@@AnoNymous-dh2svi remember things when I was 5 lol its possible plus it was traumatic and lost her dad. It’s something she never forgot

@@FallenOrderx3 most adults (far beyond 21) barely remember anything before their teens, but major or random events from much earlier can stick with them

@@AnoNymous-dh2sv I remember plenty of things from when I was that age. Before, not much. Maybe some scattered memories.

​@@AnoNymous-dh2svNo there's a huge difference

@@AnoNymous-dh2sva 7 year old isn’t a toddler but go off

That's what stood out for me as well. She really only alluded to her father's death, without specifically saying he drowned or died, suggesting that even all those years later, it was still an incredibly painful loss for her.

You can see the trauma surfacing by how she shifts her entire position to huddled over/protecting her core as she gets closer to that point. Heartbreaking. Losing a parent has a profound effect on most people to begin with. Can’t imagine how losing one in this manner would’ve affected the course of one’s life.

Yup, dead on. Must've been so awful.

I can’t imagine the lifelong pain of loosing her dad. I am assuming he died. What a great father that he acted so quickly and precisely to get his little girl to safety. God bless her.

@@Welcome_To_Life It's *very* safe to assume he died, don't you think?

Yes

It also took a long time to deploy the boats for some reason so expect 12 hours to deploy

@Hunter Bridge The thing is even if they couldn’t deploy they still would have tried to stay on the lifeboats when the Titanic sank. That’s what happened with lifeboat A and C, both weren’t fully deployed but passengers/officers got on it when the Boat collapsed and 60+ people managed to survive. I put more blame on the Captain as well as he didn’t clarify the urgency of the situation so passengers were still not getting on the boat after being told the ship was sinking. Undermanning the lifeboats was stupid and they ended up trying to recall them back but it was too late by then.

Less people would have died if more boats were loaded at full

Is this really true though? They only had roughly 2 hours after the iceberg hit. To launch 2200 people into lifeboats in that tiny amount of time which requires a lot of manpower would be difficult. Remember that the first lifeboats didn't even get launched well over an hour after the iceberg hit.

So sad 😢 to lose a good, brave and noble father

I’d be more concerned with losing my life. I’d be plotting on how to escape.

They both probably saw each other again after they died. Everyone who had an NDE will tell you that.

@@josephmarzullor u a father

Who cares about the narrative when all of those people were lost. Anyone would have felt the same if it was their father. This is so deeply tragic there is no words

@@lizvtaz6 Well,the narrative IS about the loss of lives !! So what are you complaining about?

@@lizvtaz6damn you evil . It’s from her perspective

Someone doesn't know what a narrative is.

@@FreshUnlimitedMusic No, I am not evil. I am angry that the original comment uses the word "complain" when anybody would be more interested in the death of their own family members than about "the narrative". For me she did not stop the narrative she started talking about things that are more important. A lot of people seem to be misinterpreting my comment. I should have phrased it differently.

She’s from a bloodline of sadistic sexual deviants and child killers. This woman earned her rightful place in hell.

Sure you did

@@liqourspapi yes, that’s right.

@@liqourspapi r/nothingeverhappens

@@liqourspapi bellend

😥

Dam

Smart cookie

that's the movie you idiot. not real life. *xD* don't believe movies

Cool.

Agreed it​ would​ be​ as​ bad​ as​ WW2​ or​ Nam'

I bet many of the survivors went to therapy, if you could even get it back then

Especially eva...

@@MsVijay9999 She was young enough to not have a whole lot of understanding at the time, what was going on, to have a bad memories. If she had been a teenager, things would have been different for her.

@@JENDALL714 she was 7, I remember being 7. She had enough to be traumatized. If she where 1 or 2 maybe not.

It never leaves you. 56 years since I survived but my father died at sea. In my mind; it is like it was yesterday.

Yeah it's painful to see as it still haunted her. And now we are talking about the sub that imploded recently...so sad

​@@billchief397those greedy billionaires got exactly what they deserved. LEAVE WELL ENOUGH ALONE!

tech has improved since then😅now ships have radars installed in them to detect icebergs

If the Titanic had been equipped with sonar and radar technology, the tragedy would likely have not occurred. However, sonar was still in the experimental stage in 1912, and the development of radar was still more than 20 years in the future.

@@Vegan_scorpiooNo duhh

I guess humans dont learn. They will always put their own self before the lives of others

That's true the next time I'm captaining a boat with 2000 people on it I'll be sure to remember this interview!

She was my nan's best friend when they lived in Ilford. Funnily enough, Eva's voice sounds like my nan's, which is quite spine tingling as I lost my nan 12 years ago.

Yes, I love to listen to her speak....Loved the Photographs of her as a little girl, when she sailed on the Titanic....she was a Sweet Little Girl!

I Love Susan Atkins Despite losing her father at a young age, she grew up to be a Magistrate! She was also a professional singer, which I expect is how she met my nan, who was the same.

