😎

Thanks.

@@yoprofmatt 🙂

@@yoprofmatt TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE. BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental (ON BALANCE). Consider TIME (AND time dilation) ON BALANCE. E=mc2 is taken directly from F=ma. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE, AND consider what is the speed of light (c) ON BALANCE !! Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. I have also explained (or proven) why THE PLANETS move away very, very, very, very slightly in relation to the Sun, AS I have explained the cosmological redshift as well !!! ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND necessarily) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). CLEARLY, gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites (ON BALANCE); as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. By Frank DiMeglio FUNDAMENTALLY UNDERSTANDING TIME AND WHAT IS BALANCED ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL FORCE/energy: CLEARLY, gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites (ON BALANCE); as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Consider TIME (AND time dilation) ON BALANCE. TIME is necessarily possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND necessarily) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental (ON BALANCE). Consider TIME (AND time dilation) ON BALANCE. E=mc2 is taken directly from F=ma. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE, AND consider what is the speed of light (c) ON BALANCE !! Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. I have explained why THE PLANETS move away very, very, very, very slightly in relation to what is the Sun !! I have explained the cosmological redshift. Since what is the Moon is about one quarter of the size of the Earth, the density of the Sun must be (and is) about one quarter that of the Earth ON BALANCE. It is proven, in fact. Indeed, given what constitutes DIRECT comparison, what is the fully illuminated (AND setting/WHITE) Moon is the SAME SIZE as what is the orange (AND setting) Sun. They are, in fact, the SAME SIZE as what is THE EYE ON BALANCE. (Notice what is the TRANSLUCENT blue sky ON BALANCE.) SO, the Moon is a land form that is necessarily about one quarter the size of what is THE EARTH. Indeed, think lava. Great. Carefully consider what is the BALANCED BODILY/VISUAL EXPERIENCE of the man AND THE EYE (ON BALANCE) who IS, in fact, standing on what is THE EARTH/ground (in what is a BALANCED relation to/with the MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of SPACE). Great. E=mc2 IS F=ma !! The average ocean tide is two meters. That is at EYE LEVEL/body height !! (Moreover, in the middle of the ocean, the tide is two feet, or maybe three feet.) The tides are CLEARLY and necessarily proven to involve what is BALANCED electroMAGNETIC/gravitational force/ENERGY ON BALANCE. The BULK DENSITY of the Moon IS comparable to that of (volcanic) basaltic LAVAs on the Earth. The energy density of LAVA IS about THREE TIMES that of water !! LOOK up at what is the blue sky (ON BALANCE) !! Think about it ALL. So, on balance, we would multiply times two in order to then derive the surface gravity of WHAT IS THE EARTH/ground (in direct comparison). The surface gravity ON the Earth is then accurately determined to be six times greater. A person weighs about one sixth as much on the Moon. Notice, on balance, that what is the Moon IS ALSO BLUE. The illumination regarding what is the orange AND setting Sun AND the illumination regarding what is the fully illuminated AND setting/WHITE MOON does appear to also constitute a match. Said Moon and said Sun CLEARLY manifest at EYE LEVEL/body height. Excellent. It is proven. Proportionally, on balance, the Moon is a LAND form. Excellent. Notice that the curvature or shape of said Moon matches that of what is THE EARTH/ground (given what is a clear horizon, of course). By Frank DiMeglio

I'm good. Very nice to meet another Fanderson™ from India. Cheers, Dr. A