The Extreme Solution Germany Found to Destroy Dangerous Enemy Drones

Рет қаралды 947,087

5 ай бұрын

Welcome back to the Fluctus Channel. In this captivating episode, we embarked on an informative journey through the world of modern air defense technologies. We began by discussing the evolution of counter-drone strategies and delved into the sophisticated systems developed by companies like Rheinmetall, including the Skynex and Oerlikon Skyranger.
Fluctus is a website and KZfaq channel dedicated to sea geeks. Whenever you are curious or an incorrigible lover of this mysterious world, our videos are made for you !
We publish 3 videos a week on our KZfaq channel and many more articles on our website.
Feel free to subscribe to not miss any of our updates and visit our website to discover additional content.
Don’t forget to follow us on twitter:
/ fluctusofficial
Please keep the comments section respectful. Any spam, insults or troll will be deleted.
To contact us, make sure to use our email in the about section of this channel.

Пікірлер: 176

@johnslugger 2 ай бұрын

*They are using Shaped Charges to push both molten copper and hard projectiles! Smart Germans!*

@annetteshoniker3132 4 ай бұрын

The Banshee is made in Alberta Canada. Meggett Canada use to own the drone target business before it was sold to Quanti-Q of Britain. They make the Rattler missile drone, Mosquito helicopter drone and a high speed boat drone. The boat drone was adapted by the Ukrainian Navy and taken to new levels as the Sea Baby. Ukrainians are so smart and brave they deserve our support. As for all the critics it's all in the ammo and I would bet on the drones will or would get shot down regardless of angles of attack as this gun knows where all the drones are at any time as the radar sees 360 degrees and the ammo is smart and shoots like buckshot. Drones don't stand a chance with this beast on the field.

@antoniomachado6969 3 ай бұрын

Excelente vídeo, parabéns de Portugal.

@renebrossard 4 ай бұрын

Your show is very captivating and informative. Kudos to the music supervisor or composer. Very effective use of music. Too bad there's no mention of who it is.

@garymiller5937 5 ай бұрын

The new air defense systems appear to be quite effective. They're certainly needed in this new age of drone combat. 😊😊😊

@johnkochen7264 5 ай бұрын

As long as the drones fly in a nice tight formation. I have yet to see how effective it is if they come in willy nilly. That cannon cannot shoot in two directions at the same time.

@jackchid6040 4 ай бұрын

@@johnkochen7264 Most of these drones like Shahed or Lancet are pretty slow with around 100km/h. That 35mm cannon can engage up to 6km. So if it has line of sight it can engage for 3-4 minutes till the drones arrive which should be more than enough.

@dirk-jandekrijger7303 3 ай бұрын

New? Its just like the gepard was in 1980

@apakansaja8505 5 ай бұрын

*The enemy can throw anything at you but the most important thing in modern warfere is having a very strong defense counter measure.*

@__logan__duvalier__ 5 ай бұрын

get a job mate !

@TheSulross 4 ай бұрын

Any defense can be overwhelmed by shear numbers - the big advantage that Russia has over the entire NATO block of nations is that it can greatly exceed the West in the production of artillery shells (and there is no real defense against a barrage of artillery shells other than an offensive capability that can suppress or knock out the source of the artillery fire - Ukrainian military units are currently down to rationing the use of artillery shells at ten a day when attempting to respond to a Russian artillery strike).

@arthurarthur2165 4 ай бұрын

@@TheSulrossэто полная чушь , если бы россия была такая могучая по производству артиллерийских снарядов , тогда БЫ она не КЛЯНЧИЛА артиллерийские снаряды у нищего Ирана и нищего КНДР. Копито ? 🇩🇪

@TheSulross 4 ай бұрын

@@arthurarthur2165 Yeah, well, it's been keeping up a steady, superior artillery barrage capability for many months now. Western security sources have conceded they've been taken by surprise by Russia's ability to keep up a manufacturing supply of new shells.

