This was an instant back after watching this. This looks great. The best thing about how this game turned out is that it feels so incredibly authentic to many of my game sessions where one missed rule spirals end game totals to laughable amounts. But, these teachable moments always become reminder points to stress on for the teach later. The journey was worth it and we found out we were the foxes all along.

I think its awesome that Elizabeth Hargrave was actually there in the chat answering the questions!

As soon as Tom rolled his dice for the first pup and marked his card I jumped onto an All In Pledge!!! How beautiful are those foxes?! Great live play 🦊❤

Thanks for this playthrough! Can't wait to play this game!

LOL I was thinking to myself the whole time that it seems waaaaay OP to get tokens for every pup!... Turns out it was 😂

Seems like a really good game ❤️ plus I absolutely love foxes!

Already seeing improvements compared to the prototype I played at GenCon. Definitely one to keep an eye on!

Wow! I’m already planning to play the game, based on the spread seen in the first screen down view.

This looks really fun

Quiet a busy game isn't it? Thanks for playing

Loved playing this at Gencon. Definitely keep an eye on it, it'll be good.

I wish the video would include a couple minutes of debrief/ first impressions

Always fun to watch 😁

Thanks!

FOX Rob Feeney Australia. Going to kickstarter now!!! Great playthrough. Looking forward Tom’s evaluation

I just backed this today. Its not a bad price for an All-In plege

So what do we need to answer to enter the competition?

1:01:18 The Red player in the bottom right has a friendly dice with two halves, only one of which is being used (by a purple die). Could they also complete a blue or brown die, or do the friendly dice have to also remain in a single-colour row?

Oh cool, so Tom making jokes about what to put in the entry email probably means my entry is invalid. Yay.

Tom screwed up his second round pup. Only rolled dice for one parent

she is so awesome!!

Tom's mic (I think) needs a windscreen.

I watched this video when it came out. I even am backing the game, but I might cancel because honestly, I do not like how they are marketing their KS. Just an opinion from what I have observed and read on the campaign page and honestly does not have to be responded to. Just an outward thought on my part. The fox meeples I am cool with either design, I just do not understand why we had to have exclusive meeples offered to us by the player? That seems weird rather than just offering one whole stretch goal for all player counts to get the KS meeples. What would have happened in the event that only 1 or 2 or even 3 of the players got the improved stretch goal met and not the others. Would we have gotten the game with that odd number of KS exclusive fox art meeples? Just seems weird. Also, why not just make the 5th -6th player count as an add-on or something included in retail? If it had offered some exclusive mechanic or changed the game I would understand the exclusivity, but it does not. So, why the exclusivity especially when the main box is made to already house this expansion? Seems weird to limit and lock this behind KS exclusivity and limit the chance for this game to reach the table for larger parties when it seems to perfectly include 2-6 players with no change to the core game. Of all the stretch goals including solo is great for a huge backing of solo gamers. UV-spotting is always nice on games, and I enjoy the artwork. I want this game, but just because it is a KS does not mean it needed to have stretch goals, look at maul-peak they offer their game as is intended. Their game is offered at face value for what they are giving and the only benefit to KS backers is early accessibility. It is just a good example I can compare to. But, I still can not wrap my head around the idea that I am being sold 2/3 a game and having to pay an additional $40 just to get the last 1/3 of the game with the matching upgraded components.

i want this game so bad just so i can name my foxes 😁🤘

No one pointed out FOX MULDER??? #thetruthisoutthere

The game seems to make more sense having a higher player count than 2 players. Guess, it's off my list. Would have backed it if I had a group to play with. Thanks for the playthrough.

45:00 Camilla has two females.

Fox Moulder 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🦊

I feel this is incomplete as we didn't hear from the players about afterthoughts etc.

The double fists of dice was offputting to me. Was that because they didn't know how to play or is there that many dice in play by the end of a typical game?

Simultaneous actions arg. I tend to really dislike those. Game looks fun enough though.

Always mic rustling sounds on the dice tower videos. Someone needs to learn better audio engineering...or new mics or something.

I was interested until seeing that it was about BREEDING foxes.... Why couldn't it just be about conservation or something? I'm not usually against themes that would be unethical irl, it just feels really off-putting to me

LOL Found "Dilisio Blunder" in an online urban dictionary.