No video

The Maxx "C" Errata

  Рет қаралды 116,468

Farfa

Farfa

Жыл бұрын

Patreon 👉 / farfa
Twitch 👉 / farfa
Discord 👉 / discord
Twitter 👉 / farfaygo
Merch 👉 store.streamel...
TikTok 👉 / farfadespair
Links 👉 beacons.ai/farfa
TCGPlayer link! 👉 bit.ly/2UCHS5K
Contact 👉 Contact@farfa.xyz
Edited by: Blue Capricorn
#Farfa #Yugioh #MasterDuel

Пікірлер: 1 200
@waffiie
@waffiie Жыл бұрын
farfa threatening to become a hello kitty channel as if thats not exactly what we’ve always wanted
@HaxDotCombo
@HaxDotCombo Жыл бұрын
Legacy of Fur-fa
@Zenbon111
@Zenbon111 Жыл бұрын
Just proves how many weirdos in the community
@Sad-Lesbian
@Sad-Lesbian Жыл бұрын
Hello Tantan
@Jyxero
@Jyxero Жыл бұрын
Gay Dante pass is close to that dream
@DreZato12
@DreZato12 Жыл бұрын
farfa fur hire?
@mikewilliams8698
@mikewilliams8698 Жыл бұрын
The funny thing about having Maxx C block other hand traps is that it makes the Maxx C challenge viable.
@hurrdurrmurrgurr
@hurrdurrmurrgurr Жыл бұрын
It also means the card becomes worthless against FTK decks so I'm not a fan of this one.
@lija-everything
@lija-everything Жыл бұрын
Its hilarious power level aside, the most frustrating thing about Maxx "C" has always been that it's impossible to play around because they can simply chain it to a special summon effect and always AT LEAST go card neutral. I've always thought it would make a lot more sense if it worked like Droll & Lock Bird. If your opponent special summons a monster: you can discard this card, etc, etc. The card would still be extremely strong (and likely need more nerfs on top of this), but you would actually have a chance to go minus using it. It's always a pet peeve for me in any video game when there is a card/move that is literally IMPOSSIBLE to use poorly. Just click Yes and win.
@lija-everything
@lija-everything Жыл бұрын
So this one is in the video! Yeah it is pretty deck dependent, but many handtraps are. so 🤷‍♀
@TurtonatorGuy
@TurtonatorGuy Жыл бұрын
Imma chain it to pot of duality just to prove you wrong 😎
@DANCERcow
@DANCERcow Жыл бұрын
Sounds like you just need to get better at the game!
@gudamgirexia1000
@gudamgirexia1000 Жыл бұрын
Change your pfp we need full power
@trueblueryu5713
@trueblueryu5713 Жыл бұрын
I definitely see a lot of scrubs just fire it off during my standby phase when I have an out to it or way to play around to it, so there are definitely ways to use it poorly, and they find those ways
@Ninetale3z
@Ninetale3z Жыл бұрын
Not gonna lie. I like the extra deck only errata more than the go second peak power. It puts in theme with the other C hand traps with them being focused on extra deck disruption. It even opens up more dead carding starts against them. Kosmo and UA can play under that for example.
@justsightseeing1
@justsightseeing1 Жыл бұрын
Traptrix generally only summon 2 ED but need the extra special summon for brigadine & sera search.. Which totals of 4 card drawn. At that situation they might just be forfeited.. Cutting it into 2 (if maxxc get errata to only draw for ED SS) will make it more fair
@VenatorXVenator
@VenatorXVenator Жыл бұрын
Honestly both 9 and that one should be the errata combined.
@colmecolwag
@colmecolwag Жыл бұрын
I play UA and that's why I don't like that errata, lol UA could still finish a board on like three interactions or negates and that errata just basically makes it useless against that specific deck (Not that it'd be meta if this errata passed but it just makes it feel weird just Ignoring the card entirely like Floo does)
@azurabbit12
@azurabbit12 Жыл бұрын
@@colmecolwag some decks will just be inherently better against certain hand traps, that's just a quirk of how the game is, and that can be a useful and powerful perk of certain decks, Kash and Floo can play under Shifter, some decks don't get hit by Ghost Belle or Nibiru at all, I don't see why some casual tier decks being good against a specific hand trap would be bad
@ScrubTheNub
@ScrubTheNub Жыл бұрын
@@colmecolwag so your argument is “hey my decks a bit better now” like what?? Lmao If you can’t break my U.A board (which with MOST hands isn’t going to give you much. Best case scenario probably a pop and 2 negates if you can get both field spells in hand) without Maxx C then your deck just fucking sucks dude lmao.
@jps_user20
@jps_user20 Жыл бұрын
The number 9 actually make it function like Dimension shifter in a sense that you only need it to deter your opponent from comboing and not a "win more" card and i like that kind of effect
@eclipse3479
@eclipse3479 Жыл бұрын
It still skips turns, whats there to like ?
@jps_user20
@jps_user20 Жыл бұрын
@@eclipse3479 1. it's not a win more card anymore. 2. it's actually can encourage smart planning on turn 2 player to not wipe the turn-1 player before the battle phase unless they want to get counter maxx-c'ed. 3. In case of What about Nibiru / Evenly, make it "If you control 1 or less card" for activation condition instead of "no card"
@poro9084
@poro9084 Жыл бұрын
@@eclipse3479 depend on decks, rikka can essentialy give your oponent only one card if you drop it early, also some decks have line how to still get board while not giving oponent too many cards, but nowadays, when kashtira which has one card combo.. well
@eclipse3479
@eclipse3479 Жыл бұрын
@@jps_user20 it never was a win more card? Just because you can only use it going second doesnt make it fair. U still skip my turn if i dont have the out. I dont understand how people still argument for this card. The best errata was the, you can draw 2 max. And thats still way to broken
@alexanderjackson7948
@alexanderjackson7948 Жыл бұрын
But even then it's still a generic staple that's broken beyond belief that deters creative deck building.
@TheFallenStarlight
@TheFallenStarlight Жыл бұрын
The errata where, while you control no cards you may activate Maxx C sounds very good. It's annoying facing Maxx C and they have board.
@awakusutv1574
@awakusutv1574 Жыл бұрын
Now we only need to combine the two best suggestions from the video: "While you control no cards (Quick Effect): You can send this card from your hand to the GY; this turn, each time your opponent Special Summons a monster(s) from the Extra Deck, immediately draw 1 card. You can only use this effect of "Maxx "C"" once per turn."
@lorenzotanzi9851
@lorenzotanzi9851 Жыл бұрын
Hard once per turn? Too generous. Slap a once per duel on it just in case
@hurrdurrmurrgurr
@hurrdurrmurrgurr Жыл бұрын
@@lorenzotanzi9851 How often do you plan to have 0 cards without getting otk'd that a once per duel clause would be needed?
@lorenzotanzi9851
@lorenzotanzi9851 Жыл бұрын
@@hurrdurrmurrgurr I wasn't serious😂😂 imo maxx c could be unbanned at 1 copy and would probably be fine
@awakusutv1574
@awakusutv1574 Жыл бұрын
I played in 2017/2018 when Maxx C actually was at 1 and it has been super toxic in my experience, which is why it only makes sense at 3 or 0 imo. But I respect, if you have a different opinion about that. Also, why not make the errata unique then and turn it into a "once per match"? :v
@lorenzotanzi9851
@lorenzotanzi9851 Жыл бұрын
@@awakusutv1574 you can still add it back, that's the point. Also, being at three means that you have to take into account an higher probability of encountering it multiple times during a duel, like being under a dimensional shifter lock with floowandereeze, if it's one, people still have to keep it in mind while deckbuilding, but once you get rid of it, that's it, otherwise at 3 you can still be locked for more turns. And since it would be a hopt, you can still get it back, it would be overkill but I think that otherwise it would never be unbanned at least here in TCG. obviously, this is my opinion, and I respect yours, and everyone who disagrees while giving a constructive reply.
@chrispybx
@chrispybx Жыл бұрын
The best errata for Maxx C would be “this card is now forbidden from tournament play forever”
@mulundamunika8215
@mulundamunika8215 Жыл бұрын
naw the best errata would be "cards with this text or similar will be banned and not allowed to be printed"
@shaxplosion
@shaxplosion Жыл бұрын
"You cannot activate this card."
