yeah, premier league teams in particular are inflating prices in football way too much. I think it'll be good for the economic stability of the industry

Yep he is a hyperbolic click baiter.

Real spends like 800 mil a year on these matters. So the english top clubs are now around half of what the spanish top clubs are in spending power. This is not a transfer budget. It Transfer, Salary, Agents fees, Staff Salary. This is a massive massive cap on the league, Real already spend 40 mil more on wages a year than City who is the top english wage spender so do Bayern so you are also just lying.

Yep, you're the only one. 🤭

​@@wankerflaps Yup and this is how Rashford gets a $100M price tag. It's crazy how inflated the English players' market values are. It's not sustainable

Why does Man Utd always spend a lot of money on shitty players ??😂😂😂

@@iam_kxylee Well to be fair they also spend a lot on good players like Casemiro. Not saying that it was a good deal. United just throws out money like it's nothing.

​@murasame1450 Personally, I think Manchester United overpaid on Casimero for the length of contract!!

@@iam_kxylee called having John Murtough and Richard Arnold as recruitment. They’re bankers, didn’t have a clue what they were doing.

@@davidsaville5239 Yeah, I said it was not a good deal they made, but they still got a good player out of it.

I couldn't agree more if 115 says no then we should say yes

@@alfiemorris2282 but united said no aswell lol

lol United said no too dummie

Haha what a 🤡

@@MC-ie8xl United were city before city dominated the league of course they gonna say no they want their glory back

Ain’t that the truth

115 Charges FC

Wrong. This will destroy the league.

And Uniturd

​@@iam_kxyleecry

Correct

Exactly!!!!

And he's scared Prem will lose their FAKE top spot

You'd think united fans would be all for it with the amount of money they've wasted on bang average players 😂

No he's scared City have already spent enough so it doesn't matter now City will win every year because no club can come close to their spending,

Might help them by accident. Maybe stop buying 80 million pound dogshit players like Antony lol

But yet he Claims he doesn’t care about city

Obviously. There was no issue when Man U was dominate.

Villa has are hella rich. They get in the top 4 consistently and they will spend big.

@@atikurrahman9304they can’t tho cos of ffp. They are literally in the same position as us (Newcastle) We have owners who want to spend big but can’t

U do know villa have one of the richest owners in world football 😂

U do know Newcastle have the richest? More than the prem combined 😂

​@@DomNUFC990the new rulse are replacing ffp

He just does it for the views. Do not trust this guy😂

If the new system is implemented it will give city and some other clubs the extra incentive to leave and join the super league

Do you know the meaning of moaning?

@@paulorganisation1do you?

@@YodaSkywalkerstop them then? Why do you act like they can’t do anything the prem could ban them if they do that plus the uk government is pssinh a law that would stop clubs from joining a super league.

He doesn’t have an actual clue it’s hilarious and all the plastic fake United fans clammed and agree with him 😂

The worst part is there’s people who believe everything he says like gospel even though he has no clue about anything

Isnt the 85% rule only applicable to clubs in UEFA competitions?

If a massive club like Liverpool agreed? Then im not bothered about man utd in the mud and tinpot man city overspending as usual .Then im with the other teams including spurs, west ham etc! This was needed

@@mymemories925 because John Henry wants to pocket extra cash dividends out of club.

True

Duff beer

Duff beer ha

The problem here is that you are gonna be losing out on big players. City now now have around half the spending power of Real because of this cap.

@WistiPurpleday again it seems like only City and United would be adversely affected. Everyone else either nothing changes or its a big help, unless you think teams should spend more than 400 million per window

Wouldnt this corrupt the Premier League even more in the eyes of other leagues? The only reason the Prem is seen as the best league in the world now is because they have so much money and spending power, so all they do is buy the best talents from other leagues and so on. With the new system, more clubs will be able to spend more money, only adding fuel to the fire no? Now instead of only the top teams throwing money around, the majority of the league will have that ability.

It won't benefit the smaller clubs when they spend way more than they can afford and they start going bust. Then everyone will be crying.

@@Hello-wy2px the premier league is corrupt to the bone, what are you on about? where there is big money, there is corruption and that's why you never seen any scandals in bundesliga like you've seen in serie a, premier league and laliga

The question isn't "why are these fans for or against it?", the question is "should all fans be for or against it?" Some people will be in favour of unfair things that benefit them. So what? Who cares? How does that get us anywhere closer to the truth?

UTD didn't do 115...

We earnt it,didn't buy it!🤬👹

​@@IR17171717has to be the most pointless comment ever!

Hate them but United earned it!!!

Like the Ferguson era?

@@samuelkoomson6017 How?

​@@samuelkoomson6017how did you get that from what he said? Most of us including me want football to be fair. I don't want a ref to not give fouls and cards because "he's trying to keep his hands in his pockets" only to the have the get get out of hand and begin to give out ridiculous cards. I want decisions to be fair even if it goes against my club. I want there to be something like goal line technology for throw ins and corners and often those decisions are wrong and we all know a corner often leads to a goal. I also don't want teams taking the Mick with shell companies over paying players and managers (and likely refs) so one team completely takes over. Some of the best games are small teams Vs each other. Its sport, it's meant to be fair and it's being ruined by money in many different areas.

