Yeah, but the 757 is much longer, so potentially more legroom

@@bobcruickshank4489nope it just means more seats

@@maxsaviation9512 not to mention the 757 can takeoff and land on MUCH shorter runways than the a321neo. the 757X would have saved boeing if they did not stop producing it.

@@aviationkrazi1429 You cannot draw valid conclusions from a wrong premise. A "757X" was never developed and will never exist. The takeoff run of a (real!) 757-200 is 2,070m. That one of an A321neo is 1,988m.

@@kermecke and 757X could have an even shorter takeoff range

Me to

lmao

True😂

I didn't realize until I saw this

@@supsnailIT'S THE REAL SUPSNAIL!

Thank you so much

Glad you enjoy it!

What is the difference then. Both A320 family and B757 are considered as narrow body aircraft with a 3+3 seating. I don’t anything no matter what you do you can’t wide the seat anymore further.

@@ludwigtailsThe A320/1 is much more fuel efficient

@@ludwigtails While both are narrowbodies the A320 family fuselage is wider than the 757 fuselage

There is one more point: The A320 family was designed to carry containers and would allow Icelandair (and equally PLAY) to open a supplemental cargo business, using belly freight. Boeing single aisle jets do not offer this option. As an interesting aside, German companies had developed a highly sophisticated magnetic train ("Transrapid"), sadly with only one existing application in Shanghai, China. The dimensions of the Transrapid carriages hat been set to exactly allow hauling the A320 cargo containers. Sadly, a broad coalition of green fanatics, railway traditionalists and some others succeeded in undermining the project so that it was finally abandoned in 2011.

That's interesting considering it's not certified yet.

Exactly. The 737 was a huge short haul success. They’ve tried to make it something it’s not with these failed max variants, while abaondoning one of their best aircraft.

@@davidyardley512Boeing really locked themselves to be checkmated by continuing 737 production instead of stopping it and making 757 derivatives instead

Yeah also Airbus got exposed they deleted the anime livery in the A350F design Competition then deleted the video 😂😂

Boeing baby 😂😂😂

@@maxsaviation9512 exactly! the lazy gen alpha ipad kid version of the boeing 757 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

I honestly don't get why people are opposed to single aisle long haul. It's not like you plan to run around in the aircraft. You sit in your seat and do the occasional toilet visit. If the seats are the same, what's the actual difference for single or double aisle?

@@Bunnysinger it’s small. We only have a single isle which could cause blockage.

@ludwigtails Yes, but how often do you need to actually get up? Most of the time, you're just sitting down?

As like the ones with the normal liveries, retired

You said it, engines. So not really a Boeing issue. Airbus has the same engines. Icelandair almost crashed in Oslo some years ago. Now, that is something!

So what

And financially unprofitable…

Wish Boeing made another version updated of the 757, its kind of a hole in the market with those being retired now. Delta/United still flies them though! They're still around.

@@shreyasdevarashetty2158Times will change, and as nothing could last forever, an all new replacement is to be needed. Although the 757 was a good bird, its already her time. And honestly, the A321neo is sufficient enough for the role the 757 left as the 321s a newer airframe with less milage, not to mention the cfm leap and p&w gtf is way more efficient compared to the rb211 of the ‘57

That's the same airframe that 707, 727 and 737...

Seems like you wouldnt run a very good business then?

@@TheRuben_music how many airlines are there who still have 727, 747, or MD11 and the likes in their fleet? close to none guess why they burn money like crazy.. like millions of gallons extta per year per aircraft compared to their newer counterparts plus they are much louder which in most cases costs extra money in airport fees plus maintenance becomes more expensive the older they get.. MUCH more expensive that for a single aircraft that is dozens of millions of dollars each year not to mention safety issues that may arise from the aging airframe etc no sane business would keep them for sentimental reasons of a few hundred people worldwide who mostly don't even fly those planes bcs they live on the other side of the world you can't compare an old plane with an old guitar or something (judging by your name)

@@m3redgt Chill man... you are talking over yourself

@@TheRuben_music I mean...hes right?

@@blurrypilot4473 Ofc and i agree. it is that nostalgic value crap i dont get. Generation next!

No disrespect. Lots of people think the switch is controversial. Just look at our comments.

Wish Boeing made another version updated of the 757, its kind of a hole in the market with those being retired now. Delta/United still flies them though! They're still around. The Airbus A321 XLR is going to be quite uncomfortable though, most 737 and A320 series aircraft aren't comfortable on longer flights.

@@thecaynuck the A321 is slightly wider than the 757, so it will be the same or slightly better from a passenger's point of view

And how long have you been working for flyPLAY hf.?

The new livery is the best airline livery

you’re not gonna die on a boeing, i hate comparing safety when they are both so much safer than cars

@@aviationkrazi1429 Safer then cars?! SO you are telling me that the pilots ripped a door off a MAX plane? Cuz when a car is unsafe, it is the DRIVER

@@TheRuben_music dude, no. even if door blowouts happen, the plane can still fly perfectly fine and can still fly. even a door blowout in a plane is incredibly rare to even dying in a car crash

@@TheRuben_music but pilots are trained to handle situations professionally and to know what to do

@@TheRuben_music you are really stupid

All the way to the boneyard - yes. Sadly though. IMO the shorter 757 had been one of the most beautiful examples of industrial design of all times. But airplanes are tools to make money. And for the 757 as such a tool, time is running out.

@kermecke Not yet! Delta and United still intend to use the 757 till around 2030. It will be in the cargo industry for much longer. Its so capable. Hopefully the 797 will be based on the success of the 757 😎

@@joshuaborges1723 DELTA indeed seems to have shifted its strategy a little. During the Covid crisis the plan was to phase out the older models and streamline the operation ASAP by renewal. But now the crisis is called "Boeing", and DELTA's main competitors suffer from increasing capacity limitations. DELTA seems to have switched to "expansion", with now over 1000 aircraft and more 'busses coming in every month. And the easiest way to grow is to NOT retire aged but still airworthy aircraft. OTOH, Boeing victim UNITED does not want to shrink too much. The consequence is equal: they hesitate to retire. I do not believe in a "797" though. Boeing can only regain a bit of credibility if every and any manager who ordered illegal assembly shortcuts, harassed whistleblowers or forged false documentation gets fired promptly. This alone would allegedly effect hundreds more of top-educated people. If someone looks at Boeing, the impression is "nothin' works". They burn cash at an incredible rate, and human resources are getting overstretched. And the trust of all stakeholders is fading away. Who would buy a "797"? I would risk my 2 ct that DELTA would not.

They are

airbus is fantastic! screw boeing ;)

Un-screw Boeing. Or un-bolt? Un-string the stringers? I always had the impression that such stuff had been overestimated ... Even the dachshound-legged 737 has enough doors and wheels - doesn't matter if one occasionally falls off.

@@wisehat_yt Most Airbus planes are boring unfortunately.

@@thecaynuck thats not true tho lmao

@@thecaynuckthe A320 was the first *mass produced* airliner to use (digital) fly by wire