That explains why some East Africans show Caucasoid features.

What an amazing work, the video is wrong and not correct from beginning to end.

@@TUNC66 Are you Turkish by any chance?

@@YeastCartography Yes,i amTurk, what's the problem?

Apparently, afaik, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand and Odisha region was mostly occupied by various hunter and farmer tribals, and spoke various lost languages in the past, before they homogenized by switching to Kol, Munda and Prakrit tongues.

Alas, I did not find so many genomes in India, probably because I mainly used Vahaduo. For example, I am missing the genomes of Marathis, Konkanis, Sinhala, Assama and Odia. That's why I've outlined them roughly. I would be very grateful if you shared the sources from where you got the genomes.

It will basically be double of whatever Sintashta ancestry one has. So a Haryanvi with 40% sintashta will be roughly 77-80% Vedic because vedic ancestry essentially means 50% sintashta & 50% IVC.

@yxzhvw348 none of your business

So do I as an Indian

​@@iamzeus7368great response to that good job

@@soumyajitsingha9614 During the Neolithic, East Iranian farmers settled in northwestern South Asia and mixed with the native South Asian hunter-gatherers, creating the Indus Valley Civilization. Eventually, the people of the Indus Valley Civilization finally managed to adapt to the more humid and tropical areas of South Asia and migrated south, absorbing extra South Asian hunter-gatherer DNA, creating the Dravidians as we know them. The Dravidians also have some Sintashta steppes, though much less than the Indo-Aryans.

I love ayran with mint 🐫🐵🇮🇷🐪🐒

Yes, after the Germans.

Knk dikkatli izle irani demiyor zaten.

​@@tanhukim9963 Soy diyor. O da yanlış?

@@Secular_Turkish knk silik yazılan yazılar var, bir de koyu yazılanlar var. Silik olanlar Hint İran olmayanlar zaten, sadece onların dnasını taşıyanlardır.

@@tanhukim9963 onu anladım zaten. Ancak Proto Türklerin coğrafyası İrani coğrafyadan çok ayrıydı. Proto Türklerin taşıma olasılığı çok düşük ve yanlış

Turks originate from modern day mongolia

Geography wise is also correct. No need to bring your casteism here. This map is mostly correct.

There would be millions of dots in the map if he try to do so 😅

@@ShiblyMartin-yp6mj That's true. That is why a column chart is correct

@@jmab721 Let me tell you the reason. Irula a lower indian caste does not have any steppe ancestry while the Iyer brahmin has one of the highest steppe ancestry in tamil nadu. The problem is that dna is in extremes not similar

​@@jmab721 caste wise is more relevant. Here in Maharashtra, Chitpavan Brahmins can sometimes score 40-50% Steppe MLBA. Whereas Tribals who are mostly related to Dravidians and Austro-Asiatics score only 5-10% and 1-2% steppe MLBA respectively.

Not anymore. Some recent Jaat samples have showed some of the highest sintashta ancestry ever (~45%)

Linguistics today doubt that Altaic is a real language family. They just say Turkic and Mongolic, a connection between the two families cannot be proven.

@@Ravie3 Sure they can. The word for arm/hand (these languages tend to use the same word for both): Proto-Japonic: ta(r)i Proto-Koreanic: tali Proto-Mongolic: gar Proto-Turkic: kar(i) In Mongolic languages the word for arm has developed a martial sense of flank or wing of an army, while in Turkic it has developed into a more merchantile sense of a unit of measurement, usually ranging between the length of a forearm (cubit) to the length of 2 arms. The divergence in connotation from a word that originally referred to the same thing suggests a common origin rather than a loanword.

@@siyacer My dude, don’t do amateur linguistics research, leave it to the experts. Neighboring languages, through contact, can share vocabulary or even sound/grammar changes, which is why determining what’s a cognate and what’s a loanword can be so difficult to figure out. The professionals who study this for a living say that there’s no concrete evidence that Turkic and Mongolic stem from a common root.