@arthurarthur2165 4 ай бұрын

@@TheSulross то , что россия получила миллион артиллерийских снарядов и сотни баллистических ракет от КНДР - признали сами руссофашисты . А обломки баллистических ракет, корейского производства, обнаружены в Киеве после обстрела руссофашистами жилых районов Киева и Харькова. И это факт.

@gezalesko3813 5 ай бұрын

That is an extreemly expensive solution to an extreemly cheap problem...

@TesterAnimal1 5 ай бұрын

Think before shit posting. It’s cheaper than your electricity generation systems being blown up.

@gezalesko3813 5 ай бұрын

@@TesterAnimal1 you can buy about 150-200 electricity generators for the price of a single "drone silution" of the military industrial complex...

@__logan__duvalier__ 5 ай бұрын

you got it in a nutshell !

@user-pe6fl5rh8y 4 ай бұрын

Einigkeit und Recht und Freiheit für das deutsche Vaterland!

@anthonyboomer641 5 ай бұрын

Sehr Gut!! Wir brauchen es jetzt!!

@elsap75 5 ай бұрын

Die "Oerlikon Skyranger Gun" wurde bekanntlich in der Schweiz von Oerlikon Bührle entwickelt, das heute zusammen mit der Contraves AG als Oerlikon Contraves AG Teil der deutschen Rheinmetall Defence ist.

@gerlachsieders4578 5 ай бұрын

True, that was a smart takeover by Rheinmetall. And in loose sense, skynex is the evolution of the Gepard, building on the succes of the Oerlikon gun. I am still waiting for the day Americans get the pronunciation right for Rheinmetall...

@MostlyPennyCat 5 ай бұрын

But did they just design the Oerlikon gun or all of the system that goes around it to create Skynex/ranger? I though Oerlikon just designed the barrel and action and Rheinmetall designed everything else. Not sure if that includes the timed flak ammo.

@WahrsagermithoherQuote 4 ай бұрын

@@MostlyPennyCatNur die Oerlikon-Kanone 35mm vom Gepard wurde in der Schweiz entwickelt. Schon im 2. WK haben die Schweizer ca. 20.000x 20mm Oerlikonkanonen bis 1943 an die Achsenmächte geliefert. Die 30mm MK vom Skynec/Skyramger ist wieder in Deutschland entwickelt. Die Schweizer kannst wegen ihrer angeblichen Neutralität nicht mehr als Waffenlieferant ernsthaft gebrauchen. Die liefern noch nicht mal Munition am das verteidigende Land.

@MostlyPennyCat 4 ай бұрын

@@WahrsagermithoherQuote Sorry, the translate button just broke down... 😩

@tomcat9112 4 ай бұрын

i am Swiss and seeing many swiss companies, being it Oerlikon or SIG or .... it pains me to see these jewels companies and their technology sold abroad.

@junl6748 5 ай бұрын

Drones must now go from mothership to self-destruct. And it must also act as a repeater from the mother ship. Then you don't have to use expensive satellites.

@robertpeters9438 4 ай бұрын

But they can be jammed more easily that way because there are more opportunity for detection.

@lucienhoule5948 Ай бұрын

X ray top efficient yes but all depend how lasting a shut because it is easy to know where it come from for the enemys.

@LOLOVAL-os3pq 3 ай бұрын

there is also the English AJAX and the French EBRC JAGUAR CTAS 40 mm

@lingth 2 ай бұрын

In future Tanks will need to move with such vehicles in groups.. the threat to tanks from drones is so severe, more so then Anti Tank Missiles.

@davekisor1486 Ай бұрын

What you called the Hercules was actually the much older Ajax.

@kylexu227 3 ай бұрын

would also make a nasty anti personal weapon

@kinkade6710 2 ай бұрын

man...who wants to go stand in the Avenger box on the back of the Humvee.......guy needs sunglasses

@martyndyson9501 4 ай бұрын

If anything its the ammunition thats doing most of the work, explosive ammo, i wouldn't like to see the hit rate without that type of ammunition .

@OiDepp 3 ай бұрын

the ammunition alone is nothing without the gun, the carrier, the personal and the software on board. this all has to be optimized to get the best results. with "just explosive ammo" you can not reach the effect of such complex systems. and for the facts: this is not what you call explosive ammo.

