And then you look at Camilla Parker Bowles and what good did she do to the world? I can't even remember.

Phoenix, What you have written sounds alright, except that it is not the way that it was. Diana was charming, and she charmed Charles, just as much as she charmed others. There is absolutely no evidence , NO EVIDENCE that Charles cheated on Diana with Camilla or anyon else in the first five years of the marriage. Yet within that five years, Charles was clearly desperately unhappy, and Diana was clearly suffering from bulimia. What went wrong? Diana had a bad childhood from the start. 4th child in the family where they NEEDED a boy to inherit. Child 3 was a boy who died, so the birth of yet another girl was a disappointment. Unlike Charles, there are NO photos o Diana in a loving relationship with her parents. Her mother left home when she was eight, and she attempted to pay her mother out.... for the rest of her life. Her father remarried, and Diana attempted to pay him out, for the rest of his life. Her AIM in life was to marry a pince, and her target was the Prince of Wales. Sh had the beauty and charisma, and was as tall as a catwalk model. She charmed him. BUT she came to the marriage with a great load of baggage: school failure, resentment, jealousy over her parents remarriage, bad behaviour that had got her successive nannies sacked, eating disorders and self-harm. Apart from her beauty, charm and the fact that she was the daughter of an Earl, she was personally just about the LEAST suitable woman he could have married. She was a Fragile Narcissist. This implies that rather than being grandiose and outwardly bullying, she saw herself as a perpetual victim, and blamd her husband, and her family for every problem, failure or annoyance. Yes, she had an outward persona of charm and service. She was photographed countless times visiting the sort of Charities that she enjoyed. She was great at playing the Princess for sick children and dying veterans. The notion that she ACTIVELY campaigned is a misrepresentation. Sh accepted invitations, signed the book and had her name as Patron on the letterhead. Charles did NOT go out and about with her, because she was quite viciously spiteful, and could be extremely embarrassing in public. In these pictures, where William appears to be nine or ten, the marriage had been over for years. Diana had been having lovers since the year of Harry's birth, 1984 That action constituted Treason. Charles ceased sharing her bed. Camilla came back into his life in 1986. So in this video, which talks about rumours..... the Marriage was finished, unofficially. By this time, Diana was in a relationship with James Hewitt. Diana WAS indeed clinging to the boys, because appearing the "ideal mother" was part of the game that she played to maintain status, publicity and popularity. In fact, she manipulated the children's loyalties, continually became jealous of their nannies and sacked them, played favourites between the boys, and subjected them to her bouts of screaming tantrums, and emotional blackmail. So almost everything that is in this video is uninformed speculation.

@@MandyJMaddison Diana had massive problems, and most of those were self-inflicted. She was highly manipulative, always courting media attention while at the same time complaining about it. It was all an act. Camilla is not this way at all. She is who she is, and Charles adores her. When did he EVER call Diana "his darling wife"? I don't think he ever did. He does this with Camilla all the time, not because he is trying to impress people but because he is absolutely besotted with her. It isn't hard to understand why somebody feels this way about his perfect match. Diana was not in any manner, shape, or form suitable for him. The only good that came out of the marriage were the boys.

@@MandyJMaddison 100% Correct! TYVM

MandyJMaddison a

We all miss prince's Diana, also her sons

that little charlotte might be a young diana too!

I am pretty sure she’s watching from above the clouds.

As she only married into royal family she could not be called Princess Diana. It was worldwide media who gave her that title. The queen did not give her that honour. She was Diana, Princess of Wales or Princess Charles of Wales but never ever Princess Diana. Only those born of royal blood can use prince or Princess before their names

@@keepcreationprocess 1111%1qqq

Im the king of the North pole Luciver I don't have amnesia anymore I want to go home right now I have a castle at Liverpool. Im a real American every real American knows only king Luciver has a history about the corona virus. The South African corona virus main carriers have downloads of my feldelity armed response ipad the downloads is inside of the stumic of a corona virus main carrier.The original armed response ipad isn't hard to trace because I made it with my Samsung android. Google Maps 65 Meyer Crescent Robertson Western Cape South Africa see the blue circle moving around underneath the house is a virus carrier with a download of armed response virus carriers wired people infected on purpose forbidden plugins on telecommunications virus carriers makes phone calls with other people voice tone they blocked off millions of likes and comments from off my Facebook posts. The forbidden download was on Google ads worldwide. Im not impressed because I sad last year I want to go home right now. I'M NOT SOUTH AFRICAN IM REAL AMERICAN. I have a tax meeting later this month U.S dollars

M

Huh? Only a 90s child? Make it make sense.

@@windtossedsea4094, Her mother wore the fashion (so was probably born in the 1960s or 1970s) and she had the colouring books (so was probably born in the 1990s). It does make sense, but I see what you mean!

Can u get for me her books thank u

Facts upon facts.

Uhg

00 K

Para pegar un clip en el cuadro de texto, tócalo.

