@@all-gaming3549 Mongol is killing so many people when they invaded

Gunpowder in Europe: increases. Spanish glory: about to begin. The Mongol Empire drowned in the Spanish lake, the Pacific Ocean. Thanks, Mongols! Or Turks! Whoever brought it to us!

@@DataEYE2 In just two months you can't get enough popularity but your videos are good and I hope your channel you will stop neglecting you.

@tofrie its actually a bacteria

Adam made a nice edit on Orkhon Inscriptions. I suggest you take a look. :) kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mpeEfK5mxpeVdWw.html

sorry but you miss 7 seconds of history

@@loganshutts1063 sorry but you have missed one second of history lol

Ok

@@loganshutts1063 The intro is 20 seconds tho

I gave you the 1,000th like

Therefore, historians are divided into ancient, medieval, modern historians, and so on. A person simply cannot fit the whole story in his head.

That is what the west will tell you about history XD

@@prasadmankar7650 Are you implying that in other parts of the world they teach literally everything historically in a linear and all-encompassing fashion? Or are you just taking issue with the specific events I mentioned? I imagine if I were to go to a non-western country I'd still learn history the same way, but the specific events would change. Or are you just leaping at an opportunity to take a shot at the west because of personal biases?

​@@CraigJS91Ignore him. Most likely a conspiracy shill.

One of the most interesting KZfaq videos

same i am a history and geography nerd i also know allot of maps and stuff

agreed

atleast you could have become a specialist doctor in that time

@@libalaique9258 yeah but i'd rather watch cats fighting and idiots brawling on trains

Maybe not the best but is on the top whit bohemian raphsody

@@ausdorian3252 will you do the fandango?

Finally, you know the truth. 90% of my knowledge about history comes from the internet.., not school.

@@KentoKei same

that's right you learn most of knowledge fron internet not school school just waste of time

This is because you're looking at something you *want* to learn.

Indeed

how does he make this? what program?

@@bodigames idk ask him not me LOL

@@bodigames MS paint

I had to pause it on the year I was born 😎historical date lol

Unfortunately not all of history. 99% of it is lost or lied about :(

Ollie Bye holy crap!! Im first!

You are the best! I'm from Israel

KMC Congrats :)

Ollie Bye bee added

I'm the second

no 50 likes? i'll fix that.

Laproaig The Holy Roman Empire lonely will kill you in this game

Or every time the UK is concurring something

Xin - Shang - Zhou - wtf ...

how about every time Egypt gets conquered.

Melodic a

But of course--they're the EXCEPTION! ;)

Hahahaha. Nice one

Nate Roth Europe: "I have conqured the world!" America: "Hold my beer..."

Europe: America, you don't even know what beer is.

Now its the time for the internet to conquer the world, Internet: "Hold my memes".

In fact, China has been at war with the nomads to the north for thousands of years.

They were busy fighting themselves

POVHFR Videos you should of just made the video slower

@@andrewkryvenko8245 I didn't even think to slow it down before. Thanks.

Same happened to me at the end I was like fuck I can't remember anything.

same here

@Jake Forgione 0.25 speed for the win. Just sayin

Yes, like the *Fappicene* era, where all single men existed

Lmao

@@atheistleopard618 Really?

@@yavrumdeutschland66 duh

Yeah but there is some mistakes in the video in north africa

then, in the rise of the Mongols, 40 million died? the first world war had only 15 million

Just imagine, new babies born during that period of time. World didn't just stopped producing babies. That means more than 40 million people died actually.

I think that was from the black death

Marcel Telang The black death killed over 200M people

The black death was in the 1300s

in 10-30 years you may be able to zoom in on an intelligently estimated world map and see for example generated Roman empire colosseum fight´s people living working and army´s advancements. In detailed real time life like graphics, it might happen if the Ai revolution take off and don't turn on us. Ai advancement is said to be exponential and hard to predict it can happen very fast but also be delayed quite allot. But when it does things will change fast.

That's possible with ArcGIS Pro.

