The problem with measuring time and distance using red shift is that we do not know the exact location in space time in our own universe. We measure red shift galaxies by using our position according to our idea of the observable universe. The actual universe may be so large that our observable universe may only be a fraction of the size of our universe.

Here’s a question for you to ponder. Can light interfere with light? Can the light we see from distant objects be interfered with by all the light heading towards it on its way to us? It’s an awfully long way for light to travel. Or maybe it’s gravity that interferes with it.

May be red shift is not due to expansion but some other optical or gravitational influence.

What is this fascination with living on different planets. Like go somewhere just to do the same things we do here. 😂

On the eighth day, God said, "Go figure"

Dark matter always struck me as a made-up thing, allowing scientists to skip over the important bits. Kind of like, "I was going to get married 'yada, yada, yada' and now I'm single" Only with the Universe . . . there is all this space we don't understand, 'yada, yada, yada' and now the Universe is expanding faster than we expected. (Replace 'yada, yada, yada' with dark matter.)

One solution to the difference in early universe measurements vs late universe measurements of the Hubble constant and the discovery by the JWT of large galaxies in the very early universe is time. A fundamental assumption is that, while 3 of the dimensions of spacetime may bend and stretch the fourth, time, is rigid and has been elapsing at the same rate since the beginning. Is it possible that time and space are related in such a way that, as space expands, time elapses at a slower rate? Like the person in an elevator who cannot distinguish between sitting still on the ground and being accelerated at 1 g by a rocket ship in outer space, we cannot distinguish between space expanding and time elapsing at a slower rate. If at some point in the future it takes longer to go from point A to point B it could be because space has expanded or because time has slowed down, or both. If space was not expanding but time was elapsing more slowly over eons then a photon released billions of years ago and detected today would, like an audio recording played at a slower speed, seem to have a lower frequency, or be red shifted. This could affect late universe measurements of the Hubble constant because these are based on analyzing the red shift of photons released billions of years ago. Part of the red shift could be due to a reduction in the rate at which time is elapsing between when they were generated and the present and space might not be expanding as fast as thought. Also, when the universe was smaller, time could have been elapsing at a greater rate and the universe could actually be much, much older than 13.8 billion years. This would allow enough time for the formation of very large galaxies sooner than is thought possible. Now this is just a suggestion from a retired biologist. Don't expect me to do the math.

There is a theory that the universe is electrical

In an infinite universe, there are infinite mechanisms at work. What we know is a lot - to us. But in the greater/total picture - we know nothing.

Regardless of who's correct about your 'crisis' - Does it matter?

Why has 'Hubble' to be a constant? There are theories that the expansion rate increases. But I admit, with a 'Hubble constant' it is easier to calculate. At the end of your video, there is even some 'trumpet' showing that the expansion is not constant.

when your sight is limited in a vaste ,or maybe , infinyte, universe,, it always seem that you are in the center of it,,like the sailor before new thechnologies, would only see the ocean to a minimal view in distance so it would look like he is always in the middle of it ,till he could see land,,,🤔😉✌

Looks likely Hubble was right when he later questioned his own theory. Seems Wal Thornhill's ideas will be adopted in the coming paradigme shift.

4:49 At [something] university in the UK. It sounds like dure-ham. Did you mean Durham?

And that’s new , somehow?

dark matter, what is it? is it merely a proposed answer to previous questionable ....... stuff..... im just a carpenter, what do I know

"terror tree" I found this video by searching "The universe is not expanding"

The Big Bang is the greatest faux pas in the history of science. In a universe of gravitational fields, everything coalesces into a 'Great Body', and the galaxies all accelerate towards this Great Body. Look in the direction of the Great Body, and galaxies will be redshifted, and the redshift will be higher the closer they get to the Great Body. In other words, the more distant they are. The same thing will be seen if you look in the opposite direction. The redshift values for a given distance will be highest in these two directions. If you look at galaxies in a direction right, left, up or down from this line, galaxies at a similar distance from the observer as the ones on the line will have a lower redshift, due to the fact that they are not as strongly influenced by the gravity of the Great Body, as they are farther away from it. That which we call 'the universe' is actually a finite system, and just as there are billions of galaxies that make up this 'finite universe', there are probably billions of such finite universes. The question then arises as to what exists between these finite universes. It can only be a hydrogen field, since galaxies cannot condense out of nothingness. Therefore, the CMBR is the temperature of the hydrogen field, and the inhomogeneities detected within it are simply density fluctuations. And, the very high quasar redshifts are mainly due to light being 'stretched' by the immensely strong gravity of these objects, with a minor component caused by recessional velocity. We don't know anything about gravity beyond the event horizon, and Einstein, himself, said that relativity theory breaks down beyond the event horizon.

The universe isn't a 3+1 spacetime Cube...it's a Metatron's Cube.

Its too hard to fathom an infinite universe because there would be nothing outside of it ! Even tho there are. Hypothetical mathamatical eqautions attempting to prove it you cant so the multiverse theory would be all the more correct !

No offense but greatly prefer the usual narrator.

When i look up at the night sky i can literally count every star and its 24 stars in the night sky and the little dipper is no longer visible thanks to good ole light pollution!

Why make a serious video and then ruin it with clickbait? Boooohhhh

Mathematics is what’s causing these problems. Perio.

Proves the universe is female. Always older than what she told you..........

Surprise, surprise. A human model doesn't follow reality. That never happend before. 😂

Another AI channel?

EU will explain all your mysteries.

If there are laws and systems in the universe including earth and every living things, there must be grand creator the true God. Here is what the God spoke in Bible-- "I am Jehovah and this is my name. I made heavens and stars and earth and sea and everything in it. I count all the stars and call their name. I made humans on earth in my image and made them to look after the earth and living things. No one can see me yet live. I will honor those who honors my name. I will make them live eternal without seeing death on earth"

How does anyone truly know any of these images are real. I guess you have too believe in something. I choose to believe in GOD

I believe the Earth is flat, and so do many other people around the world.

Allah is the greatest 💓💓

I think you talk a lot which is cool n all but without a nice instrumental behind it, sorta makes me not wanna listen so…