@@samuelkoomson6017 I'm not a Utd fan however, I am a football fan. We need a league where ALL teams have a chance to win titles and trophies and to qualify for European competitions. All we get now is City winning virtually everything every single season and the bottom teams taking it in turns to get relegated and this shows something is wrong. No team should be winning the title every season.

arsenal fan 😂😂😂

Completely correct. He needs to make another video correcting this one.

Absolutely correct

He works for talksport are you surprised he's spreading false information?

This will have implications on clubs like Brentford as they will now be able to spend 85% of their revenue.

@@calinho7689 My point is that the anchoring rule will only have an effect on Man. City's and (perhaps) Man. United's spending. The 85% rule will be what will limit other clubs' spending.

And premiership rugby

No it is not. This is how much you can spend on transfers. "Salary" cap. Is how much you can give players in "salary" hench the name salary cap.

@@WistiPurpleday Its not that either. Its spending entirely, on wages, agent fees, transfers etc. Its spending as a whole, not on just one particular aspect.

@@dylthomas1005 it kinda is

@@WistiPurpleday Are you upset by it?

Why would they? Self-sustaining clubs.

Arsenal have never been dominant, never won the league back to back and never won the champions league.

​@@joebarnes100arsenal were the first team to the win the league three times in a row in the 1930s

@@goonerboz6023 I don't think the original comment was referring to the 30s.

@@joebarnes100 you said they never won the league consecutively I was just pointing out you were wrong that's all

We need to take off city from pgmol

@@nicklasaxelsson71like the Ferguson era?

@@samuelkoomson6017 Exactly. Both of them lmao.

We just need to remove city from the epl then everything would be better

It clearly isn't, the economic model of the Prem isn't sustainable.

And to make the whole competition more competitive. In theory this would make the prem even more exciting in the long run. I see the biggest issue in the big clubs potentially leaving the prem for a super league.

It's the end of your huge financial cheating against the true authentic leagues ..Now the leagues with legit integrity will rise up and even more with the new champions league money

@@Triple_X_Xhere AGAIN!! Do you watch every single channel that covers English football??

@@Triple_X_X im not man city fan mate im a burnley fan so you saying burnley are financially cheating?

​@@GIBBO4182i can sense the fear in your voice .. You're scared of Prem losing its FAKE top spot

That's the theoretical story of corruption. Real practice is that big clubs are getting stronger.

Yeah well, if you have infinite money and still can’t win, maybe just let it happen right.

How did this end for them?

And still formula 1 is dominated by a single constructor, Red Bull. So this certainly isn‘t the solution to all problems.

They can spend 400 million a year, that’s a ton of money

Just scrap it all

@@kirkham111then Man City and Newcastle just outspend everyone and win everything

@@GIBBO4182United and Chelsea have out spend everyone what have they won.😂

@@alexchoo7190 😂😂😂 cooked

@@alexchoo7190 this would potentially be outspending teams by an astronomical amount. Not £200-300m over a decade

Yep, i thought the same. But they still voted against it.

not even close - it will help reign overspenders like city and manu

No but ok

@@TWOScottRage Easy to vote against something you know is going to pass and you are in the minority. Adds to the facade that they are against it when in reality, they will get to spend millions when the rules are applied to them as Mark mentioned in the video.

the dirty cheats will get away with it!!

do not turn football into nfl!! nfl clubs just move location if they want 😂😂😂 ridiculous! u probably want a tv break every 2 minutes and everyone has to wear marshmallow suits n helmets

It ruins the experience for fans. Majority of fans root for larger clubs. It really blows to see your club have the potential to do more but is stunted. Also how your larger club brings in more viewership and the smaller clubs benefit from that already.

People are paying more to watch it on TV disgusting

So the top clubs put in more work to bring in more revenue, it is a genius idea to punish hard work 😂 decades of work so bournmouth fans don't get their feelings hurt.

How about we force your parents and you to donate half of your income to homeless people?

@@alphamale3692 why would we do that when they would use it for drugs

You missed the point bro

😂😂😂

Delete this comment 😂😂😂

@@obinnamadichie maybe u dont know how market works dude. At the moment so call small teams can't spent more because of FFP. Look at the newcastle, richest club in EPL but they still can't spent because of restrictions where as clubs like united Arsenal city can spent without any issue. So if from next season spending cap remain fixed for all the clubs, then clubs like everton, forest, villa, newscastle will burn cash too without the worry of point deductions.

The thing is his supporters here mostly Liverpool fans are just delusionally obsessed with City because of repeatedly falling short of them..they don't realise Utd's have actually spent more and taken the most advantage since the 90s and if Utd finally get it right through wasting so much money it will be them and City competing just like 2012,2013 and 2018 with Liverpool and Arsenal no were near.

better run club ahhhhh 😂😂😂 wtf u been smoking? everything city has achieved last few years is from cheating!! dirty scumbags!! and u acting like is from being well run 😂😂😂😂

🎯💯👏

This is good it makes the game more competitive

Where would they go? No one else can realistically compete

@@StrikeBolteafc ...If wages significantly dropped in England they'd obviously go abroad to clubs offering more and it wouldn't need to be the ridiculous levels we have now if there was a huge drop in England.

