Probably one of the most mind bending, and mentally stimulating bathroom sessions I've ever had.

If a tree falls in the woods and there is nobody to witness it, it does not make a sound, due to power-saving functions of the simulation. If the area is not being used by players (humans), the area does not exist except in a very toned down manner for power-saving reasons. One a player gets close enough, the area is loaded and whatever changes should have happened during the time it was unloaded get performed so it is up to date.

I've been purposefully avoiding this topic because it's so hard to explain, but you nailed it! Thanks for the shoutout, means a lot! Maybe I'll try some experimental stuffs one day.

"Printed PCB of your circuit" "PCB board" Yep, managed to get all 3 in there in only two sentences ;)

Hey keystone, glad to see a new posting. Interesting stuff!

I remember sitting in a dank classroom being lectured Bell's Theorem. This, like other experiments with light, remind us that classical and quantum mechanics are not unified. It's an exciting time to be a physicist!

Thank you KZfaq Algorithm for finally promoting small cool channels!

I understood everything and nothing at the same time. Is this what Quantum™ science is about?

Personal partial epiphany on the rotating polarization situation while watching this (no real educated mathematical base for this, just concept that came into my mind): If the polarization is caused by electrons only being able to vibrate along one axis, maybe they not only just let through photons polarized at a right angle to that axis but when they encounter a photon polarization that is at some angle neither perpendicular nor parallel and photons are quantized, and must be either fully absorbed or not at all, the electrons essentially absorb the parallel component vector of their polarization and re-emit a brand new photon polarized according to the remaining perpendicular component of that photon (or accumulated sum of multiple such photons since quanta are always whole numbers) That new photon is then free to interact with the next filter in a non-parallel, non-perpendicular manner.

hey guys! I know it has been a while, I'll try to get some more out soon, but I have been working on something really big (not for a video, but as an experiment/invention) and I have been getting promising results for my first few tests, so I am really excited about it! (if you are curious, it deals with protons ;)

Nice to see mini cody's lab is uploading again 😅

The craziest part of reality is how subjective it is. We have hardly scratched the outer echelons of this plane of existence.

I still dont understand how everyone talking about this just glosses over the idea that the light going through the filter gets changed as it goes through the filter. I mean that idea PERFECTLY explains what's happening here. he said in the video and it is measurable that all light passing through a polarizing filter is now oriented at the same angle as the filter. We can't prove** that the filter changed the light, but we see that all light on the other side is oriented with the filter. so this would easily be explained by the fact that light within a certain margin of the angle of the polarizing filter would get 'redirected' to match the filter and this would perfectly explain what's why light can pass through the three filters and make a 90 degree turn but not 2 filters to make a 90 degree turn. I mean referencing the 3bl1br video, they say that light at angle 0 when passing through a 22.5 degree filter, 15% gets blocked and 85% is let through, so now we can measure that all light passing through that filter is now polarized at a 22.5degree offset from the initial reference. So it only makes sense that the next filter would behave exactly the same as the first, but with a new reference, thus leading 60% of the total light remaining and at 45 degrees offset from the initial beam reference. Even using entangled photons doesn't disprove this idea because you are only sending the photons through a single filter. thus the % let through matches as if it was only one filter. You need to run this test again but have the entangled light pass through 2 filters. So that PhotonA would pass through filters 0 and 45; or 0 and 90 and photon B pass through filters 0 and 45; or 0 and 90 independently. IF there was some spooky action at a distance, then you would expect if PhotonA passed through filter 0 and 45 and PhotonB passed through filter 0 and 90 then you should expect to see PhotonB to pass through filters 0 and 90 25% of the time. But i would bet money that PhotonB would pass through at the % perfection of the filter, since after all i doubt any filter is 100% perfect, so lets assume a filter of 99.999%perfection, you would see PhotonB show up 0.00001% of the time.

I like how there's a completely serious 10 minute build up then it jumps to an experiment where you're shooting lasers at a device that looks like a pair of those googly-eyed-glasses with the big -nose, wearing a second pair of goggles for safety. Glad to see you back and making videos again :)

A Photon checks into a hotel. The Clerk asks if it needs help with its luggage. The Photon says, “No thanks, I’m traveling light.”

I really like your style, your content and your personality. I'm glad you're uploading again and getting sponsorships to keep doing what you do.

You just earned yourself a new subscriber! 😄 Great video!

Me: "Im pretty smart" This Dood: SCIENCE! Me: 0_o wut

It seems that wherever I check on a channel that i haven't watched in a long time and see they haven't posted in a while, they post a video in a few days! That's happened twice this week. Great content as always.

Thank you for providing the links in the description. Very useful resource!

No explosions? *oh wait this is keystone science and not electroboom*-

Did you edit the video to make it seem like you don't need to breathe, or do you exchange gas through your skin? Gills maybe?

Wow you put a lot of work into this video! Thanks, this was awesome to see!