@@Ravie3 Did you seriously just call a paraphrasing of an actual peer-reviewed article "amateur linguistics research". Sure, if you love your "experts" so much, here's an article on the topic. Search up "Triangulation supports agricultural spread of the Transeurasian languages"

@@Ravie3 😂😂😂 aferin siz bu kafayla devam edin

I haven't checked the data, but it makes sense. That general region was already quite densely populated by the time the Iranian tribes got there, probably because it was very much tied with Elam and Mesopotamia. So actual replacement was just unlikely to happen.

no that"s impossible because today persians from that region(while they"re more mixed with elamites than ancient persians) have 18% sintashta so ancient persians I think were more than 25% sintashta

@@user_18789 impossible. The 20-30% is not really steppe ancestry. It's steppe_mlba ancestry, which is significantly admixed with european farmers. Steppe_EMBA is the real 'steppe ancestry' and it is this kind of ancestry which northern europeans have ~50% of. Yamnaya, Afanasievo and early CWC ancestry basically. Steppe_mlba are the Sintashta / Srubnaya / Andronovo populations. Basically 70% steppe_EMBA 30% late neolithic farmer. The peak is with Rors and Haryana jatts who have like 30-35% steppe_mlba or 21-25% steppe_EMBA. But most South Asian Indo-Aryan speakers have significantly less than that, even the Brahmin. Its less in Armenians, Kurds and Iranians. Armenians have like 5% steppe_EMBA ancestry, depends on individual and if they have ancestry from elsewhere, as some groups in the Caucasus have higher steppe ancestry (peaks around 35-40%) but funnily enough those groups are not Indo-European speaking. In Iran it depends on the ethnic group but its mostly around 10-15% (EMBA), similar for Kurds. East Iranian have the highest amount of steppe_mlba of Indo-Iranians, around 40% give or take a couple percentages. Or 28% steppe_EMBA roughly.

@@Shtf132 yes I mean steppe _EMBA or sintahsta Also just armanians have 4% steppe EMBA but iranian have between 10_33% steppe(sintahsta) forexample: kurds have 16% sintashta Azeris 12_25% persians 15%_33% baluch 22% lur 10_17% gilak 15% you can check it yes it depends where region are you from

Mongols have some indo European ancestory because andronovo or some other culture migrated around Mongolia before the rise of mongols there. Ladakhis are mostly just tibetians whom indo Europeans rarely encountered thats why I think they have no aryan ancestory

​@@ganeshwarsekhri2810 makes sense, but then how do you explain Nepalis having comparable levels of Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry to Uttarachalis and Biharis? Nepal is 30% Tibetan ethnically. Likewise, Ladakh is 51% Tibetan, 48% Indo-Aryan ethnically, and 1% other ethnicities. The similarity in Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry between Nepalis and Indians can be attributed to the fact that intermixing between Tibetans and Indo-Aryans is common in Nepal, especially in the Kathmandu region. Similarly, there would likely be some degree of Indo-Aryan influence in Ladakh and therefore among ethnic Ladakhis.

@@jostnamane3951 ladakh is very difficult place reach even more than nepal maybe thats why also nepalis are pahari people and mountains were scarcely populated by proto dravidians thats why aryans didn't intermarry also look at example of himachal pradesh where many people are fair skin and have. Caucasian features

Maybe I should have added Ladakhis. They, unlike other Tibetans, have some Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry. Apparently Ladakhis can be considered to be 30% Burusho

Yes also Western UP I believe is more steppe heavy than Punjab

This is fake information, highest steppe aryan ancestorry percentage is found in Nordic Europeans , original aryans looked like that not Delhi Haryana 😂

@@ashri3494 Aryan ancestry means Proto Indo Iranian ancestry, nordics don't have that. Pehle tu apna unpadd gawaarpana durr kar, fir baat kar.

​​@@jmab721they have it who are you fooling around jackass 😂 , closest populations to sintashta are mostly Nordic phenotype European ethnicity groups not Delhi Haryana one

​@@jmab721 ganwar Dravidian , check pictures of rors they don't look anything like Dravidian. They look more like kalash chitpavan etc types in terms of phenotype 😊

😂

"Non-Indo-Iranian speakers" are marked in grey.

