Cringe ngl

Nvm I’m not the first rip maybe next time

@@charactercreations if it’s cringe then why are you watching it?

@@charactercreations ok you’re honestly about to start a war bro

@@IrieTheGreatcan you shut up? nobody asked?

his name is also ness in the moive

the movie was underwhelming but that was cool

Best part of the whole movie

That's fucking dumb.

@@donxx1206sans is ness

she is not dead, but if mike goes to prison, everyone in the prison will die and responsible will die, literally even judge and everyone involved in taking mike to prison will die, in a horrible way there was something so deadly at the side of mike, he still didn't show up but he always watching, its a monster more terrifying than hallowen, jason 13th, Freddy kudge,Chucky he is so deadly, he could totally make all others slasher regrets, he going to show them what truly violence and rage means there is nothing that can stop it doesn't expect anything than absolute level of violence and rage of him no limits, not even death can save them

Personally I don’t think Mike Schmidt will be the main character in the next movie instead I think it will be Michael Afton which is what happens in the games. I did think at one point that Mike took his mums surname instead of his dads for whatever reason but that wouldn’t make sense since Vanessa did and it was Shelly(unless she’s married). In the games Schmidt is thought to be Mike Afton but for the movies I’m still a bit confused on the whole matter.

@@darkpain2452 Is this level of corny mary sue in the game too?

He also has a history of being violent But I agree. I was wondering at end of movie how exactly he was gonna explain his aunt's death. Especially since he invited her over to the house and then "oh NO" She ded

let me tell you a thing about plot armour

There's nothing about custody or abusive dads or dark pasts in the games though.....

@@CCCOMICCREW Still FNAF lore

@@valwillcommitars0n Dumbass lore.

⁠ya sure about that

i'm familiar with the lore and and i didn't think it was all that great and its mainly because of how it adapts its lore

Exactly it didnt follow the lore very well [by very well i mean not at all] but not considering that it was still good@@jskywalker58

Am just going to say non FNAF fans will start to actually enjoy this when it gets multiple movies like am pretty sure we aren't getting Michael afton as main character for a while ( I wanna see him so baaaad)

Tbh the movie didn't stick to the lore that well at all, Vanessa isn't Willam's daughter, Mike Schmidt is Michael Afton's fake name, William should be at least 70 years old, the doors don't behave the same, Mike slept through about 3 nights without any problems, animatronics don't behave normally. For the last Fnaf project Scott Cawthon did, was pretty shit

​@@EggetteW opinion

Very nice

It was a PG-13 movie tho

I think it should've been centered around Mike surviving the nights. :(

Yeah, like not a jumpscare every minute, what is the point of the movie man.

Should’ve been Rated-R

Hm, yes an entire hour of: 💻🚪💡💻🚪😱🐻💀

@@not_a_demonlmaoo 😭

@@not_a_demon better than an entire hour of: 😴💤💤🔪👶💤💤😱

bro expected a six hour movie of someone sitting in an office for five days

@@InvertedDLikr like what bro? The whole gameplay was being in the one room, looking at cameras, wow what a thrilling movie that would be

FNAF is 13+ but has kids in the fandom.

I wish it weren't for kids. The devs trying to pander to kids is watering down the franchise. It isn't scary anymore.

Recently, it's begun to lean more towards kids, and it's made a lot worse by how lots of KZfaq channels and outside parties take the characters and names and just put into weird little animations and stuff.

KZfaq made it a thing for kids because all the let's play gamers played it, like they do many indie horror games, which yes kids watch, but they usually don't get attached to it like that. What made it an exception is the mascot type characters. Just got a chord with kids extra I guess. That's why if you notice there's some indie devs now purposely making horror games with "cute" characters (bendy, poppy, etc) hoping to strike gold. The first FNAF was actually nothing special, you sat in a room with monitors hitting buttons to block access to your room. Couldn't even walk around. The dev was just that lucky with these characters being a draw for a younger audience... However, he's far into now and the last FNAF game was totally made for kids on purpose. The main protagonist is even a kid vs the previous story lines about adults working at a run down pizza joint. TL;TR The dev caught lightening in a bottle, helped by how many kids watch KZfaq let's players.