@HairSaves
@HairSaves 7 ай бұрын
“This card cannot be used in a Duel” ahh errata
@veneroluigi8157
@veneroluigi8157 Жыл бұрын
Next turn, you can only summon as many cards you drew by this effect.
@veneroluigi8157
@veneroluigi8157 Жыл бұрын
@aaa ddd Yeah, it also need a clause with something like "you can't active this card if you control more card than you opponent" or that the clause to be "summon/set"
@arandomcrusader8822
@arandomcrusader8822 Жыл бұрын
​@@veneroluigi8157 or "You can only activate this card if the total cards in your hand and field are less than your opponent's"
@Shazam1998
@Shazam1998 Жыл бұрын
The issue I often see is that people try to errata cards too hard. If you nerf it to a point where its no longer worth actually playing youve basically just removed a card from the format, and if thats the case you could have just banned it to begin with.
@dragonmaster951753
@dragonmaster951753 Жыл бұрын
If Maxx c draws cards it'll likely see play. How do we know this? Most of the pot cards see play and they are all nerfed versions of greed
@Zero2HeroX
@Zero2HeroX Жыл бұрын
Say that to konami lmao
@dylanreeves4339
@dylanreeves4339 Жыл бұрын
I agree. I mean, look at CED: why it had to get an errata not withstanding, the card card went from one of the best cards ever printed, to a bookmark.
@YukiFubuki.
@YukiFubuki. Жыл бұрын
For some people that’s the entire point though, they’ll only allow the card to see play if it’s practically unusable because they never want it to be usable in the first place Had someone on the comments of farfa maxx c ban video try to argue that it’s only fair that they should be able to combo off as much as they want and maxx c being popped off of them should not be able to effectively do anything It’s almost like they’re trying to scapegoat their unhealthy solitaire obsession behind something else
@SuperSayianWarrior
@SuperSayianWarrior Жыл бұрын
​@Dylan Reeves A better example would be Crush Card Virus. Card went from Format defining to be a +3 for a Lightsworn Player since it forced them to destroy 3 wulf from deck, sending them from deck to GY thus letting them summon the Card.
@Hoshino_Aoi
@Hoshino_Aoi Жыл бұрын
I like #9, not only it's in line with the line of thought that "Maxx C can stop combo deck" that many people have, but it also doesn't let combo deck drop the same Maxx C on your head when you trying to play around like 3 4 disruptions.
@alexanderjackson7948
@alexanderjackson7948 Жыл бұрын
What would you think about maxx "C" limiting your amount of summons per turn for the rest of the duel then? (Only 2-3 per turn). It would essentially be impossible to play the card in combo decks then.
@Hoshino_Aoi
@Hoshino_Aoi Жыл бұрын
​@@alexanderjackson7948 idk, to be honest, the "can't activate this card if you control other cards" seems more like what would happens if Maxx "C" ever got errata, since it's very simple, clear, straight to the point, and very Konami like.
@SnowyGrass
@SnowyGrass Жыл бұрын
@@alexanderjackson7948 might as well just ban the card since no one would play it then.
@alexanderjackson7948
@alexanderjackson7948 Жыл бұрын
What about labrynth or eldlich or branded?
@cybzer0560
@cybzer0560 Жыл бұрын
You didn't solve anything. Just made Maxx C a hard going 2nd card that's still main deck. Honestly, it's no different from Evenly, kind of. I can still Niberu you and do everything the same going 2nd before and after this errata. I can't use it first, that's fine because it was just the cherry on top of the cake. You still have to deal with my board and whatever handtrap i may have or s/t cards.
@Sup3rNo7a
@Sup3rNo7a Жыл бұрын
I've personally taken a liking to a "skip your next battle phase", or "your opponent takes no damage until their next draw phase" sort of errata. That way the effect is mostly unchanged, but it guarantees that your opponent will get another turn if they do decide to just stop.
@dubbyplays
@dubbyplays Жыл бұрын
that way though it becomes a literal "lost coin toss? chain maxx c so I can steal your first turn"
@drewbabe
@drewbabe Жыл бұрын
that doesn't really mean anything because chances are that the end result is you're gonna have a 6 card hand, a loaded graveyard, and 3+ disruptions on board and your opponent will have maybe 2-3 cards in hand and an empty board and _maybe_ a loaded graveyard when they start their turn 3. It's still way too much advantage. I mean look at every Runick quick play card, which all make you skip your next battle phase. Any deck playing a sizable Runick engine plays almost all of those spells and dedicated Runick strategies play all of them. Skipping a battle phase means little since you get to set up your board and draw 3 (or more!) during your turn, and you also get to draw 3 on your opponent's turn. You can just out-advantage your opponent forever unless they have an out for Fountain (usually has to be a non-target, non-destruction out, too, since Huginn and Muginn exist.) Maxx "C" is a turbo version of this dynamic where, if they don't have an answer for it (like Ash or Called By) you don't just draw 3, you either get to completely skip your opponent's turn or you get to draw 3+ cuz with the exception of like Floo, True Draco, and Monarchs, every deck is gonna need to special summon at least a few times to set up a board that isn't pathetic. Mirrorjade pass is a best case scenario where you go card neutral and have decent disruption but it's still gonna be nothing compared to what you could have set up.
@dubbyplays
@dubbyplays Жыл бұрын
@@drewbabe good point
@ogbarcode8777
@ogbarcode8777 Жыл бұрын
Literally doesnt change anything it still ends your turn and allows your opponent to start a one card combo that ends on a board thats gonna stop whatever you are able to play
@lazimhuq8774
@lazimhuq8774 Жыл бұрын
Runick maxx c
@MrNovascar
@MrNovascar Жыл бұрын
I personally love the 4th, it turns off all other handtraps in return and would basically negate your own board when used turn 2 if you go first. Other suggestion: It summons itself and needs to stay on field in order to draw cards. Many decks have removal options, so this could be deald with way easier and usually with your main engine instead of "just draw the ash/crossout/whatever"
@HairSaves
@HairSaves 7 ай бұрын
And you could also just go battle phase to out it then go combo. It guarantees you live one more turn while also allowing your opponent actual interaction to stop it
@MrWhatIfAnime
@MrWhatIfAnime Жыл бұрын
What about a delayed draw? Like drawing the cards at the end phase all at once instead of drawing them during the special summon. Still gives the card advantage you’re looking for but only accessible during the following turn.
@N12015
@N12015 8 ай бұрын
That means you need to have something to stop the board with your starting hand.
@Freefidy
@Freefidy Жыл бұрын
The "you cannot activate other card effects this turn" literally does the same thing as the last one except it dosnt turn it into a sidedeck card, as well as removing the risk for "taking the challenge" and the inherit synergy of drawing into handtraps
@Practitioner_of_Diogenes
@Practitioner_of_Diogenes Жыл бұрын
"well as removing the ... inherit synergy of drawing into handtraps" That's kinda the point...
@magiv7573
@magiv7573 Жыл бұрын
@@Practitioner_of_Diogenes not quite, maxx c was printed well before the modern state of hand traps. The "point" of maxx c was to net more cards when the game goes back to you on your turn, which is still a strong effect
@Practitioner_of_Diogenes
@Practitioner_of_Diogenes Жыл бұрын
@@magiv7573 I'm saying adding the "can't activate cards after resolving Maxx "c"" is the point of that errata in that it removes its synergy with handtraps. While it still letting to draw a fuckton of cards is still way too powerful, removing its synergy with handtraps makes it sllllightly better.
@magiv7573
@magiv7573 Жыл бұрын
@@Practitioner_of_Diogenes ah ic, thought you were saying the intent of the card was the drawing of handtraps, nbd.
@LoneSWarrior
@LoneSWarrior Жыл бұрын
Max "C" allows you to draw cards in the end phase dependant on how many cards your opponent has on their field.
@ShadowSaberBaroxio
@ShadowSaberBaroxio Жыл бұрын
This is also my suggestion. That way, comboing to get a single decent boss monster doesn't give the opponent a bajillion free cards.
