Pinned for truth. It isn't a great adaptation either, but it's better than Disney. Then again, it isn't hard to be more faithful to the novel than Disney was.

Kay I still enjoy the Disney movie. It made me read the novel and I've come to love Hugo's works so very much. Disney did a decent enough job with staying true to the spirit of the novel at least.

Kay I love both versions of the hunchback of Notre dame

Kay I love the Disney's hunchback of Notre dame

bill sykes Disney actually love this version of the hunchback of Notre dame.

Rohan Guy i like the disney showing only froll being mean

***** what u mean

***** scooby was in france?

***** I like how people still respond to this comment even after a year it was posted

***** what u mean the same world

Haha you and me both! I saw this when I was 6 or 7 and then the Disney version when it came out two years later. During the part at the end of the Disney version where Esmeralda is about to be burned at the stake is when I was like "wait a minute, I've seen this story before!"

i thought i was the only one! i think i saw it on VHS tape when i was younger. i swear my parents thought i was imagining it 😂😂

+HetemSenar This version is the second best animated adaptation being surpassed by Disney. But there are another ones who are... really, really bad.

+Destroyer of Destruction You say it as if it were fact... Which it isn't.

Destroyer of Destruction Agreed

1956 version is the most accurate one. The french one, not the U.S

+Super Spyro7956 (Blu Medic)/Ezra Dobbins (hitchhiking ghosts) she's munch nicer in disney

this was made before Disney they're are way worse versions of the hunchback of Notre dame such as that crap goldenfilms version ....

K Li don't get me started in the golden films one and 'the secret of the hunchback'

@@kli1487 and the new Burbank version

K Li WAIT THAT WAS A REAL FILM? I thought it was a joke! *schedules therapy*

EmmanuelleLunada2010 Agreed

EmmanuelleLunada2010 other versions of the hunchback of Notre dame 's films adaptations some had happy endings too

whitch one do u like

Actually, while Quasimodo does have red hair and an asymmetrical face in the book, he's described wearing a bright red and purple tunic with little bells on it. So for some reason they chose to make his costume more dull and muted when making an animated adaption for kids, funnily enough.

i love the disney u

Sorry! 34:04

lol, me too! I was also terrified of uncle Ebenezer in Burbank's Kidnapped

do u like this one

Monseigneur Claude Frollo looks like Mephistopheles with AIDS.

do u like the disney one

I like the book one. :^^^^^^)

how come

It’s possible!

Your right He does

Frollo looks a bit like Palpatine in this version.

Agreed!

Ya, I consider not readin’ it.

I believe it took some inspiration from the 1939 film adaptation of the story

Really?

It's not a remake it's an adaptation of Victor Hugo's book; remake it's a term for reimagine version that is not based on any source material.

+levios rainnor You only say this because she has an English accent and cannot see the slight distinctions that make the voice unique.

GummyBearRecords how come u did like disney

its ok but , it wasn't anything like the book

GummyBearRecords what way

+GummyBearRecords The Jetlag version is closer to the book than both, but is not nearly as good as the mentioned versions.

Destroyer of Destruction whitch 1 u like

Neither do I!

Burbank Films Australia

@@xanadustudios2586 thank you

This is the full version.

@@Kay-pv9ks Thank You so much!!💓💓💓... Do you know where can I watch the Disney version 💓💓💓.

@@allyyagami3552It’s on DisneyPlus.

JacquelineThePurpleGirl It must be just you.

JacquelineThePurpleGirl I mean, this impressed the hell out of me. The animation is incredibly poor, but it stays very close to the real story until the end. This definitely puts Disney to shame.

Micheal Polant I wouldn't say that this puts Disney versión on shame, but this animated adaptation is good.

+Micheal Polant The animation isn't really that bad. People should stop comparing everything with Disney and be fair to other interpretations of their works. All film companies don't have as high budgets as Disney do for their films. I wouldn't blame you if you mocked Dingo Pictures' interpretation of this story though. You should watch it.

just you

i love the disney one greater

Melody Lady Melody me too. He looks like an angel.

Ingrid Calderon In the book, I think Hugo refers to Quasimodo as "an angel trapped inside the body of a devil"

Melody Lady Melody I hate the mondo version of the hunchback of Notre dame

"...wears a truss."

FROLO SATANIC CULTS

Of course Frollo is creepy But he use to be a good man before his lust made him bad This film forgets to add Frollo's Good Character

Kuro Kitsuna Well the film literally started right after he became obsessed with Esmeralda.

Ébren Álmodó I thought this Frollo was the most accurate and developed incarnation of his character.

Kind of looks like Palpatine with Sith Robes. 😂

Burbank Films Australia's films were generally stuck between being more faithful to the original works (they were all based on classic novels, rather than fairy tales) and being appropriate for all audiences. For this reason, their entertainment value often paled in comparison to Disney's (who often took great liberties in faithfulness to ensure appeal and entertainment) and might have been the reason as to why they've fallen out of fashion. Still, animation fans might get a treat from discovering some of them. My personal favorites include The Three Musketeers, Kidnapped, 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea, Peter Pan and Oliver Twist (this last one belonging to a series specializing in Dickens' novels, with all works amounting to 72 minutes in length rather than 48).

ebmosier1 , hello..what's your zodiac sign (in other words your birth date)?..:)

i like disny greater

I like how he's a red head too.