It's called Europa Universalis IV + Extended Timeline Mod

Geacron is decent, but it is often inaccurate. Regardless, it is basically what you described.

Well you just figured out how your going to make your fortune. I would buy that shit.

Islam will fix the problem again soon InshaALLAH. Corruption and Interest based Market will end, Peace and Justice will prevail.

@M.A. Rehman Insha allah

@@MuhammadAadilurRehman Probably not

@@me67galaxylife for sure we have the proves it will happen and nobody can stop it

@@waqasahmadahmad1680 i'm waiting then

Except 10 countries didnt randomly appear next to each other on some random island.

well, there are settings and mods u can use to play on earth with a somewhat accurate civ placement. I just cant wait for a truly long strategy game with so many elements that would really encapsulate the growth of civilization through history.

Nikeel A.W well the paradox games are pretty good

Crusader Kings 2, Europa Universalis IV, and Victoria 2 are all way deeper games then Civ.

It reminded me of the Civ end game replay on crack too! Good shout. :)

Agree, especially the first Persian empire (Achaemenid) was the first ever superpower in the world. They controlled half of the world's population, No other empire was able to do that.

1.0?

no kardashev is based on energy...

If I remember correctly we're still only on K 0.76. My dream is to see a full Type 1 human civilisation before I die.

we are nowhere near type 1 😂 type 1 requires mastery over home planet, especially it's energy