@LynnLyns
@LynnLyns Жыл бұрын
The best errata for Maxx "C" is: This card cannot be used in a legal Konami Tournament
@iiTzSpectreZ
@iiTzSpectreZ Жыл бұрын
The special summon from the extra deck one I'd love to see. If it was errata'd for that I'd think it could become a lot more fair to play.
@Venomzilla1
@Venomzilla1 Жыл бұрын
I like the “cannot activate other effects” option best, because it still accomplishes most of what options 9 does, as you wouldn’t be able to utilize an established board if you decide to use MaxC. On top of that, it also prevents abusing hand traps.
@RadianceOW
@RadianceOW Жыл бұрын
My suggestion is that an errata'd Maxx "C" can be reworked to only work during the current Main Phase. This makes Maxx "C" still strong when you lose the coin flip (since there is only 1 Main Phase on turn 0) and allows the player going 2nd to decide how many special summons they want to commit before the Battle Phase.
@f687sNFM
@f687sNFM Жыл бұрын
Maxx c should be banned lel
@trinxty6099
@trinxty6099 Жыл бұрын
My favourite errata would be that you have to control no cards and that you draw the cards during the end phase. That way you have to use it going 2nd and it doesn't help you get handtraps, it helps to get get board breakers or to have enough gas to play through a board. I think Maxx c like this actually encourages back and forth
@MiiMavis
@MiiMavis Жыл бұрын
makes you still pass the turn if they drop it. that doesnt solve anything except modern problems of drawing handtraps maybe replace "control no cards' with 'have no cards in your gy', and/or 'cant acticate other effects this turn' what would that do? if you force them to ash, imperm,... they cant use maxx c anymore BUT, the card would still be playable in a deck without other handtraps.
@anon2447
@anon2447 Жыл бұрын
if the point of it is to make it only viable going second just add "you can't use this effect if you had the first turn of the duel" without having to write a long control no cards etc etc paragraph
@DarshiaCallis
@DarshiaCallis Жыл бұрын
The best way to fix Max C is to change two things,first add "If you control no face up cards" as a activation condition this way if you get board wiped you can still use it as recovery while having backrow facedowns or whatever it also means having a field in play prevents you from activating it So Runick decks for example won't get as much out of max C since they need their field. Second "Cards you draw by this effect must be revealed to your opponent" this way you know what the opponent is drawing off max C and can make decisions about what to do based on that information.Information about what is in your opponents hand is extremely valuable. For example seeing opponents draw their nibiru means you know with certainty to play around that. On the other hand you would also be able to see them drawing bricks that do nothing for them or maybe they are drawing useful cards but they drew 2 copies of a hard once per turn and your end board is going to be prepared to negate it anyway. you won't have a big unkown factor to deal with and if you still get rolled you'll know for sure when the opponent just had the good stuff in their hand to begin with.
@heavenbot
@heavenbot Жыл бұрын
#8 is straight up crazy, and I love it. It seems with Time Rending Morganite and the newly revealed Rose Papillon, along with the whole Floo archetype, that Konami is getting more comfortable with extra summons, so I can kinda see a world where they do something like that. Konami has been known to factor their crack usage into card design, so watch out for it becoming real lol
@zzZDarKCroWZzz
@zzZDarKCroWZzz Жыл бұрын
Best errata: "this card cannot be used in a duel"
@monke-mk5
@monke-mk5 Жыл бұрын
When you opponent special summon monster 3 times, you win the match. This card cannot be used in a duel
@patirck024
@patirck024 Жыл бұрын
Every time a player special summons both players must draw 3 cards and discard 2 cards
@roto469
@roto469 Жыл бұрын
Every deck that uses the GY would be busted
@Pattex_
@Pattex_ Жыл бұрын
this is the least balanced suggestion ever. even if you dont run a GY deck this is ridiculous
@renaldyhaen
@renaldyhaen Жыл бұрын
Every time I see Anti-C people and give suggestions to banish or discard the additional cards, I really can't trust people like them.
@aichisendou6375
@aichisendou6375 Жыл бұрын
Nah, draw 2 and banish one face down, and after banishing 5 cards, the effect of maxx c no longer lingers
@aichisendou6375
@aichisendou6375 Жыл бұрын
Banish one face down is a must, but idk if draw 2 or draw 3 is better
@Shinde425
@Shinde425 Жыл бұрын
I like number 9, but I would also add a "your opponent takes no damage until the end of the next turn" clause too, since any deck can play it. A very aggressive deck would make that turn skip an auto win, even with a clause like D-Shifter. The plan would be to neutralize the advantage of going first, and would switch "who went first" almost. Giving your opponent a few extra cards to set up some form of disruption would be a lot easier if you know you won't die next turn.
@matteste
@matteste Жыл бұрын
One I saw that I liked went like this: If you control no cards (Quick Effect): You can discard this card; during the End Phase this turn, draw cards equal to the number of extra deck monsters your opponent controls + 1. You can only activate this effect of "Maxx C" once per turn.
@Fassle
@Fassle Жыл бұрын
why not monsters in general but without the +1
@steeveedragoon
@steeveedragoon Жыл бұрын
The suggestion I've been giving for a while now is actually a mix of 2 of these. 1. During the turn it resolves, you cannot use any other cards. 2. You have to return cards from your hand to your deck equal to the number you drew during the end phase. This way it's still a very powerful card, but it doesn't become an automatic win button.
@Gymnasiar
@Gymnasiar Жыл бұрын
if you had to return the cards drawn, you wouldnt play the card at all. In deckbuilding my side options are already very limited. Instead of playing a "hand-fix" you would just side the board breaker directly.
@nicholaswalker757
@nicholaswalker757 Жыл бұрын
Still doesn't fix the problem unfortunately because board breakers exist. Also if you take the maxx c challenge under these restrictions you still lose because then your opponent will just keep the best 5 out of the dozen or more cards they drew and then you'll get dark ruler + evenly matched and then get full combo'd post battle phase, or they just otk you if they use board breakers that don't lock them out of dealing damage.
@steeveedragoon
@steeveedragoon Жыл бұрын
@Wat Simp yeah. That sums it up. If necessary then it can be return cards to the deck -1, and you can only draw when you have 10 or more cards left in your deck. Highly specific, yes, but it at least keeps the card from being an auto win button.
@chelovechecheggg5185
@chelovechecheggg5185 Жыл бұрын
​@Wat Simp I would absolutely draw 4 at the start instead of five if I could basically pick what those 4 cards are, which is this idea is about
@freaki0734
@freaki0734 Жыл бұрын
@Wat Simp didn't phantastical dragon phantasmay see play? anyways there are also solutions for that like you could shuffle back the amount of cards you drew -1 I still think a draw amount limit of 3 is the best way
@spacewarp5850
@spacewarp5850 Жыл бұрын
I’d like how they do it in duel links where you have a restriction based on the amount of cards you have in your deck. Ofc this would be really hard to manage in the TCG but in master duel it could work if the user only has like 5 insect monsters in their deck. Making insects way better by basically hurting everything else. Same could apply to DPE where if you have 10 hero monsters in your deck you can use it.
@alanganon672
@alanganon672 Жыл бұрын
maybe the effect could say, if you have at least 10 or more hero cards in your deck, field , hand or graveyard, you can activate this effect
@owenwalters5505
@owenwalters5505 Жыл бұрын
Having to reveal an Earth Insect in hand would be a good way to make people play the other "C"s
@haydenbennett3547
@haydenbennett3547 Жыл бұрын
Between Ash, Crossout, Called and Droll and Lock, it doesnt need an errata and is fine at 2-3. Combo players have had their fun and its fine to punish decks that over extend their resources.
@Shiny_Plume
@Shiny_Plume Жыл бұрын
Tangently related, but it is odd that Konami doesn’t do Ring of Destruction levels of errata anymore. Ring of Destruction used to be able to be used on either player’s turn, can target your own monsters, and I think used to burn both players at the same time. And then they changed it to you can only activate it on your opponent’s turn, only target your opponent’s monsters, but you can’t target one whose attack is higher than their LP, and you would take the damage before your opponent so you would likely lose first. It went from so broken that I could see it being played and enable FTKs in 2023 to never being played in any decks except very niche burn decks. I guess Konami has no need to go that far with erratas anymore, but it’s still interesting.