It's essentially baby's first horror game -- dark and scary, but not TOO dark and scary. I say this as a long time fan myself.

Theres also the Aunt's motivation being stated by Mike as being the money Mike is suppose to be receiving as assistance for taking care of Abby

@@hunteh78 I forgot to mention that! Maybe he's just playing it up for the video, who knows.

Also worth mentioning that thing he said about Vanessa getting “all weird about Abby being there”. Abby literally got electrocuted from Bonnie’s guitar on accident so she was just looking out for her safety 😵‍💫

@@FaerieSteph222_she knew long before that incident that abby shouldn’t have been there

Wasnt cannonically William Mike's father

Fnaf movie has two main problems: It's not scary & hard to understand if u know 0 fnaf related stuff I enjoyed it tbh, 7.5 or 8/10 from me

That’s perfectly fine 👍🙂 I’m glad the fans can enjoy it❤

@theceoofeggmansempire5214 I think the real reason the horror movie wasn't horrific was because they still wanted to appeal to the younger demographic. I think they were simply limited to what they could show

@@theceoofeggmansempire5214not true cause my 50 year old mom could follow the story😭

@@Dante_Fryeah that makes sense

Also this is just something but Alex Meyers knows NOTHING ABOUT the franchise. You can't say it is a bad film without knowing the franchise. The Movie is made for fans, no newbies intended.

@@AlphineTheGuy True. Although, my Mom isn't a fan and only knows it through me, but she rather enjoyed the basic plot, with her only criticism being that Vanessa didn't act like a cop should have in the situation. Yeah, Ghost Kids, totally fine, but gosh golly gee, Vanessa walked onto the premises without being authorized by Mike, who was the one in charge of guarding the place, regardless of rank differences? Unrealistic! ((lol)) I've been a fan since about the time the second game really popped off, and while I'm not part of the intended demographic ((I'm in my early 30s, but I'm also Autistic with ADHD, so this series does work great for hyperfixation and task management)), but I've got virtually all the games, read all the books and regularly listen to theory videos, icebergs, and flood of fan songs. This movie was an absolute treat for fans. Jim Henson's Creature Shop did a great job with bringing the characters to life! 😁

Hey, I agree! When I watched them build a fort, firt I was like . "... Isn't it suppose to be a fnaf movie?" Then, it felt to me like they gave the animatronics the childhood and friendship they'd never have due to, well, death. I dunno, maybe I read to much into this

@@AlphineTheGuyi am a fan and this movie fucking sucked

"masterpiece" is an overstatement iv been a fan FOR YEARS and it sucked

As someone who watched coraline as a little kid I believe whatever they’d come up with would terrify kids a tad less than coraline did.

@@baneq105 Yep. I was thinking that actually seeing the gory side of this story would be more traumatizing for the younger viewers than just hearing about it and seeing the 8-bit version we get in the games. Especially the Springtrap death scene from FNAF 3. IMO it was a good call to change the context of that scene to make it slower and less gory than the one in the games, because actually showing all that blood and flesh-tearing they describe in the books would be a lot. Plus, making it rated R might have turned the movie into a cheap gorefest instead of a proper story that pays respect to the original games.

@@SpeedyCheetahCubyeah, you’re probably right. Tho I much more rather the way the story was presented in silver eyes book (not the one with drawings) as opposed to the movie. But the movie is also awesome.

⁠@@AceCool-gr4rd why you even bother to answer then? You’re not adding anything to that discussion from almost a month ago

Fnaf has never been that gory and it was going to be very story heavy no matter what rating it got. The games have very deep lore, you can’t make a Fnaf movie without focusing on it a lot. Plus a large portion of the fans are on the younger side so it makes sense the PG - 13 rating.

Yeah I think people are forgetting that this movie is mostly made by a guy who happened to make a game that got extremely popular, he ain't no hollywood genius and that's okay. I am not a fan of the series but am simply interested in the characters and story and I think that this movie being targeted so much towards the fans is not a bad thing at all. Scott wanted a gift for his fans and that's what this is, you can't expect any regular horror fan who doesn't know a thing about fnaf to be in love with this movie. It gives me a bit the same vibes as IT, not good in terms of being actually scary, but the atmosphere and story are there

It has made 120 million, smashing plenty of records. It's the exact opposite of a flop.

what's the movie's budget anyway?

