The name Maori was created by General Assembly of New Zealand in the Maori Real Estate Management Act 1867. In this act the word "Maori" shall mean aboriginal native of New Zealand and shall include haft-caste. Under Allodial title to Te Ika-a-Maui or Aotearoa is through whakapapa, occupation and discovery. Aboriginal natives did not discover New Zealand. Te Ika-a-Maui was discovered Firstly by Maui and his brothers and named all the parts of the islands. Secondly Kupe arrived and called it Aotearoa. On the 14th Jan 1839 Hobson while in Australia prepared the documentation for the Treaty of Waitangi and on this date annexed New Zealand by discovery by Abel Tasman through Australia before our ariki and rangatira signed the Treaty of Waitangi on Thurs 6th Feb 1840 and lost their rangatiratanga (sovereignty not governance) to be a mea signatory to a document that they had no involvement in and became a mea trustee and shareholder of their Allodial land title under the crown agents MLC run by colonial governance Pakeha Magna Carta not Maori Magna Carta.
@DW_Kiwi Жыл бұрын
All I got from this was your statement "on Thurs 6th Feb 1840 and lost their rangatiratanga (sovereignty not governance)" The Maori lost their sovereignty. So agree!!
@willgeorge5644 Жыл бұрын
I believe we should ALL rule ourselves, part of rangatiratanga? It's part of direct democracy. What the world has now is representative democracy, is not only open to abuse but encourages it. Our government has reached a stage where it's a club, and we can only vote for the people we dislike least. Anybody we like has no chance of getting near government, and they are too wise to try.
@michaeledgar6118 Жыл бұрын
Congratulations to the bloke who recorded this incomprehensible monologue
@dgm25934 ай бұрын
Wrong pakeha! 540 chiefs who signed the Maori version of the treaty did not cede sovereignty!
@amomentsnotice15 күн бұрын
Oh really, Caucasians were originally nomadic barbarian cannibals that migrated from the eastern regions of Europe known today as the Caucasus Mountain Ranges, western Europe & the continent of Europe Eurasia was originally established & inhabited by melanated black ancestors long before the Science of Pheomelanin came through the ancient history of Climate Change during the last Ice Age some 20K+ years ago. Foreign rulership of Ancient Kemet is 3600+ years old to this day now known as Egypt, the same exact programme played out on all Indigenous Communities around the Planet. It’s nothing new what New Zealand is doing politically in 2024 or any other year before or after, every Foreign Nation that was in the rulership of Ancient Kemet are the same Nations playing the same games in 2024. 👁️🕳️⚫️🌍🌎🌏👽☠️✨🖕🏽
@rihipaeahughes98313 ай бұрын
Please say something that will impact the kaupapa
@rihipaeahughes98313 ай бұрын
That was awesome ❤
@richardmartin3127Ай бұрын
This is 6 years plus old.
@tangihorofitzgerald9156 ай бұрын
The very first people of the world all spoke the same language until the Holy Spirit took charge and sent the WORD.
@rihipaeahughes98313 ай бұрын
Omg wtf
@rihipaeahughes98313 ай бұрын
What of the first Tiriti
@davethewave724810 ай бұрын
'They [the Maori] didn't know how much interests they owned in the land, and they didn't know where there interests were' [when the Crown agents were buying land in central NI]. Anyone see how absurd this all is? What kind of ownership is it where the owner is ignorant of what they own. Looks like the agents were only looking to extinguish later claims that *could* at a later date be made by Maori in the area. The country was undeveloped, the state/ govt had not much money, the land was waste land... need I go on. This speaker is projecting current values onto the past.
@DW_Kiwi Жыл бұрын
At 52:12 "Sovereignty is about the ability to exercise power" Rubbish. Sovereignty was the ability to legitimately exercise Common Law. to control the Lawlessness of New Zealand. Thereby offering protection to both parties.