@@rael1999 that doesn’t answer my question what clubs would be able to compete

@@StrikeBolteafc Saudi!!!

@@dhirshg true but that affects every European league not just the prem. also do you think Saudi will realistically pass the prem? They have bought lots of players yet with they still aren’t that popular. They are the biggest in Asia not doubt but won’t be able to compete with the European teams

Hate them both but you can't compare apples and oranges! City are now actually trying to buy class, history and pedigree - let alone trophies. Laughable. No credibility.

Well that was because United earned their spot. City was just lucky they were bought up by a country.

What are you talking about? City never spent more above their income, not even once. I dont know where you saw that, but it is clearly false information. Bias toward City by media once again

Yeah blame everything on City..lol

Yes, they need to get done for 115 befire the end of the season. I would say do a rangers on them.

@@jimbo6059 that’s not gonna happen though Man City bring too much money into the league and this is bad for all English clubs competing in Europe

indeed it is I agree. corrupt

Seems to be working just fine in American sports.

Compete!! Sorry to pointed out.

It’s always been about money. The “golden age” of serie a in the 90s was full with owners using at as a money laundering scheme. Take of your nostalgia lens and realise it’s always been like this

It's always been about money, you just didn't see it that way back then.

@@Diogo85 You don't know what you are talking about.

@@StrikeBolteafc You don't know what you are talking about.

@@grsmustard9139 explain how then. Enlighten me and don’t just say you don’t know what you are talking about that’s not debunking anything

Arsenal already have young squad ready to compete and they didnt need spend so much money meanwhile the biggest loser of course its united

Is good for Man U because they spend lots of money for trash players

450 mil a year on everything football related is really low. Real is allowed to spend like 800. So its not gonna be competitive it gonna make England a worse league. So maybe you are right more competitive because they are making it Italy and will be overtaken by other leagues when they can't keep players soon.

@WistiPurpleday For me, it isn't how much you spend. It's the way in which you spend what you have. And if you haven't got the money, then you sell to buy. That's what we do in the lower leagues, so why can't the so-called elite? You also have your youth academy and your loanees to fill on the bench if you can't buy extra.

​@@Chall1spending isn't just transfers. If what Wist said is true then it would make the league more competitive by making the top teams worse. It would be better to have the top teams remain at the level they are at and try to give the teams below more of a chance

@@WistiPurpledaynot they sent where did you get from? They can not spend 800 mil every year

@@StrikeBolteafc That is literally what they are allowed to spend by the spanish rules yes. Read more and talk less about stuff you know nothing about thank you.

Well said Jamie 👍👏👏👏we want a competitive league not just for the few.

its always been that way you clown

Like when Liverpool were dominating?

@samuelkoomson6017 wasn't entirely financial reasons for domination tho was it ? Liverpool earnt the right just like utd did in the 90s Now teams exploit the ruled just like city and Chelsea, small clubs just throwing money left right and centre and although that is happening Liverpool are still competing.

​@@jamiehayes5888liverpool spend, stop pretending they're a small club. So delusional 😂

Why would teams willingly decrease their revenue if their costs remain the same?

Youve spent 1.4bn 😅

manu have the highest payroll in the EPL

It might acc make the epl weaker coz the best players will go to different leagues as they want to play for the best teams and if the best teams in the epl cant afford them they will move to different leagues

Please

🙏

😂😂😂😂😂

​@@Triple_X_Xwho's your team

​@@Jake97xBarcelona and city real plastic

But they are not gonna stop Chelsea who have spent a lot more than ManCity? Why? Ooooohhhh wait, they haven’t won as much as we have. Ahhhhhhhhh

@@Dualshock911 If Chelsea want to spend money this summer according to the FFP rules they have to sell players. Don't talk without knowing.

@@Samin-qi8gz sir who’s talking about this summer? We are talking about what all 3 clubs did previous windows NOT THIS SUMMER tf???

​@@Dualshock911u have to be one of, no change that, you are the dumbest person i ever seen make comments. as they say, you cant fix stoopid 😂😂

Yes but the Premier league is in the position at the moment where it makes more money than every other league in Europe. If that changes it’s going to be a big problem

The top clubs work harder to bring in revenue that helps the entire league but your idea of fair is to punish them? You have the socialist mind virus that makes zero sense. 😂

Don’t act like we spend the most and a lot every window, Chelsea and UTD have outspent us for a couple of years now. It’s because we win, you get blinded by it and think it’s down to money

They will do the same with Girona as well.

"Pathetic" rise to the top? I'm not sure you understand the meaning of that word.

That's what you lot don't get. City already did the crime, they are now benefiting off its spoils. This only hurts every other club trying to close that gap.

@@alexperryman23 I need more than that bro, I’ve heard that like 10+ times already