@zhufortheimpaler4041 3 ай бұрын

the Rheinmetall AHEAD is not explosive but air burst

@eric-janh.ted.8880 2 ай бұрын

The ammo is not smart. It's only self destroying beyond the target with a timed fuse to not cause damage on the ground.

@AdelaUntalasco 5 ай бұрын

Wow amazing...

@GRS4HlK2 Ай бұрын

Does this also work with the PS4 or PS5 gamepad?... asking for a friend.

@LOLOVAL-os3pq Ай бұрын

and GOALKEEPER of THALES , laser HELMA-P ( France ) !

@1966camillis 5 ай бұрын

It's terrible the New War!

@abraham2172 4 ай бұрын

Yes, but less terrible with these systems protecting cities.

@eric-janh.ted.8880 3 ай бұрын

And now erratic moving drones instead of a static cloud smiling at the camera at zero windspeed.

@zhufortheimpaler4041 3 ай бұрын

skyranger is C-RAM capable, it can engage and destroy moving and jinking drones without problems

@eric-janh.ted.8880 3 ай бұрын

Still I think it's only that effective to static or ballistic (predictable) trajectories.

@zhufortheimpaler4041 3 ай бұрын

@@eric-janh.ted.8880 dude the system is in CWIS use for 20 years and tested extensively. you can shoot down incoming mortar rounds and artillery grenades

@rvanrijswijk6103 2 ай бұрын

Waarom niet patrols vliegen met camera

@VishnuAi 5 ай бұрын

Gj this was super interesting guys

@dougxto6603 5 ай бұрын

Always first to reply after seconds uploading

@ramonpunsalang3397 3 ай бұрын

Thee cannon probably has a longer than a laser and isn't. Affected by weather.

@MrKilper 2 ай бұрын

it hase 3 diferent Systems and just saing german know how to build the best you gett ..... SEE the gepard system 50 years old ,best defence for Drones

@Psxvince 4 ай бұрын

All 2 expensive, laser systems are the future

@OiDepp 3 ай бұрын

laser is not always better it can be hardly effected by weather like fog rain clouds dust smoke - all present on the battlefield.

@nextinimanai2876 3 ай бұрын

actually laser CAN countered by material, so you will still need a mix of both

@DG-sn2js 2 ай бұрын

However, the Nike Hercules can deliver a bigger punch. Like a nuclear warhead! Go 24Q20 class of ‘73! Fort Bliss, TX. Air Defense Artillery (ADA)!

@ronaldwhite1730 4 ай бұрын

Thank you . ( 2024 / Jan / 02 )

@rvanrijswijk6103 2 ай бұрын

Een aantal langs de grenzen zetten samen met nl radar

@winstongludovatz111 5 ай бұрын

Like the drones will line up in a 10 feet by 6 feet grid and remain stationary to be shot down? Rheinmetall needs to work on its scenario design.

@ateleskier7066 4 ай бұрын

Hey genius - you know this is basically a flak system don't you? Flak on super-steroids. Radar location and predictive vector tracking, placing a 35mm cannon shell in the vicinity of where it is going to be within the flight time of the projectile. Proximity detonation and shrapnel radiating in all directions, only requiring one or two shards to cause critical no-flight damage to a plastic drone. See what can be achieved when you stay awake at school?

@abraham2172 4 ай бұрын

It was just a demonstration.

@clydelouis5956 4 ай бұрын

You took the words out of my mouth.

@user-op3zf6if9i 3 ай бұрын

i thought same thing, what happens in a multi drone multiple angles attack from front and rear ? maybe they do not want to show everything, people get ideas.

@randuru 3 ай бұрын

This demonstration took place three years ago.

@raincho7809 Ай бұрын

군집드론 100 대가 공격해오면 감당 가능할까?

@Dunbar0740 4 ай бұрын

Only effective if the drone swarm presents itself to the business end of the weapon system. Unfortunately, drone swarms swarm; they attack a target from all points of the compass, simultaneously. The intention is to envelop and overwhelm. This leaves a directional weapon system, like Rheinmetall's, vulnerable.