But regarding the Polish Empire and Lithuania, the video is completely wrong. Because in the video Lithuania is shown as an independent country from 1385 to 1569. But that is wrong, because with the treaty of Krewo of 1385, the Polish king became the ruler of Lithuania which then became part of the Polish Empire, which arose from the annexation of Lithuania to Poland. Because of the personal union of Poland with Lithuania in 1385, Poland became an empire and Lithuania, like other territories, was part of the Polish Empire. The treaty of Krewo for personal union of Poland with Lithuania in 1385 was the first step in Poland's takeover of Lithuania. This union was declared indissoluble. This personal union meant that the Polish king should also be the ruler of Lithuania. In fact, the union treaty also contained the provision of the attaching of Lithuanian and Ruthenian lands to the Polish Crown. However, the various other treaties which followed this treaty actually meant the takeover and Polonization of Lithuania too. A significant resolution was the adoption of Polish administrative divisions and offices like voivode and castellan by Lithuania. Even more important was that in total 47 selected Lithuanian nobles were adopted by Polish nobles heraldic families and granted Polish coats of arm. This symbolic gesture signified their desire to adopt Polish customs and integrate into Polish society. Because of this possibility of heraldic adoption, Poland had a much higher proportion of nobles than other European kingdoms. In Poland, the proportion of nobles in the total population was already 10-15% in the 16th century, in the rest of Europe it was 1%. Thus the Union of Krewo in 1385 signified the beginnings of the strengthened Polonization of Lithuania. Strengthened Polonization because the Polonization actually started before the Union of Krewo, because Lithuania was Christianized from Poland. Priests, especially from Poland, Christianized Lithuania and priests had great influence at that time, so there was already a Polish Influence in Lithuania before the Union of Krewo. So the Polonization of Lithuania started with the Christianization and was finally completed with the Union of Lublin in 1569. Polish dominance about the Lithuanians, so also about the Ruthenians illustrates also that the Polish king automatically became the grand duke of Lithuania. That was by far not the only additional title of the Polish kings. For example, the Polish King Sigismund III Vasa had in addition to the Polish royal title, Grand Duke of Lithuania and Grand Duke of Finland, Prince of Rus, Prussia, Mazovia, Volhynia, Podolia, Podlaskie, Severia, Czernihów, Samogitia, Livonia, also Hereditary King of Sweden. Rus stands for Russia because the Poles ruled large areas of Russia at the time, and even Moscow was briefly occupied by Polish troops. Samogitia stands for the Baltic States, which the Polish king largely ruled. Hereditary king of Sweden and Grand Duke of Finland because the Polish king was also the king of Sweden for a short time. But he lost the power in Sweden and Finland. This list of titles makes it clear that Grand Duke of Lithuania was just one of the many titles of the Polish king. But the most important title was always King of Poland. In the end, the title Grand Duke of Lithuania was just one of many Polish king's titles. The title was particularly important only at the beginning of the Polish rule over Lithuania, when the Lithuanian nobility was not yet Polonized. At that time the Poles still had to pretend the Lithuanian nobility that this was not a takeover. The treaty of Krewo for personal union of Poland with Lithuania in 1385 was the first step in Poland's takeover of Lithuania. This union was declared indissoluble. This personal union meant that the Polish king should also be the ruler of Lithuania. Thus Lithuania ceased to be an independent country. What is also negative is that the historically wrong term "Poland-Lithuania" is used, although at least Lithuania is shown as part of the Polish Empire, although the wrong term is used to name the state. Unfortunately, many people and historians use also the wrong term commonwealth in connection with Polish history. But the term Commonwealth is inappropriate because it gives the impression that the state was a common wealth for Poles and Lithuanians alike. So the common wealth served both nations equally. But in reality the Lithuanians had to submit to the Poles and were largely Polonized and thus assimilated. It was actually a Polish empire completely dominated by the Poles. Lithuania was completely dominated by the Polish Empire like also the Ruthenians who were the ancestors of the Belarusians and Ukrainians. Poles completely dominated them all. The Lithuanians were voluntarily polonized and the Ruthenians partly too. All relevant was Polish like also the Polish currency Polski Złoty. Złoty means golden in Polish. The capitals of the entire state were the Polish cities of Krakow and Warsaw. The ruling Poles have also determined what the state should be called Polisch Rzeczpospolita! The Polish name was then adopted by the Lithuanians into the Lithuanian languages ​​as "Žečpospolita". By the way, Polish term for nobility ”szlachta” was also adopted into Lithuanian as ”šlėkta” like many other Polish words. The majority of the loanwords in Lithuanian were from Polish. Using the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is absolutely wrong. Because this Polish state was a Polish Empire which was completely dominated by the Poles and the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Besides that the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation and is therefore wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. But the term should also not be used because the use of Lithuania in the name suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! If one wants to use a more modern term one can use Polish Empire as also the term Swedish Empire is used. In any case, it would make sense to use the Polish proper name Rzeczpospolita as a designation for this state, which was actually still internationally common in the 19th century when talking about Poland before the partitions. The term Rzeczpospolita seems difficult to pronounce for non-Poles. But that is not the case at all. With a little practice, anyone can pronounce the term correctly, even you. A little help: Rz is pronounced like the "isi" in vision. So virzon sounds like vision. Cz sounds like the "ch" in church. So Czurcz sounds like church. But if one just use "sh" instead of "rz", that sounds close to Polish. "Ch" can be used instead of "cz". So Shechpospolita would be written in English, which could be pronounced without problems. So there is no reason not to use this correct term.

Pierre Martinez™ When more humans exist, more humans f*ck(sorry by using this term). That means humans grew in a geometric scale. But that isn't the only reason. Things like the food production methods and the developement of cures for some diseases contributed for a faster population growing last years(sorry for bad english).

(I'm french my english is not better haha) Yes and the life experency is increasing each year so people live longer whenever more babys born But there will a limit or something if the population effectif is still growing by square, earth's gonna explose

Pierre Martinez™ Some researches say the world population will stop growing and estabilish when the global population hit around 9.000.000.000 people.

Researches based on what ? I don't think overpopulation will stop people making babies

Researches based onthe birth rate, for example. The people is actually making less babies. The contraceptive methods bagan to be popular in the second part of the century XX, and many countries started to get his people more instructed after the lifestyle changed from the farms to the cities. In certain countries,(like mine, Brazil) the birth rate drastically decreased last years. From families with around 7,10,13 children, to the nowadays families with less than 3. That's even the cause of problems with retirement plans. The world population wil theoretically stop to growing when the birth's average be 2 or less childs per family.

Of course. It's a great video. I personally watched it over 10 times.

Ollie Bye No, thank you for taking the time and dedication to make this :D

Very impressive research and presentation.

