The NHIndustries NH90 is a European medium-sized, twin-engine, multirole military helicopter. It was the first production helicopter to feature entirely fly-by-wire flight controls.
Пікірлер: 154
@manuellangius2896Ай бұрын
Here in the Netherlands our navy flies the NH90 very well. Only in the beginning there where quality issues..they send them back to the factory...built in Italy....but thats allready years ago.
@Toby-NL12 күн бұрын
@@manuellangius2896 oh yes , the Italians . These days Italians Build both or choppers and trains , and both have issues . Ask the Germans how a joint venture whit Italians work out .
@Toby-NL12 күн бұрын
@@manuellangius2896 they should just have stuck whit their cougars . Cougars where perfectly fine . Does not even cost more , cougars a cheaper . And a few in the military refused the new chopper from the beginning , the manage to keep their cougar and are the cool guys 😎
@Recon597 күн бұрын
Oh yes, tulips and bicycles ….
@fredtedstedman5 күн бұрын
Black Hawk was designed to fit in a c-130 which is why it has low height and stretched-out shape .U.S. Marines requirement
@Toby-NL5 күн бұрын
@@fredtedstedman that sounds odd , as the new model NH-90 the Dutch military bought to replace their older super puma happens to be 3100mm. Higher ? My question while reading that in my specification reports as I read your remark on the side “ w-wait w-whut ??? “ your awnser in combination whit the information in my specification report , makes absolute no sane sense !!! So you say the Dutch marines wanted a chopper whit a lower height then the height profile of the super puma they where using at that time ? yet the Dutch marines ended up whit a new chopper “ NH-90 “ whit a higher height profile ?!? I ask , when the Dutch marine core did calculate their specifications tailored to their needs , was it private snafu that the marine core tasks whit that responsibility ?!? A height difference of 3100mm. Higher !!! While it needed to be lower !!! What the hell is this , is this still the Dutch military ? Or did it overnight chance to “ Goddam Mc hales navy “ !!!!
@thomasmoran911418 күн бұрын
Sounds like a commercial for the NH90.
@fredm902811 күн бұрын
Faux, cela ressemble à de la propagande anti NH90
@regregan685210 күн бұрын
@@thomasmoran9114 does it though?🤔
@benoitnadeau584523 күн бұрын
NH90 is amazing when it can fly. It does not happen that often tho.
@bikesfrench85242 күн бұрын
600 copies sold and moved to blocks 2 these problems have been resolved 😊
@TheMadMax1000Ай бұрын
US is not retooling and changing its logistical/maintanance foot print to support a foriegn helo... US has over 2000 UH60s in service that fill every role and need.
@zoom502422 күн бұрын
We ordered 18 of them in 2001 and we still havent got our anti submarine fleet versions yet, so we are without that aspect because of it. We have the mh60M blackhawk which were ordered and all were delivered very quickly and they are like 10x cheaper to operate. Now Sweden added another order to double the blackhawks and are looking into getting a new anti sub/navy heli and it will likely be the Seahawks.
@badgerattoadhallАй бұрын
The carbon fiber is not good for a utility helicopter. Bullet holes are hard to repair.
@regregan685213 күн бұрын
@@badgerattoadhall tbh I don't think bullet holes are good for alot of helicopters...
@Toby-NL12 күн бұрын
i don't even understand why they did use carbon for it . who even came up whit that idea ? and why ? as it makes absolutely no sense in any logic or rational way , let alone from any military perspective . bin told they are supposed to be cheaper then the cougars they where already using . well idk , seems carbon management and maintaining a carbon chop during combat / war operational will cost more . certainly as carbon is easy damage , whit no actual capable weapon systems and whit a fuel tank of military aviation fuel under need (the side of the chop taking all the heat / incoming hostile fire)
@glennridsdale5779 күн бұрын
@@Toby-NL The same reason other aircraft are built with CFCs. They're lighter and stronger which makes for higher performance. However they have to be designed and manufactured correctly, like anything else.