@@Boiled_PizzaOnline reports say $20 million, though I’m not sure whether that includes marketing or not. Regardless, the movie is a strong financial success.

It’s actually the most expensive Blumhouse movie to date.

Yeah and also Afton being Vanessa’s dad instead of Mike’s. It was such a massive lore reveal that William and Mike were father and son and it made no sense to give Vanessa and William the parent and child treatment. Mike is obviously Michael Afton, Garett is the Crying Child, Abby is Elizabeth, and of course you have William Afton being the killer. The Afton family was right there, yet they didn’t go for it.

@@ps4pro668It seems like the movie is meant to have its own lore for the sake of unpredictably and to further separate is from the games' canon. And there are already ideas going around about Mike and Garret's dad being a stand in for Henry.

At least they kinda had it when he had to hold the vent closed when the cupcake tried to get in... but yeah, I wish at least once, he used the door button to block them off or something. Like the scene where he tries the exit door he couldve closed the security room right next to it instead and got caught by the other door maybe

​@@ps4pro668 dude they didn't do that for whatever reason your thinking, the books are also separate from the games. If he made everything a copy and paste from the games or books and put it into the movie it would not have done as well as it is now. (At least I don't think it would have) I didn't like the books very much, specifically because of the robot not knowing she was a robot story thing, I thought that was lame as shit

​@@ps4pro668Abby is so obviously elizabeth

OMG I thought it was only me that felt this way. The movie just didn’t have the same tone as the fnaf games.

Literally

I thought that they were going to at least show one night but no he sleeps through most of them 😂 like when he first gets there he fiddles with the controls and they look complex.. it would have been interesting to see a bit more of that

"Everyone"

I couldn’t disagree more. They nailed the aesthetic. I think they nailed it so much that the film actually suffers for it (as a film).

normalise? that's literally what IP-franchise films exist on. It's the norm nowadays to make a movie that already has a dedicated fanbase. I mean that's what people criticised Ahsoka for as well. And honestly when it comes to FNAF, I can respect it, it is made out of love for the fans rather than the more nihilistically soulless cash-grabs that other studios lean towards. Because FNAF actually had full-on animatronics, and was actually a faithful game adaptation.

We should normalize making good movies with coherent plots that bring something new that we haven't seen 1000 times before

​@@jamesbackwardzor Maybe we should actually looking into a film rather than knowing nothing about it, and bullshitting on it like you are so special.

How is it greedy to try to increase the community when they would make more money by catering to the fanbase? Thats literally what the Mario Movie did

Or maybe make a good enough movie so that both fans and news fans would enjoy. It's embarrassing to say make a movie for your fan base because new fans is not going to like it.

I don’t think it was really aimed for anyone else but fans considering that they showed the main villain in the trailers.

It wasnt good if were going into with knolege of the lore because they changed basically everything about it

But all things considered it was an ok movie

@cyberdraws1770 Well it combines both game lore and book lore to create its own separate a.u (Alternate universe). That was already confirmed before the movie. And you can still go with a basic knowledge and understand. Tbh they made it quite easy. They still had the plot of William killing 5 kids, having them be animatronics. And the character Mike being the main character. And Cassidy/Golden Freddy being the vengeful one still is in there too. The only major change being Vanessa and Mike, with their familial roles being reversed. How it gets resolved with his sister using the drawings is directly pulled from the book. I think the way they pulled it off still works well a lot.

i think they shuda balanced it out instead of making a soley fan film. But oh well since its made a shit ton of money on opening weekend, idts anyone involved is bothered about reviews.

What about markiplier

​@@alejandroespinoza7735 he couldn’t due to scheduling conflicts with his own movie.

🙌🔥🔥🔥

ok

@@alejandroespinoza7735 MatPat said in his video that he was originally meant to be the other security guard that dies at the beginning of the movie

🤓ermmmmmm actually the robot who killed the aunt gold is named gold Fredboy🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🔥🤓🤓

because he's correct?