+I Love Susan Atkins yes I also❤

I Love Susan Atkins I know right she tells the story so great and it keeps you on the edge of your seat

thank you for this. I knew the title of the video was inaccurate and came here for this comment 👍

Replied just to make u remember about this old comment and the current sinking of the titanic submarine.

​@ayushmuke Here because of that too. The titanic seem to have something supernatural tied to it.

​@@6rap627é da nosso tempo ,veja que nesta época quando afundou nossos avós estavam nascendo ou já crianças pequenas e a história foi passando a cada filho nascido principalmente com a chegada da tecnologia.

@@ayushmuke yeah watched another video and been going down the rabbit hole of "final" interviews, CBS news did Millvina Dean dirty with the "crippling debt" click bait title.

So sad. Never knew this😢

I think the death toll would of been far less but I’m sure some still wouldn’t have made it. The panic and not enough time

@@WilleJamesHuff true. But again, it wouldn’t have been the tragedy that it was because the owners opted for optics and aesthetics over safety (which was why the ship didn’t have enough lifeboats for everyone on board). And the captain or the owners or whoever cared more about reaching NYC and beating a record (if I recall correctly) again instead of choosing safety and good common sense (traveling through the Atlantic at night in freezing temperatures called for a more cautious approach). The ship sank in about 2.5 hours. If they had a safety protocol in place, the crew would’ve known how to handle an emergency situation and could’ve gotten more or less all the people safely onto the lifeboats on time. Instead, they thought the Titanic was unsinkable so they initially didn’t even realize that the ship was sinking. It was only later when the lower compartments kept filling with water one after another, that the “watertight” doors couldn’t contain/stop, and the ship started weighing downwards in the front that they realized that the ship was sinking. So, they lost some precious time in that confusion as well. It’s good to have confidence, but they should’ve thought more practically that technically anything that floats can sink. They should’ve had a more modest or at least realistic perspective of things. I only say this so we can learn from the past, which is the whole point behind revisiting mistakes.

Definitely would have been deaths, particularly among the engineers and postal workers who were deep within the ship. But most would have lived for sure. Who thought that life boars for 800 was a good idea. If that was the case, why have any? No point. If the boat would need to use them, you’re saying over half will have to die no matter what.

​​​​​@@adamlewis5700they didn't think they would need enough lifeboats for everyone because the idea was to use them to transport people to a rescue ship or to shore, and then bring the boats back to get more people. Titanic sank in about 2 and a half hours, which was a lot quicker than the people who designed the ship anticipated. They thought that the design of the ship with its watertight compartments would, in the event of a disaster, make it very difficult to sink the ship and if it did sink it would take a long time. They thought rescuers would have plenty of time to reach the ship. At any rate, even if they did have enough lifeboats for everyone, sending people into the frigid north Atlantic in the dark in flimsy boats was dangerous as well and some people succumbed to the cold before getting rescued. It was never plan A to evacuate everyone and have them sit out in the ocean for hours. Anyways, if they had more lifeboats they may not have had time to launch all of them because they required the use of a complex system of davits to lower the boats that the crew had little experience with. As it was, they never successfully launched all the lifeboats. The last two were cut free and floated into the water as the ship was going under. "Remember that on not more than one day in twelve all the year round can you lower a boat. With the roll of the ship the boats swing and will be smashed to smithereens against the side of the ship. The boats then should not be overdone ... It might be fairly supposed that had the Titanic floated for twelve hours all might have been saved." Admiral Lord Charles Beresford to the British House of Commons, one month after the disaster.

I doubt everyone would have survived. The evacuation was chaotic, and the crew hadn't practiced evacuating the passengers. Probably the best example of how unprepared they were is the fact that First Officer Murdoch and Second Officer Lightoller interpreted Captain Smith's order to evacuate women and children first differently. Fewer people would have died, but it still would have been a lot of people.

Not talking about stuff doesn't seem very mature to me, but I get your point.

@@aicerg I just meant that in a crises, some partners in a marriage (and obviously good parents) can emotionally move from their own panic and think of their children who are there in the crises with them. If Eva hadn't been traveling with them, I'm sure words would have been exchanged. Attuned people can read body language. Some learn and communicate in a kinesthetic way (usually athletically inclined people). My father was an officer in the Navy and specialized in encryption and espionage (yes, really). He told me as a kid, that there are more ways to communicate than by talking. Sometimes people "feel" what you feel. He taught me to relax and know that you don't have to fill every moment or moments of silence with words and that others sometimes appreciate your presence but don't want any conversation - like when you're at a funeral or trying to comfort someone grieving. Words in those situations make things worse. As far as communication in a marriage, I do think people who are blessed with a good partnership (unbroken trust, respect and love) will trust the other when there is NO time for words, like in an emergency.

​​@@aicergYou dumbass..

no, she did not live the blitz wtf

@ihabhatim5825 What are you stupid or something? The Titanic sank in 1912 before WW1 so she even went through that as a child and then the Blitz 20 years later.

Darth, the Second World War

​@ihabhatim5825 no she did you mong .😂😂😂😂🙈🙈🙈

And the first world war too.

she died many years ago I'm sure they had a great Reunion

@@craigusselman546 Where?