@RayRay7914 күн бұрын
I think I read somewhere that Australia was unhappy with its performance and maintenance.
@regregan685213 күн бұрын
As in Australias performance and maintenance🤷♂️
@RayRay7913 күн бұрын
@@regregan6852 yeah I think it didn’t have a high operational rate and had some supply chain issues. I’m just regurgitating what I’ve read!
@Buddy895384 күн бұрын
@@regregan6852nothing to do with Australia’s maintenance, technical issues with the aircraft’s composite cabin floor, cargo hook, rear ramp, door gun placement and access, and the rappelling hook, and problems with the rotor head in crosswinds aboard the navy’s LHDs. Delays with deliveries to other customers meant the Australian Army was in effect the global fleet leader for the aircraft, meaning there was little or no global knowledge on how to fix or address many of the aircraft’s technical issues. Maybe do your research before blaming Australian maintenance and performance
@regregan68524 күн бұрын
@@Buddy89538 do you mean from almost 20 years ago as that is about how long NH90 has been in service even if Australia was one of the lead users? So what's the excuse(s) now (As in 2024)? Perhaps Australia should do it's research into what other countries have done with their 500+ NH90s to solve/sort/stop these apparent issues, preferably a decade or so ago at least...
@regregan68524 күн бұрын
@@Buddy89538and yes, I am blaming Australias maintainence and performance as engine failures due to incorrect use and a crash due to an added feature use are squarely and fully Australias fault by action and use.
@NicolaiVE6 күн бұрын
Belgium will replace it's 4 army NH90's and it's aging augusta A109B H20's with 10 H145M's (and possibly a few heavy ones like the Chinook) Due to it's high maintance costs and low flight hours to maintanance hours. The Navy will keep it's 4 NH90's, but is looking out for another Helicopter for SAR missions (on the coast) as the NH90 is too expensive in this role. It's sad, but it's the reality...
@BTR-xw4ofАй бұрын
I have never liked the NH90 for various reasons. But more importantly our SOCOMD/A special force operators did not like it either - SASR hung on to their ageing Blackhawks by the skin of their teeth - ask anyone [99%] of SOCOMD/A operators 'which' helicopter they prefer and the new Blackhawk wins every time. Without going into detail about the positives vs negatives of both platforms, Australia finally has decided on a mature, plug + play for upgrades Blackhawk. And finally selected the Apache E - several Apache E's are already delivered and are in the process of IOC. But what is as a side issue an unprecedented FUBAR even for the most incompetent and dysfunctional Dept of Defence globally - DoD's headquarters in 'Russell' - the decision by the Chief of Army to actually 'bury' what are still capable helicopters that were in their innovatory - this is a national scandal. To simply 'bury' these helicopters in landfill is a national disgrace - why we could not sell them is simply absurd - and if it was not due to the brilliant accountability of Senate Estimates Australians and the world would probably have never known. Australia's Dept of Defence is 'the' most secret Department in the entire APS. Globally - only the US arguably is more secretive. Billions wasted. A giant cover up - and 0 accountability. No sackings of APS civilian DoD staff, 0 sackings of the bloated mid level officer cadre at Russell. In other words - business as usual.
@chippyjohn1Ай бұрын
The Blackhawk has a worse service record than the Taipan with regards to mechanical failures crashes and deaths, even considering the number built. The Blackhawks were purchased as the US forced it. Their military industrial complex is selling less and less products and as Australia is run by the US and our military fight for them, they want to show a stronger US presence I Australia. Australia has no military, they are all loyal to the US and believe their lies.
@ericb.435826 күн бұрын
"We have met the enemy and he is us."