@mach186282
@mach186282 Жыл бұрын
How about if instead of drawing right when a monster is Special Summoned, it's changed so that you wait until the End Phase, count the number of Special Summoned monsters your opponent controls that were Special Summoned this turn after you resolved the effect of Maxx "C", and draw that many cards? Then its advantage correlates to the size of the board your opponent produced rather than the effort it took to get there.
@freaki0734
@freaki0734 Жыл бұрын
very intersting one
@gamerbg294
@gamerbg294 9 ай бұрын
I saw a better suggestion, in which case you would draw cards in the end phase equal to the number of cards your opponent controls (as the number of cards you draw would be more corresponding to the threats your opponent would have, in addition to nerfing it's power when you have a established board, because you don't gain an advantage immediately and if you break the opponent's entire board you won't gain any card advantage)
@brandonj8372
@brandonj8372 Жыл бұрын
Better Errata than all of these: Give it an additional effect that activates in the deck that lets you add it to your hand for free as a quick effect (non-opt)
@thiagofloreste9114
@thiagofloreste9114 10 ай бұрын
I would also change the draw effect for searching any card from your deck
@thiagofloreste9114
@thiagofloreste9114 10 ай бұрын
Or even better, you can add any card to your hand (even if it is outside of your deck)
@_M17_
@_M17_ Жыл бұрын
Maxx "C" is a powerful card in the Yu-Gi-Oh TCG that has been the subject of much debate in the community about whether it should be banned or not. Here are some reasons for both sides: Reasons for banning Maxx "C": Disruptive gameplay: Maxx "C" allows the player to draw a card each time their opponent Special Summons a monster, which can lead to an excessive amount of card advantage and disruptive gameplay. Power creep: As the game has progressed, Maxx "C" has become more and more powerful, especially with the introduction of powerful Special Summoning mechanics like Pendulum Summoning and Link Summoning. Limits design space: Maxx "C" can limit the design space for future cards, as it can be difficult to create new Special Summoning mechanics or archetypes without considering the potential impact of Maxx "C" on the game. Reasons for unbanning Maxx "C": Balanced gameplay: Maxx "C" is a powerful card, but it also requires the player to make a strategic decision on when to activate it, as well as how to use the additional cards they draw. This can lead to balanced gameplay and interesting decisions. Provides counterplay: Maxx "C" can provide an important counterplay to powerful Special Summoning decks, allowing players to disrupt their opponent's strategy and potentially turn the game around. Promotes diversity: By allowing a powerful but balanced card like Maxx "C" to be played, it can encourage diversity in deck building and gameplay strategies. Ultimately, whether Maxx "C" should be banned or unbanned is a matter of personal opinion and can vary depending on the current state of the game and the player's individual preferences.
@SLatios
@SLatios Жыл бұрын
When your opponent special summons a monster: you can special summon this card from your hand. Each time your opponent special summons a monster(s), place 1 "C" counter on this card. During the End Phase: You can tribute this card and if you do, for each "C" counter that was on this card, excavate that many cards and if you do, add 2 excavated cards to your hand, also banish the rest face-down. You can only use each effect of "Maxx "C"" once per turn. This is my errata. I aimed to do a few things. 1) Make the trigger more in line with most of the other "C" cards (a triggered summon effect) 2) Remove the lingering effect 3) Remove the immediate availability of the advantage you're getting 4) Limit the advantage to a +1 but summoning increasing the selection. 5) There's a lot of information that's given up. What's being played, what the adds are, what's being banished. Based on those, you can plan certain interactions and, if you're knowledgeable with against that deck, what they now can and can't do. 6) Create more ways to interact with it. Negate the summon, the end phase effect. It sends for effect so it can't dodge "on the field" negation. Or just remove it from the field
@quelqunx7470
@quelqunx7470 Жыл бұрын
I believe there needs to be a combination of two errata to make it fair, so like control no cards + another restriction. Also, I think the one that returns cards during the EP is a fair alternative.
@jaythephoenix
@jaythephoenix Жыл бұрын
I'd love to see "add this card to your opponent's hand during the end phase." Somewhere. Make it a reveal and not a discard so it works or bend the rules. A new and exciting Maxx C challenge.
@NAAAAAIL
@NAAAAAIL Жыл бұрын
"banish this card from your hand or gy. if you or your opponent normal or special summons a monster, draw a card then flip a coin if heads draw another if tails draw 2." that's my dream Maxx C errata. I call it Maxx C Maxxing.
@samurexatlas7373
@samurexatlas7373 Жыл бұрын
Maybe make it specifically if you're down in advantage? Something like "If the total number of cards in your hand and field is less than the total number of cards in your opponent's hand and field:(Maxx "C" effect here"
@FrostReave
@FrostReave Жыл бұрын
Floodgates turn one have become such a massive problem that Mass C is the only card that can give second turn decks a fair chance. It also forces negate decks to minimalist their special summons. And there’s always a 50% you don’t get it turn 1 even with 3 copies making having it in your deck worthless at that point. It’s not even a tuner.
@TheTopken
@TheTopken Жыл бұрын
If Maxx "C" were to get an errata, they should put in the text that you are allowed to slot more than 3 of that card in your deck. It would be the first effect of this type allowing you to run more than 3 copies of a single card.
@KingVerus
@KingVerus Жыл бұрын
Horrible take tbh.
@thiccupcake
@thiccupcake Жыл бұрын
Finally I can play a pure handtrap deck
@NeostormXLMAX
@NeostormXLMAX Жыл бұрын
Based as fuck combofags seething
@NeostormXLMAX
@NeostormXLMAX Жыл бұрын
All combo decks should be eradicated from the game
@shaxplosion
@shaxplosion Жыл бұрын
@@NeostormXLMAX I bet you play Blue Eyes
@g.sergiusfidenas6650
@g.sergiusfidenas6650 Жыл бұрын
The Gamma-like restriction is the perfect one, the one that actually would make that blasted card the "keep combos in check" thing its defenders claim it is.
@Drilbit
@Drilbit Жыл бұрын
Yeah making it so you can't use if you control cards would at least somewhat reduce the powerlevel of it without making it unplayable
@Bigtoe65
@Bigtoe65 Жыл бұрын
I don’t like this solution since it’s still too good. Like he said for salamangreats, they’ll just lose outright because they put up like 2 interruptions and the opp gets 6 cards. Gamma needs that restriction and it’s just a negate/pop. Maxx c DRAWS cards. it needs a heavier restriction.
@issacsantana6419
@issacsantana6419 Жыл бұрын
The thing is, even without the extremely toxic aspect of firing it off in the draw phase of your opponent's turn after completing your full combo, Maxx "C" is still a sufficiently toxic card going second. You present the ultimatum of: "Combo off and give me enough cards to break your board and OTK you with certainty, or pass your turn with no board state and probably get OTK'd anyway." This card is undefendable, and the argument that "my deck has a chance against better decks with Maxx C!" is completely moot, as the people using that argument seem to be unaware of the fact that *your opponent with the better deck gets to have Maxx "C," too.*
@thebloodbath8437
@thebloodbath8437 Жыл бұрын
@@issacsantana6419 max c creates interesting scenarios to both players in terms of cost benefit, and changes deck building quite a lot. sometiems max c will win the game, but theirs a lot of cards that do it, and max c unlike them has a miriad of different outs you can run. if you really hate max c, just play a deck that doesnt care about it at all (floo) or that much like a trap deck. people complaining about max c are usually people who want to set up a board with 12 million omni negates and their mad they cant run 100% consistency cards due to respecting max c. cry about it
@bloo152
@bloo152 Жыл бұрын
Yeah it would work despite what some people say. I can promise everyone that even if Maxx C was exclusively a going 2nd card, more than 50% people would STILL want to go 1st. It would be down from the 95%+ now but it would still be more than 50%. People's overwhelming desire to go first is stronger than their desire to possibly have Maxx C live. So in that sense it would be a powerful balancing tool for going 2nd in a Bo1 format.