@@alipilio6638”Disney.”

+Lundvalnaden i love the disney one it had frollo be a monster

Please, have you *seen* the Disney version?

Super Spyro7956 (Blu Medic)/Ezra Dobbins (hitchhiking ghosts) i have seen disney version, i even had the toys back in the time :) it was great but it was too much "disney", too much bubblegum. this animation is like some indie production, really deep and dark. i was scared by it when i was a kid. :D peterpan 1988 australian animation also amazing, must watch

Lundvalnaden​​ so your telling me that they "bubblegum" Frollo?

Super Spyro7956 (Blu Medic)/Ezra Dobbins (hitchhiking ghosts) well disney cartoons are "disney".

Maria: The Demon Barber of KZfaq omg same

Phobues and Pierre Doesn't

Yep I pretty much survive the whole event

Well, according to the book, your fate is worse... You get married :D Beside's you're a womanising Jerk :D Book you, at least.

Magic3Star But Piere survives... Worst character in book

How is he worse than Frollo or Phoebus. One killed Esmerelda out of lust and the other was willing to let her hang and just tried getting in her pants....Piere was just....weird with his goat loving...Or do you mean worst written character?

Mmm-hmm.

@@xs0528 Thank you for realizing it.

@@disneyrules7808 No problem.

The animation maybe

In a book, the judge is also deaf, but not really merciful, as you see

witch one do u like

This one

how come

Disneys version makes the hunchback look like a child on roids, this version he looks like the miserable man he is supposed to look like Also, this version isnt filled with horrible songs

Agreed.

ultrahotty He took Esmeralda's goat and escaped

Actually, this version was released 10 years b/f Disney.

Right, I meant that when I personally saw this version was about two years before the Disney version came out. It was first released, as you said, about a decade before the Disney version…but that was before I was born :)

lol

How can it be a ripoff if it was made before the Disney version?

Perhaps he skipped leg day?

Ya.

I thought this version still made it clear that the Romani vagabonds were only acting in that way out of desperation to survive (whether certain individuals were faking it or not), since no one would offer them real work to do and they were being constantly brutalized by an unjust Medieval system. The movie still had Esmeralda as a good person, who was both compassionate to Gringoire/Quasimodo, and considered the poor people in the Ghetto as her family. Clopin also explicitly points out how cruel the Nobility's court systems were to his people, that he was treating outsiders of the ghetto the same way out of fear/retaliation, and that his treatment of Gringoire is still merciful by comparison. His point is first proven when Quasimodo is interrogated by the deaf judge, has his trial treated as a comedic spectacle, and publicly both whipped and humiliated for something that was not truly his fault. I then see it proven even more, when Esmeralda is tortured into falsely confessing murder and witchcraft, when people like Frollo and the prosecutor are pulling the strings to get what they want or persecute outcasts they do not like, rather than being interested in any real justice or holiness. So I would still say that both the original book and this particular adaptation still shows the outcasts in a sympathetic light and that the real monsters of the story were the hypocrites in high society, rather than the outcasts that were judged as "unholy savages."

Depressingly enough you can still see Romani people begging on the streets in modern Europe today, because many of them are still a persecuted and marginalized minority. Unfortunately, many books and movies still portray Romani/Gypsies in a romantic light as as happy vagabonds with magic powers. Victor Hugo was in many ways ahead of his times in his portrayals of the poor and unfortunates in both The Hunchback of Notre Dame and Les Miserables.

luly lulyanka agreed. I didn’t like that either, though I totally dig Clopin’s purple mustache!

Ya, at first I thought it was tar, but it turned out to b lava!

Женя Корн poor Guy, I mean poor Pierre, he failed to save her, I'm going to draw this Illustration.

250th comment: I’ll say!

yeah right I remember seeing this when I was 9 and it scared the hell out of me and considering that I also found Disney's version very scary, that animation had traumatized me :D However now the Hunchback of Notre Dame is my favourite Disney movie!

AmyLeeQueen If you scared,it's your problem.I watched tahis when I was younger than 9 and I loved it.

Stefanie carina mayr Disney has nothing to do with the original

Ths film is close to my history Except The Gypsy and Quasimodo died in my history, while the film has them alive As for the Disney One They did not add my charms Both of these versions did not add my Marraige with Fleur de Lys, which ends in an Unhappy Marraige

AmyLeeQueen - i watched this when i was five, and parents recorded it for me on VHS, so i watched it again and again... It scared and traumatized me also, but i was a pretty odd kid, and i smoehow enjoyed being scared, and whole dark atmosphere in the cartoon. I am 29 years old now, and it is still pretty impressive, in that dark atmosphere way. I think that it is very real though, those times weren't pretty, and i think if we found ourselves in 15th century Paris, that we would do anything to get back into our time as soon as possible. Those were dark times.

That’s just ridiculous.

Frollo, is that you?

@@taylorholmstrom248 Don't worry. As Frollo says in the musical: "The wicked shall not go unpunished."

No Sugar No Disease #FakeChristian #FrollosApprentice and lastly, fuck you with something hard and sandpapery right up the ass with no lubrication :)