Yes!! Body, blood, soul, and divinity of our Lord.

Jonathan Cahn as well...

This was/is an awesome message…and correct. My only comment is that I believe Scripture also makes a compelling statement allowing one to conclude that He offers the fourth cup, not the third. Scripture says after supper. It doesn’t say immediately after the supper. Furthermore, the large piece of unleavened bread is saved for the end of the Seder. A number of steps occur after the supper. However, after the wine, Scripture says they sing a song and then head to the mount. The fourth cup commemorates God’s fourth promise: “I will bring you in (to my Kingdom). Christ is my High Priest and Intercessor. Following in His footsteps and He will lead me in. Keep in mind that the temple remained for another generation. Christ is telling them to maintain their faith in His message, and do as He instructed despite the sinful earth and intransigent temple corporation trying to dismiss them as heretics. In fact, I believe their closing hymn is a shadow of Old Testament hymns of deliverance with Moses’ hymn top-of-mind following deliverance from the Egyptian army. Regardless of which cup you believe it is, the message and outcome for those who are loving, faithful, and obedient will be rewarded. Remember, Christ’s obedience for dying on His cross was totally due to His total love for His Father. We are the beneficiaries of His love, if we stay the course until death and perfection.God bless,awesome sermon, and live a loving faith.

Thank you for letting us know that you received from the message.

HI Dawn, I have felt the same way too. Communion and the power of our words. Last Sunday we had a testimony at church about this lady who was diagnosed with an terminal breast cancer a few months ago. She took communion everyday and every time she took it "in remembrance" she speaks life and says by His stripes I am healed. She is now totally healed and cancer free.

We are blessed that you found the video meaningful to you. Jeffrey D. Miller brings messages like this to congregations throughout the US and overseas. If you are interested in hearing him contact us: jeffreydmiller.com Also you may listen to the daily radio program, Messianic Minutes, MessianicMinutes.com

May the Good and faithful Mashiach Yeshua's Spirit lead you in your search for Truth dear. There are other Messianic Jews who are very annointed teachers...learn from them . Shalom Shalom

I’ve subscribed to your KZfaq channel and I now have started a youtube channel with videos on the Lords Supper. Kindly watch subscribe and share and comment in Jesus name. All blessings in Jesus name

what is "Good friday"?

There is only one perfect eternal sacrifice and one continuous celebration Supper until the Lord Jesus returns to the mount of Olives near Jerusalem Zechariah 14:4..

We are blessed that you found the video meaningful to you. Jeffrey D. Miller brings messages like this to congregations throughout the US and overseas. If you are interested in hearing him contact us: jeffreydmiller.com Also you may listen to the daily radio program, Messianic Minutes, MessianicMinutes.com

Good to hear that you are blessed by the teaching! You’ll find teaching articles on our website www.jeffreydmiller.com

We are very blessed to hear how meaningful it was for you.

That’s great to hear. We hope you were blessed by the teaching!

Communion is not in the Bible. The Passover has nothing to do with Roman Catholic Communion. Passover Seder Meal folks not a catholic communion

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/eJlorZybs5-Yp6s.html This is Catholic theology that makes this talk sound like kindergarten. Don't you think the Catholic Church has theologians? WATCH what I have pasted.

Now as they were eating, Jesus took bread, and after blessing it broke it and gave it to the disciples, and said, “Take, eat; this is my body” (Matthew 26:26). And as they were eating, he took bread, and after blessing it broke it and gave it to them, and said, “Take; this is my body” (Mark 14:22). And he took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it and gave it to them, saying, “This is my body, which is given for you. Do this in remembrance of me” (Luke 22:19). and when he had given thanks, he broke it, and said, “This is my body which is for you. Do this in remembrance of me” (1 Corinthians 11:24)

