Im curious, what does JW teach about this?

@@superjjewii JW's are Arians aka Unitarians. They reject the Trinity. They believe only the Father is Yahweh. The Son is a created being. The Spirit is not a person it is God's active force.

JWs teach that Jesus is not God and that He is a created being. Praying that their eyes would be open to see that Jesus is LORD.

Same name. Yehovah said He is the only God and the only saviour (yeshua in Hebrew) then He *manifested* as Yehoshua (Yehovah-saviour) to do exactly that. Yehoshua is Yeshua in short, transliterated (keeping the sound) into Greek as we can see in the original Greek new testament is Iesous or English Jesus...

I believe JESUS CHRIST fulfilled Jeremiah 31 v 31-34

Yes. He means the divine name.

Thank you, brother! The Father is certainly called the Ancient of Days, but the name YHWH is shared by all three persons of the Trinity. Peace!

@@chadbird1517 That's new clarity... I've been inclined towards 'the Spirit of Christ' 'the Spirit of God', 'the Spirit of the Son' that Paul says, as synonymous, it's 'Their' (the Father and the Son) Spirit... and 'It' and 'He' is a Holy Spirit. The ontology of God is so lofty... whew... it breaks my mind trying to imagine reality. And I don't care for the Roman infusions n definitions made along the way. I still feel like I'm still 'coming out of Babylon' not just religiously but we have been greatly mislead on most public issues and education. Large associations like AMA, FDA, CDC have sacrificed millions on the alter of big 'sorcery' lucre. As of today 6/9 new Dutch study released said over 35 million have been killed by mRNA jab. And Fed case last week ruled mRNA technology is NOT a vaccine... what happens when the masses understand they may possibly have a ticking time bomb inside them...(some say frequency can be used to trigger expression) I know this technology exists in mil world, I don't know if was it used here but seems it likely was... truly this could be the beginning pangs of serious turmoil with tribulations and time of trouble. I'm convinced that God's Grace and Love never diminishes towards us, but corporate mankind will destroy itself as it has unlocked directed energy capabilities and in the wrong hands split the world in half! Not even exaggerating... Tesla understood this and wrote about it and the US built it. Because we do, we can keep it from everyone else, and would know if someone else was trying to build such etc. We can 'bring fire down from heaven' in view of all. The tech used in anti gravity appears / disappears n looks like a 'miracle' or like magic...but just physics Can take out nukes quite easily I understand as well, so that's good... ;-) When mankind is destroying himself we have the hope Jesus will step in to save us and put an end to the crazy before no one is left to be saved. If I understand right, He will take everyone He can get! And I'm in! Amen! Got carried away there but we do live in interesting times...I turn 70 on 7/7 and have had my days as I got my 'threescore and ten' and feel very blessed, and feel like I've had a bit of a Solomon experience in that I've got to sort of see it all through the years and career and all. (Then I fell out of normalcy for about 10+ years after a great career retiring too young (long story)). I desire to 'walk IN Him' for what ever time is left. Looking for that one perfect day knowing I'll never have... perfect love is a pretty high standard. But it's worth it, He is with it. If you read this far I'm impressed... Blessings! This was therapeutic ...

The overwhelming scholarly consensus is that Yahweh is the historically accurate pronunciation, but it is not something to be legalistic about. If one does not like the uncertainty of pronunciation, just say Yod-Heh-Vav-Heh, which are the four Hebrew consonants of the name.

while pronounced similarly, the phrase being said is not 'Moloch YHWH' but 'Malakh YHWH'. Moloch is a Canaanite god but 'malakh' (mal’āḵ) is a generic term for messenger, typically used for angels/divine messengers. the term "Angel/Messenger of the Lord" is the tranlsation of the phrase 'mal’āḵ YHWH'. Rest assured, there's no connection with the Canaanite deity Moloch here, though the similarity in pronunciation is unfortunate lol.

@@ginsusharkstudios8044 Thank you for the clarification.

Yes, Father and Son are the same 'entity'/Being (ousia). See the Nicene and Athanasian creeds.

The traditional language is that the Father and Son share the same divine nature, similar to how a human father and human son share the same human nature. The analogy breaks down, of course, but that is one way to think about it. As far as the name goes, the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit all have the name Yahweh. That is why Jesus says to baptize in the name (singular, not plural) of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.

​@@ChericeGraham, I don't think they are the same being or entity.

Yes, that is the essence of the Trinity. Father, Son, and Spirit are one, three persons in one entity

@@awodeyisimiloluwa7240 Zechariah 12:10, Revelation 1:17-18, Hebrews 1:8 Jesus is the LORD and the LORD is the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. They are all 1 God, YHVH.

Jesus's name in Hebrew is Yehoshua which can be either Yeshua or Yoshua in short form, same meaning.

Yes. Languages change. Hebrew itself did that over the centuries when the OT was being written. help.1517.org/knowledge/jesus-or-yeshua-is-it-wrong-to-call-him-jesus

Straw man . Genesis 11 God created the different languages!

What does that have to do with the name, Jesus is the English transliteration of Greek Iesous which is the transliteration of Aramaic Yeshua or Yehoshua (Yehovah-saviour) in long form, all the same.

Thanks for the feedback! I can see why it might appear "fanciful garbage" to some, but let us look at the grammar and context. IF Paul had said "that at the name, Jesus..." then certainly he would mean that personal name. But he says "name OF Jesus," the phrase "of Jesus" is in the genitive, which denotes possession, that is, the name belonging to, given to, the man Jesus. This certainly could mean that the name is Jesus, but it could equally mean the name above all names that has been given to Jesus. In the context, what is this name? Paul tells us in vs. 11, "Jesus Christ is Lord." In Greek, "Lord" is Kyrios, which is the Greek translation of the Hebrew name of God, YHWH. Were we to ask any Jew of the 1st century what name was "above all names," the obvious answer would be God's name, YHWH. Therefore, as Peter O'Brien comments, "The name (τὸ ὄνομα is definite) greater than any other that God conferred on Jesus as a gracious gift (ἐκαρίσατο) is his own name, κύριος (‘Lord’), in its most sublime sense, that designation used in the LXX to represent the personal name of the God of Israel, that is, Yahweh." Peter Thomas O’Brien, The Epistle to the Philippians: A Commentary on the Greek Text, New International Greek Testament Commentary (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1991), 238.

@@chadbird1517 I have looked at the context and the grammar. It is very straightforward. As one old writer said, "I do not care for novel interpretations. Cream lies on the surface."

I don't think your passage in Acts rebuts it at all. It doesn't say _"... by the name Jesus Christ ..."._ It says _"... by the name OF Jesus Christ ..."._ That seems to support Chad Bird's point.

@@KenJackson_US and the pronunciation of Yahweh? Can you show me how we come to this?

@@BornagainE Sadly, I know neither Hebrew nor Greek. Do you?

Yehovah.

@@P.H.888 Jesus said: “I have come in My Father’s name, and you do not receive Me; if another comes in his own name, you will receive him.” ‭‭John‬ ‭5‬:‭43‬ ‭NASB1995‬‬ Jesus name is actually Yahusha which comes from the Father’s Holy name Yahuah. Yahusha means Yahuah is salvation.

​@@TheAnointedWarrior, actually u won't find any name starting with yah in the Hebrew Bible. Jesus's name was written as Yehoshua or Yeshua in short...

@@TheAnointedWarrior made up transliterations. YHVH the 4 Hebrew letters = Yehovah. Read Genesis 18 ~ 19v 24. Then there’s You shall call Him Emmanuel! God with us!