Oòòòòoòòòo⁹⁹⁹

Oòòòòòòòòò9òppòQàaàqqqàawwaàa

12:44 is a complete lie.. If buddha is avatar of vishnu... Why is Buddhism called NAASTIK ? Buddha is not an avatar of vishnu.... It is a brahminic conspiracy to bring buddha under Brahminic control... Mahaveera of jainism and Buddha rejected VEDAS, manusmriti, animal sacrifice of brahmins... Buddha did not believe in creator and destroyer, and buddha asserted his followers that he was not God... He is only a path guide... not a mukthidaata....but maargadaata... Buddhism, fulfillment of HINDUISM. All southern Acharyas were CRYPTO-BUDDHIST.... -swami vivekananda-chicago-1893

Beautifully stated! I just wrote a comment, not as well written as yours, that he seemed to be inhabiting the Buddha. Mindful Kayaker, we are spiritual siblings! As for criticisms of this talk, thank you for the head's up because I won't entertain them although dying of curiosity as to what could possibly be criticized here:). Namaste to you, fellow traveller!

@@garypuckettmuse I think it is important to remain curious if we're genuinely interested in pursuing a spiritual path instead of a spiritual entertainment where you pick and choose whatever happy ending suits your taste.

@@swastikashrestha4991 You mean you think it's important to tell *me* that. Presumably because you couldn't understand my comment. Which is fine, Swastika. Cheers.

@Mindful kayaker : I don't understand what you mean by : This man has become one with the Buddha? 🤔 I think that would be quite problematic, if his Vedanta or Vaidika view is informed by Sankaracharya's or Kumarilabhatta's stance, because in sankaradigvijaya, an authoratitive text of Advaita Vedantin (check the sringeri math) sarga 1 sloka 93-95, what Buddha taught is a wrong teaching, So, according to Kumarilabhatta (which sankara endorse later) even Buddhist women and children should be killed and not spared. So, I doubt if he would prefer to become one with a Heretic, the Buddha. 🙏

@@isvara5325 what are you -- the spoilsport who takes things too literally or the nerd who thinks it's all about the words in the texts? Relax. Maybe don't take things quite so literally. I don't think Vedanta and Buddha are at war, okay? You're picking your side and "defending" it. What side is that-- the sarga 1 sloka 93-95? The world is a lot bigger than that and so is your mind. Never take man at his word because words are only symbols, they are crude stand-ins for what is. It's all one baby AND Tat Tvam Asi!

I me mine my feelings too!

Our hearty. Pranam

12:44 is a complete lie.. If buddha is avatar of vishnu... Why is Buddhism called NAASTIK ? Buddha is not an avatar of vishnu.... It is a brahminic conspiracy to bring buddha under Brahminic control... Mahaveera of jainism and Buddha rejected VEDAS, manusmriti, animal sacrifice of brahmins... Buddha did not believe in creator and destroyer, and buddha asserted his followers that he was not God... He is only a path guide... not a mukthidaata....but maargadaata... Buddhism, fulfillment of HINDUISM. All southern Acharyas were CRYPTO-BUDDHIST.... -swami vivekananda-chicago-1893

12:44 is a complete lie.. If buddha is avatar of vishnu... Why is Buddhism called NAASTIK ? Buddha is not an avatar of vishnu.... It is a brahminic conspiracy to bring buddha under Brahminic control... Mahaveera of jainism and Buddha rejected VEDAS, manusmriti, animal sacrifice of brahmins... Buddha did not believe in creator and destroyer, and buddha asserted his followers that he was not God... He is only a path guide... not a mukthidaata....but maargadaata... Buddhism, fulfillment of HINDUISM. All southern Acharyas were CRYPTO-BUDDHIST.... -swami vivekananda-chicago-1893

totally agree

Ph, I would love to see/hear that. I always wonder what people were thinking at the turn of the 19th century. Is it available? Cheers.

12:44 is a complete lie.. If buddha is avatar of vishnu... Why is Buddhism called NAASTIK ? Buddha is not an avatar of vishnu.... It is a brahminic conspiracy to bring buddha under Brahminic control... Mahaveera of jainism and Buddha rejected VEDAS, manusmriti, animal sacrifice of brahmins... Buddha did not believe in creator and destroyer, and buddha asserted his followers that he was not God... He is only a path guide... not a mukthidaata....but maargadaata... Buddhism, fulfillment of HINDUISM. All southern Acharyas were CRYPTO-BUDDHIST.... -swami vivekananda-chicago-1893

