I disagree Söze, lot of CGI which makes the whole thing bland, so so disappointing.

Yep, ugly cgi and complete disincarnation, looks like a 2012 race game

Easily Fincher's worst film. It doesn't matter how pretty it looks and how competently it was shot. We all know Fincher knows how to shoot a movie, but the actual movie itself was the most pointless, aimless, unsatisfying story I have seen in a long time

@@Jg-be7itand that’s why you make minimum wage

@@iboeshakmon3r698 irrelevant, and also not factual. You wish you could afford to live where I do.

Yeah I get why it’s been called a “dry film” in terms of the point of it, but I really enjoyed the thriller aspect and obviously the look. The runtime went by pretty quick. If anyone is a big fan of David’s older work then I couldn’t imagine why they wouldn’t like this one. And all the music from The Smiths! Interesting, but cool choice.

You said it right there. No matter how bad this turned out, you were always going to say it looked "stunning" cuz you assumed ahead of time. Sadly, Fincher has not been Fincher for ages now. Terrible cinematography (and story) here. Everything muddy and yellow and blurry.

@@punchforpound2808 says the guy who will never make a movie in his life 🤣🤣🤣

@@JackNolan_ That's true, but it doesn't make what I said any less true either.

@@punchforpound2808sounds like u know what’s up, why don’t u become a director? Oh right u can’t

​@@jackz4149 Post from your wrong alt "Jack" account this time, shill? I assume Im talking to one of Hollywood's shills right now, so let me take the opportunity to ask, why are they doing this? Please at least give some hints. It's wrong to lie when talking to someone who is open to accepting the truth. Some of us have had life-threatening injuries that caused permanent disabilities, and beautiful films were one of our few joys. Imagine how much brighter the world would be if every week or two a new movie of LOTR quality came out? And maybe half of them for adults can be a lot more complicated too, like LOTR mixed with Shakespeare or the Bible, with lessons to help people grow. Hollywood has the talent and resources to do that, but instead they pour so much talent, time, and resources to do this, to do bad? Why? Why does it have to be this way? Please tell me because I really need to know.

eric is a gaffer then did anything david asks now he s cinematograherp.

I hate the fact that David Fincher, a legendary director is wasting his time picking scripts as dull and boring as this. I can't believe he gave up on Mindhunter to direct a crappy script like this, this movie was painfully bland and boring. If Fincher's name wasn't on it no one would be talking about it, even with his name on it no one is going to be talking about this movie years later like people talk about Fight Club or Gone Girl. This is such a dull and forgettable movie, don't get me wrong it looks great because Fincher directed it, but the script is garbage.

@@ChrisM-bn5vr For you, maybe, but this one is up there for me. This one is that film that not everyone likes but "speak" to me. I'd absolutely talk about this film in the future.

​@@ChrisM-bn5vrI disagree. It may not be quite as exciting or memorable as some of his other movies, but it still was very much both of those things for me. I saw it twice in theaters, and enjoyed it both times. His direction was what made it shine.

Facts

Agree! Wish he did this for every chapter.

Yes. Please try to get him to talk about the rest ...

Interesting take. Name 5 others you find to be top tier.

@@spikespiegel323 #1 for me is Eastern Promises - the fight in the steam bath

I loved the fight scene in this movie, others I consider top tier are The Raid(basically the whole movie),Mission Impossible Fallout(Bathroom), Nobody(Bus) also some fights from John Wick definitely

@@spikespiegel323 I'd personally say almost anything with Jet Li, Jackie Chan, Tony Jaa, Iko Uwais. Bourne films etc... And that's saying something.

@@Cinementality Yeah that Mission Impossible bathroom scene is tough to beat Between that and the aforementioned Eastern Promises shvitz tussle, I guess I prefer my fight sequences in places of healthy respite!😆

Exactly

I noticed that too but I don't think it was a wanted result. With just simple digital camera shake, which is just randomly moving the frame in 2d plane, there would be two artifacts: No motion blur, No parallaxes. So maybe that's why you feel the camera is trying to stay still, because it actually look a little bit off. Which is not a bad thing necessarily, especially for the fight scene, those two "artifacts" I mentioned becomes very smart execution, I'm betting they do this to make the fight/action in low light clearer (no motion blur), and replace foreground object with CGI(Adding parallaxes).