+Ollie Bye You surely knew it was impossible to make a 100% accurate video, but you did great!

TANK YOU TOO TO MAKE THIS VIDEO!!!

14 now.

Cossack Bear Cavalry chaaaarge!

21

I'm one of them for the atheistic creation myth propaganda in the beginning.

46?! send in the Danish armada!

The mongols killed 60.000.000 people in their campaigns...

🤙🏻

20% of the World population

a volcanic erruption blotting out the sun for several years killing crops, causing famine, etc around the same time had a big part in that as well.

Quite extraordinary drop in population, really disturbing. We had WWII which killed around 60 million as well but then we had a much larger population too and that was on all sides..

@Zakariyya Sajad holy shit didn't know that, that's carzy

Only to Europeans lol. It came from Asia and went through the Middle East, but only caused devastation in Europe because of how filthy and crowded it was

@@milesdavis607 The Black Death was partly brought on by progress in transport and trade. Trade routes were used and expanded by the Mongols and ironically, these same routes were used by disease which decimated everyone on all sides of conflict. In a sense, human progress brought the Black Death. SARS, Bird Flu , Ebola and modern pandemics can also be spread by modern methods of transport and travel.

The Black Death literally wiped out half of Europe's population and caused tremendous fear! Starting from Sicily (sister island of Italy) rapidly spread across Europe. The plague doctor was also born and omg, there were so many symptoms and lots were absolutely disgusting. I hope nothing like that happens again.

1.)hence the name... 2.)shut up,Fez!

*British empire: hold my land and population*

@@LiteralHatter Mongol Empire: 33,000,000 km² British Empire: 33,700,000 km² Pretty even.

I think the Roman Empire's expansion is much more impressive, considering its size and the time it existed for

@@Thorinification mongols also

@@anuraratnayake8514 Their expansion was also impressive, no doubt. But their Empire "only" lasted for something over 100 years

Sergei Apolonsky China: I was gonna take that! Japan: Same!

lol

I love that "its free real estate" joke xD

you are so funnie!!!!!!!!

Russia: (moving East) "Nobody wants ice world? Dibs!"