@Kevin_Anderson
@Kevin_Anderson Жыл бұрын
Here's a couple other suggestions: 1. Maxx "C" only draws cards for every third special summon after its activation. This keeps the spirit of potentially going crazy plus but also allows your opponent to make a decent enough board without plussing you too significantly. 2. You now draw the cards during _your_ next End Phase. This means you don't get the cards until after you've lost the chance to use your combo pieces. It could still be helpful for a few decks with hand trap starters like Tear and Labrynth, but largely it relegates Maxx "C" to drawing hand traps to help you deal with your opponent's follow-up to your turn.
@GranMaj
@GranMaj Жыл бұрын
I kinda like the gamma restrictions one. The roach can keep stupid turn 1 combo deck in check. While gives turn 2 deck more power. AND it's actually presents a different consideration for player, do you want to go first and risked getting the roach, or opt for saver option and go 2nd but risked getting full comboed when you don't draw the roach. With how strong 1st turn is, this become interesting.
@Zepparino
@Zepparino Жыл бұрын
As a OCG player i can confirm MaxxC is one of a card of all time
@ryuuohdeltaplus7936
@ryuuohdeltaplus7936 Жыл бұрын
What does this mean? Sorry I'm not too familiar with modern slang.
@bryanmerel
@bryanmerel Жыл бұрын
​@@ryuuohdeltaplus7936 if you fear monger Maxx-C, similar to how you guys do it in the TCG, to an OCG player, you don't need make-up, you're already a clown.
@ayngrand3212
@ayngrand3212 Жыл бұрын
@@bryanmerel That is not what that means. At all.
@Meat_Snacks
@Meat_Snacks Жыл бұрын
@@bryanmerel you literally have no idea what you’re talking about.
@ayngrand3212
@ayngrand3212 Жыл бұрын
@@ryuuohdeltaplus7936 It's a meme that started with people writing fake reviews about the movie "Morbius" where they leave an adjective out of their sentence and write stuff like "This is one of the movies of all time" or "This is the most movie ever". Doesn't really mean much besides "This exists". If you really wanna stretch it, you could say that saying that something exists is the most generous thing they can say about that thing, but with Morbius the joke was mostly that people didn't even watch the movie and just came up with random stuff to say about it.
@SephirothLionheart
@SephirothLionheart Жыл бұрын
I only ever had 2 suggestions to hardleg on his 30+ day mission, good to see one of them was 9. The other suggestion not mentioned here is "If you activate maxx c this turn, you cannot activate cards or effects on the field until the end phase". Basically creating a "mother of all handtraps" and would likely stop the pre-established board dropping a maxx c it'd also mean you couldn't run imperm, only veiler so called by is more live and imperm is less cemented as the staple negate.
@rokketman159
@rokketman159 Жыл бұрын
#7 is funny to me: “Surely no deck would want to put there hand in the graveyard to stop there opponent from special summoning!” Laughs in BA
@dudono1744
@dudono1744 Жыл бұрын
Laughs in infernity
@rodlurks66
@rodlurks66 Жыл бұрын
Laughs in Zombies :)
@battleaxe9145
@battleaxe9145 Жыл бұрын
My idea for an errata would be that it only works during the end phase of the turn. Your opponent goes through their combos, special summons, say, 5 monsters. You then discard it during the end phase to only draw 5 cards then and there.
@Pattex_
@Pattex_ Жыл бұрын
i like #9 the best. Every maxx c defender will say maxx c puts combo decks in check without acknowledging that combo decks can use maxx c. so this way the card actually achieves its goal of slowing down the game. Becomes like d shifter in that regard as well
@ohexenwahno5652
@ohexenwahno5652 Жыл бұрын
The problem with number 9 is that if you go first, get Maxx C'd on, let's say, Circular summon, and you have your own Maxx C, you can't activate it if you just pass, because you have a singular monster on the field.
@r3zaful
@r3zaful Жыл бұрын
The combo deck you're talking would absolutely pack their deck with crapload of handtraps that ALSO maxx c stopper, this will severely weaken them against backrow deck. Also an ash blossom can decide the outcome of the duel as maxx c, ash on big welcome? GG You don't get it? Let me simplified it to you. Play cards that immediately impact the game state, not drawing cards.
@alexanderjackson7948
@alexanderjackson7948 Жыл бұрын
And what prevents the combo decks from going second and filling their non-engine slots with board breakers? The only way to make maxx "C" not work in combo decks is by putting some sort of restriction on the effects, like preventing its user from summoing more than three times a turn (including normal summoning, because Floowadereeze).
@Pattex_
@Pattex_ Жыл бұрын
@@alexanderjackson7948 you're right, nothing stops them. this game is inherently flawed in its design where when u nerf something that's poorly designed you inadvertently promote a different kind of degeneracy.
@Pattex_
@Pattex_ Жыл бұрын
@@ohexenwahno5652 i mean, that happens now. it's not a perfect solution obviously. im just working with the premise presented.
@Smallsmallrose
@Smallsmallrose Жыл бұрын
My knee jerk reaction is the "you can't activate any other card effects the turn you activate Maxx C." The reason you can never take the Maxx C challenge in the modern day is because you inherently give your opponent all the Ash's, Nibirus, and Veilers they need to stop you. This would also solve the problem of Maxx C being used to inherently strengthen negate boards when you're going second into it. Basically, you either commit to Maxx C while challenging them to kill you, or you leave Maxx C be while keeping impactful disruptions online. The only fallout I could see from this is DRNM still absolutely sucking in Maxx C formats. Maybe mix it with one of the other erratas ro nerf it even more?
@stephanyanggreani3667
@stephanyanggreani3667 Жыл бұрын
I like this tbh.. But im surpriser by how neat the "draw on extra deck special summon" .. Or make it more skillful, make it trigger on special summon but do only "draw card by the amount of special summoned monster on your opponent field" It force you to think carefully when to activate it to maximize your draw potential and it technically capped at 6 but generally give 2-4 draw.. The most bullshit things about maxx c imo is how it have lingering effect
@timaeus22222
@timaeus22222 Жыл бұрын
I like this errata, where you just add this: "but at the End Phase, return cards from your hand into your Deck, equal to the number of cards you drew. (If the number of cards in your hand is fewer than before activation, return your entire hand instead.)"
@WeenanWoles
@WeenanWoles Жыл бұрын
Wouldn't this be better? While you control no cards And your opponent controls a special summoned monster: (quick effect) special this card from your hand. You can only use this effect of Maxx C once per turn. While you control this face up, card draw a card everytime your opponent special summons a monster. During the end phase, destroy this face up card.
@hi123452008
@hi123452008 Жыл бұрын
Maxx C should be banned, because making this comment will help Farfa realize his true form as a Hello Kitty Lets Play channel
@captainoj9073
@captainoj9073 Жыл бұрын
What if i did ask for furry farfa?
@Alberio1
@Alberio1 Жыл бұрын
I think "draw cards equal to the number of cards your opponent has special summoned this turn" would be a good change. If you activate it early you'll only get a couple of draws but if you wait too long they may have a negate up already.
@mattingle4286
@mattingle4286 Жыл бұрын
Maxx C is a powerful hand trap card in Master Duel, however, the majority of opponents going first on turn 1 usually find strategies to play around Maxx C, making the card less efficient to begin with. Usually, the player going 1st will usually set some cards then pass turn. Master Duel players know that Maxx C is in that format, so therefore, they will be less likely to special summon a bunch of times, and not giving their opponents an advantage while going 1st. Just my opinion.
@sinmethodical1837
@sinmethodical1837 Жыл бұрын
I like the shuffling back at end phase errata. Maybe apply something else that prevent other hand traps to be used the turn its activated. Or after it's used you cannot perform more than one summon during your next turn making the turn ending power of this card apply to both players ( kinda of, since stun decks could still just set 5 pass. )
@reisen9584
@reisen9584 Жыл бұрын
the second one would be useless. It's like outright banning max c probably. No combo deck would play then. Because imagine you drop max c, they stop, you summon once pass, they otk you. gg. Although it would be staple for trap deck, aka eldlich/labrynth.
@sinmethodical1837
@sinmethodical1837 Жыл бұрын
@@reisen9584 yeah the second point. IDK I just said summon instead of special summon because of floo.