Malini Gupta

12:44 is a complete lie.. If buddha is avatar of vishnu... Why is Buddhism called NAASTIK ? Buddha is not an avatar of vishnu.... It is a brahminic conspiracy to bring buddha under Brahminic control... Mahaveera of jainism and Buddha rejected VEDAS, manusmriti, animal sacrifice of brahmins... Buddha did not believe in creator and destroyer, and buddha asserted his followers that he was not God... He is only a path guide... not a mukthidaata....but maargadaata... Buddhism, fulfillment of HINDUISM. All southern Acharyas were CRYPTO-BUDDHIST.... -swami vivekananda-chicago-1893

No they are perfectly fine

12:44 is a complete lie.. If buddha is avatar of vishnu... Why is Buddhism called NAASTIK ? Buddha is not an avatar of vishnu.... It is a brahminic conspiracy to bring buddha under Brahminic control... Mahaveera of jainism and Buddha rejected VEDAS, manusmriti, animal sacrifice of brahmins... Buddha did not believe in creator and destroyer, and buddha asserted his followers that he was not God... He is only a path guide... not a mukthidaata....but maargadaata... Buddhism, fulfillment of HINDUISM. All southern Acharyas were CRYPTO-BUDDHIST.... -swami vivekananda-chicago-1893

Rather profound distortions ...He is presenting his own distorted version of Buddhism. Read my comments above to understand where he went wrong.

@Vprabhat thakur ..Yes....and Hindu thoughts influenced Buddha . That's the way it should be..continually learning and renewing your thoughts and ideas.... After all, Everyone is searching for truth. It should never stop.

Let us say, there was no Vedic culture and there was no india/ Bharatvarsha. And then a prince called Siddharth Gautama was born, what would have happened.

@@kmanoham how did Hindu thoughts influence the Buddha? what are the proofs?

Arka Basu how so?

@@amannoobs He is presenting his own distorted version of Buddhism. Read my comments above to understand where he went wrong. He is doing great disservice to Buddhism and Nagarjuna.

@@bibeksharma270 my question is that are u enlightened ?how can u be so sure that youare only right?sounding nonsense

@@saswatabiswas190 And you think Swami Atmapriyananda is enlightened? Why because he wears all orange clothes and can recite stories about Buddha and his life that we grew up hearing since we were all children? Everything he's saying is in our basic textbooks!!! But then he's taken the basics of Buddhism and Buddhist terminology and made it into a cocktail and serving people who like the taste of it and are too threatened by people who ask and warn about the convoluted ideas that are mixed in it.

@@swastikashrestha4991 it's not about being enlghtenment. it's about common sense. with common sense he was able to teach us right teachngs of buddha/

He is presenting his own distorted version of Buddhism. Read my comments above to undertand where he went wrong.

12:44 is a complete lie.. If buddha is avatar of vishnu... Why is Buddhism called NAASTIK ? Buddha is not an avatar of vishnu.... It is a brahminic conspiracy to bring buddha under Brahminic control... Mahaveera of jainism and Buddha rejected VEDAS, manusmriti, animal sacrifice of brahmins... Buddha did not believe in creator and destroyer, and buddha asserted his followers that he was not God... He is only a path guide... not a mukthidaata....but maargadaata... Buddhism, fulfillment of HINDUISM. All southern Acharyas were CRYPTO-BUDDHIST.... -swami vivekananda-chicago-1893

Yes, the best in distorting the correct message of the Buddha. A great disservice to Buddhism.

Stop hating and you'll find your life more satisfying

These so called swamis have been spreading false and fake information about Buddhism since the 3rd Century , my friend Lhawangla

@The Future Really ? So please give the words of the Buddha that I contradited . Please quote Authentic Buddhist Sutras and Suttas not what some Hindu Swamis says what the Buddha said. Then we'll see who seems to know more about Buddhism than the Buddha himself 😊 Unless your write up was a satire to this Swami ? Thank you both ways though .

@The Future And what is your proof of this total nonsense about what the Buddha taught? your own personal ideas? These sutras and suttas are the records of what the Buddha taught and that they work is proven by enlightened Masters from generation to generation to date . So all you have is your own personal opinion about the Buddha that you're spewing out her as proof? The Buddha clearly said in the Mahaprinabbana Sutta that he left his teaching as a guide to what he taught and now you and your Swamis 2600 years later with virtually no contact with these Sutras et al are claiming you know what the Buddha ACTUALLY taught while the Buddhists do not? WOW!!! Amazing irrationality. Thank you again for your reply 😂.- A copy of exactly an older Swami Vivekananda said a 100 years ago .

@The Future And how do you know this? Have you studied Buddhism under a genuine lineage master? Or have you even bothered to investigate it a little, instead of swallowing whole the distortions of Hindu teachers, like the swami-ji here? If you had you'd know that the sutras are the words of the Buddha himself and that they are filled with "hardcore philosophy". It's best to educate oneself on a subject before one criticizes another's knowledge of the same.