Because almost EVERYBODY has some proto Germanic DNA in the Americas because of European Colonization, even if low like in Mexicans and Peruvians due to the Visigoths in Spain

I’m already planning to make a map about the spread of proto-Germans, so I’m already studying the history of Latin America. However, I made maps about the colonization of the USA and Australia precisely because of this map. I put off making maps about the peoples of Western Europe precisely because of colonialism, which is a really complex topic. Therefore, I planned to complete the eastern Indo-European direction first. I prefer to divide the people of America according to the American Census, as well as according to the "Racial map of the world2" from Masaman. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ancestry_map_of_the_United_States,_2016.png commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Racial_map_of_the_world2.png That is, I will designate mixed groups as mestizos, mulattoes, etc. But I will designate peoples who are not particularly mixed, by their European nationality, although this may be accompanied by many inaccuracies, but I will try to have as few of them as possible

He doesn't know anything about europeans, he is iranian, do your arabic roots

​@@The_Geographer_Mapswikipedia is pookipedia, misleading information all mistaken, edited by jews, it is not real history

Your spelling is not very accurate curry boy india 🦃😂

​@@Liam-eo5dythanks for correcting me mehmet.

@@sahilsingh6048 india man 🦃😂

​@@Liam-eo5dy🤜🤜🤜🪳🪳🪳🪳

@@sahilsingh6048 ✌️✌️✌️

I've just almost finished the Migration Period. There is more work to be done on colonialism. Maybe in a month map will be ready.

Will be in germanic peoples videos migration of the new world?

@@The_Geographer_Mapshow long until it gets released?

​@@ganglosaxon1488you are iranian arab wanna be white western people, you were born dark skinned middle eastern, forget imagination, live real

​@@The_Geographer_Mapsdon't do germanic, you are arabic, do your arab brothers kurds persians syrians

I wonder why Mansi is then considered to have one of the highest ANE ancestry? i.imgur.com/Rdx1whi.png This is what Vahaduo shows: Saami: 68.2% Erzya; 16.9% Nganassan; 15.0% KAZ_Botai. Mansi: 30.5% Erzya; 40.8% Nganassan; 28.7% KAZ_Botai. Ket:584_R01C01: 3.6% Erzya; 53.0% Nganassan; 43.4% KAZ_Botai.

@@The_Geographer_Maps Please search the 2023 scientific research "Ancient human DNA recovered from a Palaeolithic pendant" by Elena Essel, ..., Svante Pääbo (Nobel Prize winner) et al. In this scientific research, they managed to extract human DNA from a Paleolithic pendant found in the Denisova cave in Siberia. It was concluded that this DNA belonged to two women who were part of the population that became known in the scientific circles as "Ancient North Eurasians" (ANE). Table 7.2 of the supplementary information from the same research shows the genetic affinities that these two women had with the current people of the world (the higher the value, the greater the genetic affinity): (I sorted the values in the table in descending order) f3-statistics A B C f3 Pima DenPen(all) Mbuti 0.271 Pima DenPen(deam) Mbuti 0.273 Surui DenPen(all) Mbuti 0.271 Surui DenPen(deam) Mbuti 0.273 Quechua DenPen(all) Mbuti 0.27 Quechua DenPen(deam) Mbuti 0.273 . . . Saami DenPen(all) Mbuti 0.263

Persian Kurd Azeri?

@@tanhukim9963 yes I have diverse ethnicity

@@qpdb840 Azerbaijanis= Turk

@@tanhukim9963 Not Oghuz Azeri Azeri Iranian

@@qpdb840 If Azeris are Iranians, Hazaras are Turks. Does race look at DNA? Even Mongolians have more Aryan DNA than Azeris. Are they Iranian too? Also, Mongolians mostly have Turkish DNA. But we do not come out and call the Mongols Turks.

Because the Afanassievo Culture didn't carry indo-iranian ancestry they were related to indo-iranians but not identical and they spoke in proto-tocharian language(they are both indo-european) only maybe in iron age and bronze they interacted each other and intermixed and tocharians in this time started to have dna from sintashta gene pool

n imagination, dreams to be western and white man 😂

Hmm, well, I heard that the Indo-Iranians and Slavs seem to be genetically close. And the same Eastern Slavs (Russians, Ukrainians, Belarusians) had contact in ancient times with the same Scythians

​@@justperson7551slavs habe white skinned eurooeans, iranians dark skinned asians, 2 different races and 2 different continents, i heard it 😂😂 it is not about what you hear, go to school arab boy

"Ancient Vedic samples lack any MLBA-related ancestry". Rakhigarhi sites aren't ancient Vedic sites. Steppe MLBA ancestry arrived with the migration of Vedic Aryans, around 1500-1200 BCE. Implying that it arrived around 1000 BCE or later suggests a desire to portray Vedic Aryans as natives of India, which they were not. Proponents of Indigenous Aryanism are just like Sub-Saharan Africans who lived in huts contributing little to no to the development of any modern civilization until very recently but still claim that Cleopatra was black.