@@Nomenooooo no

Couldn't have said it better myself

This is exactly what I was thinking. A movie about a game gets hyped up for all audiences and then crashes and burns with all audiences expect for those who actually loved the game. therefore the film company thinks its pointless to make future sequels. happened with WOW's movie. I would love to get a second movie or a series but because of all the hate we got that wish would probably never be.

Alex inspires me.. My parents said if i get 70K followers They'd buy me a professional camera for recording..begging u guys , literally Begging..

Nothing wrong with liking a fast food film, but fast food is fast food.

thats how i feel. its mot really just a movie for the general public, its a gift to us and i wouldnt have it any other way

I was smiling this whole movie so I know what you mean. Truly a love letter and it shows.

U literally forgot to put Cory into there edit it in bruh Cory was a major person to the fnaf community

No man, there are 2 more movies coming

I was bored 😂

​@@dj_cmc2274he is so annoying he didnt help it at all. He was just a replacement for markiplier . THE ACTUAL STAPLE.

It was an hour and a half long FNAF ad

It's not even this... It's marked as "horror-komedy" As a horror fan I am disapointed As fnaf fan I feel like Scott trolled us again and do shitty. Like... I couldn't watch it without a cringe creepin in espessially with Vanessa Afton thingy. It's just so full of fanservice...

​@vixenthefox328 a fnaf film when its made for the fans HAS FAN SERVICE 😲

@@SpiDuD exactly!

@@SpiDuD oMg pEoPle wAnTed a HoRrOr MoViE nOt a cOmeDy Tragic. It doesn't matter, but you can't face the fact that the film was disapointing, it was full of bunch of random things, a lot of questions weren't answered like "Where is Garrets body?", "Garett was killed but where is he now?", " Why would Steve/William start to kill, what's the reason?", "Where tf is Mike's and Abbys dad?" And a lot more. Plot holes are just triggering, and I really felt like I am whatching fanmade full of game/books theorys without any game/book example. Can you imagine waiting for years for an adaptation to get this? AND WITH PRODUCER LIKE BLUMHOUSE?! Why they didn't do a horror? Who knows, but there was nothing from horror there exept from Guard being killed and those jerks being killed on screen. And Baloon boy meme. But almost all the scenes, like those with taxi, were used before, and it wasn't an original side of comedy. The best part of the movie was Matpat with his "but it's just a theory". And if you are good with Scott probably trolling us the whole time with advertising a horror movie and in the end he gave us a comedy, then go on, but I can say that I didn't like that movie.

it's the 2nd highest halloween weekend in history, and about to break mario's opening. ya it did much better than exorcist haha

you know what. Regardless of what you think of FNAF, Exorcist: Believer is far worse, far more scummy, far more nihilistically greedy and corporate and soulless. It makes a mockery of the original and its part of a 400 million deal to make a trilogy of shitty exorcist sequels. Its proper IP-cash-grab bullshit and im so glad it flopped, hope to god it ends there. So happy that Talk To Me, technically a film related to the idea of exorcisms/possession, did really well, as an original fresh take on the concept.

@@GuineaPigEverydayI didn’t think it was original, I’ve seen the idea before but it was really good.

Financially, yes, script wise, no. Exorcist Believer was mid, very generic, but at least it had some competent actors and a consistent tone through 90% of the movie. Believer was just another one on the roster, more fodder, no one expected a lot from it, but FNaF.... that's a different story, eesh.

Ive been a fan since the begining and its terrible. Anyone who defends this plot, they never want to bring up the actual plot. Thats intresting isnt it, almost as if the plot is so bad no one can mention it to defend it, they just say its good because they glaze anything fanf related

Right like show the pizzaria when it was open and go from there!

Yeah it should've started there when the incident happened and it timeskips to now

He's not wrong though.

Fr cause of matpat its enjoyable

Yup sad that markiplier didn’t make it in the movie

Fr

It felt so forced this it's just a theory it is so out of place

​@@Simbala-bq5vymat wanted to exaggerate it but everyone thought it would feel out of place

no ik i used to watch gameplay and watched a quick what you need to know video and i wasn't shocked at a single plot twist. i think the writing felt like they kinda just watched the same video as me

The plot twists are just badly executed.