@regregan685213 күн бұрын
Seems more than alittle strange Australia destroyed the MRH90s and buried them so soon?🤔 The "investigation" was not yet even complete before they literally buried the evidence and even when Ukraine asked to take them Australia for some strange reason denied them🤷♂️
@tomijorgАй бұрын
Norway has calceled the NH90 contract becouse of delivery delays. bad service program, and so on. We have now ordered Sikorsky MH-60R Seahawk Helicopters instead. This should do us well for several years. Love from Norway
@tomijorgАй бұрын
Also. a few years back, we got new SAR Helos. We went from SeaKing (Used as SAR helicopter for the norwegian airforce from 1973 to september 2020 "2020-2023 was a face out period") to SeaQueen. we ordered 16. I think the MH-60R Seahawk as a naval patrol and antisubmarine helicopter together wil AW101 Marlin, will give us both Combat and SAR capabillities that can serve us for many many years. The NH90 should never have been ordered. And the norwegian government searched for quite a long time for a reason to get out of the NH90 contract. If memory serves me correct, there is an upcoming trail where Leonardo Helicopters has the opinion of that Norway was in the wrong then they broke the contract. IMO as a norwegian citizen, and quite updated on our military, i think we should just by us out of the whole NH90 thing. Leonardo did not delivere on one singel point. In fact, they delivered the first 2 (or 3) NH90 out of spec of what was in the contract. It could also not do anti sub missions in about the first year. The service program costed about tripple of what the contract stated, and Leonardo could not supply high enough amount of spare parts to storage. Those two reasons is what was used to get out of the program.
@bikesfrench85242 күн бұрын
The NH 90 sold 600 copies, these technical problems have been resolved and it is moving to blocks 2😊
@b06-garanchonyhunilorenzof30Ай бұрын
Australian Military cancelled their order to buy this NH90. Because this helicopter is grounded. They want Black Hawk in their military.👍
@brunol-p_g880015 күн бұрын
The Australians grounded the NH90 for 2 reasons: they’re inability to run a maintenance chain ( and it’s the case for every single piece of gear in the Australian military, Navy and air force), and for political reasons. New Zealand, just next door, hasn’t any problems with its NH90s and an availability rate over 70%.
@thehoundGOT10 күн бұрын
@@brunol-p_g8800 I agree with you that Australia ordered Blackhawks partly for political reasons, AUS and USA are becoming closer militarily. NZ seems to be able to operate NH-90 without major problems but they only have C-130 transports which the NH-90 does not fit into.
@cameronjohns8639Ай бұрын
Too unreliable with an availability rate of 44%
@petereberl1598Ай бұрын
Actually less than that - out of 80 NH 90 (german Army) just about 12 to 16 are available at any time. In the German Navy are about five out of 18 are ready to take off at any time.
@regregan685213 күн бұрын
All comes down to individual countrys maintenance procedures, RNZAF get over 70% availability rates out of theirs which is actually a typical fleet availability rate🤷♂️
@TheSvenson187523 күн бұрын
By far the best analysis I have ever seen of the "problem case" NH-90. As is usually the case with projects in which the Germans are involved, it should be something that can do everything - this of course increases the potential sources of error exponentially - as we saw "recently" with the Puma. But now it seems that they have learned from their mistakes and are increasingly using CotS/PotS. I still think it's right that the developer nations stuck with the project despite the high maintenance costs. This is the only way to build up the necessary know-how... The NGRC program offers European manufacturers the opportunity to show whether they can now keep up with their colleagues from the States... P.S. A similar video about the (HAD/UH) Tiger would be even more interesting 😉🤞
@cooldude-bronstАй бұрын
US Black Hawk is battle proven, others?
@giancarlodecaro8930Ай бұрын
Just a little ignorant, the typical arrogant American, the NH90 had its baptism of fire in Iraq and then was used for years in Afghanistan, Libya, Lebanon, Mali, Somalia, this as far as use in the hinterland is concerned, at sea as a helicopter embarked on an infinite number of missions, the last one in the Red Sea against Somali piracy and Yemeni Uti. Be careful to inform yourself before writing.