Thank you for enlightened me ! You're like a pro or whathever ? I love the utilisation of those "artifacts" in the opening sequence but I hate them in the fight action scene. I thought it look complety fake. I don't really like this movie but Fincher always use a lot of technical things to do his shot so it's always interesting to analyse @@TheDonutboy1573

​@@TheDonutboy1573adding the shake in post would definitely have been for the wanted effect. C'mon, it's Fincher.

@@nlg070301 Sorry I can understand why you misunderstood, I was replying to the comment about the effect of the camera shake is "trying not to shake". I don't think Fincher would sort of half-ass things in this way. As I explained that I believe doing camera shake in post has benefits to the images so definitely intentional. The fight scene took a lot of production time as I read about in an interview of Messerschmidt.

Fincher mentioned in another interview that he shot almost everything stable and if shake is there it is added in post.

"The lighting was great." 🤣😂😅 It's literally, objectively, some of the worst lighting of the last 50 years in any movie, but you single it out for praise. Wtf.... Im living in bizarro world.

@@punchforpound2808Naw it really fit the film.

tf are you shmoking@@punchforpound2808

@@punchforpound2808it’s beautiful cinematography and lighting. So sad you don’t understand. Oh well.

@@MattSalcedoRespect your opinion, _if_ you're being honest about it..... I just totally disagree, respectfully. Peace.

I disagree, I think this movie was painfully dull and boring. The movie looked great because Fincher directed it, but the script was garbage, if Fincher's name wasn't on this no one would be talking about it, it would just be looked at as another mediocre Netflix release. Even with his name on it no one is going to be talking about this movie in a few years like his other great films, it's incredibly forgettable. There's nothing actually interesting that happens in the film, there's no interesting twists or turns or reasons to actually care about the characters or where the plot is going, which was really disappointing being a huge Fincher fan. You're literally just watching this stoic, soulless hitman go from killing one person to the next and cleaning up after himself, it's boring. The low IMDb ratings are strongly deserved, I can't believe Fincher stopped Mindhunter to waste his time directing a crappy script like this, I expect a lot more coming from Fincher.

@@ChrisM-bn5vr Everyone's entitled to their own opinion, of course. I do agree that this is one of Fincher's slower, minor works but not because it's lacking in quality. It's just a different kind of story. The external story is extremely simple. The internal story about the Killer and what he believes is much more complex. You have to engage with the script to see the discrepancies in his thoughts and actions. It's a meditative piece, not a plot piece for "twists and turns."

Me too

It had a limited release but it wouldn’t have done well with a wide release. These kinds of movies rarely make the money back.

I hope there’s a sequel

It looked like it was handheld shake added in post too which made it even more odd.

That's true. It felt weird because Fincher doesn't use that technique. There's a few scenes on his movies that feature that technique but on this movie it was more obvious.

His worst, by far, and it's not even close. What Fincher film do you think is worse than this aimless, plot-less, unsatisfying waste of 2 hours?

Why did you go in expecting this to be his best film?

@@visualsinfilm98 - I dig the question so I'm guna answer as honestly as possible. I thought that way because to me almost all of his films have been his best, to me anyways.

Way to pat yourself on the back.

nope. were too busy watching Call Me By Your Name, instead of this commercial trash.

you’re so close to getting it. just a little more thinking

@@turtleguyfan About what? What did I miss? Feel free to share your stunning aperçus.

@@zogzog6611I completely agree. It’s 2 hours of vacuous, empty nothingness. I was extremely disappointed.

@@conorfurlong Right? At the start of that movie I thought I was going to get a peek inside a different world. By the end, the people who knew the most about contract killing were The Killer and then me. All the other characters were so unbelievably stupid or undeveloped that it was hard to care about any of them. I get that smart people seem to think it's a clever joke to play on people to have them watch a movie that is kind of making fun of itself. But it wasn't even funny.

@@chrillex91 I'm not talking about deep. I'm talking about consistent with its own premise. I'm talking about remotely plausible. I don't know if it's on the director, but certainly his name is all over it, but at the very least they should have an intern working through plot and character development so that a movie that looks like this isn't instantly ridiculous to an average viewer watching it real time. So yeah, it's lazy. It's super lazy. I'm sorry if that hurts your feelings.

Great film BTW

Nah its pretty great. You were just most definitely expecting something different and more plot heavy

@@myfilms999 I was expecting it to be good, like all his other movies

You saw that video too huh? About what Fincher does to the viewer with his presentation? I believe its literally called "how David Fincher hijacks your eyes" lol. And before you try and swear youve never seen it and this is truly your original assessment, save your breath.