Yes she did 💕🙏🏾💕

She truly was beautiful - inside and out, and way ahead of Her time, in so many ways... It wouldn't surprise me if she continues to be an icon for centuries to come...

Yes, Diana wanted to be Queen. Why else do you think an extremely beautiful young woman of nineteen would set her cap at a man who was Heir to the Throne? She had met Charles a couple of times earlier, and she knew he was no Prince Charming. There was nothing about Charles that would make a young woman fall madly in love with him.... except the fact that whoever he married would done day be Queen. He had NOTHING ELSE to offer Diana. He was 32, balding, the perfect model for a newspaper cartoonist, was diligent, dedicated, and was widely regarded as eccentric because of his attitudes to everything involved in environmental protection. He liked all sorts of pursuits in which Diana had no interest whatsoever- hill-walking, fishing, polo, hunting, live theatre, classical music, reading, painting, and religion. And most of all, he was absolutely DEDICATED to HIS MOTHER. Charles dedication to his mother was not because he was a "Mummy's boy". It was because he was her heir as reigning monarch, and because he had knelt at her feet and sworn himself her "liegeman of life and limb". Any woman who married Charles simply had to accept her position. The Queen IS the QUEEN. Diana never accepted this. You will be very hard pressed to find even one picture of Diana curtseying to her. She used to put her earphones in her ears, and walk past the Queen in the corridors of Buckingham Palace without even saying Good Morning Ma'am, let alone curtseying. Diana simply tried to pretend that the Queen did not exist. She acted like a silly resentful school child.... and directed at her the same attitude that she had for her mother and stepmother. Everybody imagines that Camilla was the enemy in Diana's life. She wasn't!. Diana only went to the Queen when she wanted to complain about the Queen's SON. That was kind, wasn't it?. It is hard for someone who is unaware of protocols to realise the extent to which Diana got up the Queen's nose. HGer FINAL act was saying "I just want to be Queen of Hearts". You might think that this sounds SOOO SWEEET! Dear Diana jus wants to LOOOVE people! No. What this is about is being the PREMIER QUEEN in the pack. This is about the love and loyalty that is due to the REAL MONARCH. And Diana, whose popularity was dependent on her BEAUTY more than any other factor, was indeed able to steal what rightfully belonged to the Queen. She was able to do it, NOT because she REALLY CARED, not because she worked hard, not because she supported charities.... but simply because she had CHARISMA, which the Queen, Charles and Princess Anne never had. Diana is the "Queen of Hearts" because of her charisma. Nothing else.

Harry is doing pay back on his mums death William Has more responsibility He must be the next king Charles has got what he wonted so long life the Queen xx

@@lynettecrilly5805 Dont know why you want Harry to be the next King wehn (a)isn't going to happen, he is not the heir and (b) he has walked out on royal life.. and does not want to be royal

true

👍❤️

PSYCHE D#LIC - Young Royal brides were not required to be virgins - they needed to be seen as demure - Diana wouldn't have passed the test anyway

why do you depend on celebs for role models?

There is no Queen of England.

Diana will be the most beautiful princesses in the history but the Queen of England is Elizabeth II😄

I'm Chinese from Malaysia. She's also forever irreplaceable. The whole world loves. Misses her😠

@@murph8837 vh

ELISA ALVAREZ there hasn’t been queen of England since act of the unions. Lizzie is Queen of United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland also Diana was never a Princess. She only married a royal so not entitled to be called princess

He should not married her when he didn’t love her and had a mistres

IMHO, I think Diana would have been content to stay in her marriage, surrounding herself with domestic interests as she served the UK as well. I think this is where her heart was - if CAMILLA had not been there from the very beginning tearing her dream to shreds.

. " the whole world " ?

I wish her and Catherine could be together today to support each other😢 they would have loved that.

@@berthapape2165 Hello. How are you doing?

One day maybe. I hope.

dont be so foolish. THere has been an in depth investigation of her death years ago, which told the truth about her death, ie that it was due to excessive speed and driving iwth drink taken, and not wearing a seat belt

Diana never passed an exam and was a neurotic person who drove poor Charles round the bend. She didn't want him to do anything but worship her. She didn't read and the only hobbies she had were tending to her face and body. In other words she was absolutely boring.

@@jenniferhewson5831 "she didn't want him to do anything but worship her"? I think you mean all she was asking for was some love from her husband?! Charles was a jerk to her from the start, so how dare you say Diana drove him crazy. Diana was humiliated by that man in front of the whole entire world. All Diana wanted to do was love her kids, love and be loved by her husband, and give love and show compassion to the world. Side note, you are one ignorant and blind person if you can't see what happened there, who did what, and where the blame goes.

Tina, you forgot beautiful!! Princess Diana was also a stunning woman!!! R.I.P Diana

@@jenniferhewson5831 did he not marry her knowing all dz things n hiding his affair. He is nothing but a horrible husband n pathetic human selfish

Hi

Thanks linda Dickinson?