@user-mc6js8or3r Жыл бұрын
True that but became a corporate investment for past n present politricksters under democrappy
@matiupyro6606 ай бұрын
Yeah I agree😁
@rihipaeahughes98313 ай бұрын
Maori prejudice themselves by default answering to documents drawn up the British
@dennisconroy34593 жыл бұрын
This is undescribable about the taking off land from the Maori. The Maori concept is you cannot not sell your mother the land ,but to share mother Earth with other ethnic people under Tikanga and customary rights. What the Colonialist did they approached minors and separated the land from the Maori ,this is absolutely wrong. Now Maori are standing on the outside of their land, separated from creating a wealth to their well-being. A remedy is in need and has not been rectified yet. Statutory cloaking does not give the Government the excuse that they may think that is satisfactory to themselves. Maori land court deliberately invented to benefit Colonialists and used as a deliberate tool to attempt to take land of Maori , A lot of land has never bought, The Maori were not selling land it was the vision of the Colonialist, not Maori.
@DW_Kiwi Жыл бұрын
The "Treaty " says based your comments that you are racist
@user-mc6js8or3r Жыл бұрын
Truth n nothing but the truth will set NZ free, , , n remove the profiteers
@Matikemai20406 ай бұрын
@@DW_Kiwiwho f arkin caree 😂😂😂
@kingfillins41176 ай бұрын
Any sell it? Maori didn’t have money. They would massacre the whole iwi and take the land though.
@Matikemai20406 ай бұрын
@@kingfillins4117 aiiing stop the cap
@whakakai-wanangaongapuhi73966 жыл бұрын
Tena koutou katoa......☠️
@tribesmann88007 жыл бұрын
The only remedy is to kick the crown out of the drivers seat, they will never ever give up the sovereignty they stole from Maori. Go back to the signing ( which is legitimate ) to King William IV, the original partnership 1834. The words ' Maori, Iwi, waitangi tribunal ' etc .... belong to the crown, i.e the crown own maori ( invented by pakeha 1945 ) and Iwi also owned by the crown. The pakeha have been underhanded and will always work for their own interests under this system while maori go round and round in circles under them.
@andrewbell9039 Жыл бұрын
makes sense for Brand Aotearoa ?? their little playground in the Pacific.
@DW_Kiwi Жыл бұрын
So wrong. Stole!!! You do not know or have been taught wrongly about actual history.
@DW_Kiwi Жыл бұрын
Your ancestors "signed" it away!!
@dgm25934 ай бұрын
No they didnt. Your ancestors cheated and frauded the treaty. You thieving liers.
@NellbyNqture2 жыл бұрын
38:00
@rihipaeahughes98313 ай бұрын
So annoying the sound of pakeha mispronouncing Te reo
@richardmartin3127Ай бұрын
Recon, more insulting even after all these years....yet laziness still prevalent.
@davethewave724810 ай бұрын
The whole point of the Treaty was for Maori to wilfully sell surplus lands in order to settle immigrants. The intention of the Crown was for Maori to enjoy the privileges of civil society while that society grew around them.
@rihipaeahughes98313 ай бұрын
Underhanded corrupt annexation of Maoriland
@rihipaeahughes98313 ай бұрын
Pakeha are the major owners of Maori coastal land originally annexed by government institutions
@davethewave72483 ай бұрын
@@rihipaeahughes9831 Most land was bought by the Crown or settlers.
@tonymorgan92404 жыл бұрын
Not Pakeha I am a maori of full blood I can trace my whakapapa back to the 7 tribes, Son of Joseph Eiphraim Try and dispute if you can I feel you know nothing about anything suck it up and get a life ???
@StGammon772 жыл бұрын
The Israelite tribes were white, you know, the ones who were enslaved for 400 yars by the black Pharoahs, prove it wrong suck it up you had 800 yrs to build an empire and you were still in survival mode when Europeans came to settle.
@stephenlennon73692 жыл бұрын
Buhahaha 😂
@user-mc6js8or3r Жыл бұрын
And the cow flew ova the moon 😂🎉
@gayjacob165710 ай бұрын
How did you come by the name Tony Morgan?
@richardmartin3127Ай бұрын
Stop it... you're discredited you're whakapapa. With European names. No full blooded MAORI is in existence.