Why such negativity and unwarranted criticism?

@@MrHynotiQ nothing personal.. Mukti or liberation is an important issue and such misinterpretation blocks all possibilities to liberation. Furthermore, why do you think such refutation (not criticism) is negativity? Would you say the same to Einstein who refuted Newton's Law? Isn't it the same, that if we don't get scientific theories right, the possibilities to understand the reality correctly is blocked? But you don't tell Einstein that his refutstion is criticism and negativity. You are conditioned to think thst there shouldn't be precision in religious views. That is wrong. This also means you are not familiar with Indian spiritual context. Furthermore, he is blatently making mistakes and misinforming people about Buddhism. People have right to know the truth.

not at all.avidya in Buddhism also in Vedanta mean towards the same way. approaching in different ways. and secondly, sunyata and brahman conception are absolutely the same if you understand sunyata well you can understand that emptiness literally does not mean nothing its cant be described in words beyond intellect and the same was told in Upanishads about brahman. sunyata means the self-independent -existence everything in-universe is sunya.that means it depends on something else and this theory was developed by Nagarjuna not buddha and in Buddhism sunyata is considered absolute thing (especially in Madhyamika school)what buddha taught is within time and space and what Vedanta teaches beyond time and space. and leave the spiritual fact .look scientific theory science always says that which has starting always has to end .so that samsara or you can say the universe does have an ending. because the universe is in time and space dimension..and buddha was kept silent on god.thats absolutely right because that realization is beyond word and he rejects the idea of a creator god.means he didn't personify god what Upanishad also teaches. what god is refers is only pure awareness nothing else.buddha never denies the existence of god(pure awareness)rather always he told: "buddha lives with unrestricted awareness".and without 5 aggregates he realized there is an unrestricted never-ending awareness .illuminate all around .same teaching of Upanishads.and sometimes when he was asked what you are he replied "I am awareness".nowhere Buddha said there is no god. Buddhism is not atheism. Buddhism is agnostic .once someone asked for buddha "did you find anything to prove the existence of God"? he replied "did you find anything to disprove the existence of God?" that's buddha .he believed god more than ours because he reached the ultimate truth. if buddha is enlightened (definitely ) he has to come to that conclusion what prophet Muhammad, Jesus Christ,Guru Nanak, st paul, st john, Ramakrishna Vivekananda and many enlightened monks ended up with this conclusion because ultimate truth is one cant be twice and they shared same experiences what is taught in Upanishads and Swami Vivekananda said "unfortunately his followers didn't understand buddha" because buddha is one and his followers were many. and seems you are confused because you are trying to get enlightened through youtube.do not get confused you will never get unlightened until and unless you can realize yourself.that's why buddha always said"atmodipa bhabo"tell me one verse where buddha said there is no god(not as creator).buddha was agnostic not an atheist.but now a days buddhist made it athesim.if you are follower of buddha well and good .first realize what is sunyata get enlightened first after that discuss because knowing of ultimate truth cant be helpful from him who never experiences it always gathered knowledge from book.you are making same mistake what in buddhas age so called bramhan used to do.not realizing anything only blabbering

@@bibeksharma270 throw more light brother ..tell me about Nagarjuna

@@mayankpo What precisely do you want to know about Nagarjuna, related with our topic?

He is presenting his own distorted version of Buddhism. Read my comments above to understand where he went wrong.

@@bibeksharma270 😆😆😆😆 Ya.... Hinduism disintegrate in the very second truth of four Noble truth let alone going beyond 3 and 4 th Nobel Truth

dukka is not process. there is another word for process. sorrow is one of the quality of dukka/dukha.

He is presenting his own distorted version of Buddhism. Read my comments above to understand where he went wrong.

He is presenting his own distorted version of Buddhism. Read my comments above to undertand where he went wrong.

12:44 is a complete lie.. If buddha is avatar of vishnu... Why is Buddhism called NAASTIK ? Buddha is not an avatar of vishnu.... It is a brahminic conspiracy to bring buddha under Brahminic control... Mahaveera of jainism and Buddha rejected VEDAS, manusmriti, animal sacrifice of brahmins... Buddha did not believe in creator and destroyer, and buddha asserted his followers that he was not God... He is only a path guide... not a mukthidaata....but maargadaata... Buddhism, fulfillment of HINDUISM. All southern Acharyas were CRYPTO-BUDDHIST.... -swami vivekananda-chicago-1893

yes, very powerful distortion of Buddhist teaching. He is presenting his own distorted version of Buddhism. Read my comments above to undertand where he went wrong.