Close very close, as there is one major element missing in this interesting problem. Rotation. Not only does energy have compression and rarification as taught as waves, alternating dielectric and magnetic fields, it inherently also rotates. The rotation through the substrate causes an interesting result. The light shifts slightly in rotation and is therefor slightly different in rotational angle than before it entered. The middle polarizer does the same which results in the light further shifting which is seen as light passing through the last polarizer. All energy inherently rotates and this is known as the Lamar frequency.

Your videos are perfect for home experimenting and I plan on building some of your projects!!

Glad to see another post. Getting over my head, but got most of it. Don't stop. Works as an excellent filter. Wouldn't getting unexpected results on such an experiment imply that there are local hidden variables that we are as yet unaware?

You're relevant! I just took a while to get myself together, but you are relevant. We have so much to teach people!

I really liked the practical instruments used and the whatever available instruments you got, very cool.

From my understanding, there were never hidden variables anyway, it's just instantaneous energy redistribution in space happening and the reason why it's instantaneous is that otherwise, the universe would probably collapse if it didn't correct the energy mismatch. You can notice the same exact pattern/mechanism in atoms with electrons that jump between energy levels, they do it too instantaneously, again for the same reason, energy balance due to the 1st law of thermodynamics(and if that is true, then the universe is closed system too). The very exact mechanism at its core? That's a bit tougher to figure out.

I'm still trying to figure out if you are 18 or 45

Imagine your eyes could detect all particals, waves and all other spacial phenomenon like gravity instead of just photons.

Thank you for this video. I wish that I had watched it before the Bourbon kicked in. I will have to watch it again. Subscribed.

Dude i don't how long it takes to get your videos up Extremely descriptive just the way i like it Most importantly your linking papers in the description

Thanks, i really needed that headache lol

9:40 "Now with the general understanding out of the way.." Me: Yeah.. understanding.. haha..ha..ha.. *I UNDERSTOOD NOTHING*

Thank you!!! This is an awesome way to demonstrate such a complicated/ non-intuitive idea.

Nice to get a upload from you again! How is the fusor reactor you and cody is working on going?

I have heard of this experiment, extensively, but this is the first time I have actually seen it explained. Even in its abbreviated state, the explanation of what to look for and the processes involved was incredibly done. Great job on this!

Well scientists have yet to prove the biggest question know to human kind which is: *How my wallet is always empty and my rubbish bin is always full?*

This video showed up in my feed along side my usual gun, motorcycle, and female MMA fight videos. I watched the whole video, beginning to end, and understood ZERO of what you were trying to explain. I'll just take your word for it. So, reality isn't as we perceive it, or just light? Someone give me the "Barney The Dinosaur" version of it please. Your enthusiasm is obviously authentic, and appreciated.

I'm starting my A-Level physics course in a few months, couldn't be more excited!

Could the photomultiplier be somehow skewing test results when it changes the photon(s) into an electrical signal?

the universe and the moon is there and working because there is an observer outside us little humans that makes everything exist... science tries to work around it but eventually it will get to the conclusion that he exists. cheers!

Your so smart and good at getting the information across. Keep making awesome videos!! 😁👍👍

this was a really cool and informative video, cant wait to see future content

So this is where quarternion numbera come into play. Figuring out the vectors that you were talking about in the first half. Interesting that I would learn about those yesterday and then come across this video to really understand what you were talking about.

You will never understand just how much I need that painting of Albert Einstein in my life

Thank you for a new video! Instantly clicked. Sadly your videos get fewer and fewer. I am always looking forward to your videos.

Y...E..A.H "I think I've got all that". 🤔

Two questions: 1) did you stop to take a breath while making that video? 2) are you good at reading tongue twisters?

Great video! Really interesting topic.

could PCB way create a pcb that would act as a hub for wiring on a dirt bike that makes engine plug, battery, voltage reg, and discharge control signal output a simple interface? or is this a question better posed to them?

Everytime someone talks about entanglement I think: isn't it just because light has no time? Even if for us we can count time and interact with light in different moments, for the light existence is only one moment. So if we interact with a photon now and change one of it's characteristics, we are essentially changing it's entire existence, which can seem like it's in the past but it's not. A way to make sure is to split the photon in 2 and then take one and split again. Check if all 3 still seem entangled. If so, we could set a yes or no switch and activate it with a split electron and take it away and flip it on and off with 0 lag by interfering with the other half of the electron.

It's amazing how many people rush through the explanation of this. It is one of the most important concepts of all time. Calm down, take a breath now and then, and relax lol

This guy should be up there with backyard science, king of random and etc

I love experiments involving lasers. I hear people say that laser content on youtube becomes repetitive and boring however, this video shows that that's just not the case.

Thank you for the new video.

Keystone Science: *posts video (Everyone Liked That)

It looks less like a rig to measure photons, and more like you built a time machine :)

"PCB board" Oh, those are cool, like PIN numbers and RAM memory, or CD discs.

The beings controlling this simulation: *nervous sweating*

0:55 A ruler that is a Printed Circuit Board Board. Nice.

Always love some work of a fellow Bell.