@@jostnamane3951 well mr. Smartass vedic languages are attested before 1000 bce , and 1000 bce date for vedic arrival is too late for anything too be true

@@jostnamane3951 rakhighari isn't vedic but sanauli and abhaypur, kalibangan and vadnagar is vedic indeed

​@@boiled_fish_with_rice your point?

Yes

It depends on what is meant by Indo Iranian ancestry. The people with the highest amount of steppe ancestry are Northern Europeans.

@@stsk1061 The first known peoples of the nomadic Aryans were the Scythians, Sarmatians and Yuezis. They are not Northern Europeans. They were Caucasian horse-drawn nomads who spread from Eastern Europe to the Mongolian steppes.

@@aliklc1970 The Aryans were just Steppe people mixed with Neolithic Europeans. This is basically the same population that exists in Northern Europe today.

@@stsk1061 No way. Unlike northern Europe, it is a mixture of eastern European steppe nomads and indigenous northern European hunter-gatherer people

Kurds have the most Iranic DNA even more than than Persians

باید 7 8 تا بچه بیاری 😂

?

If the Turks had not come, we probably would have had more iranian in central asia persians of afghanistan and tajikistan have highest genetic of sintashta on earth

Turks are from Mongolia and aren't Netive of central Asia

@@Unknown_Iranian_Soldier1 İran'da Türk topraklarıdır

Haryanvis do not necessarily possess a higher Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry; rather, it is the Eastern parts of the Punjab region 🇮🇳🇵🇰 (encompassing Modern-day Haryana, Indian Punjab, Pakistani Punjab, and Himachal Pradesh) that exhibit a higher percentage of Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry compared to Western Punjab 🇵🇰 (Modern-day Pakistani Punjab). The map illustrates the overlap of Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry between what is represented as Punjabis (or Eastern Punjabis🇮🇳) and "Hindis" (or Haryanvis🇮🇳). My theory is that Aryans who settled in the Punjab region (especially Eastern Punjab) were less prone to mixing because of the already fertile landscape of the region and low population. Whereas Aryans who settled in Central (Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh) and Eastern parts of India (Bihar and Madhya Pradesh) were more prone to mixing because of the already high population of these regions.

​​@@jostnamane3951Haryana is literally the core of Vedic expansion. Himachalis do not have high PII ancestry, they are a max of 25% PII, whereas Haryana max PII is 43%. Hindi, Prakrit, Sanskrit all expanded from the core area of Haryana, Delhi, northwest UP so it is not surprising that the heaviest steppeMLBA is also here. Other variables like Punjabis becoming more liberal wrt to free mixing, or being at the forefront of attacks, are also responsible why PII is slightly less in Punjab. It's a direct continuum where Pakistan Punjab is 25-30% max PII, Indian Punjab is 35% max PII, and Haryana is 43% max PII.

​@@jmab721fake information , Haryana don't have high steppe just the jats and rors who are high steppe mostly stay in Haryana they have elevated steppe due to being Scythian heavy mixed , other haryanvi normal

​@@jostnamane3951 Jat's were Indo Saka desendents (all Jat's were High Steppe) including North Rajasthan, haryana, West up, even two North district of Gujarat.

Tocharians and iranic scyhts dominatet you tousend of years 😅

​​@@ChristopherTanne-se3pzyes as i say iranians>>>>... You people

Wannabe Aryan spotted

​@@soumyajitsingha9614understand my comment first

​@@soumyajitsingha9614abhijit chavda fan i presume😂 you are not aryan and certainly your face dont look like one !

Corded ware✅ *of northern Europe❌

They are Slavic

Because the channel holder is ihnorant.

​@Unknown_Iranian_Soldier1 The Slavic are one of the major Aryan group in Europe.

No iranians only lived in arabia, not in europe

​@@antonival50slavian people are different race, you iranian arab, slavians are europeans

Yep and your a unicorn right?

No. %10

@@tanhukim9963 you liar bastard, Even central Turks could score %25 sintasta like in this video, how is possible yoruks have %10 sintastha ancestry kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gN59ldWlsJ22YJs.htmlsi=GGHq2UnIf3j62brw

​@@user-sk8lf2vp5lBecause they mixed with the natives of the paleo Balkans and Anatolia.