That’s because world is made of of 3 gunas- Tamas, Rajas and Sattva. He falls in Rajas.

Then you're also against krishna

Hey, he is not here to speak for your buddha dharma. He is embracing buddha as a figure of great reverence of the hindus, that's all. He is not interested to promote buddhist philosophy. And don't speak as if you can outright refute shankara's philosophy. You have been talking of swamiji's ignorance of buddha dharma but your comment shows how ignorant you are about shankara's vedanta. You guys never understood the atma of the hindus. He is talking of buddha( the avatara of vishnu) and not the buddha the Buddhists. Also, there are various ideas on how the word zen came into existence.

@@nirjhardas7333 will you want to hear someone else's opinion when you are totally sure about what you just said? Our energies are too valuable, take care of them.

Buddha said there is suffering, there is a cause, there is cessation and the 8 fold noble path, now did the Buddha say, go to KZfaq and fight for me? Reality is Chatuskoti Vinirmukta, get to know it.. All philosophies are trying to make a sincere attempt from their level of understanding.. They want to reach that! Why get involved in power struggle? And dear Sir, if you really want to bring a Buddhist revolution to spread the right teachings of Shakya Muni, why don't you become a Buddha come-again? Buddha said that there is salvation, why aren't you Buddha? Why are you on KZfaq refuting some man who doesn't even know Buddhism? You know Buddhism, have you access to reality? There was a reason Buddha was quiet when asked Metaphysical questions! Our immediate concern is understanding suffering and to stop that suffering, our only goal. Let us not refute others unless we ourselves have access to Buddha, to Shunyata. I'm not making an attempt to put you down, just a sincere message to walk the path, reach the goal and then illuminate the world. This video being, your comment arises; your comment being, my comment arises... we are all relative, limited.. let us become whole

'if you meet the Buddha, kill him if you meet Sankara, kill him"

@@ananya1786why should one waste energy to do that? Just be... neutral, no?

to know about buddha that does not mean you have to become Buddhist.its not mandatory. if you would like to learn from Buddhists who are basically ignorant(most of them in the modern era, not enlightened at all) your effort will be futile.that's why after the demise of buddha Buddhism got obsolete from its birthplace India.(teaching of buddha is absolutely right no question in that.) because this core philosophy was not new in India and when they tried to wrench absolute truth they became moribund in Indiapioneer was Adi Sankara who firmly challenged the wrong understanding of an ignorant Buddhist. and logically defeated them. great philosophy but mostly misunderstood like Islam.not any core difference with Upanishads.

@@saswatabiswas190 It is not mandatory to be strictly Buddhist per se but it is important to learn Buddhism from an authentic Buddhist masters to get the accurate meaning of Buddha's teachings. Buddhists hold 2500 years of unbroken lineage of ordination (upasampadaa), scholasticism (aagama) and realization (adhigama). One needs to get connected with these lineages to be an authentic Buddhist. So, what you said above is not true. Adi Sankhara never properly refuted Buddhist view. You can read his bhasya to understand it. He and many Hindu pundits actually erected a straw man and beat it for thousands of years now in India.They created their own idea of Buddhism and wrote against it. You seem to be doing exactly the same. Adi Sankhara actually used the army of a Kerala king to kill Buddhists, wipte out Buddhism, and usurped Buddhist site. I don't think that is a very glorious story. You can read Sankhara Vijaya and Sankhara Digvijaya to get to know what he actually did. Buddhist accounts show that he was defeated three times by Buddhist masters in debate. Actually it looks like Buddhists are telling the truth because when we look at his so called refutation, he hasn't properly understood Buddhist idea of sunyataa. Anyway, to understand more, please read this article first www.byomakusuma.org/MadhyamikaBuddhismVisAVisHinduVedanta.html

@@bibeksharma270 you sound like an extremely dogmatic person who likes to quibble and fight with people. That's ego, not spirituality. Now please don't go on another essay writing spree in the comments!

@@kyabe5813 Your name and your comment do not match. Your name is Indrajit (the one who won Indra) but you don't even seem be macchar-jit (the one who would win over a mosquito). Your comment is as poor as this. How do you feel with this epithet? I am teaching you a lesson here - either comment on my content, or just don't bother to evaluate anyone in person, as if they are your psychiatric patients. Since you dont know me personally, such personal comments are called ad hominem - attack on a person rather than his thoughts. If you want to be true to your name, show me how and where I am wrong while evaluating this fake swamiji who is talking something that he has no idea of.