smokeybirdman First of all, the Jews continued to celebrate Passover, but now understanding that the Lamb represented Yeshua their saviour. The original Passover was a foretaste of redemption, completed in Yeshua. The early Church Father’s did not see the Eucharist as literal at all, as I quote below. Didache, written in the late-first or early-second century, referred to the elements of the Lord’s table as “spiritual food and drink” (The Didache, 9). The long passage detailing the Lord’s Table in this early Christian document gives no hint of transubstantiation whatsoever. Justin Martyr (110-165) spoke of “the bread which our Christ gave us to offer in remembrance of the Body which He assumed for the sake of those who believe in Him, for whom He also suffered, and also to the cup which He taught us to offer in the Eucharist, in commemoration of His blood“(Dialogue with Trypho, 70). Eusebius of Caesarea (263-340) espoused a symbolic view in his Proof of the Gospel: For with the wine which was indeed the symbol of His blood, He cleanses them that are baptized into His death, and believe on His blood, of their old sins, washing them away and purifying their old garments and vesture, so that they, ransomed by the precious blood of the divine spiritual grapes, and with the wine from this vine, “put off the old man with his deeds, and put on the new man which is renewed into knowledge in the image of Him that created him.” . . . He gave to His disciples, when He said, “Take, drink; this is my blood that is shed for you for the remission of sins: this do in remembrance of me.” And, “His teeth are white as milk,” show the brightness and purity of the sacramental food. For again, He gave Himself the symbols of His divine dispensation to His disciples, when He bade them make the likeness of His own Body. For since He no more was to take pleasure in bloody sacrifices, or those ordained by Moses in the slaughter of animals of various kinds, and was to give them bread to use as the symbol of His Body, He taught the purity and brightness of such food by saying, “And his teeth are white as milk” (Demonstratia Evangelica, 8.1.76-80). Augustine (354-430), also, clarified that the Lord’s Table was to be understood in spiritual terms: “Understand spiritually what I said; you are not to eat this body which you see; nor to drink that blood which they who will crucify me shall pour forth. . . . Although it is needful that this be visibly celebrated, yet it must be spiritually understood” (Exposition of the Psalms, 99.8). And in another place, quoting the Lord Jesus, Augustine further explained: “‘Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man,’ says Christ, ‘and drink His blood, ye have no life in you.’ This seems to enjoin a crime or a vice; it is therefore a figure [or symbol], enjoining that we should have a share in the sufferings of our Lord, and that we should retain a sweet and profitable memory of the fact that His flesh was wounded and crucified for us (On Christian Doctrine, 3.16.24). A number of similar quotations from the church fathers could be given to make the point that-at least for many of the fathers-the elements of the eucharist were ultimately understood in symbolic or spiritual terms. In other words, they did not hold to the Roman Catholic doctrine of transubstantiation.

