They were old 13 years ago. Clint who is a stand up guy narrated it right but wrong ie: the second shot hit Connelly after passing through JFK , shot 3 was the fatal shot , Shot 1 most likely did ricochet off something and send the cement to James Tague.

Bullets pass through things, change directions, act in ways that don't seem possible, the science of terminal ballistics is baffling, i'm not surprised at all with the injuries/damages sustained in this case.

Just watching this now and I remembered your comment from earlier. That's the glaring hole, isn't it? The fact is, Tague _was_ grazed in the cheek by a fragment of something (a bullet, or cement chip), and was taken to hospital for treatment. As well, Mr. Hill said he only _heard_ two shots, although he saw the impact of three. There may even have been a fourth somewhere in the order that he did _not_ hear, that missed, and struck the curbstone, and injured James Tague. I guess this will forever remain a mystery until all of the JFK files are released.

Thank you. This is true.

You are spot on. Clint Hill in my opinion knows much more than he has ever let on. He’s covering something up.

@@peterbravestrongHe was the only one who reacted At his age if he knows something I’m sure he would say something even if it got him killed

@@peterbravestrong Paranoia.

*would have, not would of.

They are also now 60 years older …. And out of their mouths they didn’t even talk about it for years. So memories get mixed. I have a friend who is an officer who was hit by a car while out on traffic stop by a drunk driver taking a wide turn all the way to the shoulder. While not even traumatically hurt but it was scary. He remembers the car coming from a totally different place despite the dashcam on his patrol car showing the car clearly hitting him from the left and behind .

spot on

All credible evidence points to Oswald.

Yes, he, too, like pretty much everybody else, is part of a conspiracy....

And you safely approach the Dallas PD and persuade them en masse to assist a bloody coup, help in the successful escape from justice of the "real killers" of a brother officer with a wife and 3 children, and bend over backwards making themselves all eternally loyal accessories to murder and treason HOW, exactly...?

Even if it was only him (and that is unlikely), it STILL was a conspiracy. He said so himself, "I'm a patsy". It couldn't be more clear.

Oswald also denied “shooting anyone”. He also killed Officer Tippit. Have you watched “the Trial of Lee Harvey Oswald”, and have you watched more of this series from The Sixth Floor Museum?. Before rendering an opinion, or stating short snippets or quotes, spend serious time gathering information from these and other interviews. Side note: not a single bit of “conspiracy” evidence has ever stood up in court. I encourage you to continue (I’m at the 1-year mark and still watching) gathering evidence. I’m certain you will end up with: “1 shooter/ 3 bullets” Cheers!

Paranoid much?

@@aaronz7056 Oh, you know how it is... All of these keyboard warriors know the _rEaL tRo0tH!_

I once asked Palamara under one of his videos accusing the Secret Service of being conspirators how somebody approaches them and persuades them to help murder their own President, and he made no attempt to answer the question. He just shot back, "LONE NUTTERS WILL BE BANNED!" immediately blocked me so I couldn't ask another question, started bragging about how he hasn't got time for people only there to "bother" him, then went right back to cranking out videos giving his middle finger to J.D. Tippit's family as he accuses the man without evidence of being a conspirator so long as it suits his crackpot "theories" and doing the same to Ruth Paine as though he's just gagging to get his ass sued for slander. The man is a total screwball.

@@aaronz7056 Hmmm...it sounds like you are an insanely jealous stalker of Vince.

@@mandylee87 I plainly said I asked him one question and he immediately reacted like a fruitcake without a leg to stand on (that's your idea of an "insanely jealous stalker???), and speaking of stalking, he accuses people without evidence, just giving one great big "F-word you" to them or their families so long as it suits his crackpot "theories." How about YOU explain how you approach Kennedy's Secret Service and persuade them to assassinate their own President, because he obviously can't or he would have simply done so and won me over.

@@aaronz7056 I would say just agree to disagree and move on. You people are never satisfied.

@@mandylee87 So you can't answer the question, then, didn't think so. Hilarious watching crackpots happily accusing people without any evidence so long as it suits them but as soon as you ask them to back their crap claims up with a shred of evidence or any persuasive argument it's "I would say just agree to disagree and move on..." then they bail out of the conversation, clearly hoping everybody is so stupid they won't notice they immediately dodged the whole thing. We're never satisfied? How about you conspiracy theorists stop evading questions and admit you are making stuff up? Oh, and no doubt you will still explain how my asking Palamara one reasonable question and noting he ducked it with a berserk rant and my pointing out when people like you trumpet him as some kind of investigative genius that he's a circus clown is being "insanely jealous" of him? If I did what he did in response to a single question I'd expect guys in white coats to come after me with a big butterfly net. P.S. How do you safely approach Kennedy's own Secret Service agents and persuade them to help you murder their own President? I stand by that question.

Note I once asked Palamara one question under one of his videos accusing the Secret Service: how, exactly, do you safely approach Kennedy's own Secret Service team and persuade them to help you murder their own President? He won me over with his detailed, compelling, evidence-laden response. Just kidding. In fact he made no attempt whatsoever to answer the question, promptly replied, in all caps, "LONE NUTTERS WILL BE BANNED!" immediately blocked me without another word, started bragging about how he hasn't got "time" for people only out to "bother" him... then went right back to cranking out more videos giving his middle finger to the family of J.D. Tippit as he accuses the man of being a conspirator without evidence, and doing the same to Ruth Paine as though he's just gagging to get his ass sued for slander. No, I'm not making this up. LOL