Your not free from your own idea about Buddha nor his teachings, how can u be really free to see Buddha. Any religion if seen through I mind, will fail to that person. Lol whether to laugh or cry don't know... Anyways, please do try to battle your mind, my friend...

I hate to say this heretical thing but Tibetan Buddhism is an interesting synthesis of Nagarjuna (who the Dalai Lama loves to own), Indian Buddhism, mixed with Buddhism that came to Tibet from China -- not selling anything because I go my own way but it took me a long time to pinpoint what was nagging at my mind about all this. Tibet is the place where it all just happened to come together. Now you have to look past all the native Tibetan hats and armies and whatnot and into the heart of it, stripping the politics away which is the whitewashing of today. Still I appreciate it myself because it clears the clutter if not historically accurate. Because this is not a history lesson. Don't be lost, be opened. Anyway, tat tvam asi.

@@garypuckettmuse ..... What's your point, by the by???

Thank you Bibek ji for this much needed clarification. While Swamis wanting to share Buddha's message is very admirable, it is very unfortunate that they lack the sincerity and humility to learn the Buddha's teachings from an authentic Buddhist lineage and choose to explain his realization and teachings to their whim presenting nothing but their own misguided opinions to the listeners. What a huge disservice to someone who is genuinely seeking Buddha's teachings and they instead get served this porridge quoted as 'Buddha's message'! Maybe Swamis need to start understanding that presenting Buddha's message to the audience on a global platform requires a lot more than such mediocre homework. Their curriculum of past Hindu Swamis' work is neither adequate nor appropriate to interpret Buddha's words as all of them have only given their distorted ideas without any study of Buddha's teaching, mixing them up with different hindu philosophies.

Thank you

@TheDharc You don't even seem to know the basics of Buddhist history. Buddhism was well preserved in Srilanka since 2300 years; Tibet since 1300 years; China since 2000 years. Of course, Buddhism was still alive in India until 13th century. Since it was transmitted to China, Srilanka, Tibet, Japan, Korea, Thailand, Burma, they kept the living tradition alive, which means they not only preserved the words of the Buddha but also the tradition of meditation he taught, the unbroken tradition since the time of the Buddha. Hinduism is a separate system from Buddhism. The Buddha criticized Vedic/Brahmanical/Hindu teaching saying that their scripture do not contain the truth to liberate someone from this world.It is for this reason that Hindu/Brahmanical/Vedic schools categorized Buddhism as "naastika", something outside their own system. You don't even seem to know such simple fact. As an Indian, you should know at least the basics of a religion, which was a native school. Buddha dwelled among our ancestors.

​@TheDharc With due respect, what is meant by "mostly chinese-japanese" Buddhism? No matter what form of Buddhism we consider (Mahayana in China/Japan, Vajrayana in Tibet/Bhutan/Nepal or Shrawakyana in Sri Lanka, Myanmar etc.) all of them include the practice of Samatha and Vipasyana, following the teachings of Shakyamuni Buddha. The teachers from Tibet/China came to the Indian subcontinent to study under many Indian Buddhist masters, and that's how they learned Buddhism and took it back home. And Chinese great Masters like I Tsing Huen Tsang, Fa Yen came to study in Nepal and India. Also, teachers/masters from the Indian subcontinent went to Tibet/China to teach and help establish Buddhism there. For instance, masters like Amogh Vajra from Nepal and Bodhiruci went to China. So with due respect your argument that Buddhism has been "chinese/japanese" is incorrect. Buddhism has adapted to different cultures, yes, but it has not changed the core (the right view/enlightenment/vipashyana). Authentic teachers of Buddhism -- validated by their own masters who belonged to an unbroken and enlightened Buddhist lineage dating all the way back to the Buddha himself -- still exist in various countries. And they are certainly more credible and authentic sources to explain the Buddha's teachings than someone who has not studied under authentic Buddhist masters belonging to an unbroken enlightened lineage, even if the person is in India. Also, you seemed to imply that in India the Buddha Dharma has been lost for more than a 1000 years (since you say it's been mostly Chinese/Japanese for that long)? If that's so, how can you say for certain someone in India can teach the Dharma accurately, since it's been lost for more than 1000 years?. It's also not exactly true that it's been lost for more than 1000 years, by the way. It's less than that, but still a long period of time. Bhawatu Sarva Mangalam.

It seems you have got enlightenment.

Ye moksha kyun chahiye aapko.

शास्त्री साधना को विरोध नहीं किया है आपका प्रश्न ही गलत है आप किस तरह का भी साधना करते हैं अंतर्गत वाह वह मोक्ष की ओर अग्रसर करता है आपकोअब गौतम बुध का शव साधना करते थे उस तरह कोई जिए या आप मंत्र जप साधना।

No, he is totally wrong. Check my comments.