Jenny Gaston The Early Church Fathers whom Catholic’s revere, did not believe in transubstantiation. The doctrine of transubstantiation came much later on in the mid 300AD onwards. It was a heresy and the fact it is still endorsed today is anathema to the true Christian Faith. I quote some of the early father’s below. Excerpt: "At times, they echoed the language of Christ (e.g. “This is My body” and “This is My blood”) when describing the Lord’s Table. Yet, in other places, it becomes clear that they intended this language to be ultimately understood in spiritual and symbolic terms. Here are a number of examples that demonstrate this point: The Didache, written in the late-first or early-second century, referred to the elements of the Lord’s table as “spiritual food and drink” (The Didache, 9). The long passage detailing the Lord’s Table in this early Christian document gives no hint of transubstantiation whatsoever. Justin Martyr (110-165) spoke of “the bread which our Christ gave us to offer in remembrance of the Body which He assumed for the sake of those who believe in Him, for whom He also suffered, and also to the cup which He taught us to offer in the Eucharist, in commemoration of His blood“(Dialogue with Trypho, 70). Clement of Alexandria explained that, “The Scripture, accordingly, has named wine the symbol of the sacred blood” (The Instructor, 2.2). Origen similarly noted, “We have a symbol of gratitude to God in the bread which we call the Eucharist” (Against Celsus, 8.57). Cyprian (200-258), who sometimes described the eucharist using very literal language, spoke against any who might use mere water for their celebration of the Lord’s Table. In condemning such practices, he explained that the cup of the Lord is a representation of the blood of Christ: “I marvel much whence this practice has arisen, that in some places, contrary to Evangelical and Apostolic discipline, water is offered in the Cup of the Lord, which alone cannot represent the Blood of Christ” (Epistle 63.7). Eusebius of Caesarea (263-340) espoused a symbolic view in his Proof of the Gospel: For with the wine which was indeed the symbol of His blood, He cleanses them that are baptized into His death, and believe on His blood, of their old sins, washing them away and purifying their old garments and vesture, so that they, ransomed by the precious blood of the divine spiritual grapes, and with the wine from this vine, “put off the old man with his deeds, and put on the new man which is renewed into knowledge in the image of Him that created him.” . . . He gave to His disciples, when He said, “Take, drink; this is my blood that is shed for you for the remission of sins: this do in remembrance of me.” And, “His teeth are white as milk,” show the brightness and purity of the sacramental food. For again, He gave Himself the symbols of His divine dispensation to His disciples, when He bade them make the likeness of His own Body. For since He no more was to take pleasure in bloody sacrifices, or those ordained by Moses in the slaughter of animals of various kinds, and was to give them bread to use as the symbol of His Body, He taught the purity and brightness of such food by saying, “And his teeth are white as milk” (Demonstratia Evangelica, 8.1.76-80). Athanasius (296-373) similarly contended that the elements of the Eucharist are to be understood spiritually, not physically: “[W]hat He says is not fleshly but spiritual. For how many would the body suffice for eating, that it should become the food for the whole world? But for this reason He made mention of the ascension of the Son of Man into heaven, in order that He might draw them away from the bodily notion, and that from henceforth they might learn that the aforesaid flesh was heavenly eating from above and spiritual food given by Him.” (Festal Letter, 4.19) Augustine (354-430), also, clarified that the Lord’s Table was to be understood in spiritual terms: “Understand spiritually what I said; you are not to eat this body which you see; nor to drink that blood which they who will crucify me shall pour forth. . . . Although it is needful that this be visibly celebrated, yet it must be spiritually understood” (Exposition of the Psalms, 99.8). He also explained the eucharistic elements as symbols. Speaking of Christ, Augustine noted: “He committed and delivered to His disciples the figure [or symbol] of His Body and Blood.” (Exposition of the Psalms, 3.1). And in another place, quoting the Lord Jesus, Augustine further explained: “‘Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man,’ says Christ, ‘and drink His blood, ye have no life in you.’ This seems to enjoin a crime or a vice; it is therefore a figure [or symbol], enjoining that we should have a share in the sufferings of our Lord, and that we should retain a sweet and profitable memory of the fact that His flesh was wounded and crucified for us (On Christian Doctrine, 3.16.24). A number of similar quotations from the church fathers could be given to make the point that-at least for many of the fathers-the elements of the eucharist were ultimately understood in symbolic or spiritual terms. In other words, they did not hold to the Roman Catholic doctrine of transubstantiation.

smokeybirdman I did watch and thanks for that, but you also should watch this talk by a Messianic Jew explaining true communion as in the Jewish Passover, to what it actually means now. The Catholic Church is trying to bend the scriptures to suit its own doctrines on transubstantiation, when in fact neither the Apostles nor the early Church father’s believed in the literal presence - that doctrine was introduced some 300 plus years after Christ. I have quoted on this thread some of the writings of the early Father’s, Didache, Origen, Augustine etc... if you care to read what they wrote you will clearly see the truth. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/Z7CAoql8zLXOnp8.html

Amen I’ve subscribed to your KZfaq channel and I now have started a youtube channel with videos on the Lords Supper. Kindly subscribe share and comment and watch in Jesus name. All blessings in Jesus name. From Ireland Sean in Christ

Thank you for viewing the video; we are blessed to hear that you blessed by the truth of Messiah!