By the way, regarding the Polish Empire and Lithuania, the video is completely wrong. Because in the video Lithuania is shown as an independent country from 1385 to 1569. But that is wrong, because with the treaty of Krewo of 1385, the Polish king became the ruler of Lithuania which then became part of the Polish Empire, which arose from the annexation of Lithuania to Poland. Because of the personal union of Poland with Lithuania in 1385, Poland became an empire and Lithuania, like other territories, was part of the Polish Empire. The treaty of Krewo for personal union of Poland with Lithuania in 1385 was the first step in Poland's takeover of Lithuania. This union was declared indissoluble. This personal union meant that the Polish king should also be the ruler of Lithuania. In fact, the union treaty also contained the provision of the attaching of Lithuanian and Ruthenian lands to the Polish Crown. However, the various other treaties which followed this treaty actually meant the takeover and Polonization of Lithuania too. A significant resolution was the adoption of Polish administrative divisions and offices like voivode and castellan by Lithuania. Even more important was that in total 47 selected Lithuanian nobles were adopted by Polish nobles heraldic families and granted Polish coats of arm. This symbolic gesture signified their desire to adopt Polish customs and integrate into Polish society. Because of this possibility of heraldic adoption, Poland had a much higher proportion of nobles than other European kingdoms. In Poland, the proportion of nobles in the total population was already 10-15% in the 16th century, in the rest of Europe it was 1%. Thus the Union of Krewo in 1385 signified the beginnings of the strengthened Polonization of Lithuania. Strengthened Polonization because the Polonization actually started before the Union of Krewo, because Lithuania was Christianized from Poland. Priests, especially from Poland, Christianized Lithuania and priests had great influence at that time, so there was already a Polish Influence in Lithuania before the Union of Krewo. So the Polonization of Lithuania started with the Christianization and was finally completed with the Union of Lublin in 1569. Polish dominance about the Lithuanians, so also about the Ruthenians illustrates also that the Polish king automatically became the grand duke of Lithuania. That was by far not the only additional title of the Polish kings. For example, the Polish King Sigismund III Vasa had in addition to the Polish royal title, Grand Duke of Lithuania and Grand Duke of Finland, Prince of Rus, Prussia, Mazovia, Volhynia, Podolia, Podlaskie, Severia, Czernihów, Samogitia, Livonia, also Hereditary King of Sweden. Rus stands for Russia because the Poles ruled large areas of Russia at the time, and even Moscow was briefly occupied by Polish troops. Samogitia stands for the Baltic States, which the Polish king largely ruled. Hereditary king of Sweden and Grand Duke of Finland because the Polish king was also the king of Sweden for a short time. But he lost the power in Sweden and Finland. This list of titles makes it clear that Grand Duke of Lithuania was just one of the many titles of the Polish king. But the most important title was always King of Poland. In the end, the title Grand Duke of Lithuania was just one of many Polish king's titles. The title was particularly important only at the beginning of the Polish rule over Lithuania, when the Lithuanian nobility was not yet Polonized. At that time the Poles still had to pretend the Lithuanian nobility that this was not a takeover. The treaty of Krewo for personal union of Poland with Lithuania in 1385 was the first step in Poland's takeover of Lithuania. This union was declared indissoluble. This personal union meant that the Polish king should also be the ruler of Lithuania. Thus Lithuania ceased to be an independent country. What is also negative is that the historically wrong term "Poland-Lithuania" is used, although at least Lithuania is shown as part of the Polish Empire, although the wrong term is used to name the state. Unfortunately, many people and historians use also the wrong term commonwealth in connection with Polish history. But the term Commonwealth is inappropriate because it gives the impression that the state was a common wealth for Poles and Lithuanians alike. So the common wealth served both nations equally. But in reality the Lithuanians had to submit to the Poles and were largely Polonized and thus assimilated. It was actually a Polish empire completely dominated by the Poles. Lithuania was completely dominated by the Polish Empire like also the Ruthenians who were the ancestors of the Belarusians and Ukrainians. Poles completely dominated them all. The Lithuanians were voluntarily polonized and the Ruthenians partly too. All relevant was Polish like also the Polish currency Polski Złoty. Złoty means golden in Polish. The capitals of the entire state were the Polish cities of Krakow and Warsaw. The ruling Poles have also determined what the state should be called Polisch Rzeczpospolita! The Polish name was then adopted by the Lithuanians into the Lithuanian languages ​​as "Žečpospolita". By the way, Polish term for nobility ”szlachta” was also adopted into Lithuanian as ”šlėkta” like many other Polish words. The majority of the loanwords in Lithuanian were from Polish. Using the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is absolutely wrong. Because this Polish state was a Polish Empire which was completely dominated by the Poles and the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Besides that the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation and is therefore wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. But the term should also not be used because the use of Lithuania in the name suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! If one wants to use a more modern term one can use Polish Empire as also the term Swedish Empire is used. In any case, it would make sense to use the Polish proper name Rzeczpospolita as a designation for this state, which was actually still internationally common in the 19th century when talking about Poland before the partitions. The term Rzeczpospolita seems difficult to pronounce for non-Poles. But that is not the case at all. With a little practice, anyone can pronounce the term correctly, even you. A little help: Rz is pronounced like the "isi" in vision. So virzon sounds like vision. Cz sounds like the "ch" in church. So Czurcz sounds like church. But if one just use "sh" instead of "rz", that sounds close to Polish. "Ch" can be used instead of "cz". So Shechpospolita would be written in English, which could be pronounced without problems. So there is no reason not to use this correct term.

@@GreatPolishWingedHussars and also the very early spread of people to China

@@arta.xshaca I do not understand!

It has so many wrong things. It seems the video is sponsored by history robbers. Seriously though, the sequence of events and kingdoms put regarding the Horn of Africa is totally insane and not true. Example, during the Axumite kingdom, Geez was the spoken language. You can turn up any literature to prove this. Even on Wikipedia. Amharic language becomes popular on Abyssinian kingdom.

