Jazakum Allahu khayrun for this wonderful discussion. It's a blessing to see ulema who differ on some important issues to respectfully disagree while calling us to the bigger issues.
@ruhmuhaccer8642 жыл бұрын
khayran not khayrun bro
@Wayfarer5703 жыл бұрын
SubhanAllah. This is was eye-opening for me. Jazakumullahu khairan
@Naijiri.3 жыл бұрын
Good discussion. Would've liked to see "wahdat al-wujud" be dissected here but perhaps another time. Barakallahu feekuma.
@Mohammed-nn3ts Жыл бұрын
Dr Hatim is trying hard to be smooth.
@lordrisen36963 жыл бұрын
I don’t believe this guy is 100% hanbali, he is a neo hanbali salafist, and Abdul Qader did do bayah
@lordrisen36963 жыл бұрын
@@haisem9281 mashallah, even ibn taimiyah did sharh al umdah, and had more knowledge of the hanbali madhab, my statement still stands, and no one is shaming or insulting sheikh hating, I have immense respect and love for the sheikh
@lordrisen36963 жыл бұрын
@@haisem9281 true hanbalis (who refuted the wahabis and their leader) do not view Muhammad abdul wahab as Sunni let alone hanbali, Muhammad abdul wahab says that which is contained in matn al iqnaa’ and al muntahaa is false and against the way of Ahmad, even the prophetic Text “ ما في الاقناع و المنتهى مخالف لمذهب احمد فضلا عن نص رسول الله"
@frankincensemerchant12842 жыл бұрын
He is qualified in the Madhab, and adheres to it so how he is not "100%".
@lordrisen36962 жыл бұрын
@@frankincensemerchant1284 what I said was clear, if you know the madhab you’ll know exact what I said, just read his book on theology
@frankincensemerchant12842 жыл бұрын
@@lordrisen3696 If you mean he doesn't adhere to all the Aqaid views of the later Hanbalis I agree, but the same can be said of later Hanbalis not adhering to all the views of the early Hanabilah(and wider Athari Scholarship). kzfaq.info/get/bejne/oNGGhJdnmLzahHk.html