You should also do a documentary about Dilophosaurus.

Thanks for clarifying that. I was thinking "Didn't I already watch this one??"

I don't know where you got your info from, but the film makers admitted that they needed a bigger dinosaur than velociraptor but wanted to keep the name as it sounded cooler.

Great video thank you!

A Thai fighting roster with the huge spurs... Those birds are all muscle and not really consumable due to how tough their muscle fibers are... Dinosaurs remind me of them and when they kick with their spurs that $hit hurts so anything bigger with higher weaponry is scary to me

exactly! I was attacked by a blue jay once and I was emotionally scarred.

A swan is about the same size as a turkey. I’ve been charged by swans when kayaking, and seeing an angry swan puffed up and run/flying at you at about 10mph left me with no doubt he had violent intent.

Geese are fearless as well.

One was not the problem but they ran in packs!

I've been waiting for someone to point this out since the movie first came out. 😂

Your opinion doesn't matter unless you can physically prove any of this

@@davidsheckler4450 Thank you for your OPINION on this :)

@@keileyk8507 Physically prove your fake-a-saurses then. Pictures with any 🤷

@@davidsheckler4450 I don't know what your problem is here. Your OPINION doesn't matter to me. And I have no business to prove anything to you, you're not worth my time. Have a nice day :)

⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠@@davidsheckler4450Your opinion on Velociraptors doesn’t matter unless you can physically prove they didn’t vocalise. And if you weren’t that dense, you would have get that point before embarrassing yourself.

A turkey wll fuck you up.

Mine is “ALLEN”

I think of the clicking noise for when Owen was training them

“You didn’t ask for reality. You asked for more teeth.”

@@sabrinaschell4938 lol, right?

I wish you were entirely right. Unfortunately the JP Movie also presents inaccurate fossils. The Velociraptor is oversized as fossil too.

@@mufasaruleroftheanimalking1026 Maybe Grant just sucks at identification and mistook it for a Utahraptor or something? 😅

Makes sense, both in franchise and for franchise. It's not the real thing, it doesn't even look like the real thing (although, first film was pretty "realistic" considering what we knew back then), it looks as you expect it to look. Btw, we didn't discover utahraptor since after the film, JP raptors were ment to be scary, not realistic. It's just such an irony, movie monster gets validated by science.

P ❤Ppp😊😊

Ai

"Facts are facts" 😂🤣😅😂🤣😅😂😅😅😂🤣😅 you don't have any facts & can't provide any physical evidence

​​@@davidsheckler4450t it's confirmed jp raptors were based on deinonycus real velociraptor was just 3 feet in height

Just ignore the muppet, he’s parroting the bs all over the comment section.

If anything they're scarier this way!

Lol, 10mm baby!

Except _Velociraptor_ almost certainly *didn't* hunt in packs... 19:30

i like velociraptors

Especially if said goose has fuck-off huge serrated teeth

Thats because you can look in your yard in real time and not have to sift through 65 million yrs of forensic evolution.

The late, great Sir Terry Pratchett ( Him diamond) created a wonderful character in his Discworld series. The Royal Falconer of Lancre, HodgesAaaarrrrrgggggg. He adores his birds utterly, almost as much as they all hate him. They all keep trying to kill him every chance they get. Hence the Aaaarrrrrggggg part of his name. Good luck!

Falcons are lil dinosaurs.

despite popular beleive , the raptors in JP and JW are alctually BETWEEN the size of the utah raptor and Dienonychus. bigger than Dien , but definitely smaller than the utah raptor. many try to claim they are the saize of utah raptors , but they arn't they could pass for either large examples of Dienonychus , or small examples of the utah raptors.

