That was actually addresses here when Ruyi cut her hair, it is revealed that he only wrotr the poem to make himself look good like he was a faithful husband. Drama distory history but history is sometime romaticized and the truth lost in the past. History is written by the winner after all

@@magicwandstudio3141 in this drama, Ruyi was the love of his life but in history it was his first empress Fucha. Granted History is not the Gospel truth. However, History, isn’t written by the winner but by people who came later, using discoveries of historical evidence by proof of writings, documents, etc…and definitely has more possibilities of truth than drama script written in one’s imagination. Besides I didn’t mention anything about the emperor’s poetry, making himself appear to be a faithful husband, etc… in the drama. IN THE DRAMA….😂😂😂

@@meimei1919 Every if history is written by those who come after based on what they find of the past, you have to bear in mind that what they find as evidence can very much be manipulated by those living in the present. For instance, if I were a person of historical signficance and my diary was later discovered as a sort of primary source. Well, that gives me a little power in how I tell or retell certain events. I could just as easily distort history by getting rid of someone's diary (perhaps my sister kept one and she was also of historical signficance but I was jealous of her so I destroyed all evidence of her life). With no evidence of her life, well, then, how would future historians possibly capture her version of events that we both shared in childhood? Then, also, let's bear in mind that history tends to favor those with resources. If I were in poverty and illiterate, what chance would I have to leave any trace of my existence? Would I have a diary? Would someone else keep a diary about me? Would I show up in the newspapers? No, right? So who would most likely be able to leave behind traces of their existence? Those with resources, education, access, or connections. In the end, that leaves a skewed perspective. In that sense, those living in the present do still have a way of impacting how their lives are recorded in history. I think about the Cultural Revolution and how the CCP destroyed records of family genealogy and artistic works and literature. Wouldn't that very much influence what history has to say about the time periods that were lost because the CCP in the Cultural Revolution decided to destroy these documents and records? What about the fact that North Korea is closed off from the rest of the world? What history can we present of the people that lived during the time of this country's existence if we have no access to their information? The only people who can release any information about this country is its dictator and his staff. That's a lot of power and influence over what is recorded in the history books.

@@SL-lz9jr well said

@@SL-lz9jr 😂😂😂So cute to compare the writings of history to your sister’s diary and getting rid of it to distort history. I can hear the cries of despair of the souls of the long dead court historians for the total disregard of their hard work for the future generations.🤣🤣 The earliest written RECORDS was in 1250 BC, Note, not relics found. The Chinese and the Koreans had court historians following every important court official and were present during royal court. These filed records were the source of our modern day knowledge of China. Not heresay, from artefacts or diaries.😄 Some examples like The Book of Documents 11th century, BC, Records of the Grand Historians 100BC were recorded by the then court historians. I don’t know about other countries but I did China’s history as my thesis, so I do know for sure that today’s knowledge of Chinese history is due to these historians and the well kept books they recorded. Besides I’m of Chinese ancestry, proud of it and want to clarify facts of its history, when it’s misunderstood, not to get into an argument with ppl. So my apologies. Please do read History of China. It’s so enthralling and exciting to see how it’s developed to China today.

Someone's being bludgeoned to death outside at his command, and his expression is exactly the same one I wear when I'm trying to remember the correct order for the verses of "American Pie" because my brain's insisting on looping it in my head.

@@redwitch12 😂😂😂

@@20PINKluvr Hey, there's like 12 verses (excluding the refrain) and the whole song flows so smoothly that you can mix up verses without even realizing it if you're not focused! ;D

@@RottedRowan You have given explanations based on the drama and your own conclusions and understandably he wouldn’t get rid of her or have her executed, for his own reasons (or the script writers) but he COULD. He’s the emperor and she “belonged” to him once married. Her family how powerful can’t interfere with his decisions especially when she has done wrong. There have been cases in history where the emperor has degraded and sent them to the cold palace or surreptitiously poisoned. Her misbehaviour disgraces her family, and they themselves would have punished her severely if they could or at least distanced themselves from her as the emperor could have 3 generations of her family executed if he so wished. The emperor is still the emperor and in his case, a “husband” both roles giving him lordship over a daughter who has married “out” and furthermore disgraced the family in her wrong doings. Maybe, the marriage was planned politically to strengthen his power, to have the military force enhanced but at the end of the day, the emperor fears no man. However don’t forget that in the early dynasties, there wasn’t a unified China under 1 emperor, but many states with their own emperor at one time. Hence they needed the military power to ensure protection and support against the other emperors, and the one with military power may even usurp the throne and be the next emperor. Not in this story of the Qing dynasty, where he was the only emperor of China at that time. The “punishment “ of not servicing him for three months is a joke. Having hundreds of concubines (he was reputed to have thousands, mostly “untouched”) they would probably only service him once in many months anyway, unless she’s a flavour of the month. but, what happened to this punishment? She returned more devious and evil than before and the poor faithful maid took the brunt of it. Rather, died for it.

@@meimei1919 He may be the only emperor but the clans could unite with other and rebel, or do something shady behind the scene that can cause the downfall of the dynasty.

As the emperor, he had to be very careful with his public image; gossip could literally ruin an emperor's reputation. A servant being beat to death seemed more reasonable than beating one of his wives to death. Her family, who were likely to work as officials at court, could raise a rebellion against the Emperor. (Doesn't mean it was right tho lol)

He created this harem… he created the toxic culture by allowing all those manipulative behaviours, he knows he needs all his in laws money and armies … hence the fact that he has so many women from powerful clans, he is at the head of those women quarrels, divide and conquer ... he prefers dealing with this issues because it makes him “ look like “ the “man”.

Ruyi's Royal Love in the Palace

Ruyi love in the palace

Ap judulnya

@@esteramsal8423 ru yi in palace

@@candrabai1903 tks..

Ruyi's Royal Love In The Palace

後宮肚兜傳