@@tanhukim9963 Anatolian natives had just %3 Yamnaya ancestry and there is no real Balkan ancestry except in northwest Turks. Therefore, I didn't mention northwestern Turks.

​@@user-sk8lf2vp5l O now. Okey bro 🙂👍

Yep that's their only achievement

@@based4560 they acheived lots of achievments

​@@based4560😂😂😂

Yeubana blyat?

Kurds are largely indigenous to their lands, they are not Aryans or have any significant Aryan/Steppe DNA, they only speak an Indo-Iranian language

Kurds are iranized Assyrians Aramians by medes in fact

@coginito8365 Iranians are actually of Elamite and Kassite origin. They assimilated with Aryan immigrants coming from Central Asia. There is little Aryan influence on their genetics.

​@coginito8365 it's because Modern-day Biharis are mixed with Austro-Asiatic people who came to the region even later than Aryans. Ancient people from what is now known as Bihar didn't look like that. Look at the portrayals of Chandragupta Maurya and some other ancient "Bihari" emperors and rulers. Most of them had pale-yellowish skin tone. Plus I know plenty of good-looking Biharis.

@coginito8365 every Jat I’ve seen looks like a brown punjabi though, most Aryan DNA is concentrated in the Khurasan region, north Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Tajikistan, and the Turkic central Asian countries

No , but , there religion was close to arya samajists of today

​@@sahilsingh6048Vedic religipn then became brahmanism which became hinduism

​@@based4560 im saying about which Sect of hinduism is most similair to vedic religion in Todays time , mostly Arya samajists and Smartism are similar and still follow very similar ideology.

What do you find to be inaccurate in the video? Personally, I find it hard to believe that Ladakhi people have no Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry despite being surrounded by Dardic speaking Aryan Kashmiris, even Mongols have some Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry but 0% for Ladakhis according to this video.

@jostnamane3951 That the fact is not shown! The fact that Sintashta ancestry came very late in India and probably due to elite Sakan migrations. It's becoming increasingly clear that the whole Indo-European 'western steppe origins' is a myth. Instead, Indo-European either originated in lower Caucasus or central steppe (below Urals and east of Caspian). I personally lean towards central steppe. Since the dawn of man, people have migrated from eastern and central steppe to western steppe and Europe, including the later Turks and Mongols and perhaps the Indo-Europeans themselves! The reverse was not so common and barely occurred even in the Bronze Age and Copper Age, the time Indo-Europeans speaking communities exploded. Sintashta ancestry, for example, came late into India, and only via Scythian/Sakan admixture. Indo-European languages are quite different from Caucasian languages despite the apparently large sound inventory, and also share vague similarities with Siberian and Uralic ones. In fact, the central steppe was probably occupied by old hunter Europeans and North Eurasians, as evidenced from adjacent areas, and both of those groups have significant contributions in modern Europeans and Central Asian populations, making the case stronger. Yet, the later, western steppe 'Yamnaya' ancestry is rarer and not ubiquitous as some may hold it to be. Horses were also domesticated more east than the western steppe. It's quite explainable as Indian literature also talks about migrants to India who occupied the northwest, aka the Indus Valley and eastern Hindu Kush. They are regularly called "Mlecchas" (the "ch" here is an aspirated form of the "ch" used in English for "chocolate", otherwise written as "c" for South Asian linguistic transcription), which means foreigners, and influenced Hinduism, and its various aspects. Sakans were Iranians, and their tongues lacked some features of Indo-Aryan languages, which probably influenced the northwest Indo-Aryan languages (they lack the breathy voiced sounds, for example). In fact, Sakans penetrated continuously into India, and gave a lasting, considerable mark on most South Asian bloodlines. They are frequently found in Brahmin lineages, suggesting their elite status was retained during caste reforms in ancient India. The video is wrong in several aspects, as the Sintashta ancestry entered much later and spread more gradually (the rate at which the color gradients shift in this vid for South Asia seems like a few men r*ped a lot of women in just a few years, which is also unlikely considering the relatively large population of the area even back then). Well then, where did the Indo-Iranians/Aryans come from? Probably from an eastern offshoot of the Indo-Europeans in the central steppe, whose hunter European/North Eurasian ancestry gradually was diluted by pastoralist Iranian/Khorasani ancestry as they penetrated into Central Asia via the Pamir-Tianshan-Altai Mountain Corridor, and then successfully encroached upon the Oxus civilization and Indus-Saraswati civilization (IVC) lands, with very similar genetics and medium-scale elite dominance (elites patronizing their languages and culture onto those below them). More archeological excavations of post-IVC northwest India and Copper Age central steppe would shine light into these yet poorly understood population dynamics. Note that, by 'India', I meant South Asia in general, not just the modern country.