Exactly

Barnyard chickens emus cassowaries and ostriches all reproduce after their own kind. That is the evidence we see today and all we know. When does sexual reproduction happen if it's taking millions or billions of years to change from one kind to another and then it has to find the female of the same thing somewhere that changed at the same time correct? I'm just curious where we get the logic that anyone could believe that dinosaurs could turn into a bird? Strange

@@seanmartin2185 From "BirdLife International" - dinosaur evolution expert Prof. Roger Benson, "Birds belong to the theropod group of dinosaurs that include T. rex.". There is much more to this report, as well as confirmation by paleontologists & ornithologists. Thanks for your reply.

@@cdfdesantis699 Evolution and Professor don't belong in the same sentence. Do some more research evidence of creation is all we have. There's no way to describe the laws that run the universe unless somebody gave the laws. That right there is indoctrination it's the reason Hitler killed 6 million Jews. He believed in evolution too and was a flaming racist just like Charles darwin. Charles Darwin was actually a naturalist and a real dull-witted man. I'm sorry but the evolutionary Tale and the geological column don't have any substantial evidence and I've studied it 30 years. Thanks though keep searching!

@@seanmartin2185 It's rather close-minded to aver that evolution & creationism are mutually exclusive. I have no issue believing that God created everything, & set in motion the evolution of the universe. God said, "Let there be light", & ever since, there's been light. Stars are born, live for trillions of yrs, & die. Our star, the sun, gives light to our solar system 24/7. God doesn't have to continually say, "Let there be light.". God created all life, & told it, "Be fruitful & multiply.". Life has done so, from the 1st bacteria which appeared on earth 4 billion yrs. ago, right up to today, with earth's human population now standing at 8 billion, because we've taken our Creator at His Word, & breed like frenzied rabbits. God doesn't have to tell every single male & female to be fruitful & multiply. He set the mechanism in place eons & eons ago, & has no need to constantly repeat himself. Science & astronomy have proven that the majority of the stars we see at night are so far away, & their light (created by God) takes so many billions of yrs. to reach earth, that those stars died long, long ago. Ice cores from Greenland & Antarctica, & sediment cores from lake & ocean beds, are used to track the geologic, climactic, & carbon-based life form evolution of earth, & even give evidence of interaction with space traveling objects such as asteroids & comets. Comets brought water to the new-born planet, cooling the fires of its birth, & eventually those waters covered the earth. It was at that point that "the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters". I will not limit my God by believing He Himself is constrained to humanity's imperfect knowledge of His works. I will not limit my understanding of the universe God has created by turning away from the scientific evidence of His power. As the hymn sings, "Oh Lord, my God, when I in awesome wonder consider all the worlds Thy hands have made - I see the stars, I hear the rolling thunder - Thy power throughout the universe displayed...How great Thou art!"

@@cdfdesantis699 then consider Genesis and you'll see it's certainly mutually exclusive to God only. I would just consider the god of the Holy Bible not this God that you have fantasized. I do not see anything in scripture except the let there be light and a few things else you said that were correct. Did you end up getting as far as day 6 reading where He created Adam? And actually the entire first chapter God would have written himself obviously it says God said and God said, and God said, and God said and it says it quite a few times and everything happened exactly how it should have. Chapter 2 you'll notice somebody else is offering! It's man yeah it's now Lord God Lord God. Genesis actually has 10 authors in total. As far as the star is being where they're at you've also missed the other passages of scripture and just seek them all out for yourself but I will send you a list of scriptures that states after God created the stars that were around the earth which was created first he flung them into place he stretched the heavens and it is still in the process of moving. You are correct and saying God doesn't have to continually speak light. But it was not billions or trillions of years ago because clearly the Bible gives us how old Adam was until he died. If you add up all the dates in the Bible it comes to almost 6,000 years ago to the creation. I believe God is on a time scale and 6,000 years will represent the six day work week. On the day of the Lord's return that will start the next Thousand Years of the great day of the lord. He is always on time. Anyway he stretched forth the heavens the stars are in place where they are and there is no issue with seeing the lights and it can be certainly as far away as they are saying it is. That is still not a problem for us to see it if God initially created the Stars around the Earth in a closer proximity that's not a problem for God. There are trees that are standing through layers of rock that these people claim are formed over millions of years slowly. It's not possible the tree is fully preserved it could never have stood there that long while somehow layers of straight Rock and Earth are being formed around it. Obviously this thing was buried rapidly. The fossils were very rapidly. You cannot have a fossil you cannot have death pose positions on animals like they find when they dig these things if they were not buried quickly. To deny the Genesis account is to just completely forget about God. I'm trying to say you can't have it both ways. You have to stick with the Genesis account and that God of creation and trust that otherwise it all falls apart

