khayran not khayrun bro

@@haisem9281 mashallah, even ibn taimiyah did sharh al umdah, and had more knowledge of the hanbali madhab, my statement still stands, and no one is shaming or insulting sheikh hating, I have immense respect and love for the sheikh

@@haisem9281 true hanbalis (who refuted the wahabis and their leader) do not view Muhammad abdul wahab as Sunni let alone hanbali, Muhammad abdul wahab says that which is contained in matn al iqnaa’ and al muntahaa is false and against the way of Ahmad, even the prophetic Text “ ما في الاقناع و المنتهى مخالف لمذهب احمد فضلا عن نص رسول الله"

He is qualified in the Madhab, and adheres to it so how he is not "100%".

@@frankincensemerchant1284 what I said was clear, if you know the madhab you’ll know exact what I said, just read his book on theology

@@lordrisen3696 If you mean he doesn't adhere to all the Aqaid views of the later Hanbalis I agree, but the same can be said of later Hanbalis not adhering to all the views of the early Hanabilah(and wider Athari Scholarship). kzfaq.info/get/bejne/oNGGhJdnmLzahHk.html