great coverage, thank you very much

I'm sunni but shiya is right way of Islam ❤

Beautiful work thank you ❤❤❤

Beautiful documentary. Watching it is whole a lot of pleasure.

Shukran katheer ❤

افلح من صلى على محمد وآل محمد بارك الله فيكم ويوفقكم ان شاءالله سلام خاص للعزيز السيد عبد المنعم حفضه الله

Without names mentioned, certain identifications of who is talked about in religion can be made. Sunni and Shia doctrines about the sheikh of the time and such seem more Judaeo-Christian than Islamic. Zoroastrian beliefs related to the Innocent and plurality of exalted leaders between another prophet and a final guided one match up more to the Shia beliefs on the issue.

The early Shi‘ah never had this idea of twelve imams. Hence the Shi‘ah divided into many sects. Some Shi‘ah believe that only ‘Ali was an imam; they are the Saba’is, who stopped at that point. Another group said that he was an imam, as were al-Hasan, al-Husayn and Muhammad ibn ‘Ali; they are the Keesaanis, and they stopped at Muhammad. Another group said that the imamate went up to Ja‘far then stopped. And another group said that al-Muntazar (the awaited one) is also an imam; they are the Ithna ‘Asharis (Twelvers). And there are other groups and many other divisions. Anyone who wishes to know more may refer to an-Noobakhti’s book on the Shi‘ah sects. So you can see that the idea of twelve imams came very late, because this idea did not exist among the early Shi‘ah; the hadeeths they quote were fabricated after the death of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) and even after the death of most of the imams of the Shi‘ah. Thus it will become clear to you that the Shi‘ah are the ones who made this number match the number in the hadeeth of the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him). Finally, I say that the sound report is the one that says “all of them from Quraysh”. The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) would not have mentioned this general claim if he had meant something more specific; doing so is contrary to eloquence, and the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) was the most eloquent of people. For example, I would not say, “I am going to give a hundred dinars to every Arab,” then if an Egyptian comes to me, I tell him that I meant every Syrian. Is he not going to accuse me of being foolish and unable to express myself, and tell me that in that case I should have said “every Syrian”? If the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) had meant ‘Ali and his sons, he would have said, “They are ‘Ali and his sons.” Even if he had said “All of them from Banu Haashim,” that would have been eloquent. Banu Haashim were many, and Quraysh were more numerous, but the report speaks of them (Quraysh). If at-Tijaani [who wrote a book in support of Shi‘i ideas] and others quote this hadeeth as evidence because it matches the number they have, then what would they say about the hadeeth narrated by Imam Muslim in his Saheeh (2779), according to which the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said: “Among my ummah there will be twelve hypocrites; they will not enter Paradise or even smell its fragrance, until the camel goes through the eye of the needle”? End quote. Kashf al-Jaani Muhammad at-Tijaani (a refutation of at-Tijaani’s book), p. 75 ff And Allah knows best.

I SEE 4 PILLARS AND 3 WINDOWS THE SHADES ARE ALL PULLED DOWN WHEN I OPEN THEM YOU WILL KNOW !!!! Love John !!!!

sinless ?

Allah akbar, its terrible you say that without the imams, "the earth will shake ", what a big lie, you ships, what is the evidence from the prophetic hadiths , forget about any from other sources??