Bro. Jurassic Park is a Hollywood propaganda show. That stuff is unacceptable because it's geared towards misleading the public.

The sooner you wake up to the unpleasant reality that Spielberg movies exist to groom kids into being naive consumers (and possibly worse), the better off you'll be. It's a bitter pill to swallow, but you'll be wiser for it. If you don't wanna let go of Jurassic Park, fine. Read Crichton's book. It's better. Spielberg's movie is the kindergarten version of the story. Indiana Jones raped Marion when she was a teenager, and the two of them talk about it IN THE MOVIE, and HE BLAMES HER. Jaws has harmed shark populations so badly, Spielberg has made reparatory payments to shark conservation programs. The Goonies is just gross all around. Schindler's List is full of half-truths and embellishments that are inappropriate for the subject matter. Spielberg is a charlatan. George Lucas stole half of Star Wars from his ex-wife Marcia and the other half he stole from everyone/everywhere else. Those two men lied their way into our lives and colonized our childhoods.

@katiekat909 I thought it was based on real events? Thanks for ruining my childhood.

Okay

@@user-lq9oi5jq3n okay! 😘

Correct, the semilunate pronates each manus in a rotation that their palms would be facing each other first digit up in a catching stance. I recently discovered a semilunate from Utahraptor near Moab. Also, being covered in feathers, the digits would be partially hidden. The entire arm would appear cover in feathers and rather folded and bird like when not extended. In my opinion, artist Emily Willoughby reproduces the most accurate restoration of their appearance. If you would approach one from a distance, you might assume it to be a strange looking bird. An associate of mine just sent me a second manus digit with a claw for research study from North Dakota that I believe is to be from Acherorapter temertyorum. The claw was very curved and sharp like Eagle Talons for holding prey. Everyone of these fossils is extremely rare. So far, the foot bone from A. temertyorum from South Dakota we are working on are similar to Adasaurus from central Asia. Still under study to certain.

@@davidletasi3322 *WHY would I approach one? hahaha!* 🦖🦖

@@davidletasi3322 I'll see if I can "dig" up anything on Willoughby >>> thanks

IKR?

If you're an Englishman of any age, it is very rare for you to say anything is superb.

Crichton's dinos are hella more accurate than Spielberg's too. Spielberg is a joke, tbh.

Really.... You're commenting on fictional science. 🙄🙄🙄

Also, Acheroraptor temertyorum found in Hell Creek sediments. Several specimens I'm working on were found very close to where the Tyrannosaurus rex "Sue" was found.

That's not a politically motivated change, so they're not interested.

I'm seriously calling your sanity into question....because it's not worth it just to pet. Nothing "alive" is worth losing a limb over just to pet. I think feathered dinosaur would look almost comical, specially with family guys constant fight with the chicken guy, far from scary

I bet it did, and especially if they had numerous young or were injured.

@@Liksterr97 Makes sense.

Id say probably yes. Many modern carnivores scavenge as well as hunt. Big cats,canids, even some bears do. It would be a waste of easy calories if they didnt.

All predators scavenge including humans. Stupid question.

actually no ur wrong

Achillobator is a better candidate. Utah raptor is too large

Gained a follerer

Yeah, similar to hyenas in a lion's world.

If i remember correctly the leading theory is a sand dune fell on them midfight burying both

@@BobBob-eb4io Oh interesting. I guess that makes sense.

No, the main raptor in JP3 had like quills, on the head