@margaloosboy2572 жыл бұрын
stupid Maoris settling withthe rip off Pākehā shame on u . Te Atiawa 🖕
@rihipaeahughes98313 ай бұрын
Govt created institutions like lands and survey, gave small shareholders a way to sell their shares without consulting other landowners imagine what happened next, lands and survey leased the land and dissolved the major shareholders
@rihipaeahughes98313 ай бұрын
Ĥongi hika was a missionary who wiped out many tangata in the outer BOIslands down to ngatiwhatua, he was indoctrined into British warmongering against his own people, I patu haere koe
@davethewave724810 ай бұрын
Maori land was sold largely at a nominal price. This land was then on-sold to settlers. The revenue raised enabled the building of the state and the infrastructure, which was meant to better the life of all. Historical imagination is required here... not a 'correct' reading of the past [on present terms].
@GS-wz1ud3 жыл бұрын
Under article 3, Maori are entitled to all the rights and freedoms of British subjects. The Magna Carta is a subset of rights within article 3, where the rulers and the ruled were subject to the same law. This precept, that everyone is subject to the same rules of law is a fundamental notion of democracy. This raises a number of questions regarding the failure of the Treaty, where a tyrannical Crown enacted draconian legislation, and systematically undermined Maori rights. Starting with treaty principles of good faith, fair dealing and proper process. Why can't these principles be expanded to include the Magna Carta, to give the TOW some teeth. What about BORA, where the TOW Act must be interpreted in a manner that is consistent with the rights and freedoms in BORA. BORA is a subset of rights within article 3, and article 3 under the TOW Act must be interpreted in a manner that is consistent with the rights in BORA. That seems reasonable, because the whole concept of the rule of law is present in both documents. Power must be exercise on a principle of law: rather than on a whim.
@GS-wz1ud3 жыл бұрын
Rule of law is in the Magna Cater chapter 29, included in section 3 of the ILAA 1988.
@operationgoodoil81312 жыл бұрын
You will find that the word "Maori" did not pertain to any specific ethnic group or groups with an honest interpretation of Ti Tiriti. Tangata Maori is translated as ordinary people or natural people. The meaning and the principle that was being conveyed was "natural persons" a long standing legal definition of a breathing living or "alive" human being. Therefore the meaning was that all new Zealanders were to have equal rights and privileges as a citizen of England. It was the bedrock for the constitution of governance, an exact replication but only unique in that it is an entirely different country. The only country in the world where this happened, the condescending racists want to make out like the tribesman didn't know what was going on. They knew, in fact they had discussed it in great detail and I am sure that such a profound and unique occurrence would of had much input from them.
@GS-wz1ud2 жыл бұрын
@@operationgoodoil8131 Maori and Pakeha are in the preamble, and the use of the term is consistent with the goal of establishing a government. Agree with the rest of your oplnlon., and include some Northern Iwi now claim their tupuna didn't cede sovereignty as well. Can't call them racist; delusional perhaps, but not racist.
@davethewave724810 ай бұрын
'In many cases land purchases weren't robust and fair'. OK, so the better educated among the Europeans advocated some kind of protectionsim. Many Maori themselves resented such... they wanted complete equality before the law. Once many chiefs got their name on the title, they were only too keen to sell the and [often surplus undeveloped wasteland to them] for short term gains.
@Thewandereringanzac5 ай бұрын
Where do you get your info from? I want sources so that I can read and be educated because every comment section you appear in you say things that no historian is saying. You’re either dead wrong, making up your own version of history, or know something these historians don’t.
@davethewave72485 ай бұрын
@@Thewandereringanzac You need to take into account the notion of a 'paradigm shift' [read Thomas Kuhn on this]. A paradigm is a set of concepts by which most make the mass of information that surrounds us intelligible. All those 'historians' your refer to are most likely subscribers to the new paradigm [remember, there has been an intellectual revolution of late]. Given this, you need to read with an open mind the original source material. Go back to the letters, diaries, journals, testimonies... and the further back the better. There you get your history straight from the horses mouth - warts and all~~
@davethewave72485 ай бұрын
@@Thewandereringanzac R. D . Crosby, Colenso, Cowan, Polack, Reeves, Grey, Gorst, Sinclair, King, Ward, Buick to name just a few~
@Thewandereringanzac5 ай бұрын
@@davethewave7248 cool thanks for that ✌️
@rihipaeahughes98313 ай бұрын
Landless in a multiply owned land system created by a pakeha lead governance, natives don't stand a chance after that Treaty signing fiasco that was drawn up on the ship that carried it here