@NickWuebker
@NickWuebker Жыл бұрын
I saw an errata suggested in a post on this topic on the Master Duel Reddit and it seemed pretty good. The errata was this: If you control no cards (Quick Effect): You can discard this card; during the End Phase of this turn, draw cards equal to the number of Extra Deck Monsters your opponent controls +1. You can only activate this effect of Maxx “C” once per turn.
@floflo1645
@floflo1645 Жыл бұрын
I would add "you can only activate 1 other card after Maxx C activation this turn" to avoid getting handtrapped 5 times on top of fixing your opponent hand for the next turn.
@cuttlefish6839
@cuttlefish6839 Жыл бұрын
​@@floflo1645 it wouldn't need it since the draw I'd at the end phase
@sushiroll3795
@sushiroll3795 Жыл бұрын
I like this, except I think that it should just be equal to the number of Extra Deck Monsters your opponent controls, not +1. That would actually allow it to go minus and not just be a hand trap Upstart Goblin.
@NickWuebker
@NickWuebker Жыл бұрын
@@sushiroll3795 Yeah, that would be my only change to this errata.
@nath7690
@nath7690 Жыл бұрын
I like to combine 2 suggestion for maxx c - You can't activate another card effect from your hand. - at end of turn put card from your hand equal card you draw from this card(maxx c) effect. With this you can't activate another hand trap when you draw it and it help going 2nd player to craft their hand to break opponent board next turn.
@lordshmee13
@lordshmee13 Жыл бұрын
During the end phase draw equal to the number of special summons your opponent did that turn 😅 still potentially damaging but at least they aint drawing while youre playing turn Heavy text version for crazy new card idea You Discard this card from you hand, every time your opponent special summons banish top card of your deck and at the end phase your opponent chooses 3 cards( if less than 3 select all) and if any cards are still banished by this cards effect you choose 3 more cards(if less than 3 select all) add selected cards to your hand.During your opponents end phase while this card is in your GY your opponent selects one your banished cards and adds selected card to their hand.During opponents draw phase they must reveal 1 card owned by the opponent and return it to the top of owners deck and if they do, negate any card played that turn with that name and it cannot be activated that turn.😅
@kenja0685
@kenja0685 Жыл бұрын
During the Standby phase: you can send this card from your hand to the GY and reveal your hand; for the rest of this duel you must keep your hand revealed. During the End Phase of this turn, draw a number of cards from your deck equal the number of times your opponent Summons a monster(s). You can only activate the effect of Maxx "C" once per duel.
@dragonmaster951753
@dragonmaster951753 Жыл бұрын
I like this one. It allows Maxx c to still gain advantage but not use any of it during the turn and reveals the opponent hand so they know how to navigate their turn.
@Machu456
@Machu456 Жыл бұрын
Same here, as you don’t gain immediate advantage to draw into a hand trap and abuse it while still potentially gaining a ton of advantage, however I would change this effect to have the hand reveal is after the semicolon so it isn’t for cost in case they have the 1 of (or 2 of in MD) called by. Other than that slight change, I like this version.
@blade8741
@blade8741 Жыл бұрын
I still dont think this would work too much. Even if you had your hand revealed, if you still have 15-20 cards on hand its bound to have so many hand traps/board breakers/starters that it wouldnt have mattered.
@netcat22
@netcat22 Жыл бұрын
Just make it a mulligan. Still broken, but not as broken as just drawing 50 cards lmao. "During either player's turn: You can send this card from your hand to the Graveyard; this turn, each time your opponent Special Summons a monster(s), immediately draw 1 card, then place one card on the bottom of the deck. You can only use 1 "Maxx "C"" per turn."
@hirukashiro5995
@hirukashiro5995 Жыл бұрын
This is a minus 1 mulligan. A bit bad to be honest, considering you're going 2nd vs full board here. Make it like Saryuja (draw X cards, return X-1 cards) so that it becomes a card neutral mulligan then this should be ideal
@alfian4653
@alfian4653 Жыл бұрын
A -1 mulligan is just a worse phantazmay. Might as well just play mallet at that point.
@netcat22
@netcat22 Жыл бұрын
That's kind of the point. It's still a mulligan, it can still help you draw your board breakers and starters. Making it a hand neutral card would still make it a no-brainer inclusion in any deck. The entire point of errata-ing it is to avoid that issue. Also it's not a "worse Phantazmay", as you can use it at any point, and not just when your opponent summons link monsters. They do fundamentally different things. Also sure a "non-quick effect mulligan your hand once" is definitely better than a quick effect that triggers upon every special summon. 🐔👍
@hirukashiro5995
@hirukashiro5995 Жыл бұрын
@@alfian4653 This. If it's a game mechanic like in Magic, then sure, a -1 mulligan is cool. This is consistent as you don't need to draw "the card" for you to mulligan. But making maxx c as a -1 mulligan is basically just making it not really worth it. You have to draw the maxx c itself, your opponent has to keep playing, your opponent has to play a crazy combo deck, you have to still draw good so your mulligan makes your hand better, AND you still get a -1 after all that
@TheLeechaolan15
@TheLeechaolan15 Жыл бұрын
Maxx C errata: this turn every time your opponent special summons, add 1 "C" monster from your deck to your hand, except Maxx C.
@ratiuvictor9533
@ratiuvictor9533 Жыл бұрын
During either player's turn: You can send this card from your hand to the Graveyard; this turn, each time your opponent Special Summons a monster(s), immediately draw 1 card. If your opponent doesn't summon at least once they banish they entire hand. For every 2 cards you draw, your opponent banish one random card from their hand. During the next draw phase you can draw cards up to the number you draw due to the effect of Maxx C. You can only use 1 "Maxx "C"" per turn.
@lorenzoaurilia4759
@lorenzoaurilia4759 Жыл бұрын
I don't think erratas should be the solution to every kind of broken card. Some cards were meant to be absolutely broken, and they should stay so. While banished forever to the shadow realm, of course
@strangevol5264
@strangevol5264 Жыл бұрын
no, more cards the better, because more interesting cooking
@RunicSigils
@RunicSigils Жыл бұрын
The ideal banlist is the one that has the fewest cards on it. Everything that is too generic or OP should get errata for balance. There are only definitely a couple cards that really need to be on it. I really don't understand what is with this weird childish notion that the game shouldn't be balanced and that some cards just never be allowed forever. You paid for them, you should absolutely be able to use them unless they are absolutely unfixable. You are free to use them without errata on your own. Can even make up your own effects if you want but that is not how official tournament play should be treated. It is a product and a game.
@lorenzoaurilia4759
@lorenzoaurilia4759 Жыл бұрын
@@RunicSigils the concept of "balanced" is too variable based on the metagame. There are cards that have received absolutely shit erratas and will forever be this way, even though sometime in the future they could have been played as they were originally printed
@RunicSigils
@RunicSigils Жыл бұрын
@@lorenzoaurilia4759 it would obviously be taken into account for new cards as well. All you are doing is making arguments for Konami being lazy in the future but no one cares about your pre-defense of a company. Again, you can use the cards with whatever effect you want with friends, but that has no bearing on tournaments. It should straight up be illegal to not have them all playable in a tournament setting if possible because that would mean they are intentionally selling you a product you cannot use as THEY intend.
@lorenzoaurilia4759
@lorenzoaurilia4759 Жыл бұрын
@@RunicSigilsWith alternative formats this would all be solved, erratas in standard and the original printing in the other formats And still, I didn't say erratas shouldn't exist, but some cards are too iconic in my opinion to be changed that much
@chaosmage7721
@chaosmage7721 Жыл бұрын
Id go with option #9, but I'd add 2 things: 1) make it last until your next end phase. 2) make it apply to both players. This means that if you use maxx c to either plus off of your opponent or keep them from comboing off but then try to combo off on your turn, your opponent gets to draw for every special summon you do. basically the idea is don't put someone under maxx c if your deck doesn't want to be put under it either.
@armorparade
@armorparade Жыл бұрын
that's way too wacky
@vanesslifeygo
@vanesslifeygo Жыл бұрын
when Konami does errata something they usually get it. they will probably errata it to only drawing ONE making it completely unusable, or just not errata and it stays banned in tcg.
