“A hole, if there were be one, would be a new kind of particle, unknown to experimental physics, having the same mass and negative charge to an electron. We may call such a particle an anti-electron.” Published by Dirac in mid 1931 - the greatest prophesy in modern theoretical physics - prior to actual experimental discovery

@@aXw4ryPlJR the best of man is he who has eyes to see the unseen because seeing the unseen is enlightenment

its crazy to me that they took pictures at this level in 1932

This is why I am enraged when people say there's a consensus of scientist who claim "_____", fill in the blanks. They do this with Dark Matter, Covid or Climate Change. And if you suggest something different, or try to poke holes in their ideas, they mock you and call you a denier. Science should be questioned. Always. That's an essential part of Science. And Science should never be about consensus! It should be experiments, results and the DATA.

"Dirac noticed the negative energy himself" . Yes he did! Thanks for pointing this out.

Very appreciated by physics enthusiasts but I agree the world doesn’t know of him. His time will come like Tesla and Turing.

@@M.-.D Tesla should never been in a conversation with Dirac and Turing.

@@gaulindidier5995 Tesla was an engineer, without engineers physicists are stuck, which is the current problem with "bigger" particle accelerators...

@@niks660097 Yeah sure, Engineers are very important, but they can't go to abstraction land like Grothendieck or an ex engineer mathematician, Raoul Bott. I most probably could never start to build the LHC, and probably would make everything explode...

@@niks660097 vise versa also true

thank you for this

I vote Feynman

I vote Dirac

@@audience2 I vote Dirac too Excerpt from the book The Strangest Man " In his paper, Dirac had cryptically remarked that a critical quantum quantity is ‘analogous’ to its classical counterpart, but Feynman believed that the correct phrase was ‘proportional to’ (that is, if the quantum quantity changes, the classical one always changes proportionately). Here, at last, was Feynman’s chance to find out what Dirac meant. Feynman described his problem to Dirac and came to the crunch: Feynman: Did you know that they were proportional? Dirac: Are they? Feynman: Yes they are. Dirac: That’s interesting. Dirac then got up and walked away. Feynman subsequently became famous for his new version of quantum mechanics but thought the credit was undeserved. The more closely he looked at the ‘little paper’, the more he realised that he had done nothing new. He later said, repeatedly, ‘I don’t know what all the fuss is about - Dirac did it all before me.’ "

beauty is in the eye of the beholder ... who's to say what is ugly? Beauty and symmetry can be misleading in physics -- where is supersymmetry now?

Just change your orbit and problem solved.

You can come to my orbit 😂😂😂

@@RajeshYadav-to5zq the sheer game physicists have is demonstrated through your comment

😂😂

The positrons were not in orbits but were free particles created in electron-positive pairs by cosmic ray collisions. Under these conditions, positrons and electrons are deviated by magnetic fields in opposite directions.

🤣🤣

Hahahaha. Yes

That was my first thought lmao I was so confused

Aprende ingles cara, vai deixar de se comunicar com o mundo por causa disso? boa sorte.

They aren't entirely destroyed because they create a lot of energy when they collide. You can view them as being converted into energy (photons iirc).

Yes, matter-antimatter collisions produce energy through a process called annihilation. When a particle collides with its respective antiparticle, they annihilate each other, and the total mass of the two particles is converted into energy according to Einstein's famous equation, E=mc^2. This energy is typically released in the form of gamma rays or other high-energy particles.

Be very careful with such statements. I'm sure you are talking about virtual particles, the thing is, that it is a ''mathematical trick'' or our explanaiton/description of vacuum fluctuations. Particle-anitparticle pairs emerging from vacuum and then anihilating while giving borrowed energy back to vacuum is just a simplified interpretaion to wrap our minds around certain problem. The reality (whatever your definition of that is :D) is very likely different and probably beyond human imagination. Physics is not about describing reality, it is about creating models of the world which are consistent with our observations.

Man is a good in ruins

Dont be silly , he is English , we have no gods or do we need them , in fact we disproved the monotheistic Arab nonsense in 1687 and 1859 , he is simply a homosapien who thought , just another Englishman with an equation that represents a fundamental aspect of reality , he had flaws and faults like us all . Its the equation that is important not the man .

Schlodsinger is interesting.

Mathematics shows where there is an inconsistency, and force to bend the reasoning. It predicts nothing by itself, it only guides a good initial idea.

@@clmasse It LED Dirac to the positron.

yeah but Dirac came to the equation that bears his name by calculation, Schrodinger got his equation out of his belly.

Dirac had his famous equation inscribed in his gravestone.

He wasn't wrong, he was just incomplete.

If anyone was wrong it was Schrodinger, Dirac's equation was very accepted by the physicists of his time and has been by modern physicists.

To use telepathy use your throat and tongue chakra. Moving your tongue to sound out the words helps transmit.

That's a bit dramatic

Soooo melodramatic. Good luck, no one will miss you & Google has shadow accounts on people without one.