@@bibeksharma270 are u enlightened ?how can u be so sure that he is wrong you are right.dont read only books use your intellect.

I don't think Swami Ji seems to have a good grasp on principles of Buddhism. He is very learned in Vedanta.

yes, you have forgotten everything. That is the reason you are not being able to discern whether he is telling the truth. Almost everything he says about Buddhism in this video is wrong. Read my comments above to understand why .

@@bibeksharma270prove thing which is wrong in vedanta i will give you explanation with help of physics

@@saswatabiswas190 I wrote the above refutation of this self proclaimed Swam ji. You haven't properly replied to any of the points there. I have already shown what is wrong with Swami's discourse. Furthermore, from Buddhist point of view, Brahman or Atman is just parikalpita, an imagined entity, which doesn't exist at all. I have quite explicitly written in those comments. You are always welcome to refute them, if you can! Furthermore, It looks like you haven't come to senses yet, after all the refutation that @Mijin Kurum, @ Isvara wrote in other threads. You are neither scientist, nor you have any a correct training in Indian philosophies and you are just saying bla bla bla to all the people here. You are just a laughing stock. All the questions you have asked so far can be asked to you too. Do you realize that? However, many of the commentators here are quite knolwledgable and know what they are writing. In short, you seem to completely not know that Buddhism has 2500 years of living uninterrupted lineage. They have perfectly preserved what the Buddha taught in Pali, Sanskrit, Chinese and Tibetan. By gettting connected to these lineages and reading these texts along with commentaries would accurately tell us what the Buddha taught. I myself am trained to read Pali, Sanskrit and Chinese Buddhist texts. Apart from that, we also read other Indian Darsana, for example, Vedanta and we know what Sankara taught. You seem to even not know that the basic training in Sankara Vedanta starts to reading these texts and reflecting on it. The correct knowledge is obtained in three stages: Sravana (hearing or reading), manana (reflecting) and nidhidhyasana. Even in Sankara Vedanta, enlightenment is a process, that you go through several stages. So, your idea that one has to be enlightened to get the basic idea of Vedanta is quite non-sense. Anyway, you don't know these things because like that Swami you are also talking non-sense and gibberish without even knowing the basics of Science, Vedanta and Buddhism. Please don't make yourself a laughing stock.

@@bibeksharma270 you are talking like same what bramhin did the mistake in ancient India. only knowledge no application and realization.did you realize anything? are u enlightened? how can u come to know brahman exist or not? what I know and don't know I believe youtube its not the best medium. mail me bro.lets have a meet face to face talk on phone email saswata55555@gmail.com.what I am what is my qualification will be cleared bro.and yes don't get arrogant.it's not a symbol of a follower of the buddha. and secondly, i believe you are from India. i wish to meet with you at antariksha Bhavan. please come to Bangalore.we can have a cup of tea..you can see by yourself am i scientist at all or not.best way to verify me. you read Sanskrit and other languages that don't mean no one can read in the world. and one simple thing which one 5 years child can understand that something can not come out of nothing that means something is there please read zero point field and zero-point energy if you are from science background you will understand or else its not job for any infant.also please try to understand special relativity theory.I never concerned about Vedanta and Buddhism. without realizing anything talking about those showing ignorance, how far my qualification is i never accept anything without logic and science behind it.i never leave any expert comment what i didn't realize i simply would say "i don't know" and you said you read Vedanta that's great and please pull out one verse of nondualistic Vedanta or any Upanishad.i read those mostly (not entire) and please prove it wrong with logically. will accept. and if someone reads only book and scream that he knows ultimate truth means there is a big question mark on his knowledge because in human history none of the enlightened one like Jesus, prophet Muhammad,guru Nanak even buddha didn't directly express or described anything because it according to them it can only be perceived not described. simply it's beyond intellect. and thirdly who gave you the assurance that buddhas word still remains unchanged from 2500 years back to 21 st century. were u there from that time? or someone who is known to you who was there from that time? you read holy Quran the extremist says in one verse it's written whoever is the non-muslim fight against them kill them.do u think can it be written really in Quran .in Quran its clearly mentioned that the slaughtering of one human being means killing the whole humanity.so how can you believe that what you read its exact word of that particular enlightened person .only one way is there verifying by yourself that's why buddha never believed anything until and unless he verified it. he verified and let us know what is right and what is not correct.so verify by yourself and cling to any literature, philosophy or book. only knowledge is useless if someone cant realizes it. swami Vivekananda said |" if you read one book in the library and apply and realize it you are much more educated than someone else who read all book but couldn't realize couldn't apply anything in his life" even you can find so many channel n youtube who will give you knowledge about ultimate truth from any religion but unfortunately none of them is enlightened.thats basic problem. you might be egoistic what language you know and which philosophy you are trained and think who wish to refute you logically he is an ignorant, less educated person but i never do this mistake. because before enlightenment and after enlightenment conception about ultimate truth will be different absolutely .you might cling with your ego (atman, against the teaching of the buddha)as a knowledgeable person but I don't .would like to request please mail me we will have a talk face to face.only love for you.in future not expecting any personal attack .how much you are knowledgeable and how much someone is ignorant it's not concerned here. how philosophy can be established with the light of logic and modern science it should be concerned. would expect a logical explanation in the future, not any personal appeal. only love for u