If your into is correct and accurate to how your channel is. You earned a subscriber from that first 30 seconds. I never really subscribe to channels but anyone who can demonstrate experiments for me to learn. I'm on it!

Great video! Here may be a thought for you. :-) According to Einstein, photons do travel at the speed of light and time plus distance stops at the speed of light. That means that from a photons point of view no time is gone from its creation til its death and it hasen't moved. So according to a photon, it exists simultaneously on every spot, the whole way, at the same time. Also every split, bounce and so on is the photon at different states at same time the same place. In other word, a photon do exist everywhere in every state the entire time.

Buddy i shouldn't exist is what doctors have told me my whole life yet im here.

I keep clicking the bell but when I come back, it's not clicked.

11:51 Hussah! A man of quality!

Simple. Reality is 100% perception. Disprove that

Me: scrolling YT for whatever Also Me: slams on brakes when sees a New Keysone Science vid

Brain overload....lol but a really cool and interesting video! Keep up the good work!!

Can you do the double slit experiment on the Halve photons?

Excellent video, well done.

U have changed so much u are grown now :) nice video

Seriously love the oldschool video game music!

Wow! I never thought of rotating the polarizer as equivalent to rotating the basis vectors of the system.

I thought I was dumb before watching the video. Watched the video. Now I KNOW I'm dumb.

Question: Does light retain the momentum of the object it is emitted from? This may account for some things as the Earth is in motion relative to a absolute universal center. I am aware this phenomenon appears in the likes of Redshift/Blueshift, but I am curious as to if it is applicable to the "c" in and of itself. Something else, is if it is not applicable to c, one could determine the stated motion relative to universal center. I could have also just completely misunderstood your experiment and results, in which I would like to hear how so that I may better my listening skills. Regardless, good stuff.

Dude I understood what you were talking about you should be paid well for your efforts

can you please link where i can buy your white board markers please!!!! omg i used to have the same one that i used in my old Trig class! lol

Дружище, ты просто молодец, очень увлечённый рассказ! Спасибо за популяризацию науки) Желаю тебе успехов!

A fun thought to ponder is conceptual quality of movement, say if you move in a dream your not actually moving, but the concept retains itself as such as movement.

Can you please tell me which lens are you using to focus on BBO crystal?

thanks for great vid hon, giggles sadly we should be forgetting the reality and distractions ,and concentrating on our own conciousness ,and remembering who and where our true Mother is , As when we are only seeing a week shadow of the real reality ,our results are corrupt..

How goes College? good to see you back

The violation of Bell's Inequality doesn't disprove state variables. Rather it reveals that state variables must necessarily include a time-varying term (manifestly true of photons) and that time-keeping is local. Gravitational gradients (which are undeniably, present in our cosmos) give rise to gravitational time dilation so that Bell's integration step should have employed a gravitational path integral. Had he done so, his presumptive state variable would not have vanished, but would have yielded a non-vanishing "beat frequency" term that also explains one of the causes of decoherence in qubits. Had Bell taken into consideration General Relativity (i.e. gravitational time dilation), he would not have been able to justify his untenable simplifying assumption that time ticks at the same rate everywhere and everywhen in the cosmos. Without that unrealistic and untenable simplifying assumption, his derivation runs into a brick wall. In short, time-itself is at the root of the hidden variable.

Spooky action at a distance is referring to entangled pairs . and yes it is spooky and yes information does travel faster than light

@Keystone Science do you think that quantum mechanics allows there to be another world outside of this plane of reality? as in do you think there is life after death?

Awesome!

Polarizer only blocks light, right? Then how did the middle polarizer at 6:10 let those 45 degrees light to pass through when there were none of those present to begin with?

I got confused at the 6.00min mark. Just before this, you explained the polarizing filters filter out all but one polarity. Now, those same filters rotated at 45deg suddenly let proportional polarized light thru. I am failing to build my understanding because this foundational concept is left unclear for me. Which is it: all or proportional - can anyone clarify please?

"So I made a list of all the bad things I've done and 1 by 1 I'm going to make up for it. I'm just trying to be a better photon." *reference to my name is earl*

The whole point of this story is that, when a tree falls in the forest, it doesn’t make a sound OR sound waves! The tree never fell in the first place either. When someone comes to the forest, universal procedural algorithms are performed and that location’s rendering “catches up” with the environment and events around it. This is most likely for power optimization. Our consciousness, in it’s current state may be the trigger for universal generation, or “rendering”. However, our consciousness does not currently have any power in this process.

First!! Just kidding xD just stopped by to tell you that I love your videos and you are the reason I like physics :D

Could you use the sun as a source? Could you assign a musical value to each observable photon and listen to the bit stream live?

The Variable may be in 3d physics, as in the wave function is essentially in all directions and particle may just be bouncing and spiraling thru... Just a thought TY love the vids

how dose a wave pocket laser work? so that 45 degree polarization. is that due to the photon drag effect?

We missed you

What are the brown horizontal lines that scroll throughout your video ?

Awesome...