thing is war is not fair and never will so WT will never be fair either

@@AgentK-im8kewt is a game they can do better at balance, besides the ka50 over-performs without a tail, while in real life its meant to be able to rtb with tail damage, it is not actually capable of fully controlled maneuvering with the entire tail gone, this could change and it would be more realistic and more balanced if the rounds that sheered the tail off actually dealt mortal damage to the copter

he didnt show replay where there is a spaa/autocannon/IFV close by and he got killed immediately.

@@AgentK-im8ke The argument of war not being fair so war thunder shouldn't either is like playing dodgeball with little kids but you shoot them with guns not balls. Its not aplicable since WT is a game

@@dharmdevil Okay? But a leopard or Abrams don't have autocanons? You get killed by CAS when you have no way to fight back (so like, most tanks in game except the IFVs and SPAAs) thats why it feels so cheap

the ka 50 does not need a tail rotor so it kinda makes sense

​​@@doggy2601 Yes, it does need the tail. A tailless Ka-50 can't do more than slight maneuvers needed to get home.

@@StudleyDuderight no? the ka 50 uses a dual rotor so it does not need a tail to counter tork the tail contains some rwr stuff and a rudder that you dont actually need youll lose some rudder but you can find videos of ka52s rtbing and landing without tail rotors lol

@@doggy2601 It still needs the tail for stabilization and balance. Going home is about all they can do once the tail comes off. Besides, few of them have even been surviving the first hit. Russia's "superior" designs turned out to be nothing more than wunderwaffe.

@@doggy2601 The rotors on a helicopter are like the wings on an airplane, the tail section on a KA 50 is a rudder. Fly a fixed wing aircraft without a tail or a rudder and tell me how well it flies.

I didn't know that. thx