No, it's racist shit saying subhuman blacks were a thing. My channel has videos proving many claims here wrong, such as the dates of early mankind.

Battles were fast and modern it wasn't like the old ages where armies just siege a fort.

How many seconds will it take to end all life with nukes?

How many A presses will that need?

Then WW3 is 1000 frames

Greeks as well😭

don't forget the Arabians

Basically most of the middle eastern nations

@Troll King You're ignorant af. I see what you're trying to say, but, I live in an Islamic nation and we take our real history regardless of what religious influence we have. same for science and math. Every subject is universally taught with objective reasonings.

Even the Chinese as well

Oof.

😂

I would call it land of the fukasako. Why? Cause there probaly would be alot of men with pierced nuts, like their balls, yes, their balls, do you know these two slimy hairy spheres that hangs on the sausage that is connected to your urethra? Yes that.

@@_Xenocidal that is weirdly specific

So you mean.... the flintstones in Las Vegas turned out to be historical facts?

Leonidas Migliorini Plaster Persia: I’m back motherfkersss

Παύλος Δημόπουλος Persia: gtfo back you your desert

India:if u wanna die why don't u come over! 🙏💪🇮🇳💪

@@Jhaaninc well good jk but India lost...just Greek soldiers were tired and wanted the War to End...sorry for telling you the truth

@@dimitrisvroutsis6270 lol u live in Greece so u won I live in India so we won. But does it really matter today who won 1000s of years back? 🤔 😂

kim jong starts to playing after few years game over

And people are constantly joining, but would you look at Japan, probably THE best player in here!

JP lol

Risk universalis

We'll finish the game with a American-Chinese stalemate and move on to play Sins of a Solar Empire

luv frm Kerala, India

About...

Eli..that's why we hv computers nowadays..

This video isnt accurate atleast isnt update since gunung padang the megalithic site located in west java indonesia founded is older than egypt pyramid. Estimated time atleast the construction site is began as far as back 20.000 BCE which mean there is already civilization in west java indonesia

@@imanafdar Despite your weird speaking, you're right. We all know Mesopotamia was the first advanced civilization, before Egypt. And he forgot Norte Chico

Possibly, because it was a collab, and for simplicities sake on that big of a scale, i'd say maybe around 6 months including research and animation

That is true! :)

to find usa please skip all human history and culture and jump to the last second of the video xD

everything...looking at the whole human history almost at a glance must be called EPIC.

It already IS epic! It's the entire sweeping scope of human history, after all. But yes, good music improves everything. :)

The story is pretty epic even without the music.

26 BCE: The Roman Empire has joined the game

1429: The Mongol Empire has left the game.

It's 1206 when the Mongols were united It's 756BC when Romulus established Rome

7:05 *Dacia (Romania) joined the game*

15:05 np

Then you realize the many that died for a single nom

@Higgs mapper inc Mongols *eats all of Asia*

@@jonnywoche609 *The Romans just ate the Mediterranean for breakfast*

good one

it's time to paint the map!

There’s a few like that

Fiat lux bill wurtz?

*E X T R A* *T H I C C*

hehehe

big legend

Uhm, Metal Ages contains Copper Age, Bronze Age and Iron Age. Metal Age it's not an age itself

thx

@MegaClaw Its just a name to Describe the Interwar period from 1815-1914 atleast in my Interpretation.

@MegaClaw Tbh I'm not British, I'm not even from a former British colony, and I still refer to that era as the Victorian Era It's way easier because it gives you a sort of "placement", like, it's more "accurate-ish" than just saying "the later 2/3s of the 19th century and a bit of the 20th but before the Titanic sent the world to hell" Idk how to explain it Like, "Victorian age" evokes a certain image in my head I don't get with just saying, say, "19th century"

But surely, if those fractions of a dot are so small, then those rivers of blood must be even smaller still by contrast. Less than a drop. Less than a molecule. And by that logic, insignificant.