@thomasprogli3372 4 ай бұрын

How much time will a drone need to cover a range of 1-2 km because that is the time Skyranger has to shot them down. So spread them out as much as you want. And this is still a hypothetical because there is not one drone swarm system available yet.

@kinkade6710 2 ай бұрын

It assumes the threat is coming from the sky, 200 feet off the ground in a tightly packed cluster it can engage with ease. If the drones come in NOE from multiple directions 10 feet off the ground, it can't depress to engage without taking out it's own personnel.

@theSpicyHam 4 ай бұрын

hitting drones beyond 600 meters can be very hard or 400 meters

@fatihacar5817 Ай бұрын

Bizim Türk yazımı Korkut’u almışlar biz yaptık diye övünüyorlar komik 😂

@trumpforever6706 3 ай бұрын

And at night do they see the new Russian drones painted black with very low infrared tracking? I doubt. The Russians are preferring jamming systems on the front, in fact reports of Ukrainian drone attacks have significantly decreased recently.

@Chaudapeau 4 ай бұрын

I Think The Military Use Too Much Acronyms, or ITTMUTMA

@baldis12 3 ай бұрын

This should not be difficult.. make small missiles,. 10 cm? Connected to optical sensors and a 360 radar. Done

@hansjoachimvoigt1075 2 ай бұрын

Methode kam schon vor Jahren ins Spiel.

@class77sncb 5 ай бұрын

Gepard noch mal neu auflegen..besser ist das !

@augustiner3821 4 ай бұрын

nein, allein der Turm des Gepard wiegt 11to und er braucht zwei Kanonen für die gleiche Firepower. Die Entwicklung geht weiter.

@DiegoTeixeira 3 ай бұрын

problem is its cheaper to make drones than destroy them. That math doesn't fit (yet)

@harrison00xXx 3 ай бұрын

Anno 1980s you mean....

@NielsKanne 5 ай бұрын

man sollte nicht durch den deutschen Titel suggerieren, dies sei ein Beitrag in deutscher Sprache, wenn er das nicht ist!

@philcitizen4671 3 ай бұрын

Die Titel werden Automatisch Übersetzt

@giovannirusso8853 Ай бұрын

Niente sottotitoli, ciao

@petrgusev8798 12 күн бұрын

It’s the xbox 360 controller for me

@billotto602 5 ай бұрын

Get a load of the Danish soldier's helmets @ 5:42 & a few minutes later ! Wow !

@8100rpm 3 ай бұрын

we saw how effective the Patriot is VS Russian flying washing machines 🤣

@redbone4458 4 ай бұрын

Avec une porte de 4 km ils vont pas faire peur a grand monde🤣😂

@davidegiordano6993 4 ай бұрын

La germania andra deindustrializzando, anche i tecnici dovranno andare all'estero... forse in america forse in russia forse in cina...

@Kiker0077 Ай бұрын

😂 Bro das steckt in unseren Blut

@TechMilitary901 5 ай бұрын

❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

@ersen.mheim42 4 ай бұрын

Drones are much cheaper, you need to build hundreds of vehicles to stop them

@To.Si.Ma. 4 ай бұрын

If you have built the platform it counts ammo vs drone. Ammo is cheaper than the drones.

@saulocrema2275 4 ай бұрын

o custo benefício para a Rússia seria melhor atacar aos países que estão apoiando a Ucrânia nesta guerra com armas e soldados do que continuar com essa guerra simétrica no front, é muito fácil para os aliados que toda guerra contra a Rússia fique no front de suas fronteiras, sustentando uma guerra da qual não sofram os efeitos colaterais.

@user-ko6jm7sb9t 5 ай бұрын

❤❤❤❤。❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

@ERSCAUS 4 ай бұрын

But wait! That ant at the bottom right of the screen at 15:16 is a top secret Nano Tech piece of equipment that is surveilling the testing of these new weapons, and acts as a target finder and coordinator for russian air and artillery pieces. Fortunately, I made this all up - the russians are too backward to develop and deploy such advanced technology!