@@redrooster1908heaven

Not really, shes far too reserved for theatrics I would say.

Why would she care?

She already mentioned that the titanic is the grave of her father and many others and it should be left alone.

@@michaelbailey8729 She'd probably say "It seems to me this current event is of the same foolishness as the Titanic itself."

I am so genuinely curious why you think this. Cause it sounds pretty dumb in my head no offense to you. That is not her problem and doesn't relate?

Watching it after the Titan disaster 🥲

💕🙏🏻🌟

Narrator: they did not rest in peace

🕊️🙏🏻🕊️🙏🏻🕊️

accent*

I didn't take it that you were referring to her 'accent" as the "reply" below suggested. She has a wonderful "story voice" that draws the listener in and informs with interest!

Educated British

story voice?

@@JoeVington basically the tones of her voice while saying certain parts

If you survive something like titanic, at that point, the only thing that can kill you is old age lol

@@296jayce ugh but i would hate to like live with ptsd. i can only imagine how she feels

@@malloreighg6974 right??? geez i can’t imagine, i’d feel haunted by the ship in a way

@@emi0404 just the sounds and seeing all the dead bodies in the water ☹️😳

I imagine it haunted the survivors from that night until their death.

Jim jam pizza jam we will go for to such a, a

Interview was in 1990, so it would've been 78 actually, but nonetheless, just remarkable that she could still recall everything in great detail.

​@@interstate3551actually this was in 1992 and she was 87 by this time even if it was in 1990 she would have been 85 then because she died in 1996 at the age of 91

💕🙏🏻🌟

"keep them from spazzing out" how articulate😂😂

@@colin8770 hahahaha

Still just as traumatic if not more. It just makes them able to get in the boat and be calm for the moment. The moment they realize he's not following it'll be 10 times worse

@@chumon1992the point is he stayed strong for them so they wouldn’t feel guilt or fight about who gets to go in the boat etc and we’re able to stay calm in a dangerous situation

@mariahspapaya I see what you're saying but they absolutely WOULD feel guilt. Probably for the rest of their lives. Survivors guilt is a VERY real thing especially when it comes to family. I'm not saying what he did was wrong, what I'm saying is, psychologically in the long run it wouldn't make a difference.

Not exactly some of the survivors died soon after the tragedy. I've been looking at quite a lot of videos about the sinking there were tons of survivors who lived shortly meeting unfortunate events like car hitting, food poisoning, being sick with a disease, suicides, etc.

you can say they instead of he or she, it's much easier, i promise.

@@damndorothea stop with your pronoun bs.

The chef who got drunk and rode the stern into the water survived and went on to be a chef on other cruise lines before passing on in 1956

RMS Titanic bye bye

@Nagito Komaeda what??

@@JoeVington She was trying too be funny but failed miserably at doing so.

@@Sauron66633 lol yep

Amen 🙏🏻🕊️🙏🏻🕊️🙏🏻

Beautiful ❤

It's a simple choice as a loving parent. However, very hard to fathom the pain to let your children go for the last time. Given the choice, my kids would go on to live over my own life every time.

Her father didn't get in because it was customary at that time to put women and children first. He didn't give up his place in the lifeboat for his wife and child, he did it for some other woman or child, because that was the social convention at the time.

A typo in your Scripture reference, Just FYI.

@@baptist1644 Thank you....!!!! Yes, it is John. I'll do a correction. Thanks again. (I must wear my glasses more when I'm typing!!)

I only heard about this today. When the guy (Baldrick from Blackadder I think his name is Tony) said the man took his life and I saw the age he was from the gravestone I was shocked. Like 77. Poor gentleman.

I'm sure she would appreciate your comment if she were still alive to read it.

🙏🙏🙏🙏she looks like an angel

I agree

Damn, I never knew that

Part of the reason it took so long was probably because they were trying to make sure women and children were in fact first. If they had enough lifeboats then that process could have gone a lot faster with less panic. Of course that's just speculation on my part though. There's no real way to know for sure.

It's in our genes.

@@ljones2087 mines too🤝🏾

And you left this comment 7 month ago

@@souvikdutta3153 the plot thickens 😂

Souvik Dutta 🤯🤯🤯

You sound like you were the only 7 year old kid in the world when she died lmao

7 is a lucky number

Yeah but she was a burden for taxpayers.

@@azazello1784 How so. She and her family have probably contributed more in Tax than you and your family will in your miserable little lifetime.

@@azazello1784 How so?

@@bowtoyoursensei554 She lived till a very old age so I am sure she retired long ago.

ronald nelson This wasn't Millvina though.

She was 2 months old wasn't she? She went to her loved ones in 2009.

The youngest survivor and the last to die, but Edith Brown Haisman who was 15 at the time and died in 1997, lived to 100 years old. I think there were one or two other survivors who became centurions.

Most of the healthy young male survivors served in the trenches of WW1. The war only broke out 2 years later.

Hey bruuhh