Earth from space is literally an extremely microscopic dot

a pale blue dot

That friction of a dot or other similar dots are perhaps small in size but are significantly big in value in our 3D universe.

I do think of all those things, and then realize that it all had to be that way so that we could be here today as we are. It all happened according to plan.

Thank you sir

What do you think the next era will be called ?

The last ages ?

@@888BreadOfLife Space age

This is so eurocentric

The Invisible Man in the sky, makes sense

2600 years vs almost 200000 years...

cost some lives in the documenting of history. RIP

Very bad research.

^ What do you mean? What was bad about it?

John Dough explain

It is not correct , timing is not correct

Copied

@@theorder4592 no

@@munastronaut8147 It is.

@KC - 08PR - Allan Drive MS (1468) XD

nikoplayz *shut the heck up copy cat*

I had to blink a ton to remoisten my eyes and missed the entire 20th century.

XD

I blinked with one eye and then the other the whole time. It works!

who knows how this video will look like in 500 years. Maybe we just live in some quite stable decades and thats it

Moved down from the trees to the land.. Yeah sure bro 😂

Japón

Nippon or nihon

No its THE SUNRISE LAND

TRAIDORES

❓

and next will close the channel lol

Mason Vank he already made the history of the world, no point making other videos lol

This video is actually that, but in Fast-Forward!!!! ;-)

Have fun!

FrozenGrip Why?

FrozenGrip Yep

Yes :)

For the Europa Universalis 4 map probably

yes i see eu4 got their countries slightly wrong :p

it's mostly waste land

Wasteland distorted by the mercator projection.

@@axelandersson6314 Most people dont know that flat maps arent accurately proportioned, although canada and russia ARE the largest nations.

@casey I know I live in canada

The majority of the territory of these two countries is not suitable for human survival. The largest effective territory (land suitable for human survival) is the United States, followed by China

with all the small kingdoms/principality/duchy/sultanates and on popping up everywhere and disappearing a year later it would take ages to make a 100% accurate map.

Chalksy Yeah but there are inaccuracies for larger countries. If you focus on one specifically.

Robb_Stark are you Iranian ?

Yes Iranian Azeri.

Robb_Stark that why you have the picture of Shah Ismail

*No advanced civilization

@@alangervasis if you look carefully at the map, you’ll see that there were no humans at all yet

lol

acolyte10mg too bad his shit cant build house

A lot of people were born and a lot of shit went down. Genghis Khan was one of many.

Genghis Khan: My Wife Got Kidnapped, should I 1 avenge her, 2 meh, or 3 create the biggest empire in the world in kill millions.

acolyte10mg, Genghis Kahn - The Only Undefeated lifetime World Conqueror in recorded History. With Kahn, it's either you submit and play ball or Everyone including livestock, dies. The choice was Simple with no time for fucking around.

And it is under 20 minutes, ollie bye, I must submit you to the world Guinness record book.

Maybe they were very bad history lessons

This barely taught you any history. How can you see things connected to eachother? How do you see, from this reference map that things affect eachother? Which people lived and how they lived? How technology progresses? Books written? Culture? Wars? Also, I bet you can recall maybe one or 2 facts from this video.

katten elvis I can remember lots of good facts.

this doesn't actually teach much history really. you'd have to list and explain all the deaths or births of important figures, battle outcomes etc. everywhere in the world at once, this just shows the cultural and territorial history

Well the map shows sudan not Ethiopia he skipped Ethiopia for most of the video ...or he dont know map the country ?

@@rediettadesse2828 maybe

I see it! In South America right?

Chris RJ Lmao😂😂😂

Las Vegas: keepin' it real since 7900bce 🗺

las vegas ancient land

Gambling on sloth races

And 7:54 for BC

As well as 16:39 if you try hard enough as well!

@@CosmicCreeper99 I got that first try

@@CosmicCreeper99 Lol there's literally a single frame where they match

+luxembourg

Too bad UK didn't stand a chance from me and Frances

@@UnitedStatesOfAmerica1776 agree

Salut l'ami moi je suis français.On est juste à côter

Axel Laurence Africa*