@giancarlodecaro8930Ай бұрын
Just a little ignorant, the typical arrogant American, the NH90 had its baptism of fire in Iraq and then was used for years in Afghanistan, Libya, Lebanon, Mali, Somalia, this as far as use in the hinterland is concerned , at sea as a helicopter embarked on an infinite number of missions, the last one in the Red Sea against Somali piracy and Yemeni Uti. Be careful to inform yourself before writing.
@chippyjohn1Ай бұрын
It's not battle proven, when has it been used against a nation with sophisticated weapons?
@videre8884Ай бұрын
The Black Hawk proved itself in combat in Somalia as a helicopter that was not built for combat but to carry stuff. The Black Hawk is just a helicopter, not a miracle weapon. The Black Hawk had problems when it was new too. And it's 1000 times worse these days with all the modern technology that's installed everywhere. More electronics leads to more errors in the entire weapon system. With enough time and money, the NH 90 will also become a good and reliable helicopter.
@tomijorgАй бұрын
Thats why Norway )My country) has now ordered SeaHawk instead for NH90 :)
@stradivarioushardhiantz5179Ай бұрын
Preferred on AW/MH-101
@GermanGreetings25 күн бұрын
The best Helis are those, who fly. Therefore my choice: Airbus H145M and Chinook. There we know, what we get.
@frederickritchie686015 күн бұрын
If the NH-90 is so good,why is Australia scraping their NH90s and replacing them with Black Hawk Helicopters.i wish the New Zealand government hadn't bought the NH90 Helicopters for our Air Force
@regregan685213 күн бұрын
Why do we think Australia is some kind of helicopter expert when history has shown anything but? Seasprites, Tigers and now Taipans all failures in Australian service so when do we start holding the operator accountable instead of blaming the equipment? Instead of focussing on the few countries that apparently had issues with NH90s as if then they are some kind of good example why not figure out how more countries ARE still operating theirs instead? New Zealand being a prime example with one of the best availability rates on the planet and works fine for them with the air force more than happy with them🤷♂️
@thehoundGOT10 күн бұрын
Imo AUS bought blackhawks to cozy up to the USA - political decision
@MRCruise24Ай бұрын
I wonder how it holds up against the Merlin?
@tonyt8950Ай бұрын
It doesn't !
@MRCruise2415 күн бұрын
@@tonyt8950 specs please
@glennridsdale5779 күн бұрын
NH-90 should be the world's best helo in its class - but it isn't. In fact it's a perfect example of how not to run an international aircraft programme.
@ozzypresident5 күн бұрын
Its finished man thats it no more NH90. UH-60M Blackhawks have touched down under
@chippyjohn1Ай бұрын
The NH90 and variants were good helicopters. Just pushed out of use due to the US and the decreasing demand of equipment from their customers. Nh90 is better than the Blackhawk.
@jonlaurenzreyes1902Ай бұрын
poor reliability though
@chippyjohn1Ай бұрын
@@jonlaurenzreyes1902 No they werent
@corsair6Ай бұрын
@@chippyjohn1floors bend, aren’t robust enough, engine reliability was spotty, software is full of flaws, continuous tail rotar vibration and multiple crashes pushed Australia to ground the NH90 and go with the more reliable Blackhawk.
@chippyjohn1Ай бұрын
@corsair6 that's not the reason for disposing of them. The Blackhawk is not more reliable also, just look at its crash reports.
@jonlaurenzreyes1902Ай бұрын
@@chippyjohn1 bruh majority of crashes are human error not mechanical, besides that blackhawk has 100x more flight hours than nh90
@LeptospirosiАй бұрын
Too many heads coming with too many ideas and too many requirements. The story of every multinational program in Europe involving Germany.
@knowahnosenothing4862Ай бұрын
That and it was "sabotaged" to make way. They Should just wait for the V280 Valour. There was something sketchy with the head mount failing to correctly display flight data in night time flying by instruments that caused an accident resulting in fatalities.