@@philosopher1912 That’s what I was thinking for a few of them, sort of like Vanessa just saying she’s William’s daughter which was pretty boring, but this guy is saying that there were too many plot twists even though for some people they aren’t

Lots of missed opportunities. I would have loved it if Springtrap WAS mikes dad as it was in the games. It would make more sense as to why he was in Minnesota and then left, or if Vanessa was Henry’s daughter rather than William’s daughter

One of these twists isn't even a twist because press releases told us about it ages before we even got the first trailer.

I agree with you. It reminded me a lot of watching spoopy PG-13 ghost movies when I was young. The movie was good. Everything was set up properly before the payoffs later (they could have set them up a bit more, but they did fine). All the plot twists make sense. Characters that turn out to be "villains" act weird as soon as you meet them and give off an untrustworthy "there's more going on here" sort of vibe. I don't know what people are complaining about with this movie fr

Same for me, except I'm more well versed in FNAF lore. It's NOT a good movie. But I enjoyed watching it and would happily do so again!

I felt the same way. Yeah, this movie is genuinely not very good in a lot of ways but I had so much fun watching it and I would definitely be down to watch it again someday.

Maybe if it was free I'd be as happy lol..but for something I had to pay for I'd expect what was advertised which was a horror film

@@fartsmella9267 It was advertised as a PG13 HORROR FILM. There was some blood, there were kills, there were spooky ghosts and murdered kids. That is a PG13 horror film

Made for fans but doesn't follow any of the lore? Makes sense

@@Frosty_Th3_Snowman idk what movie you watched, it follows plenty of the lore

@mariov3515 yeah Vanessa isn't Williams daughter in the games, Mike doesn't have a sister named Abby, the animatronics are NOT friendly, yeah totally the lore

@@Frosty_Th3_Snowman Taking the wrong details into consideration. Vanessa was manipulated by William, as in the games, the animatronics arent just mindless monsters, but kids, Abby is a clear stand-in for Elizabeth, Mike seeing the kids in his dreams lines up pretty well with what we learn from the recent books about how possession works, and so on. The fact that the movie doesn't follow the majorly accepted theories from the games, doesn't mean it's not lore accurate. It's doing its own thing while also respecting the source material, better than the Silver Eyes trilogy did. Let's not shit on the movie we've waited for 8 years, but be happy with what we've got. And Scott has recently gone on Reddit and said that he's taking the criticism into consideration while making the second one.

@mariov3515 I am not gonna be happy with a boring, non scary, cringe fnaf movie. How they dropped the ball this hard shows they don't care. The movies will suck.

for the fans of watching it through youtube*

I'm actually glad that Markiplier was not there. He was supposed to be the security guard who died in the beginning.

I find the mentality of not caring for the general public to be so confusing. Ideally you want people to become fans of what you're showing them. It's a tough line to walk and it's why video game adaptations were hard to nail, but it's not impossible. I can see little kids being interested in the franchise from watching the movie, but the film itself falls apart to any semblance of thought. If this were any other movie of any other thing, you'd feel robbed if the main antagonist of the movie was only ever in 3 scenes and with a fake name in two of them for no explanation given to you at any point, but because it's FNAF you gotta know who William Afton prior to feel any satisfaction from the film's third act.

your saying the same exact thing im thinking im gald to see some one with the same opinion though i do understand why people dont like it

Damn you're really easy to please If those are the reason you loved the movie😭

It took me 6 years to understand the entire lore, and I am still learning new things about the mega pizza plex

an hour is not enough lolololol. As a kid who grew up watching FNAF theories from the first game like 9 years ago and been watching theory videos since then, with the 6+ games that exist, and books, and anthology books, and minigames and AAA titles etc etc. But yeah for the first movie, and technically first game, an hour is all you need that covers the main story of children in suits and springtrap.

Buddy you do not know the lore. Nobody knows the lore :)

This channel is literally leaving out so many important sections of the movie, sections that explain one another. Find a respectable way to get views. 👎 Lol also I put up a comment explaining why Steve/Whilliam was unable to make up his mind on giving Michael a job, it's because he realized that Michael is the brother of the boy he kidnapped, and so now desperately wants to get rid of him. And wants to do so by sending him to the animatronics/his hunting ground. But that comment was mysteriously removed. I didn't delete it, but someone did lol I'm pasting this comment here and there so some people can see it, because this channel has already tried deleting one of my comments, as I explain above.