@sluggernott
@sluggernott Жыл бұрын
I replied to some of these on HardLeg's Twitter post about Erratas, but some of these are SO much of a change that you might as well make these brand news cards and ban Maxx C anyways, LOL. The second one suggested is probably the best option. Then again, even with that, it becomes essentially a different card. An Errata is "supposed" to clean up problem text or alter just a couple of words or a change in condition/cost. I do like the idea of a Maxx C specifically for Extra Deck Summons. We can call it "Extra Maxx C". My suggestion - During your opponent's Main Phase (Quick Effect): You can send this card from your hand to the GY; this turn, each time your opponent Special Summons a monster(s), immediately draw 1 card, but during the End Phase, banish cards from your hand face-down until you have 6 cards in your hand. You can only activate 1 "Maxx C" per turn. It might not be enough of a change, but deeper changes would result in basically a retrained card. At that point, just ban it, and make a retrain. This at least limit it to just your opponent's main phase specifically, so battle phase special summons(if you used on turn 3 going 1st of course) and their own turn are out. Also, you are really playing a high risk game here, because you could end up drawing 10-15 cards, and have to banish most of them. Sure, you can still draw into hand traps to disrupt your opponent's combo (more the idea anyways), but now you run the risk of having to choose between keeping more hand traps or specific combo pieces from being banished away for good, possibly preventing you from your own combo or disruption on your turn. You also run the risk of over-drawing, and being forced to banish nearly half your deck. It becomes a gamble that you could quickly regret, but still gives enough benefit to make it playable. In the end, the benefit is disruption when going second, and a +1 to start your turn, at the risk of possibly banishing from a few cards to half your deck. Example - You use Maxx C on your opponent's first SS, drawing a card. It's not an instant out - you can play through your opponent's multiple hand traps IF they draw them, but now your opponent had to have properly deck built. Most hand traps are HOPT, so you can play through some of them if you have enough starters/enablers. You continue to SS, allowing your opponent to draw 8 cards. They Ash you, Nib you, Ghost Belle you - All the stops, but you end on a single omni-negate and a piece of interaction. Your opponent used 3 hand traps after the Maxx C. That leaves them 10 cards in hand. They must banish 4 of those, with several of the cards in hand being important combo pieces, forcing them to choose important cards. As we all know, almost every card in your deck is important. It can be a difficult choice, and you may have to sacrifice important cards. It becomes a battle of balance in deck building and decision making. It makes it so its not a guaranteed include in every deck. Too many hand traps, and you wont have enough combo pieces. Too many combo pieces, and you may end up having to banish away some of them, preventing your optimal plays. Imagine 18-20 draws instead? Now you have to banish 14-15 cards. That could be disastrous. If any of you read this, thanks. I could elaborate more, but this is already a lot.
@ND-er1bo
@ND-er1bo Жыл бұрын
I would do that you can't activate any other effects the turn you activate Maxx C. That means you can't use it on top of your board like the last suggestion did and you can't use any of the handtraps it draws you.
@alexanderjackson7948
@alexanderjackson7948 Жыл бұрын
How would you feel about adding some sort of restricition like "you can only summon three times per turn for the rest of the duel", so combo decks don't just immediately win going second with five board breakers and six engine cards.
@Viarus46
@Viarus46 Жыл бұрын
@@alexanderjackson7948 Doesn't fix the issue of Maxx C being used by the turn 1 player who already deployed a negate board
@motoharumotoharu
@motoharumotoharu Жыл бұрын
I think its fair that you can only activate it when you control no monster.
@eclipse3479
@eclipse3479 Жыл бұрын
Definitely not fair
@renaldyhaen
@renaldyhaen Жыл бұрын
As Eldlich player, it is looks more fair and balance.
@motoharumotoharu
@motoharumotoharu Жыл бұрын
@@eclipse3479 How so? Its basically much more fairer than the current Maxx C. The only reason people protested for its eff are that both players can use it freely even after setting up strong board. By giving empty boards extra advantage, it gave players chance to use their skill and judgment to go through or stop summoning. It involves skills of course. Something that autopilot players doesn't like.
@eclipse3479
@eclipse3479 Жыл бұрын
@@motoharumotoharu skill my ass, how is me skipping my opponents turn fair?
@motoharumotoharu
@motoharumotoharu Жыл бұрын
@@eclipse3479 Nobody stops you for using the same card in your deck at 3. Just like Ash. Many decks can be stopped with a single Ash at the right moment. Instead of creating unbreakable board and waiting for opponent to surrender next turn, its better to create back and forth games that gives both players chances to win. You like the current state of game that is heavily determined by coin flip to win? I prefer a more balanced game. And the errata to be able be used when you controls no monster is pretty much better than the current Maxx C.
@TheProgenitor
@TheProgenitor Жыл бұрын
I'm surprised nobody mentioned reducing the number of cards drawn by increasing the required summon frequency. For example, "During this turn, draw 1 card after every second Special Summon your opponent conducts" or something of the sort. Now even if you chain it to an effect that special summons, you don't get an immediate draw. They have to do it again. This doesn't resolve the problem of, for example, Salad boards giving your opponent 5 cards in exchange for their 10 summon combo, but I think that's kinda the point. Just like how playing around Nibiru requires you to limit your end board and not every deck may be able to do that, this iteration of Maxx C would give you a lot more flexibility in how many cards you're willing to give your opponent, but only if your deck/hand is flexible enough to allow that.
@megustAslagt
@megustAslagt Жыл бұрын
"During your opponent's turn: you can discard this card. During the End Phase, if this card is in the GY because it was discarded by its own effect: draw cards based on how many times your opponent special summoned after this card was discarded: 1-2 Special summons: 1 card. 3-6 Special summons: 2 cards. 7+ Special summons: 3 cards. This effect of Maxx "C" can only be used once per turn." (so limited amount of draws, cannot draw into more hand traps, and can be negated during the end phase. Maybe it's a little too easily countered by appolousa though..)
@dhanyl2725
@dhanyl2725 Жыл бұрын
Rather than waiting until the end phase, I prefer having to return the card to the deck immediately after drawing. Kinda like ferrijit I also like some other suggestions here tho
@animemannatsu2434
@animemannatsu2434 Жыл бұрын
Is farfa finally confirming he is a furry after drawing in all those furry art books
@soulstarved4116
@soulstarved4116 6 ай бұрын
What if you change it to: Summoning itself to your field when your opponent special summons and while it remains face up on the field by its own effect and your opponent summons, then you draw. This makes it so it's not a lingering effect and you can remove it to get rid of the effect. Or in some cases, steal it, and now you get the draws. Another idea is that both players draw a card. Definitely ruins the card, but could be used in funny decks that want your opponent to draw.
@Machu456
@Machu456 Жыл бұрын
I like the idea of this video, so here’s how I’d errata Maxx “C” to be a bit more fair in my opinion: “Once per turn (Quick Effect), you can discard this card from your hand; each time you opponent special summons a monster this turn, draw a card. If you controlled any cards when this effect was activated, you can only use 1 more card or effect this turn after this card resolves.” That way if it’s played on the first turn, they can still try to stop the setup of a big board or interrupt it in some way with cards like ash, nib, or imperm, but if they go second with a full board they have at least 1 piece of disruption, but not 15.
@jojojobogogogog1544
@jojojobogogogog1544 Жыл бұрын
I am now pushing for furry farfa
@soranora4597
@soranora4597 Жыл бұрын
One thing I like seeing is replays where Card destruction is used against the Maxx C challenge. It doesn't happen often but it's pretty funny when it's pulled off. Also the tricksters burning the opponent for game is pretty funny also.
@joelbarraclough6689
@joelbarraclough6689 Жыл бұрын
If i was to errata Maxx "C" here's what can do ((During either player's turn: You can send this card from your hand to the Graveyard; this turn, each time your opponent Special Summons a monster(s) from the Extra Deck, immediately draw 1 card. You can only use 1 "Maxx "C"" per turn. You cannot draw cards if your opponents summons the monster of the same name once it's summoned))
@trainerbrendan969
@trainerbrendan969 11 ай бұрын
I mean, as a way to effectively nuke it from orbit is that its conditions are the same and everything but when the special summon happens instead of drawing a card you can add a Insect-Type monster or a card mentioning Insect-Type monsters from your deck to your hand.