@paulfeaheny3055Ай бұрын
NH 90 being dumped by countries all over because of tech problems and unserviceability.
@kentnilsson465Ай бұрын
@@paulfeaheny3055 Resulting in so high costs its not useable
@LeptospirosiАй бұрын
@@paulfeaheny3055 lets say you need to "know" how to service your fleet. I see them fly everyday and nobody here would ever think about replacing them with a less capable helicopter. Being in Italy we could easily replace them some AW149 if the NH90 was so bad as the Aussies think, but it is not! Just because Australia is Australia, And Norway program was messed up (20 years to get a handfull of machines?!?) While Sweden had so many custom mods that the costs balooned, it doesnt makes the NH90 an "unserviceable machine": ask the Kiwys 😏
@xyz-hj6ulКүн бұрын
First things first. The UH-60 is not a 'tricycle' gear helicopter. Fixed or otherwise. It's a _tail dragger_. Think about it, where the single, steerable, wheel on the child's toy is located. The NH-90 is closer in mission role to the CH-46, not the UH-60M. As such, if you want to compare it with a post-millennium similar class airframe, you need to look at the V-22 Osprey. Another all-composite wonder with similar, horrific, composite failure mode issues. Plastic airplanes crack. When they crack in main structural longeron or frame areas ALL the associated airframe skin/frames also is immediately compromised. It is 50:50 whether you can send them for rebuild as the cracks can be long, across multiple sub-assemblies and/or change the stress lines from failing structures such that poor load transference causes accelerative failure in downstream airframe sections, elsewhere. For awhile, the V-22 had a limited carry through failure that caused the fuselage to break behind the cockpit if it passed over more than a 6" bump in the ground during _taxi_. Plastic airplanes also BURN, to like shredded trash bag levels of Class-A writeoff. That said, the Sikorsky S-92 is the airframe which most closely mirrors the capabilities of the NH-90. And it is seeing continued sales in the offshore oil rig and remote resources/SAR roles because it is not designed to fold a gallon into a pint pot and make it weight compatible with air transport. The Crashhawk, which has _terrible_ bladeloading and power issues is the latter airframe. You cannot make a squad carrying utility helicopter airframe into a mini-CH and not expect bad things to happen, as the UH-60s own crash record has often shown. Helicopters are inherently dangerous mission platforms. If you don't respect the whole 'beat the air into submission, not fly but repel the earth' reality of their physics driven existence you will become a victim of their vagaries of behavior, no matter how well designed their FLCS or airframes. They also basically suspend a couple dozen TONS of weight from a few bolts and a mast shaft going through a swash plate or rotor hinge which makes them obscenely maintenance intensive as all of those bits and bobs, even when constructed of the toughest steels we have, will suffer very fast wear and tear. You will pay that price as cyclical availability and large downtimes as well or again, the airframe will fly itself apart during completely normal, let alone aggressively close to the ground, combat, operations. In the opinion of many, the USMC would have been better off sticking with a conventional helicopter like the NH-90 or EH-101, midway between a Stallion and a Skid. The V-22 got us further into deep STOM territory but came with too many compromises to size, complexity, cost and safety issues, as well as needing a host of escorts and support platforms which frankly are not often available in the mid-300nm radius condition it operates better at than a conventional helicopter. Today, with electric propulsor auxilliary fan technology and some rather clever, conventional, design understandings as far as profile weight and fuel burn margins, we could do considerably better with an NH-90 type platform but our commitment to the V-22 all but ensures the Europeans will get there first, with NGRC. The big issue is whether any of the design houses (Westland, Agusta, Aerospatiale) will be able to stay liquid as Europe's primary civilian economies continue this massive nose dive inherent to slapping their primary energy/food/resources supplier Russia while continuing to maintain an open-door policy to MENA states which are rapidly devolving society to a second/third world levels nanny state. If your government cannot afford an army to control its insurgent populations, finding customers to push sales to will be based entirely on costs and here China and Russia will both begin to pull ahead with combat tested, superior price point, designs.