Teresadeavilld

Linda Dickinson, Diana was supported by a team- she had Ladies in Waiting (some of whom were experienced, and one of whom, in the early day, was her sister.). It meant that she had a woman at every official function who was there specifically to make things go smoothly for her. > Diana had a full-time secretary, who vetted her mail, answering most of it for her. They maintained her appointment diary, briefed her on protocol, and wrote her speeches. > Diana had an armed body guard who was near her at all public venues... followed up by a security detail if needed. Her detective was often the man who appears to be accompanying her at event, rather than Charles. (She preferred him to her husband in EVERY way). > Diana's Grandmother, Lady Fermoy, had been in Royal circles for years. She was the Queen Mother's Lady in Waiting. She KNEW EVERYTHING that a woman would need to know about Royal protocol. Diana only had to ring her. But a few years into the marriage, when Lady Fermoy discovered that Diana was cheating on the Prince, she broke her previously supportive contact. > The notion that Diana "taught" the Monarchy, and somehow "upgraded" it or "brought it into the twentieth century" is nonsense. * If you are talking about a family that has served through two world wars, ..... then holding ople's hands and hugging kids does not BRING THEM UP TO DATE. You CANNOT bring an old Dowager Queen who has cleaned a soldier's putrid wounds up to date by showing her how to hold a sick man's hand. You CANNOT bring a Queen who has worked as a mechanic on ambulances, and driven through bombed London to recover the injured from under piles of bricks, up to date by walking through a clean sterile hospice and chatting to people. You CANNOT bring an old Prince up to date, when he has instigated the building of playgrounds and cricket pitches in bombed areas of Britain's industrial cities, by showing him that YOU cuddle kids!. You CANNOT bring you Sister in Law up to date... when SHE is the person who drives around war-torn Africa delivering food and medicine to starving communities, just by having you photo taken with a legless child on your knee. You CANNOT bring your husband up to date, when he is the person who has found funds to put one million disadvantaged youths into businesses and university, just by taking him to a soup kitchen. > Understand that while the Royal Family WORKED, beautiful charming Diana played around the edges of people's sufferings, and had her photo taken while she was doing it!

Diana changed the world! She steps into rooms where death was like sitting close by. The time when people had horrible fear to touch a person who is having HIV. She just did what was right - steped in and shaking hands with no fear. She was the light of hope - she showed what matters for her - having respect for every living human - no matter what religion or colors are.

@@Surfing1709 The National Health Service and researchers on HIV/Aids had studied the likelihood of the disease being spread by ordinary contact- living with a person, nursing them, or touching their skin, such as shaking hands. They had published papers to dispel the fear. But people do not read scholarly journals. So they looked for a celebrity to PROMOTE the findings. The most famous celebrity of the day was Diana. They asked her to get involved. She agreed. The day BEFORE Diana held the hand of man with HIV/Aids, a newspaper leaked the story that Diana was going to do this, SPECIFICALLY for a PRESS PROMOTION. > You might want to believe that this was a beautiful, spontaneous, charitable act by Diana. It wasn't. It was en event that took place in front of a huge crowd of INVITED press photographers. After the photo was taken, Diana chatted for a few minutes, then sanitised her hands. The photo taken with a legless African child on her knee was similarly a press event, organised by the Anti Land Mines campaign. > Diana was the FACE of the promotion. And the publicity that SHE received from these photos have caused people to believe that she was a Saint. > The DIANA PROMOTION changed the people's perceptions. > BUT when you talk about Diana's ACTIONS, then you need to understand what she did and what she DID NOT DO. Diana dressed herself elegantly and had her beautician do her face and her hairdresser do her hair.... every morning. (HM the Queen does her own hair and powders her own face). Diana then walked into a Nursing home or other such body, with all the cameras flashing. She chatted pleasantly with a few people, smiled at a few others, and ALWAYS held someone's hand for a Press Photo. Then she walked out, making a rude comment about the smell, as she went. > Meanwhile, her Sister-in-Law was visiting PRISONS. I suppose that the prisoners would rather have had beautiful Diana than straight-speaking Anne who talked about their sentences and their lives behind bars. While Diana was going to the Children's hospital and receiving bouquets and getting her famous face on the front of the paper, hugging a baby, What was Anne doing? She was out in Biafra in Africa or Bangladesh, both places affected by war and severe drought. There were children dying of STARVATION lying around everywhere. Anne's job was to HEAD UP the organisation that raised funds for food and medicine. She didn't CUDDLE the starving babies. She was NOT there to have her photo taken for the paper. She was there to supervise the distribution f food and medicine. > Yes Diana saw people dying, clean, and medicated in hospital. Diana also saw well-scrubbed children with healed wounds, in Africa. But ANNE walked among children with their bellies blown up like footballs and their bodies shrunk to little skeletons, and maggots crawling out of their sores. > And the IRONY of this is that it was the PROMOTIONAL PHOTOS of Diana that changed people's attitude to landmines and HIV/Aids. People in England RECALL that Diana walked through their hospital and smiled beautifully. The people who Princess Anne nurtured in Bangaldesh DO NOT tell their stories to the News service. > But some do. I have had a young man with cerebral palsy tell me how Princess Anne gave him the confidence to ride a horse, and how patiently she plodded around in the mud, beside the horse, partly supporting him. at her charity, Riding For the Disabled.