Well my mom and grandma watched the movie and had little to no lore on the games or books and they liked it.

Finally someone else noticed. After they got it it’s like it never happened.

Its confirmed by the director shes still alive

😂😂

Yeah, I watched it with my sister and a friend yesterday and she isn’t a fan of the games so she didn’t love it (but I did.)

True to the books too!

I LOVED it. The references, easter eggs, I loved all of it.

sameee i know like the entirety of the lore bc ive been into fnaf for years, and all the references were so fun to see, i loved this movie so much

Bruh the plot for this movie is not confusing at all 💀

SAME

Same!! I got into FNAF when I was 10, and I'm about to turn 20 in 4 months, and I agree with you, it's very special to me as well. Cherishing the hell out of it!!!

you can tell that the movie was made for fans, im in the same boat give or take some time but the ending made me giddy in a sadistic way, if ya know ya know

honestly im just confused why scott keeps changing the lore? cause he pretty much slapped the game lore and book lore and his own little sprinkles into one and its just confusing💀

@@pokix1215 retcon /ˈrɛtkɒn/ noun (in a film, television series, or other fictional work) a piece of new information that imposes a different interpretation on previously described events, typically used to facilitate a dramatic plot shift or account for an inconsistency. "we're given a retcon for Wilf's absence from Donna's wedding in ‘The Runaway Bride’: he had Spanish Flu" verb revise (an aspect of a fictional work) retrospectively, typically by introducing a piece of new information that imposes a different interpretation on previously described events. "I think fans get more upset when characters act blatantly out of established type, or when things get retconned"

FNAF is a great "your first horror" series, but there are better ones waiting around the corner, like Slenderman, SCP, The Backrooms, so on.

@@Homerboy44 As a fan of all three but especially SCP, calling it a "horror series" is weird to me. SCP can do horror, but a lot of people's stories are also completely detached from anything scary and can often be lighthearted. It's more of a mixed-genre franchise than anything.

No it’s not. You’re not a film bro or whatever. It’s not amateur.

Yeah because she's literally dead lmao

​@@itd03snotmatt3rr Dead or not, she should at least return her calls smh /j

Golden freddy can't teleport, idk about the movie tho

@@Fanciestclown_15 idk in the game he teleports in front of you but idk he's more like a ghost or a figment of ur imagination or hallucination it seems rather than a walking animatronic but idk

@@itd03snotmatt3rr juts say idk less

I agree, but with the rating being PG-13 they had to hold back on a lot

Yeah true @@silverr2718

Fnaf wasn’t that scary tho, it was 100% the jump scares that made it scary

This is one of the few horror movies where cheap jumpscares would actually enhance the film instead of dragging it down.

Eh, I mean, I guess, but it would have annoyed me while watching honestly.

that makes a lot of sense, i was thinking that mike was gonna be mike afton and thats why he didnt say it

i don't think you need to rewatch that to figure it out. it's very obvious he owns the pizzeria from that conversation.

​@@NoaWatchVideoHe goes, "Mike Sch-" and cuts himself off. I was yelling in my head "MIKE SCHMIDT MIKE SCHMIDT MIKE SCHMIDT!!!"

@@herb_rolls3929 the ownership yes, I just didn’t realize right away that he only gave him the job BECAUSE he recognized Mike from his late brother

I'm only watching the movie for 2 reasons. 1. Matthew Lillard 2. MatPat

It's not fun tho. It's flipping boring for a lot of it

This the one!^

If they really wanted to make this a horror movie they could have just gone the R-rated route and leave it at there

Well it was entertaining if you didnt put into account they changed so much about it@@DamianBarker363

yup with ofncourse regulations from the studios. but j tink next one they'll give scott full control and hopefully he'll go all in on the lore..dontngive into the gore and horror complaints

It was fine never played the games

This is why Arcane was good Written for eveyone to bring many new fans. This is written for fans appreciated by them and won't bring much new people Unfortunately

It's a defeatist mindset to write a movie on. "It can be mediocre because fans will like it". Ideally, you can have and should have both when adapting a work.

