In this video I explain how the Euler-Bernoulli beam bending is derived and go through a simple cantilever beam example.
Пікірлер: 36
@jjosesilloАй бұрын
bro this was the best video about this topic so far, please keep making videos like this man! congrats absolutely awesome
@jaz-yman42862 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much, you made a clear video, with great background, and was entertaining. I finally understand this for my HW as it made no sense in class. Big ups!
@ekeynox2 жыл бұрын
French audience here. Not bad on your pronunciation of "Antoine Parent" ;-). Interesting topic, not very often encountered online.
@jakeberkey Жыл бұрын
Loved the history behind the assumptions and derivations, excellent video!
@ivoryas1696Ай бұрын
Me when I find a channel with a fascinating video style, content that I'd enjoy, and an upload date not more recent than a year: ☹️
@Pauldyke Жыл бұрын
Good video burst 4:23, should be 1/rho = dtheta/ds
@dodo-js5gw4 ай бұрын
yes !
@nanbolkeza8296 Жыл бұрын
Excellent presentation, gave me great light into the theory of beams. pls upload more sir
@samueldeandrade85352 ай бұрын
Look at this video, it is great. This guy was great.
@ananthpullur61422 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the amazing video!
@sheylarca2 ай бұрын
Me salvaste la vida amigo
@mec007 Жыл бұрын
Excelente la explicación
@marclapuissance13805 ай бұрын
Video about M= EI/ ρ ??
@Agile272 жыл бұрын
Legend
@okanakzm2 жыл бұрын
4:13 Shouldn't the curvature 1 over ro be equal to inverse of ds over d theta?
@ananthpullur61422 жыл бұрын
yes seems like a mistake
@JosueA_455 Жыл бұрын
How accurate would you bet that Euler's equation is for real scenarios with slender columns?
@vadiquemyself2 жыл бұрын
I wonder how the model of a rod which can’t describe a torsion is still very popular
@TheMultiLibra2 жыл бұрын
So it means that if the applied force is not a point force at the free end, but is a function of location x, then we cannot use the simplified version of the Bernoulli beam, right? I mean then we need to integrate the equation four times in order to figure out the displacements of beam, am I correct?
@erikoui2 жыл бұрын
That is an excellent question. Bernoulli beam theory still applies and d_theta/d_x is just a function (the derivative of theta, or the second derivative of the bending moment function M(x)). In the case of several loads (e.g. two point loads or a udl with a point load at an arbitrary point) you would calculate the deflection as if each load was applied on its own, and then add up the results (assuming the beam acts linearly elastic). Hope this helps!
@TheMultiLibra2 жыл бұрын
@@erikoui what if the force itself is a function of location, like a distributed load, so we should integrate it four times, right?
@erikoui2 жыл бұрын
@@TheMultiLibra That is correct.
@aleksandreakhvlediani80342 жыл бұрын
4:00 how would you prove this ?
@erikoui2 жыл бұрын
The tangents at A and B are perpendicular to the radii at A and B, and also we know that the angle between two non-parallel lines is equal to the angle between their normals.
@aleksandreakhvlediani80342 жыл бұрын
@@erikoui Thank you. If proof is that easy, why waste time at 3:55 - 4:02 saying: "You can prove that the angle at O is d.theta for yourself if you'd like" , when in the same amount of time you could have said: "The tangents at A and B are perpendicular to the radii at A and B, and also we know that the angle between two non-parallel lines is equal to the angle between their normals." ?
@dominikpeter176515 күн бұрын
There is literature that mention the equation with a negative sign. Why is that?
@erikoui14 күн бұрын
Probably just depends on what sign convention is used. (If you define z as up or down)
@dungnguyenminh3308 Жыл бұрын
4:11 actually, rho = ds/dtheta
@MobileTaskForce6 ай бұрын
no
@MobileTaskForce6 ай бұрын
oh sorry didnt read wvery well
@avi122 жыл бұрын
I have a bit of a hard time understanding your accent, so I'd appreciate it if you could add closed captions and make sure they don't cover up visuals in the video since the automatic CC _does_ cover some visuals
@Jairodon2 жыл бұрын
What do you mean, I’m learning English and I understand
@samueldeandrade85352 ай бұрын
What a crazy thing to ask.
@maalikserebryakov Жыл бұрын
This equation has been proven to be inaccurate
@elshons1576 Жыл бұрын
It is inaccurate when the assumptions used to derive the ecuation are not satisfied. Othewise it gives nice results.