@IONACOMPUTERS 5 ай бұрын

With AI at the helm on both sides what then

@ateleskier7066 4 ай бұрын

ruZZia developing AI? 🤣

@brillbond7878 5 ай бұрын

Don’t look at Bangladesh... I noticed everyone is here individually........

@8100rpm 3 ай бұрын

funny how this reinmetall system came up today and i was reading and article how the same anti drone system got destroyed by a lancet today 🤣🤣🤣 damn google algorithm

@Kiker0077 Ай бұрын

Das ändert nichts

@rvanrijswijk6103 3 ай бұрын

Via satellieten

@julznartey 4 ай бұрын

why not make a drone with wheels ? they can just take them of a toy lol . instead they build a launcher vehicle so that the weapon company still gets millions bruh

@user-ol2es6oo9x 3 ай бұрын

15:14 look at the size of ants down right hand side.....looks like pony

@pedrohpires6608 5 ай бұрын

If the drone have in range but i expect that system are priority target to swarn drones😂

@damrong.1118 4 ай бұрын

Gli A50 awac russi scovano tutti i radar e batterie contraeree e fanno partire i kinzhal e puoi dire ciao ciao ai tuoi carrarmatini

@kallebraun7380 5 ай бұрын

Teuer und hochkompliziert, gegen billige Drohnen. Man braucht spezielle kleine billige Maschinengewehre für die Infanterie, zur Abwehr der Drohnen.

@augustiner3821 4 ай бұрын

gibt es ja auch, schauen Sie mal nach "Natter". Sehen Sie alles als verbundene Systeme, dann versteht man besser die Funktion eines einzelnen Systems.

@abraham2172 4 ай бұрын

Die bieten nicht genug Schutz. Außerdem kannst du nicht etliche Soldaten für diese Maschinengewehre abbestellen, du brauchst die für die Front.

@kallebraun7380 4 ай бұрын

@@abraham2172 Mein Eindruck: Im Westen werden viel zu teure System entwickelt, den Anbietern geht es nur um den Gewinn. Im Osten sind die viel effektiver, die bauen billiger und mindestens gleichwertige System, da müssen wir auch hin wenn wir den angelaufenen WK3 gewinnen wollen. Kleine billige effektive System. Die Amis haben mit ihren hochkomplizierten Systemen, Flugzeugträger, bisher nur die dritte Welt erfolgreich bombardiert. Eine Feuerprobe mit technisch gleichwertigen Gegner steht noch aus. Wenn das passiert, werden die eine Abreibung kriegen und ganz schnell ihre Grenzen sehen. Aber dann haben die nichts mehr außer Atomwaffen, denn die teuren Träger und anderen Systemwaffen werden dann kaputt sein.

@user-wu3eb6lz4u 4 ай бұрын

우리나라도내년총선에서압승하여국방비100배1000배올려서독일처럼첨단무기생산해야되겠어요.국방비도찍당이반으로삭감하니뭐하겠어요

@DP-fk3es 5 ай бұрын

Are we going to ignore the fact dude was controlling a drone with an Xbox controller @ 1:55

@iutrteiusakljdsaj8576 4 ай бұрын

CIWS:) Nough said, with Radar... 4.5k rnds a min:) Anything else is a gimmick:) LOL

@augustiner3821 4 ай бұрын

no, depite being fairly powerful, that is a comparatively dumb system, throwing tons small caliber of ammunition towards the target, whereas some tempered round of the Skynex do the same job. And its obvious, there is a considerable difference in the range between a 20 mm and a 30/35mm ammo. To find that system superior, you really have to be a fanboy.

@hoangha2 5 ай бұрын

Die Sebmord-Drohnen fliegen ganz schnell schwer zu schiessen

@imbiss69bronko 4 ай бұрын

Die sind nicht schnell

@michaeldietrich852 Күн бұрын

old stuff

@einosiirila7093 2 ай бұрын

He sounded just like Macrombe haha like my spelling😢

@dogdooish 5 ай бұрын

8 drones hovering in formation!!!!! Wow what a feat!!! BUT 8 DRONES AT 80MILES AN HOUR IN SCATTER MODE??????????????????????????????????????????????????