Terry Very well said.

@Terry -- The Royals did their very best to treat MM well but MM is a very underserving recipient.

@@wkjeom ?

CPL, MP, C/O, CPT CL p

You are still reeling 23 years later? Please seek psychiatric help.

Hi

That is true, especially her emotions and social behavior

Especially in front of the cameras. 📸

where did she find solutions for their problems???

This is twaddle straight out of your imagination. None ever described Diana as a good listener. Diana's engagement with people was on an extremely shallow level. She held hands. She stroked cheeks. And she spoke a few verbal platitudes. She didn't listen listen to the suffering and solve their problems. She did not have the intellect, the organisational ability or the courage to do that. What Diana did well was public promotions that required having her photo taken. But the royal family do not do anything that is overtly promotional. This brought Diana into some conflict with the royal family, not because of the charities she supported but because her actions were overtly promotional. The first of these major promo shoots was for the British medical association to promote their findings that hiv/aids was not readily transmissible by ordinary contact. While Diana's attendance at the aids hospice and her taking the hand of a sick man might have seemed spontaneous to the viewer, it was a planned promotion attended by a huge press delegation. Likewise, the trip to Angola on which she spent two days meeting leaders and being photographed with victims, was a carefully planned and orchestrated promotion. But to Diana's horror, the geographic society then invited her to address a meeting, and she had to get someone to write a speech that she could read. Her actual engagement with the issue and real ability to express herself is most clearly shown when a reporter asks "why are you involved in this, and she looks at him blankly and says "because it is a worthy cause," this was her stock answer. Another stock answer was" because they so deserve it" And while Diana was having her photo taken walking along a well beaten path past a warning sign, the real princess, Princess Anne, was somewhere out inafrica, driving herself around in a four wheel drive, delivering food and medicine, supervising the workers and assessing the needs of the starving and disposed people. The person who looked, who listened, who planned, who raised funds, who problem solved, who directed operations, who delivered the food, medicine and education, who really cared, was never your soppy blushing deceitful, promiscuous Diana. It has always been her plain, not very charming sister in law. But you probably don't want to know that, because Anne has never played the victim, doesn't blush and hang her head

@@Jerry-mk3wy , are you trying to be funny here?

She's not the most beautiful woman in the world.There are many more beautiful women. It's just her destiny what people makes love her.

You have just one thing right here- "Diana suffered every day". This is true. Diana suffered every day from the effects of childhood emotional neglect. She suffered from the paranois that she would not be loved, or that someone else might be loved more. She never understood the embracing nature of love- that loving people can be happy and be themselves in each other's company without demanding continual attention and reassurance. Diana suffered from having the emotional maturity of a 2 year old. You know, because everyone who knows about her knows that Diana had bulimia. That means she craved food and stuffed herself obsessively on rich food, junk food, sweet food, Mars Bars etc. Then she would make herself vomit it all up again. Well, the Bulimia was the part that was easiest to diagnose, because it was a recognised eating disorder. But it was not the only problem. Diana needed ATTENTION in the same way as she needed Mars Bars.........more and more and more attention. Some of this attention came through PROPER and ACCEPTABLE channels. Diana could go out several times a week and get really good positive attention from visiting charities, meeting people, smiling and chatting, and acting in a charming way. That was the good side of it. The bad side was the way she behaved with her spouse, and her successive lovers. They could NEVER give her enough attention.... and she drove them away by her obsessive behaviour......like ringing a man 300 times in 24 hours! This need for attention meant that if Charles DID NOT pay attention all the time, she believed he had someone else. She also needed sympathy and sex......much more sex than she got from Charles. She needed it the way she needed Mars Bars.......lots and lots and lots.....so she went from man to man. We can name at least 12 of them easily, and I know of at least three others. 15 years after she married Charles, she said "There were always three of us in the marriage." There is absolutely NO EVIDENCE that this is true. There is no evidence to DISbelieve Camilla's statement that she did not get back with Charles until 1986- two years after the marriage UNOFFICIALLY ended because of Diana's promiscuous behaviour. You may not WANT to believe this, but this is the truth. Diana DID suffer. She suffered from very destructive mental illness, beginning in her childhood.

THINK HARRY HAS MADE A STAND AGAINST HIS FATHER NOW

@@lynettecrilly5805 There is only one other post under this thread. If you were to read it, then you would have a much better understanding as to what happened between Harry's parents. Harry's mother was an hysterical, paranoid person, who threw tantrums, who continually d8ismissed the boy's nannies, who played one child against the other, who hugged then in an obsessive , invasive manner, and who expected them to LIKE her long series of lovers.

The prince's are doing what thay have to do now Harry found new life with Megan William born to be king has got a good wife And a family and the Middletons family xxxx

Charles had no shame. He married his mistress. Neither of them had any feeling for William and Harry.