@@Imanmagnet00 Who said "it can be mediocre", its just simply written FOR the fans. There are references and bits of the movie that fans will innately recognize where the layman will not and a lot easter eggs and lore that the fans are already more interested in, the target demographic is not the general public, its why(alongside other reasons) they didnt push for a grand premiere or any of the other hollywood nonsense for the movie. If you have a problem with that then you have a problem with literally any movie which specifically targets a demographic.

Ya that's an understatement; and people are saying that the movie has too much lore...

@@violeterror2048it still does lol..

How so

Not the just game. Apparently they shoved in the stuff from the books as well. Clearly not all, but they're there.

@@usonohoshi6165 only from the first novel (and 1:35 AM for Ella, tho she's also from the 1st novel), but even then it doesn't take so much from the book where it feels like it's rewriting that story

FR

Is Five nights at freddy's a real place?:/

No

I grew up with this game and I hated the movie. I think it’s awful. They could have done so much story wise and it was a disappointment to see such a horrible adaptation.

@@v.beckan9071 Nope, but there were rumors of a real restaurant of FNAF opening up, but again, it's a rumor.

The second thing feels pretty obvious like you don’t need to pay attention to know.

@@dante_0962 yes but alex said “for some reason”, that’s why. and plus you kind of do otherwise it’s not clear, in my opinion.

I was confused by the logic used for #2 by the writers... why would she want custody over a child she views as a burden for some money from the state when she clearly already has a bunch of money as indicated throughout the movie? She's probably spent a lot and plans to spend even more to gain custody of the child anyway- it's not even a worthy investment from her perspective smh

@@tristan-smith102 honestly, i dunno. Mike says to the teacher(??) that she just wants the money from the state after Jane talks to the school about Abby, so I'm not really sure.

@@unfairygodmother yeah I'm baffled by the logic 😭

I'm honestly surprised that more people didn't lose their shit over Josh Hutcherson being in the movie

@@kalanamalrosprobably because I have no clue who that is lmao

​@@kalanamalrosFnaf kill count.

@@LordDomielOfElysium Josh Hutcherson played Peeta in the Hunger Games movies

I did that with Cory literally nobody in my theater knew who Cory or MatPat was i was so disappointed

its still kinda boring tho

I watched every single one of matpat’s lore videos and the film is still trash

Not really it wasnt lore accurate at all it kinda went something like "This is the lore accurate meter over here ok.. ok so ya know what were gonna do , were gonna change everything about it"

The plot was extremely lazy and terribly pieced together for what it could have been

There is one scare that gets me! Balloon boy, does he show up at ANY POINT in the video and if he does can you tell me when and when it stops i keeps me awake at night and i don't wanna see it! Sorry you were the one I asked

Even as a fnaf fan it can get confusing with so many games and books and the movie really only used like 3 game’s worth of lore and even made the lore simpler since if they wanted to make it a 1:1 mike,Abby,and the bother would be Afton’s kids and Vanessa would be a game tester taken over by an AI Afton while the real Afton was in Hell which is just playing fnaf forever not to mention that Abby should be dead and Mike should be a literal purple zombie man/part time skin suite burning his dad every other Tuesday

@@toasterman5099 what the hell man 😭

When you actualy waching the movie, he was just rambling about stuff in the movie that dosen't mater at all compared to the rest of the movie .

@@toasterman5099 yeah .. i forgot mike was dead by the time of fnaf 1 since he was fired for bad odor(?) aka decay lol. but as u said, elizabeth (or abby..) should be dead and possessing babys suit after getting scooped in there, vanessa should be taken over by ai william and also in the vanny suit, and working not as a police officer but a security guard at security breach's pizza plex 💀💀 and not to mention william should be michaels dad, AND evan, williams youngest son, should be dead from the bite of 83

@@captainthornes ya michael got his insides scooped by baby (which is possessed by his dead sister elizabeth) and had an amalgamation of animatronics put in his body so they could escape. and his younger brother evan should be dead by his hands after he pranked him with the fredbear animatronic which btw, the game sister location is where michael "died" and then he went to work at the fnaf 1 location where he got fired for bad odor (he was decaying). i forget where else michael showed up but im thinking fnaf 3. and henry (whose kid was killed by a jealous william) aka williams old business partner was who u were playing as in pizzeria simulator where henry burned the whole place down with william/other animatronics in it to free their souls, only william never dies so he became burntrap who u see in security breach,, but william had at one point uploaded his consciousness into the fnaf vr game ? and vanessa got possessed by him into becoming vanny/basically continuing his work

😂

Ok

@@spongebobsquarepants2981You did them so dirty with that one.