12:44 is a complete lie.. If buddha is avatar of vishnu... Why is Buddhism called NAASTIK ? Buddha is not an avatar of vishnu.... It is a brahminic conspiracy to bring buddha under Brahminic control... Mahaveera of jainism and Buddha rejected VEDAS, manusmriti, animal sacrifice of brahmins... Buddha did not believe in creator and destroyer, and buddha asserted his followers that he was not God... He is only a path guide... not a mukthidaata....but maargadaata... Buddhism, fulfillment of HINDUISM. All southern Acharyas were CRYPTO-BUDDHIST.... -swami vivekananda-chicago-1893

If you can see Brahman then you are implying a duality that doesn't exist, a seer and Brahman. Advaita Vedant is non-dualistic. There is only Brahman. Nobody has ever seen Brahman.

@@mattmccartney5996 Well some have seen ishvara / saguna Brahman

12:44 is a complete lie.. If buddha is avatar of vishnu... Why is Buddhism called NAASTIK ? Buddha is not an avatar of vishnu.... It is a brahminic conspiracy to bring buddha under Brahminic control... Mahaveera of jainism and Buddha rejected VEDAS, manusmriti, animal sacrifice of brahmins... Buddha did not believe in creator and destroyer, and buddha asserted his followers that he was not God... He is only a path guide... not a mukthidaata....but maargadaata... Buddhism, fulfillment of HINDUISM. All southern Acharyas were CRYPTO-BUDDHIST.... -swami vivekananda-chicago-1893

Hey, they aren't here to promote buddh'ism' or its philosophy. They are here to promote buddha as we hindus see him.

​@Nirjhar Das , My friend which Buddha was your ven Swami talking about ? The Historical Buddha whose teachings are still followed bt over half a billion people or some cooked of Hindu mythological Buddha which has no historicity? Please make this clear ?

@@Vatulvasava he is talking about gautama buddha, who is both historical and the avatara of the Hindus. Nothing is cooked up in hinduism. The Buddhist's arrogance doesn't let him understand