Thanks for Straight Truth?

The Straight Truth is that the Royal Family ALLOCATES the charities which its members take on. Diana was ALLOCATED the EASIEST charities.... particularly those that let her stay in London. Diana was ALLOCATED the largest children's hospital (Greater Ormond Street Hoepital for Children), the Red Cross, the HIV/Aids Charity (which was a newly formed and highly topical charity), the Royal Ballet (because she LIKED ballet), and various Nursing Homes and Hospices. All these charities brought POPULAR ATTENTION from the PRESS. THIS is why YOU THINK that Diana was "genuine" and "caring". > Diana DID NOT go to places that were DIRTY, or potentially dangerous. If people were waving placards in the street...... and complaining about their loss of employment, or their housing problems....... Then it was CHARLES who went there. While Dina went to the kiddies hospital, it was PRINCESS ANNE who went to visit the teenagers IN JAIL. > THAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GENUINE CARING AND PUTTING ON A SHOW FOR THE MEDIA.

Yes!

Thanks Veronica Ivanova?

Yeaa, by trying to defend Charles, they made it seem like she was acting for the press. That's definitely the media spin speared from the Monarchy to not have Diana look so beautifully hearted and like the genuine Queen she is.

what volunteering work? The only volunteer work she did was as a kid at school

@@glen7318 Rubbish lies about Diana who you never met or knew twenty five years ago, that's how long Diana has been dead now. You just lie as usual about Diana. The only volunteer work she did was as a kid at school. just ,more ;lies about Diana as you say. No kid at school would lie like that.

Hello, how are you doing? Hope you’re having a wonderful day!!!

and it is ficitonal nonsense. She was supported, she did get help, and it took years for her to overcome her eating disorders

@@glen7318 of course it is, these people always try to make you look bad in the media for views. It’s so hurtful to the people who love and respect her memory and the work she did while with us.

@@MuscleNMarriage not sure what you mean

@@glen7318 Thanks Glen

Thanks Claire livefreeo?

Me to ♥️😩

Me three. She has the divine mother energy. Like Mother Mary or Kwan yin in the budhist tradition. "What does Quan Yin represent? Chinese Bodhisattva/ Goddess of Compassion, Mercy and Kindness is considered to be a mother-goddess and patron of seamen. The name Guan Yin also spelt Guan Yim, Kuan Yim, Kwan Im, or Kuan Yin, is a short form for Kuan-shi Yin, meaning "Observing the Sounds (or Cries) of the (human) World".

. Why ?

She allways will be for ever,even in death?Thanks Elaine Evans?

*queen

We won't get anyone similar to the late princess

😥We will never see another princess like Diana again.

Is.

Me 😞

noone?

Without a doubt. She was a Queen as a princess ♡♡

CDCFauciBirxPsyOpdUSA ObjectiveUSAeconomyIMPLOSION o

@CDCFauciBirxPsyOpdUSA ObjectiveUSAeconomyIMPLOSION are you normal? She was suffering from severe mental health issues. Judgmental people like yourself would never understand. Byeeeeeee

@CDCFauciBirxPsyOpdUSA ObjectiveUSAeconomyIMPLOSION Anastasia

I agree she was an amazing, charismatic woman, but wasn’t that beautiful or intelligent and that’s well known.

. " wise " ?

The real princes always.

She wasn’t a Princess. Marrying a prince doesn’t make you a princess in Uk royal family. You must be granted that honour and she was not

@@jamesmarshall1967 Not true. the wife of a prince is a princess

@@glen7318 only if granted the title. Catherine is not a Princess, Rachel is not a princess Camilla is not a princess yet she does hold Princess of Wales title but just doesn’t use it. Go do a little research. When they are called Princess it would be Princess William of Princess Charles of Wales.

@@jamesmarshall1967 They are all princesses. They are HRH as the wives of Princes. They are not princesses by blood.. but they are princesses. Just like the wife of the King is queen and Her Majesty

The lesson is: don't fight for people who gave up on you. That is just the truth

According to what Diana herself said, she was upset because Camilla had phoned him just before he went away, to say goodbye and she left the room to give them some privacy. So she knew perfectly well that there was a special relationship between Charles and Camilla so why didnt she back out back then?

@@glen7318 she did back out then, she divorced Prince Charles, you forgot to add that in your post of Diana though.

May she rest in peace now together with Dodi. ⚘ 🕊

You know them both do you?

@@jenniferhewson5831 You seem to know both of them judging by your comments here.

Jennifer Hewson ,By your comments,I would say you have the hots for old Chucky. Most of us have read everything ever written about BOTH of them and watched every documentary,every movie,etc... If you weren't so in love with Dumbo 🐘,you might see ALL of the picture. Go on cleaning Chuckys toilets... he is a cheater and will be looking for a new "side piece" sooner or later. Just keep bending your buffalo behind up while scrubbing the loo... he might make your dreams come true. Beware of the Rottweiler though,her teeth look snaggled,even after all of the millions of pounds "the firm" has spent on her,trying to make her presentable.