We are blessed that you found the video meaningful to you. Jeffrey D. Miller brings messages like this to congregations throughout the US and overseas. If you are interested in hearing him contact us: jeffreydmiller.com Also you may listen to the daily radio program, Messianic Minutes, MessianicMinutes.com

Mapleberry Farm - Off Grid & Outdoors LOVE IT

Working out your salvation does not mean that you are going to lose it if you dont do righteous works. Jesus already paid for your sins on the cross. But Jesus still wants us to be loving and tk showforth good works of righteousness to establish our love for one another.

We're glad that you were blessed by the message.

Rachel Wilkinson I now a youtube channel and it’s named Participate with me in the Lords Supper by Sean Rath. All blessings in Jesus name

Yes there is more tradition , more false doctrine of putting Jesus back on the cross and sacrificing him yet again and the RCC does not believe in His death for all sin.

The word "Eucharist" is not found in the bible, much less "Holy Eucharist". So what are you complaining about? Unless you know the scriptures you don't have a foundation to stand on for your comments.

All those Scriptures refer to the Last Seder (Supper). Passover is celebrated once a year starting on the 14th day of Nisan, the first month on the Hebrew calendar, in the spring of the year. There are those who believe when Messiah said, “Do this in remembrance of Me,” and, “As often as you do this,” specifically referred to Passover. Therefore, they celebrate Communion only once a year at Passover. Many more however believe His command to remember His sacrifice was meant for every time Communion is celebrated, with no limit to how often.

Jesus died on Passover for Christ our Passover lamb has been sacrificed 1 Corinthians 5:7,on the 14th of Nisan and on the 17th of Nisan is the Feast of First Fruits or resurrection day.

Most probably yes

We believe He did, and it was on the Feast of Firstfruits, which is why the Jewish Apostle Paul said He was the Firstfruits from the dead.

Solution Perfect. Info - I do it at home on my personal quite time with God, because communion is a personal passion between you and God

Yes, unleavened bread, to accurately point to Messiah.

you flunked 4th grade I see.

@@IshtarLinqu nope. Blessings to you and your family. 🕎🌏🌍🌎✝️

first of al Christ came in flesh and died shedding his blood for all human kind, don't know for sure how and why you do differentiate the Jew from Hebrew, but as saved Jew from Israel and the Hebrew I can say that you don't get Christ yet, study pray repent

invo singularity of course Yahusha (not jesus) was both Yahudi- of the tribe of Yahudah (not jew) and Hebrew! But not all 12 tribes are Yahudim, only some. Each tribe has it's own name, if you say you are a Hebrew, what tribe are you from? In these last days it is the Yahudim who are waking up their brothers, the other tribes (nations) as foretold. The true Yahudim are already waking up and telling their brethren! Revelation 3:9 speaks of those who say they are jews and are not....I wouldn't like to be in their position!!

Abraham was a Hebrew - Genesis 14v13

@@QuestionThingsUseLogic Its Yeshua (Which means Salvation)

@@jesussaves1875 hi, we know that the Messiah came in His Father's name, that He had His name in His own. With very specific meaning....Just as the prophets did too, but their names have been changed to hide this fact. (For example, Elijah in Hebrew is EliYahu, meaning El is Yahu. Jeremiah is YirmeYahu, Isaiah should read YeshaYahu etc. But it's all been yet another cover up job.) Thus the Messiah, who also is a prophet, has Yahu in His name. Yahu is part of the Father's name, that is why the Messiah is called Yahusha, which means YAH DELIVERS.

Yes

I’ve got a question for you Is the feast’s of TRUMPETS next to happen ? the taking away of the Church ?

Sean Chaney ..you said it first..passion..for the truth of communion. Let's really look who/what maybe misguided zealotry..full of religiosity, Idolatries & heresies, cover ups, deceit, murders & inhuman treatment of young innocent girls years ago..all in the name of 'paying penance' for the family!

❤