@bromegaman5962
@bromegaman5962 Жыл бұрын
Not being able to activate Maxx C if you control cards would be great. I think that solves one of the problems with the card. That might be a reason to not run 3 of it since it would only be good going 2nd. I think it still needs a second clause in the errata though. Like a restriction on when you can use it. Whether it be after your opponent special summons from the extra deck or maybe you can only chain it to an effect that special summons. This way the turn 1 player has some ways to play around it if they assume player 2 has it.
@Fairies-Keeper
@Fairies-Keeper Жыл бұрын
I think a good way to errata maxx c is to make the effect only activate if it is the ONLY hand trap monster in your hand, like for example if there's another monster in your hand which has a (Quick Effect) that can be activated in your hand in response to your opponent, maxx c doesn't work, you must get rid of that monster either by using it's effect or discarding it. I don't play Yu-Gi-Oh but this idea came to mind.
@SorryIBlackedOut
@SorryIBlackedOut Жыл бұрын
I've played with the idea of an Errata being Maxx-C only draws 1 card, but you search another Maxx-C in your deck and add it to your hand. Making it a revolver with like 3 shots to pull more disruption but not enough to outright draw 20 cards and just win next turn. The major problem I already see with this is the minor amount of time scamming that would occur from some players searching their 2nd and 3rd Maxx-C each time they use it especially with shuffling and then having your opponent cut your deck 2-3 times. Pretty vanilla? Yeah sure, but like it's still 3 +1s and it's nice to thin your deck if you've end up drawing only staple disruption or are missing combo pieces in the start.
@GoToBedSheeva
@GoToBedSheeva 7 ай бұрын
“If your opponent controls more monsters than you do” “If your opponent controls more cards than you do”
@MattSinz
@MattSinz 4 ай бұрын
If they were to combine the erraras where have to activate Maxx "c" in response to a special summon and you can only activate Maxx "c" if you control no cards, that would fix all my problems with it.
@khalilli6613
@khalilli6613 Жыл бұрын
Could make it so you can't draw for the next two turns after activating it. Makes it so you can't jut drop it beginning of a turn before anything happens and even if you chain to a summon effect, if your opponent decides to stop you went even in your hand but -1 over time. Honestly i think cards like maxx c have an important place in the game of being a big disruption to first turn combo decks and all the degen ftks
@numimio
@numimio Жыл бұрын
During your turn, (Quick Effect), you may discard this card from your hand to activate this effect: Each time the opponent special summons a monster(s), draw 1 card.
@paranixoussouxinarap4090
@paranixoussouxinarap4090 3 ай бұрын
I like its current tcg effect. If this card is in your deck: You lose the match.
@thelazt16
@thelazt16 Жыл бұрын
More broken IMO, if you can only activate it while you control no card, means if you go 1st and you already normal summon or place search card (continuous or field spell), you won't be able to activate your drawn maxx c when your opponent start, which make it AN INSTA WIN CARD GOING 2ND, unlike now which will give interaction, "You Maxx C me, I Maxx C you". The better option would be "While you control no card or your opponent RESOLVED Maxx C on your last turn", this way it wouldn't be too broken going 2nd card nor it make people can Maxx C after setting up their board.
@Shawnixy
@Shawnixy 10 ай бұрын
During either player's turn: You can send this card from your hand to the Graveyard; this turn, each time your opponent Special Summons a monster(s), immediately draw 1 card. This turn, for every 2 cards added to your hand, your opponent draws 1 card. You can only use 1 "Maxx "C"" per turn.
@Sunsaparilla
@Sunsaparilla Жыл бұрын
"You cannot conduct your draw phase, or activate effects that draw cards, during your next turn after you activate this effect."
@danha3107
@danha3107 Жыл бұрын
tbh a combination of some might be nice - the gamma restriction actually makes it an anti-combo handtrap like its insane supporters claim - the extra deck summon restriction lowers the ceiling to not completely and utterly ruin a combo player’s day with sacky bs - making it work like droll actually puts some risk in the decision to maxx c as it’s just slightly harder to go neutral/plus
@Cookie_Magika
@Cookie_Magika Жыл бұрын
an errata that makes you draw the cards for special summons at the end of the turn. then at the end of your next turn banish your hand.
@GodWorksOut
@GodWorksOut Жыл бұрын
It sounds like you want to special summon for 45 minutes and dominate on turn one. No sir, I activate Maxx C.
@waves5249
@waves5249 Жыл бұрын
You can only use this effect if you have no card(s) in your field, GY, or that is banished. When your opponent Special Summons a monster(s) (except during the Damage Step), you can send this card to the GY; this turn, each time your opponent Special Summons a monster(s), immediately draw 1 card. You can only use this effect of Maxx "C" once per turn. You cannot activate card cards or effects until the end of the next turn after Maxx "C" is used. If you want to play Maxx "C", then you ONLY play Maxx "C". I want this card to be as irrelevant as possible if it becomes legal
@slimeblue4873
@slimeblue4873 Жыл бұрын
making maxx C having the restriction of it being the only effect for a turn would make it a bit more fair, however I'd also personally make it reveal the card you drew + 2 more cards from the top of the deck then Banish those face-down. so for every Special Summon you more or less loose 3 cards in your deck and your opponent gets to see what you added / banished. It'd keep Maxx C niche enough I'd say to not be shot gunned against every deck as you could easily be decked out now with just 12-15 Special Summons until your Deck is out.
@zyalon
@zyalon Жыл бұрын
You cannot use any other cards or card effects the turn you activate max-c
@realpatriot1769
@realpatriot1769 Жыл бұрын
I'd combine the first and last suggestions. You can only draw up to 2 cards and you can only activate this card if you control 1 (or less) monsters. This achieves the following: It limits the resources you can get. Enough to break a strong board but not necessarily enough to win you the game outright. It allows the going first player, if they brick with it, to at the very least set a monster and some backrow.
@giovannialtamore8545
@giovannialtamore8545 6 ай бұрын
- Draw up to the number of cards in your opponent Graveyard. or - Draw 1 for each monster Special Summoned from Extra Deck that has a quick effect. this is to give breathing room to old decks with less quick effects but still counter modern meta decks
@gabrielsalahi3656
@gabrielsalahi3656 Жыл бұрын
You should only be able to activate MAX C if your opponent has already special summoned 2 times Then that means they still get a normal summon and 2 special summons before then getting the choice if you’ll be drawing any cards or not
The Story of Yu-Gi-Oh!'s Greatest Ever Deck
1:08:08
Farfa
Рет қаралды 67 М.
Smart Sigma Kid #funny #sigma #memes
00:26
CRAZY GREAPA
Рет қаралды 19 МЛН
Box jumping challenge, who stepped on the trap? #FunnyFamily #PartyGames
00:31
Family Games Media
Рет қаралды 30 МЛН
A teacher captured the cutest moment at the nursery #shorts
00:33
Fabiosa Stories
Рет қаралды 62 МЛН
Ouch.. 🤕
00:30
Celine & Michiel
Рет қаралды 39 МЛН
Competitive Yu-Gi-Oh! Is In Shambles Again.
13:20
Farfa
Рет қаралды 108 М.
Youtuber Accidentally Exposes the Scam He's Promoting
14:04
Coffeezilla
Рет қаралды 11 МЛН
I Tried To Beat Minecraft Backwards
18:53
Contraption8or
Рет қаралды 1,2 МЛН
A new future for Rush Duels?
9:47
Merlin
Рет қаралды 1,5 М.
Top 10 Floodgates of All time in YuGiOh
19:00
TheDuelLogs
Рет қаралды 426 М.
Can you fit a whole game into a QR code?
20:03
MattKC
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
Cicret Bracelet DEBUNK
13:26
Captain Disillusion
Рет қаралды 11 МЛН
Why Nobody Plays Exodia Retrains
12:02
Dzeeff
Рет қаралды 791 М.
What happened to these Celebrity NFTs?
13:01
Coffeezilla
Рет қаралды 2,2 МЛН
Smart Sigma Kid #funny #sigma #memes
00:26
CRAZY GREAPA
Рет қаралды 19 МЛН