@@lanam.3386 🤣🤣🤣🤣 right!

@@lanam.3386 You are referring to William and Harry's father.

Wow !!!! 🙂💓💓

Whaat??

LIAR! Why lie about something so small

When she was in USA?

@@JulieWallis1963 ENGLAND

No one's trying to replace her for goodness sake except MM and she failed big time.

A true Queen is generous, discrete, has a great sence of duty, has dignity etc. etc. .

@@ritahorvath8207 , yes, you are so right. The true Queen, OUR true Queen, Her Majesty, Elizabeth II has certainly had all the qualities that you have listed. And she has managed to be Queen all these years, without sleeping with her security officer, throwing her stepmother in a swimming pool in her ballgown, having a apprehended violence order taken out against her by her lover's s wife, running to the newspapers with stories about her husband, calling the press into her palace appartment to badmouth the family, or going off to Paris with another man to make her current lover jealous......m How has Her Majesty managed all these years, without all the attention-seeking games of the Princess who wanted to usurp the LOYALTY and LOVE of Her Majesty's people?

@@MandyJMaddison this is all nonsense. Diana did not have an order taken out by her lover's wife, she did not thrown her stepmother in a siwmming pool.

@@glen7318 , I think that you are eight about the court order. It seems the complaint was made to the Police, and investigated at the behest of Prince Charles, and the matter dropped, to save embarrassment. With regards to the swimming pool story ... that seems to be erroneous. Diana dared her brother to do it, but it didn't happen because Raine woke up to the plan.

. Wow .

you think she was honest and kind because you like her face?

This channel is creating content with a "royal" undertone, so they say nice things about Charles and Camilla which neither of them deserve.

@@horsewhisperer20394 definitely noticed that. They said nothing but good things about Charles

THEY FORGOT TO MENTION SHE LEFT HER CAULDRON AND BROOM BEHIND, WHEN SHE MOVED IN.

this documentary is from 1992, so it's possible that it came out before Andrew Morton's book, and at that time people didn't know that the information in the book came straight from Diana herself.

Qye hermosa mujer!!!!!!

Diana could run circles around Camilla. We were blessed to have her for eleven years and now her sons wirh their families

Cleopatra, Elizabeth I and Grace Kelly are way better than Princess Diana.

@@terrimichaels3018 SIXTEEN YEARS!!!

@@21ROEHAMPTON Cleo was a very evil woman!¡! ☆☆☆

Kiki Good I think she would be disappointed to know that they cow tow to social justice ideology! She of all people, would be against communist and socialism!

She loved her husband so much he didn't deserve her its funny how love hurts so bad.

Devil

What is strange about it? Its not exactly news after 30 years

Be sure enough...... karma does exist.

You don't know that. According to a book of Charles he never saw the boys after she moved out. Diana's home grandmother said she was conniving. Who really cares let them live their lives.

She was known to call the press and tell them when and where she’s be with her kids sometimes. She very much wanted to be seen as the only good parent in that family. She wasn’t.

His time had a cost. He did not "spare" his precious time for his son

@@annm.7176 what is a home grandmother? Do you mean that woman who was the Queen's lady in waiting?

@@lindap8101 -- Sicko.

Or at all.

She married to wrong man

Yes...Charles divorce Diana because of her mistress Camilla sad is he marry this witch Camilla now leaving together forget Diana that easy the bad things is they killed the Princess instead of giving her a chance ti leave happy ...

Patti Dale I think Charles loved Diana but was not in love with her. She was also looking for something in Charles and the RF that they couldn't provide.

6 5 no

. Wow .

Me too.

Diana was more royal than the current royals..REALLY!! She ain't nooòo commoner

True! The tiara she wore in her wedding was from her family!

If youre not royalty, youre a commoner. She was aristocracy, but certainly not royal before marriage. That said, its all rubbish from times long gone. These things mean nothing anymore.

@@r.22r she descends from kings ..her family titles are older than theirs .she.told prince Phillip that too LOL

Rest in peace Diana and Dodi. ⚘🕊

@jellysso3255 so true, your post, Lady Diana's life was not a Disney fairytale version. It's more of a Grimm's fairytale version. Full of actions, plot twists but never a happy ending, yes so very true, your post, plot twists was not right, it should mean it was a grim fairytale version.

*queen

As she only married into royal family she could not be called Princess Diana. It was worldwide media who gave her that title. The queen did not give her that honour. She was Diana, Princess of Wales or Princess Charles of Wales but never ever Princess Diana. Only those born of royal blood can use prince or Princess before their names

@@jamesmarshall1967 She was never Princess Charles of Wales. That would be the title of the wife of the son of the POW.

@@glen7318 the wife of any member of family take on the the husbands titles as they cannot use princess before own name. Not just their children etc

@@jamesmarshall1967 Charles was never Prince Charles of wales.. he is HRH THE PRINCE OF WALES. so how could Diana be Prss Ch of Wales

Maybe she's more beautiful, but this is not all.Camilla is a buddy for him, she's beautiful in his eyes and she makes him happy, this is what counts.