@BurdogoyPАй бұрын
You can’t even proof read your title? Narration too is ai generated!
@schlirfАй бұрын
Since the NH-90 is standing on the shoulders of the UH-60, it might just surpass the Hawk. Nothing surprising to be honest.
@meomarte6 күн бұрын
Airwolf is better than any other.
@superwout10 күн бұрын
You should write a proper title
@Leftyintollerable24 күн бұрын
NH90, or do you mean MRH90?
@ZuulGatekeeper13 күн бұрын
NH90 is far too fragile to operate in demanding battlefield conditions. All operators report lack of availably due to breakdowns & expensive maintenance. Australia have retired it's fleet after just 10 years they gave up on it as their harsher environment tore it apart. Cooler climates it faired better but still far below expectations with operators in a constant battle to keep them airworthy due to mechanical & build issues. Norway cancelled & demand their money back, Sweden followed them also citing the same problems. Nations that have stuck with it limited it's use or withdrawn it from certain naval operations as it has issues of stability in high winds making it unable to land on flightdecks.
@andrelockridge910912 күн бұрын
NH90 why so many problems with this copter?!
@huey21ar11 күн бұрын
Spoiler alert: NO
@Toby-NL14 күн бұрын
I think I’ll pas , I wont wanna sit on top of a fuel tank , while being shot at from below
@regregan685213 күн бұрын
You mean like in UH-1H Iroquois? Arguably one of the most successful and combat proven helicopters of all time?🤨
@thomasscullion944915 күн бұрын
UK USE THESE Merlins as AEW ONBOARD CARRIERS
@arturbalint67073 күн бұрын
Came back from all its operations... well yes, I suppose when your fighting sandal wearing goat herders that not that much of a boast :D
@user-gd1oy9nl1d18 күн бұрын
Still blackhawk quality
@hangar48512 күн бұрын
The AW189, the westland wildcat and the old caracal are much better than the nh90. Much better, more rugged, battle proven.
@jasonhansen89962 күн бұрын
Seeing an AW189 come HAULING ASS in and pull of an almost dead stop in the air makes everything I know about physics go right out the window. Whoa excuse me. I got that wrong it was the the AW101 - That is one AWESOME bird. The AW189 is just sexy as hell. As a US Marine, you'll never get me to say that any helocopter is better than any of our AH-1x variants. There's nothing sexier than a cobra. I know there might be better.... I have to be beholding to a bird that saved my ass more than once.
@xeon_170517 күн бұрын
Nh 90 only is only bettef in rusting while you look at it
@regregan685210 күн бұрын
@@xeon_1705 luckily it's made out of composites then?😂
@apachetamizhaАй бұрын
Airbus NH90 The Tiger seems to be more modern and navy worthy helicopter to counter enemy submarine and sabotaging activities. Aside smoother in above ocean manuaver. Good choice for Indian Navy. Recently MH60 Romeo helicopter was inducted.
@ggoddkkiller134213 күн бұрын
Trying to do everything but as a result can't do anything well! Who needs the ramp in such a helicopter? It can't carry any military vehicle even the lightest military jeeps, it is just complete waste of resources..
@265justyАй бұрын
Australia got rid of there NH-90s and bought more Blackhawks to replace them. Obviously the NH-90s were junk..
@philv3941Ай бұрын
Obviously , obviously... or not . Australia choose to get rd of all european made furniture to please USA in order to be protected against china. Like morrisson did with the french subs. NH90 is maintenance intensive, but visibly they seems good enough for french or german special forces. And those forces work much more than australians ones
@265justyАй бұрын
@@philv3941 Really... I reckon an old Huey would be far more reliable... 😂😂
@WonkoWick28 күн бұрын
@@philv3941 Yep. If u dont buy my Blackhawks, then you wont get your nuclear submarine 😅
@peterjones-b5b23 күн бұрын
@@WonkoWick They call this the 'american free trade ' system ... they have been doing it since 1941 ! that and straight bribes have seen many sales despite non appropriate kit ... dare i mention the lockheed starfighter !
