Hes out of line... but he is right

Less go

Dinos: Pop da baby Unchained: Pop all my babies Fire Kings: Pop everyone's baby

Pop the

This man is cookin’. Can I like his comment twice?

There were definitely a lot of funny ways to out it. My very first opponent led off with MST my Skill Drain, normal summon a Snake Eye, send SE+ their SD to GY and into full combo.

​@@Onibushouthat might have been me.

I mean, it’s not like Double summon is a continuous spell

Now we need field center as a new accessories

That also supports Farfa's "too difficult to code" argument. The whole 'make double summon a permanent effect' is far more complicated than just giving players the option to casually play with the goat-rulings imo

Phantasm Spiral is so much fun!

The only thing more painful was playing Malefics. My brother in christ, I'm so sorry you had to experience playing Malefics

Bro this is Minecraft

Bro this is gta

Bro this is Wendy's

@@REvoLverj98wdym this is hooters?

Ya I'm sad I missed this one. Most of the trials have been meh but this genuinely looks fun

They're 2 card combos Bro can't count 💀

Probably Cimo himself during the backroom sections of their 2 crossover videos

Just play ranked

Ya I'm absolutely skipping that event. It's just going to be meta decks with even less counterplay. No thank you

@@sladevalen2120 Oh, yes, but also crossbreeds between different meta and rouge decks that couldn’t be because they both needed the normal.

That can also be said for festivals. The last festival was 100 points for a win and 10 for a loss so I never was incentivised to play out a game from behind. The second I got board broken, or had a bricky hand, I would concede. it's much faster to win 1 game after conceding twice than it is to sit through 10 losses of my opponent combining for 5 minutes a piece.

I fail to see how main decking trap eater and remove trap counts as building properly.

That's just not true. You are coming into the duel knowing you need to either play under Skill Drain or have a way to remove it from both sides of the field. What it proves is floodgates are a blight on the game in a BO1 format because you can't prepare for them without removing current meta relevant counters. Proper deck building is preparing for the most represent decks, not main decking Trap Eater and Twin Twisters for the one Runick Stun Andy.

@@WingedEspeon , because it works. If you know you'll face cards that can shutdown your entire strategy, you deck build for cards that can get rid of them but without compromising the consistency of the deck in a big way. The rest of it is luck, especially in the Master Duel format. You may brick due to those cards and you may not. You may draw the card you need for the problematic card and you may not.

@@TylerMcVeigh1 , for example, to main deck Trap Eater while facing Sky Strikers is a blight, yes. I agree with that and that's why cards like that are bad in a best-of-one format. But Twin Twisters is a card that can help you against any deck, overall. It might be a lot or a few, but that card (like MST, Dust Tornado, Harpie's Feather Duster) will always find utility in this game because ALL DECKS have a form of gameplay that uses backrow. Even decks like Mannadium (to pop the field spell that searches) and Superheavy Samurai (to pop the pendulum scales) find a card like Twin Twisters very disruptive even though both are monster based decks. So, I disagree. To condemn certain cards just because the players wants to not play them, because it makes their decks more inconsistent against other strategies, is wrong. But yeah! I hate floodgates too!

@@Timeater Yes Twisters and other back row removal cards can have utility against some monster heavy decks, but it's generally outclassed by hand traps, other board breakers, and general utility cards, like Thrust/Talents, the Solemn cards, Bystials, or Kaijus. I'd rather have cards like Droll, D.D. Crow, or Gamma/Driver in main over Twisters versus Mannadium or SHS because they are generally more effective at cutting off my opponent's plays. Even then, back row removal going into those decks really doesn't do much to crack the board. This entire argument is also ignoring most represented decks on ladder in Snake-Eyes, Purrely, Lab, R-ACE, and Branded. Snake-Eyes can play around back row removal and it generally unaffected by it. Both Purrely and Branded are inconvenienced by back row removal without cracking their board. Even Lab no longer outright dies to back row removal now with Rollback and Arias giving the deck the ability to play from grave and hand. The only deck really represented in the meta that back row removal really hurts is R-ACE. Now I'd say maining back row removal would be a must if we were talking about a format dominated by a deck like Eldlich Stun, Lab Pre-Rollback and Arias, R-ACE, and Runick, but that isn't the case. To say including main deck back row removal is "proper deck building" just isn't true, it's format dependent just like hand traps.