Poker face haha *vomit*

Yeah I think he just Diana to have children because Camilla was too old, I think he always loved Camilla

@@erickanew after watching the crown i realized...he married Diana because the royal family forced him to...cuz they didn't find Camilla suitable for him as wife and she didn't have any royal or aristocratic family background like Diana had.. Prince Charles & Camilla was in a relationship long before he & Princess Diana met.

@@Azarath_Metrion_Zinthos yeah heard something like that years ago

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/fM-Pq5NqlbKrf2w.html

Let me explain this. Nobody has ever suggested the bracelet was "for a friend". It was bought, for his EX_mistress. as a personal thanks and memento. Charles is a man who will one day be KING. His name is already in the history books. On the Day he was born in November 1948, the Royal Artillery fired 40 cannons in London. And far away in Wellington, on the other side of the world, forty cannons were fired to celebrate his birth. The same happened in Australia, Canada, Singapore, Fiji, and on the little island of Saint Helena in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean. Because of his birth, Diana was not just marrying an ordinary man that she had fallen in love with. Charles is History. That means that the women who had been his companions and mistresses before his marriage, are also History. As a gentleman, and a prince, he could not just cast them aside. Charles told Diana that there were FOUR (not just Camilla) women who had been important to him , and that he planned to take each one out to lunch and give each one a goodbye gift. THAT was the point at which Diana started to sulk, rage, threaten, bully and make his life miserable. It was too late for Charles, as a gentleman, to pull out of the marriage. If Diana was REALLY concerned, then SHE could pull out. But she didn't. She had a week or so to think about it, because Charles had to go away to represent the Queen. Diana chose to go right on with the engagement. Did she LOVE HIM so very much? No. Diana was in love with the idea of being Queen. I will say again. There is NO EVIDENCE that Charles continued in his relationship with Camilla after the engagement. They got together again five years later, when the marriage had been completely broken down for over a year.

@@MandyJMaddison But Lady C and now in a documentary says that Charles and Camilla spent the night together before his wedding and they were at Buckingham Palace. Nice try though

@@belinhel Who is Lady C? It is not possible that Charles and Camilla spent the night before the wedding together. There was a huge party at Buckingham Palace that went on into the wee small hours. Charles was there, entertaining all his relatives. There is no question about this. It is a fact that was documented in video recordings at the time. Besides which, you are blowing out of proportion the role that Camilla played in his life. She was not a "great passion". She was a very good friend, and an occasional convenient f**k. Camilla did not achieve her status as the "most important woman in his life" until Diana had completely relinquished that role, with half a dozen other men. Keep in mind that Diana MADE THE RECORDED STATEMENT that in 1984 she had fallen deeply in love with a man who was "the best man I ever had in my life".

@@MandyJMaddison yes you’re right about that party ! I was appalled because that never came out before but I saw a few Charles and Camilla KZfaq videos and I heard that on 2 of them. I guess it wasn’t a big secret but Lady Colin Campbell on her KZfaq channel would verify or tell more about that if you ask. She answers questions and her show is about every 3 days usually. She wrote Diana’s first biography. But yes if you watch Charles Camilla and Diana KZfaq channels it always comes up 🤨. But I don’t think Diana ever found that out, it appears to be more recent news since C and C’s wedding, then shows were produced about it all.

@@belinhel Lady Colin Cambell says a lot of ridiculous things. They didn't spend the night together. Do you really think that they did

Hi

Watch the Diana tapes where she speaks about her relationship with her father and stepmother ....

What inteview with the press? She only did one interview with Martin bashir in 1995 and that was on TV

She was just as bad.

@@murph8837 -- Charles was and is rotten. He did not deserve such a wonderful wife. His sons have put him to shame. So sad Harry married such a narcissist.

@@murph8837 j

Charles was too old for her and they both didn't match together from the start. I don't try to support any of them but they shouldn't be together.

@@murph8837 princess. Diane

@James Hama thanks for your coment?Amen God bless you.

Thanks for the story?Of a PRINCESS BEAUTYFULL FAMILLY.

@James Hama Not at all?Thanks for?Your coment.

what movies? She was not a film star

Annabella Boyer - Sorry, Diana was supposed to be a Princess of the RF - not a movie star

Hello

There was no terrible crime. There was spectacular stupidity on the part of Dod Fayed which helped to cause the tragedy...

Living life the way Diana life turned out. It hard being mom a husband wife knows is not in love with her. She tried to live life like it should have been. It is living a lie. Knowing what is expected of one and knowing what the truth way life really is for Diana and Charles did not care did not put on a front.

@@francesodle6069 They both put on a front. They had to but their differences were so great that over time they could not keep it up. Other royal couples have hd their problems but tehy were able to keep it more discreet

@@glen7318 What's also stupidly was the fact they didn't have not seatbelts on. Besides, Dody was in that car but it was Diana they where chasing.