@pandibbarman22 күн бұрын
Australia has problems with anything which is not US made 🤣☠️ lol their military is a joke anyway. They just need to please their masters and fill politicians pockets 😂
@WikiWijaya-ul3cm16 сағат бұрын
🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩
@WikiWijaya-ul3cm16 сағат бұрын
🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩
@Fabio-om4kbАй бұрын
Je croyais que les Australiens avaient dit que c'était de la merde le NH90, ont m'aurait mentis ?
@jh5kl15 күн бұрын
didn t aussies also said merde french subs? isn't it just politics?
@regregan685213 күн бұрын
Why do you take Australians word as gospel?🤨 Should really try thinking for yourself🤷♂️
@pablopeter3564Ай бұрын
NH90 = It doesn't fill the expectations (TRASH). Australia and Norway said so. Germany has the same opinion with an availability rate less than 40%. The Black Hawk is battle proven and no issues.
@user-tt6il2up4o27 күн бұрын
But the F35 at 30% is ok though?
@regregan685213 күн бұрын
Battle proven and no issues??😂😂😂 if you consider being shot down, crashing and high maintenance battle proven and no issues then yea sure. That's abit like saying a humvee is battle proven and has no issues😅 the only reason US gear is so battle proven is because the US is in every battle and has lots of gear so therefore anything is battle proven if you involve yourself in enough battles (which obviously the US does) I can ride into battle on my donkey wielding a baseball bat, doesn't exactly then make donkeys and baseball bats battle proven with no issues does it...
@chiefexxor506927 күн бұрын
The NH90 for maritime operations is absolute trash, is a plastic pile of shit with no power to even carry 2 torpedos. Its ok for SAR uses.
@tonis864Ай бұрын
Only Russian helicopters nothing elese
@peterjones-b5b23 күн бұрын
spot the russian bot everyone ! lol
@tonis86423 күн бұрын
@@peterjones-b5b I am not a bot Sir sorry
@peterjones-b5b23 күн бұрын
@@tonis864 just a melt then ! lol
@tonyt8950Ай бұрын
This helicopter is garbage. The EH-101 flies circles around it !
@egodrive10Ай бұрын
Nh 90 regretted by Manu eu countries
@kentnilsson46523 күн бұрын
Doesnt matter if its better in every category if its so expensive to maintain that you wont fly it. The Swedish verdict is that its a piece of crap that was bought by morons in our military
@joshobrien6188Ай бұрын
the NH 90 is a piece of crap why australia chose to buy them now they have scrapped them due to another crash. The blackhawk is now back in the adf. Now the tiger is the last to go which will be replaced by the apache which the adf shouldve bought instead of the toothless tiger
@regregan685213 күн бұрын
You mean the crash that was caused by the Australian specific helmet optics? So blaming the helicopter fleet and not the individual pilot wearing an aftermarket add on helmet instead? Interesting thought process.
@joshobrien618812 күн бұрын
@@regregan6852 i wasn't there i'm only going off what has been said. one went down in jervis bay as well and not a night time op as i recall.
@regregan685212 күн бұрын
@@joshobrien6188what has been said?😂😂😂 exactly, people keep saying the helicopters a piece of crap, then the investigation finds the accident was caused by a faulty helmet system used by the pilot and yet its somehow still the helicopters fault??🤨 If you are going to bag a helo type for "crashing" then you may want to look up blackhawk and even apache crashes as by the sounds you may be surprised, so does that now make blackhawks and apaches pieces of crap?🤷♂️ BTW crashes and forced landings are not quite the same, ones alot more dramatic than the other but then everyone seems to love that I guess...