@Nirjhar Das I am intrigued by your statement. Since, when did the historical Gautama Buddha become an ‘Avatara’ of the Hindus? It is baseless to say the Buddha was an avatar of Vishnu or any Hindu God, for a number of reasons: 1.Firstly, the term ‘avatar’ which means to incarnate or descend, doesn’t hold any ground in Buddhist philosophy. The Hindu concept of ‘avatar’ is based on rebirth of an unchanging atman(self). Whereas, the ground (bhumi), path (marga) and result (phala) of the Buddhist path is based on the doctrine of pratityasamudpada (interdependent arising), as taught by the historical Gautama Buddha himself. According to this view, all conditioned phenomena appear due to causes (hetu) and conditions(prataya) so there’s nothing that is eternally permanent and unchanging ‘Self/Atman’ that takes rebirth. The mental continuum which is a flux of dependent causes and conditions ‘re-becomes’ according to one’s karmic volition. So, the term ‘avatar’ is neither used philosophically, nor fits into the Buddhist paradigm. 2.Now, when the view itself is different, how can it produce a Buddha who is a Vishnu Avatar? If you claim that for the Hindu’s Buddha is an avatar of Vishnu regardless of whether the Buddhist believe it or not, and it is the arrogance of Buddhists not to accept this fact. Give me a valid reason why Buddhists should accept it when such things are not mentioned anywhere in Buddhist canons? Why should Buddhists believe the words of Hindu Swamis who neither have knowledge of Buddhism, nor any experience of Buddhist meditation practices? 3.Your statement contradicts your own view. Because you’re implying the Vishnu Avatar Buddha is propounding a philosophy that is radically different from the Vedanta or Hindu view? Secondly, if you present a counter-argument, that according to Vishnu Purana/ Kalki Purana that Vishnu Avatar Buddha appeared in a deceiving form as Gautama Buddha to especially tame Demi Gods (Asuras) who want to learn Veda and attain liberation, as well as tame the sinful ones at the end of Kali-yuga. Then, don’t you think Vishnu’s intention is flawed, because: a. all those who now follow Buddhism are influenced by ‘deceptive view’, hence the prospect of enlightenment for these ‘deceived Buddhists who follow the deceitful Vishnu Avatar Buddha’ is zero. So, I don’t understand what is the purpose of such a Vishnu Avatar Buddha? Where is Vishnu’s compassion? b.Secondly, I don’t understand why Vishnu has a problem with the Demi Gods learning the Veda and attaining liberation? Isn't that a good thing? Why does he have to appear in a deceitful form as the Buddha to divert them from attaining liberation when it could free them from cyclical existence. The Buddha is an epitome of compassion and his teachings encompass beings of all existence. Whereas, Vishnu’s intention again is questionable here if he primarily intended to divert the Asuras away from liberation, which contradicts Gautama Buddha’s teachings. 4.The Buddha himself when asked by the Brahman Drona, confirmed he was not an avatar, but should be called the Buddha (buddhé ti mām dhārahi). I needn’t elaborate this point as @mijin kurum has mentioned it already. 5.Puranas were written around 350-400 CE. Whereas, the historical Buddha’s words were recorded by his disciples, who were enlightened, immediately after the Buddha’s parinirvana at the first council, and written within 500 years. So, there’s no need for a Hindu Purana to justify who the Buddha was when Buddhist canons were already recorded, had spread and was practiced all over the world. 6.I don’t understand why Atmapriyananda Swamiji and other Swamis like him want to preach Buddhism. It’s easy to hide behind words like ‘Buddha taught love, kindness, peace and harmony’. But, so did Mother Teressa, Gandhi and Martin Luther King, and present day new age teachers. Buddhist philosophy is much more profound and the concept of love, kindness, peace, harmony and compassion have a deeper philosophical base than just the idea of “love thy neighbour”. 5.Why do Hindu Swamis always want to link Buddhism to Hindu ideas when their philosophical crux is as distinct as chalk is from cheese? Isn’t that a sign of insecurity that you can’t hold your own ground and hence want to adopt a philosophical stance that is more acceptable and universal in the way it is being adopted around the globe. 6.My humble suggestion is, please read the Buddhist canons properly before making baseless comments. Buddha’s teachings are still available in its trueness. Great Buddhist Masters and Lineage holders are still alive. So, there is no need for a Hindu Swami to suddenly crop up and twist and turn the Buddha’s words, or try and ‘rectify’ or ‘justify’ its meaning. The tripitakas speak for themselves. Once you start digging the depths of Buddhist philosophy, you will realise it’s a bottomless pit. It’s not worth preaching a subject you’re not qualified to speak about. If you really want to learn about Buddhism, then please seek a proper Buddhist Master of an unbroken enlightened lineage. This is not Buddhist arrogance. In fact, it’s a compassionate plea to the likes of you to stop confusing people with false information, making a fool of yourselves and others behaving like authorities on a subject matter beyond your scope and knowledge.

@@Vatulvasava So many 'hidden' texts later became the basis of Mahayana Buddhism which is widely practised today. Does it really matter that those teachings are from the historical Buddha directly?

You don't belong to any religion. Ignorant person, stop commenting rubbish everywhere

@@loknathdas3111 I don't have to, if it is all about taking it personally when your Guruji is criticized for his misinterpretation of Lord Buddha's true message. Why don't you point finger at yourself before you do so at others. There is no point arguing you cause you have zero understanding of buddhist philosophy. Sorry, if you are hurt, there is nothing i can do since it is my duty to defend against the manipulations of Buddha's teachings.

@@tashilobsang6564 giving you answer is waste of time, what I have done already

@@loknathdas3111 You wouldn't have done so if you are wise enough. Sorry!!

Your wrong. HInduism/Vedanta, Buddhism is not just belief or religion, they are also practicle. some of principles among both of them are common and are common sense and practicle. some are beliefs in both of them for example karma and rebirth are common which makes them religious. so if you say buddha's teaching is not religion then you are wrong. because buddha believe in karma and rebirth. so stop uttering nonsese. i respect both swamis and buddhas equally. stop your hate and realise that it is originating from ego/anatta/ahankara/anataman/false self.

I stopped reading your comments as soon as I saw the name. "Parmatma ka mission". What a joke. If you have read the "Sastros" you would have never have this kind of name.

Experience is everything...

I have similar doubts about the Buddha's method - it only works for a selected few smart enough to change his perspective to such an extent that his problem are not his. How can that stop world issues like child cancer, famine, and animal suffering which is independent of human inteference?