@@arta.xshaca modern-day Indians barely have any Steppe/Aryan ancestry. And why have you added Saraswati to the name of the Indus Valley Civilization?

​@@ayzmalo5553 that's my point as well. Also, I added that considering Saraswati was a major river of the civilization as well. And maybe because I don’t like "Valley" in the name, so that's why. The name doesn’t matter in this context.

The Mongoloid (Proto-Turkic) peoples in the Altai Mountains embraced Iranic culture (horsemanship, nomadic way of life, traditions, clothing) and mixed with the Iranians to form their own unique Iranic-Mongoloid

No, the Indo-Europeans and Indo-Aryans, along with hunters and gatherers from the Corded Ware cultural sites, spread directly to the cultural centers of the Proto-Turks, namely Sintastha and later Afesefinovo and Andronovo, and the Turks had to become nomadic further east. In the east, they mixed again with the hunter-gatherers of the east, became Scythians, goldfinches and returned to their homeland. Sintastha and its extension link cultures have nothing to do with Indo-Europeans and Aryans. At the center of the Pre-Turkic formation is a link that took place with the invasion of Indo-Europeans by the Aryans.

@@gokhanevsen1886 History has preserved the names of some of them: Ishpakaia, Bartatua, Madyes, Idanthyrsus, , Skyles, Tigratavā , Octamasadas, Xāravalāna, Artavatauxma, Zarinaea, Sodasa, Sawarmag, Saurmag, and Zari- "golden". This was the name of a legendary Saka (Scythian) warrior queen. They are Indo-Iranian horse nomads Iranians speaker, they have Iranian names.

@@gokhanevsen1886 It was an eternal battle between Turks and Scythians, as it was beautifully narrated by the poet Ferdosi in Iran's national stories of Shahnamé.

@@gokhanevsen1886 Haplogroup C evolved into Mongoloid genes, Turks, Chinese, Mongols and so on.

Pajeet you still belive that debuncked Out of india theory.

It's not since we have genetic and cultural evidence

@@sahilsingh6048 pajeet me nahi tu hai cry more

@@legionnaire2 🤡 Aryans came from india not europe , hindu scriptures written by aryans themselves says that

​@@saitamaserious5100 you have no idea what you are talking about but keep telling yourself that

Proof?

How were they not Indo-European? Elaborate?

No

Scythians were nomard aryans

They were Indo Iranian and from Iranic branch look it up

Science says otherwise

Don't Be Jealous Barbarian

@@Unknown_Iranian_Soldier1 oh sorry helicopter professional

@@MongolTurk17 Ok My Hairy Barbarian in Berlin Who is Professional at Cleaning McDonald's toilets

@@MongolTurk17 persians became civilized 1500 year earlier than the Turks who learned horse riding from their Iranic masters

​@@Unknown_Iranian_Soldier1😂😂

No,but both of them are indo-european

Indoeuropeans 😎

In your dreams

Lol Sintashta were R1à & not C

@@champion1928 C is Mogol R haplogroup is İndo-European and Turkic

Pal azerbaijan became turckic in 11th century before that azerbaijan was azerbaijani (old Azeri language ) which was an Iranic language

Even Pakistanis has more Turkic root's than Azerbaijanis

Yes true. Azerbaijanis are Turk.

Indra* 💪🏿💪🏿

Indians are extremely diverse. There are people like ladakhis sikkimese who are even tibetan by race but indian by nationality.

You're not Indian, because Iranians and Aryans aren't Indians but Indo-Europeans.

Indo Iranians don't live in Arabia 😂

@@based4560 learn english and read it 😂😂🐪🐵🇮🇷🐒🐫india arabia oki

@@Liam-eo5dy What the hell. Weird ass troll.

Max Turk IQ

@@Unknown_Iranian_Soldier1 max iranian-arab iq

No. Romance languages almost entirely spread via elite dominance, aka the adoption of the tongue of the elites by the masses. Even if a vid is made about 'em, it won't show any genetic mixings.

Yes, after the Germans