennings Bryan
@jcjcc19605 жыл бұрын
Derick Walk McKinley was backed by the Rockefellers
@bloot9115 жыл бұрын
0 the box is
@bloot9115 жыл бұрын
@@GoTfan-eb8tk 6 AM and ⁿ066667 5770 is
@bradygriffith18939 жыл бұрын
5:01 The Demonym for a person from Nebraska is Nebraskan.
@hiphughes9 жыл бұрын
Thanks Brady, I am an Idiotan.
@michaelheeheejackson72557 жыл бұрын
Keith Hughes Idio*
@wrong_saint7 жыл бұрын
So back then being a populist meant being pro free trade. Funny how things change.
@guodade22397 жыл бұрын
It meant, actually, making exports cheaper and more money for farmers therefrom. Not pro-free trade, but subsidizing trade. Free trade advocates never note that trade can be subsidized. Increasing trade is the normal purpose behind manipulating currencies, whether overvaluing to subsidize imports that cannot be produced domestically (e.g. New Zealand or Latin America during the postwar period) or undervaluing to subsidize exports (like East Asia).
@12KevinPower6 жыл бұрын
The South had a lot of working class farmers, who want free-trade to export goods.
@saskoilersfan3 жыл бұрын
The new wizard of Oz was done with JFK ...
@padussia7 жыл бұрын
Why was the election of 1896 considered a watershed in American politics?
@GoTfan-eb8tk7 жыл бұрын
Because it was the first time we had a truly left-wing liberal Democrat come close to winning. Most previous ones had been centrists or in Cleveland's case, outright conservative. It was also the first time the gold standard came under major scrutiny by the general public.
@theunknownpersonism6 жыл бұрын
Keith looks like Al Franken
@xyzoub2 жыл бұрын
Hi, I am sorry but no, bimetallism is not inflationary, as was the argument of 19th century monetary monomaniacs/closet fiat-promoters, and is repeated over and over by traditional economists today: silver was the original money, and was with gold ; on the contrary, and much more importantly, the effect of taking a currency off the silver standard after thousands of years _was deflationary._ It is not the same to say : adding silver is inflationary (silver is not inflationary, it kept prices rather stable). Adding silver is inflationary in so much as money will return to a previous price stability which was suppressed by the elimination of silver as money. Alleged silver inflation is taken out of context : the action of metal suppression affects prices and it is the action which is inflationary or deflationary, not 'the thing,' silver. Taking half the money (silver) out of circulation while debts remained the same literally meant the owners of wealth and credit (who owned most of the gold) suddenly owned the debtors and working classes (who owned most of the silver) with a stroke of a pen. It is the wealthy (individuals or nations) declaring they own all the money over the poor (individuals or nations). Once State institutions and Western governments held all the gold, a process which only lasted a few decades (1870s to 1933), and populations became accustomed to a specie-less world (gold is only used for large commercial transactions and international commerce), the evolution to complete fiat, considering interests involved and the control of the banking industry over State governments, became inevitable.
@walterdennisclark9 жыл бұрын
Excellent as usual Mr. Hughes. Do you think that --assuming the Democrats prevail-- the Republican party will go through a realignment of their own with the libertarians playing the role of the outsiders who want more action, affecting the platform?
@12KevinPower9 жыл бұрын
It would also mean appealing to libertarian Democrats, who are those semi-middle to upper class liberals, which Pew Research calls them "New Generation Democrats" www.people-press.org/2014/06/26/typology-comparison/types/next-generation-left/
@EuropeanQoheleth9 жыл бұрын
***** I'd hardly call John McCain or Mitt Romney or Paul Ryan ultra conservative. Mitt Romney isn't even a Christian unless you count Mormonism as Christianity.
@jakeplays19956 жыл бұрын
Looks like the major subsection of the right is the nationalist rightwing populist clashing with the more conservative establishment. There is still a small tea party minority and to a lesser extent a libertarian one too
@richardcashman7671 Жыл бұрын
Rather than a yada..yada on the election of 1896 you need to go back, study and learn about the election. You can start with the basics. Hannah wasn’t McKinley’s campaign manager. Study Charles G. Dawes and to make it interesting you could introduce what Bob Dylan and Charles Dawes have in common. Then instead of popping in and out of the screen shot learn about the importance of Thomasville. That would be a start.
@Theshipsqiled894 жыл бұрын
Smh
@carolinecorman17162 жыл бұрын
Orator.
@romanclay19134 жыл бұрын
Garret Hobart, McKinley's first term VP, refused to step aside then died in Nov. 1899, age 55. TR and McKinley elected to office November, 1900. Inaugurated March, 1901. McKinley shot September 6, 1901. Died September14, 1901. TR became president. McKinley's campaign manager, Sen. Mark Hanna, wanted to challenge TR in GOP presidential primary in 1904. Hanna died February1904. TR won reelection November, 1904.
@saskoilersfan3 жыл бұрын
Nov 22 63...the wizard of Oz kills Kennedy. You have no idea who rules you in lies and illusions do you...I do.
@romanclay19133 жыл бұрын
@@saskoilersfan Phi Q cretin
@saskoilersfan3 жыл бұрын
@@romanclay1913 no ..it's fuck you... You should understand the Kennedy Os enigmas since you type in deception..duh. I have mastered your worlds lies and illusions. I have mastered the language of deception called English to recognize. I study your deceptions because I know you have to go through lies and illusions to see truth. If you begin with Walter Disney death ...and follow the dead Disney associates back to Oz killed Kennedy.. I don't see Os on 6 floor.. I don't see Oz behind the fence. I do see Az shooting Kennedy... I love how media's mind fuck you with magical trajectories..
@romanclay19133 жыл бұрын
@@saskoilersfan Cretinous moron, go to the psych ward. You're pathetic.
@romanclay19133 жыл бұрын
@@saskoilersfan Quit living in your mom's basement. You're insane.
@K.C.-Games6 жыл бұрын
4:17 spider man theme
@KJTV676 жыл бұрын
People from Nebraska=Nebraskan!
@zimmermandzb55695 ай бұрын
You're "explaining" the 1896 election and you can't even place the president who was presiding over the office DURING the 1896 election? Grover Cleveland was president in 1896- NOT in 1882 as you casually mention in the first 2 minutes of your video. Really kinda dampens any and all credibility you have here as a historian. What kinda research are you really doing?