@@Thenews75 idk what that means

Bro is babbling

I can’t imagine being so inspired by a middle aged conservative who made mediocre games for way too long

Well it's based off the book lore not the canon lore so that's why it's inconsistent. They were also just trying to create a new timeline and story with this movie.

Every time the Animatronics were on screen (including damn Balloon Boy and cupcake) I would SQUEAL because I loved what Blumhouse did. Like holy fuck it's BEAUTIFUL!!

@theashwoodfaerie well considering the ending it's clearly based off the books

that was what basicaly all the enjoyment is just dumb fun for the fans

@@DARKAURA999.book lore is WAY different from this. the movie was just based on fnaf 1, which gives room for the other 2 movies that they plan on making

When is that first revealed? I don't remember it being in the original game at all. Just wild.

@@Magical-N in the first game, there's a "rules of safety" poster in one of the hall corner cams that rarely changes to newspaper clippings talking about the missing children's incident. nothing is directly stated ofc in true fnaf fashion but it talks about how kids went missing and the animatronics started to smell and ooze blood afterward 👍 so yeah you're unlikely to gather all this on a casual playthrough but it's been in the lore since the beginning lol

@@siennayaay because yes😈

no its *maticus panticus*

Bro what are you talking about? I've played every game, this movie is basically a completely separate story. And it is, because it was confirmed that the movie would not be following the lore accurately.

​@@DevilsAdvocate669the movie is in the same ballpark as the books. It isn't game accurate but supposed to draw parallels

zzz

@@DevilsAdvocate669just let him cope lol

Bruh. The movie creates plot holes. It’s unreal.

Boy with blue eyes and blond hair isn't Freddy. It's Golden Freddy. You can even see it in the 'animatronic' itself, as it has only one glowing blue eye on, when he gets the taxi with Abby. Freddy has a completely diffrent kid that doesn't speak, just like the rest of the kids

watched the movie last night as a non-fnaf fan. gotta say it was a decent movie (note i haven’t seen or played or read anything in this series)

​@@0skodaoctavia0 something I noticed is you know how Golden Freddy is supposed to have two souls within him in this movie when he goes to the house. Only one of his eyes are glowing and there's only one kid there to represent him which is the kid in the striped shirt. So I am curious if in the lore of this movie, the other kid/ other soul is not in Freddy yet and that's what they wanted Abby for

@@spaceaxolotl6196 Good thinking! Yeah, it can totally be the case here. But I also think that the movie said the main reason was just because they like her and so they want her to be like them(to stay with them)

@@spaceaxolotl6196I’m betting the second soul is gonna be Abby

Felt neither horrified or thrilled

​@@Ok-fj7xx you're just boring person than 😂

I disrespect that. Every movie should be enjoyable. It doesn't have to be bad to cater fans

@@johnjordan211shut up bro😭

@@johnjordan211and why do you not like the movie?

No offense, but thats the safest opinion I've heard in several years.

@@Noryellebecause it’s bad…

because it is

Nice to hear! I thought it was legit good as well.

You should try it sometime or just watch Markiplier!

Eh, no point in learning the lore of FNAF to understand the movie. The only thing it does based off of lore is that the children were murdered and stuffed into the suits they soon possessed. Nothing else was really lore accurate

@@princerollins1629I mean it sorta was accurate to the silver eyes. They had a few references to the silver eyes too; the drawings, the kids not being aware of who killed them, changing the drawing to show that SpringTrap isn’t their friend and is actually their murderer, and William Afton being dragged away after he got spring locked.

@@raikreios ahhh, ok. But I really don't think that William should have said "I always come back" that line felt corny af to me since that was his first death, he's never came back from the dead yet

W comment

The second movie will be a banger

NO SAME LIKE? THERES SO MUCH INSANE LORE 😭😭😭