Lol nothing complicated about that at all

I'm not even a watch enthusiast, but he got my subscription

​​@@user-cf2px2ko8ywelcome to the hobby You will not regret your decision at all😅

Who cares about that a***le

🤣🤣🤣🤣

Audemars Piguet are far deeper than "just" the Royal Oak name. Sure, AP relies heavily on the RO design but you have to remember what AP can do with the RO - simple date models to chronographs, annual calendars, perpetual calendars, minute repeaters, grand sonneries, tourbillons, wandering hours, as well as exotic materials in ceramic watches, skeleton watches, extreme royal oak concepts. Not to mention AP recently made one of the most complicated wristwatches of all time in the code11 Universalle with 23 complications and 40 functions. AND they own mega high end complications supplier - Renaud et Papi, who previously worked with and basically trained Robert Greubal and Stephen Forsey, as well as the Gronefeld brothers, Peter Speak-Marin, who have all gone on to found their own mega high end Independent brands. Oh, they also part own Richard Mille and are fully independent and are still run by the original founding families - Audemars and Piguet. The argument that AP doesn't belong in the trinity is a moot point if you know the true ability of AP. Do you have a bit more respect for AP now yeh?

TBH I don't mind swapping out AP with JLC. Lately all AP has been doing is appealing to the wall st/hoodrat demographics with their bedazzled royal oaks. Sure the watches are fine but what have they done lately for horology other than further elevating its luxury status? Genuine question.

@@jerrybronham JLC are capable of trinity status but Richemont have clipped their wings in the last decade - their halo watches are awesome but their mainstream watches have been boring, repetitive and frankly poorly finished. As for AP - Google the Code 11.59 Universalle. And read about Audemars Piguet and Renaud et Papi.

@@alectang1614I agree with everything you said. I feel like vacheron Constantin not having this „one“ watch like a royal oak or a nautilus is actually good for them. They have the overseas, patrimony, the 222… they don’t rely that heavily on one design which makes the brand appear more versatile.

In my opinion the Holy Trinity has always been: Patek, Vacheron and JLC. Not AP.

Exactly my thoughts. A wonderful story about a wonderful watch made by a wonderful brand. Told wonderfully by a wonderful watch enthusiast.

And don't forget to let your teenage son show it off at the prom!

Today, you have won the internet

😂😂😂👍👍👍

Ok you got me 😂 I seen Invicta and was like 💀 hey I got one 😂 I wanted to see if I liked that much weight on my wrist and bought one to try out I’m not gonna lie and I kinda liked it 😅 .

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 Brilliant!

'A second marriage is a triumph of hope over experience.'

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Rolex operates in a different market though, and doesn't try to compete in this arena...

Absolutely agree Mr Gum...

But at the time in 2005, it didn't exist and the Sky Moon was the most complicated Patek wrist watch. Although the Henry Graves pocket watch was more complicated than either.