@frankbock211 4 ай бұрын

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 US Clowns

@user-bf1ne6iv6o 5 ай бұрын

❤

@djfade8144 5 ай бұрын

Ich hoffe , das der Boxer auch in die Bundeswehr kommt. Denn Deutschland ist bekannt dafür, das wir gute Waffen herstellen, aber meistens nur für den Export!!!!🙄

@abwdwwf 5 ай бұрын

مساء الخير &**

@lehrerteubert 19 күн бұрын

Krieg stoppen

@mysygisun3335 5 ай бұрын

あっ　L90/35機関砲に直接Rつけてる。当たり前だけど、きちんとしてる。

@Joe-jv5mm 4 ай бұрын

No adversary attacking will bunch up there drones like a flock of 🦆🦆🦆, they will approach the enemy with decoys, overwatch/ spotters, direct and flanking attack formation, electronic waveform, jamming counter measure's, All above Controlled by Autonomous AI ( no man in the middle)

@frankbock211 4 ай бұрын

😂😂😂😂😂😂

@Mysteriiox 3 ай бұрын

Offensichtlich hast du keine Ahnung

@jessef88 10 күн бұрын

Nein You don't want a serious war with the Germans

@superabbasalmani6079 2 ай бұрын

Echt ? 🤗🤑🤪😉🪩🔮🪬🪟🪞

@augurelite 5 ай бұрын

6:00 fart

@danchak499 5 ай бұрын

Dream is more powerful than real! Little Germany!

@augustiner3821 4 ай бұрын

whrere do you sit in your armchailr?

@adilalfala2573 4 ай бұрын

remember. drone have more twice speed rather than jet fighter

@ateleskier7066 4 ай бұрын

🤣 Most modern fighter jets can top Mach 2. Just out of interest, which drones can fly at Mach 4?

@AdstarAPAD 4 ай бұрын

If the system you are using is more expensive to run and maintain then the drones you are guarding against.. You have lost the War...

@flncrs7012 4 ай бұрын

For sure some bulets are not expensive than a drone.

@ateleskier7066 4 ай бұрын

Then you don't understand the role of drones in combat. If a drone is directing enemy fire onto financially and strategically valuable assets, then the drone needs to be removed regardless of the cost. This 'missile/weapon vs drone cost' comparison is just lazy thinking.

@emergcon 5 ай бұрын

Ein Volk Eine Nation Eine Kommentarsektion

@rvanrijswijk6103 2 ай бұрын

Hid and sik

@andrehoensbroek1 4 ай бұрын

A little bit late, all orders goes to US. Lockheed Martin has record orders.

@user-ju7bx8hc7k 4 ай бұрын

нихуя сё кино какое что в действии

@jhadj 5 ай бұрын

It's great they can hit drone swarms, but if the swarm is spread further apart, the weapon would need to move around to shoot it, making it not very effective.

@Austin-cx2xe 5 ай бұрын

Very nice assumption and generalization. Or were you an engineer on this system? Because not only is it capable of engaging targets back to back but its AHEAD ammo means that it can easily cover a huge amount of airspace with a small amount of ammo. 0:05 Each system comprises of 6 35mm autocannons, a radar unit and a command module. 6 guns each at 1000 round a minute is 6000 rounds per minute so it has plenty of firepower to shoot down a "swarm" even though they do not exist. We have yet to see any weapon system that can accurately deliver or autonomously direct 50 or more drones at the same time. The US is the only country currently that has shown it’s able to do this back in 2016. *It’s called the replicator program*

@sevenravens 5 ай бұрын

FAFO 😂

@jackchid6040 4 ай бұрын

Most of these drones are pretty slow, so the system with a range of 6km has several minutes to shoot down the swarm.

@imbiss69bronko 4 ай бұрын

Shut Up Ali you don't have any knowing

@nielstenbrink 4 ай бұрын

…and you assume that professional engineers have not considered such basic ideas as yours because…? 😂