@James Hama I am fine thanks

Esraa Ashraf - Sorry - did you say you knew her because you saw her on tv?

Yes she had a very caring heart. The wives of all the married men she shagged would have to agree with you.

Hi

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/fM-Pq5NqlbKrf2w.html

Please 🙏🙏 leave the royal family alone Diana is a lovely lady but she is not here now stop keep bringing the past up the queen is having a sad time with out the scam from the press

. 🤣

Not that I like camila but why is it only her fault?? Charles should've never continue his relationship with her after his marriage and chill she can't be the queen even if charles is king because it's her 2nd marriage and royal rules didn't even let her take the title "duchess" let alone queen 🤣🤣

Sure Camilla’s at fault but I mean... he was a grown man and knew exactly what he was doing. He made choices. It’s so odd when people are quick to blame the other woman and not hold the cheating husband to the same degree of responsibility

@@AnikaNawarAhmed She does have the title Duchess,. How can you say that when she is known as HRH THE Duchess of Corrnwall? And she can be queen. Unless she and Charles choose not to use the title, she becomes queen once Charles becomes king.

A sneaky cruel wimp.

Karen Pease Princess Diana was definitely murdered & sadly two other innocent people also died!!! She even predicted how she would die!!! How did she know this???!!! 😢😭

@@lorrainetavares1753 Proof! How was she murdered? You have been reading gossip columns.

Well said

I remember him!!!!!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

We will only have one Princess Diana. She was a very special person. Meghan is not at all like Princess Diana and very different. Princess Diana was very charming and still a favourite until now. Meghan is definitely not a fauvorite. I think more people prefer Kate to Meghan !

Norehan Long PC will never ever be king!!!

@Kathlyn Ofosuhene Very special: THE best thing to happen to the RF, but they never appreciated her, but destroyed her: she even predicted it!!! 😰😢😭

@@lorrainetavares1753 She said that she would die because someone cut the brake lines (whatever they are) but instead she died at the hands of a drunk driver. Apparently she could not see into the future!

Lorraine Tavares you really are delusional.

How could Charles love Diana when he had a toad in his back pocket.

@@wkjeom making no sense there

How is Diana like one of your daughters ? .

ROS G . Sounds a bit smug. I'd like to know the similarities between Diana and your daughter too??

J K - Perhaps Diana shouldn't have forced the late Queen to make the decision for D & C to divorce

It was inevitable. THe queen just did not want to face it. @@susanlockyer1192

ridiculous. they were both fighting in the newspapers adn the marraige clearly coudl not continue@@susanlockyer1192

@@susanlockyer1192 the marriage was a faillure from ealry on, and was not getting any better, as they got older. It had reached a point where they simply could not carry on as a married couple.

Hello, how are you doing? Hope you’re having a wonderful day!!!

Hi

Hi

Diana WAS NOT. In love with Dody.

Dodi had a long time fiancee and was forced to leave her to pursue Diana. Dodi's father had legal problems with the UK and blamed the Queen. He used his son to to get revenge. He killed Dodi and Diana and started the story that the Royal Family was to blame!

@@abbatrouble he didn’t kill them!! You honestly believe he killed his own son out of revenge?

@@marymckay9426 I merely meant that they would still be alive if he hadn't interfered and forced his son to pursue Diana.

@@abbatrouble then I apologise.....I didn’t read it that way!

Are you from the uk Julie?

Hanke Danaj As she only married into royal family she could not be called Princess Diana. It was worldwide media who gave her that title. The queen did not give her that honour. She was Diana, Princess of Wales or Princess Charles of Wales but never ever Princess Diana. Only those born of royal blood can use prince or Princess before their names

@@jamesmarshall1967 no, she was never Princess Charles of wales.

Hello

yes she was a commoner - only a peer has superior rank in the UK

Why? A lot of people are much nicer and sweeter with people they only have to meet once.. or behave differently at work to teh way they do at home.

@@glen7318 True. My mother is the best example of it.

@@Bogna1 unfortunately Diana was so good at being sweet in public that she is seen as sweet and angelic all hte time. But people who worked with Diana or met her in some private setting were often a lot cooler towards her than people who saw her at an engagement.

@@glen7318 That's all possible. We cannot tell we really know a person just through his/her public image.

​@@glen7318Da,narcisi i manipulatora su takvi

There were 11 in the marriage if you count Diana's lovers.

@@abbatroubleThere were never that many and she only turned to other men when her husband ignored and belittled her. Quite understandable in fact. She was a very young and lovely woman.

@@zzzbbbooo There were certainly that many and she turned to them because she was a lusty person.

@@zzzbbbooo but that's not the point. If Charles is the devil for having one affair, what must Diana be like, to have had several? but then since people constantly bring up "young" and lovely, when they mention her its clear that she is considered right because she was young and pretty

Alexandra Alberti - I thought she said 'there were 7 of us in the marriage, so it was....'

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/fM-Pq5NqlbKrf2w.html

I wish she would have chosen a quiet and remoted life after her divorce.... 🏡