Grab my new ESSENTIALS Lightroom Preset Pack! 📷 foxtailshop.com/products/essentials-preset-pack

Thanks for continuing to make canon camera content!! It’s hard to find nowadays!

Thanks for showing the R50 some love. Would love to see what a more extreme kitted out rig would look like

Thank you for this detailed, yet brief overview!

Pretty nice set but I’d add a small super zoom to the list for travel and walk around general purpose photography, the 18-150mm RF-S kit lens is quite good for a kit lens.

Great survey. Many thanks!

Thank you! Keep making content on r50 please 😩👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👊🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

The 10-18mm is an RF-S lens. Which means. It's an APS-C lens. It will give a 1.6x cropped image on full sensors.

thank you for this!

I bought Sigma 18-35 1.8 and so far this is my main (and the only) lens to go with R50. I think it makes sense to also have 1st and 3rd, thanks.

It also really depends on how you shoot. Large apertures are a must if you dont shoot on a mount or at anything outside good bright lighting. The R50 is well noted to absolutely shit the bed at moderate to low light.

The 100-400 only make sense for wild life photography, I can’t see it being use much for any other genre. It also doesn’t make sense on the R50, apsc for wild life probably would be better with R7, the higher quality apsc in canon system. The focusing is too slow on R50, I have one I would know.

Being from Michigan, loved seeing pic from mackinaw City in Mackinac Island.

I run RF16, RF28 and RF100-400. If I'm sure I don't need tele, I swap 100-400 with adapting EF Sigma 17-70mm f2.8-4 contemporary. When the Sigma 18-50 RF version arrives, I'll trade that out.

I'd replace the 50mm with the 35mm F1.8 macro IS STM. It does depend on the use case of course but for most portraits etc, the 50mm 1.8 is just too close up if you want to shoot full body. I tried both and ended up returning the 50mm. The 35mm is sharper than the 50, has Image stabilization and can actually do some macro work if you ever want to experiment with that. The rest of the video I agree with fully. I have this setup along with the RF 35mm F1.8, RF-s 18-45 kit lens and RF-s 55-210 lens.

Out of all which one would you prefer for shooting indoor videos?

and does these lenses are good for video?

The only 3 lens are 10-18mm 16mm and 50mm

@adamharig What is the lens that you can most recommend for product photography

ok in Australian dollars including tax in the price its $599 for the ultra wide, $325 for the f1.8 prime lens and $1179 for the 100mm-400mm your looking at 2103 AUD which is $1373 USD in the grand space of things I guess its not bad but these lens my question is are they high quality?

Adam - Thanks for all your videos they are super helpful. I am looking for a macro lens for my cannon ae-1 program and wondering if you had a few suggestions? My subjects would be insects, flowers, shells. I want to get super close to the objects picking up detail. Thanks in advance.

Good review

Please how switch between manual focus and auto focus I fix the focus? I've just bought the R50 camera and 50mm lens but the button on the lens does not affect the focus. I know I'm supposed to do it from the camera but I don't know how. Please help.

Question what is that thing around the camera to make it easier to hold?

I thought the third one is 24-105mm.

Does anyone know how to make the background blurry I have r50 and 1 lens which is 18-45 mm

So would these 3 replace the previous list of 4? kzfaq.info/get/bejne/q7h3maaQ27S1YYk.html

Which camera lens would you recommend for better video stabilization?

I just bought R50.. And I'm loving it ❤

Does the 10-18mm lens convert your r50 into full frame? Or would you need something else for that

So I'm stuck in between buying the EFS 10-18 or the RF for my M50. I already have an adapter (Viltrox speed booster), considering I can drop the aperture in the EFs one, what will you advise me to do?

when you zoom the camera with 100-400mm does it losses quality when you zoom?

Bro r50 kid lans video rivew

What is the best lens if i want to do youtube videos with R50 please, a lens that isolate the background and still sharp and get good frame without pushing the camera 6 feet away like the 50mm 1.8

very heplful

A better question is what camera you use to make this video ?

I am a beginner. What is a good zoom for a Canon R50.?I was thinking of the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM but I understand it is really dark at 7.1 and not really good for low light

Hi, I’m new to photography and I have the canon R50 and would love to take real estate photos, what lens would you recommend?

Although I am not buying them very soon but here in India its more than 1300 USD. But surely buy those one day :)

Who is better 10mm vs 50 mm

I can only agree with 50mm. partially. But overall this is a very convenient and obvious set. Looks almost like an advertisement. You definitely show budget lenses. So we are addressing this to people who save money, right? So the first thing is an adapter. And the second thing is used market. Let's use imagination, as well as knowledge from many tests: 1) RF 10-18 is not exactly the thing that squeezes all the juice out of the sensor. At 10mm it crops out about 20% of the frame to even out its 10% distortion. I am really a big opponent of this “smartphone” approach. Imagine that a person has all this hidden magic in his smartphone and he's tired of it, he really wants to have control now. And what does he get with this lens? Stretched pixels, unused sensor potential in the name of compactness. EF 10-18 is not the most reliable lens, but a good copy will give a more honest result and you will still be able to use all the 22x14mm area of sensor you paid for when you bought the camera. This lens may not be so sharp wide open, but all this stuff with stretching doesn’t give any chance to corners in a new lens, closing the aperture is useless. And besides, you will see additional consequences during processing. 2) The RF 50 is an excellent lens with a wonderful bonus in the form of a minimum focusing distance, but... If there is an adapter, you can also consider the EF version. It will be cheaper. You just need to remember that RF cameras do not support linear manual focus on EF STM lenses. 3) I don't like 100-400 at all. This is 70-300, which was made longer and darker. This is what Canon is doing with its telephoto lenses now. And specifically with this lens, especially on crop, I don’t like it. This is not a very sharp lens and some tests show that the EF 70-300 usm IS II at this pixel density can be sharper even after a crop to 400mm field of view. Even if this is not the case, and the 100-400 has some advantage in detail when shooting distant objects, it will not be very significant. But the 70-300 is a more versatile lens, and at the same time it at least "almost" contains the 100-400 in itself. And you can't say the opposite. And yes, you can find 70-300 cheaper. I don't know. Maybe there are some happy people who just go to stores and buy what the sellers offer them. Do they need guides? In any case, I have not seen such people in my area. Most photographers I know make the most of their budget and yes, EF was and remains a savior. Without EF, it will not yet be possible to spend money wisely.

wow those lens are expensive for the quality they are.... I remember when you could get a 50mm prime lens from canon for less than 50 bucks.

Why do y'all KZfaqrs keep pushing that shallow dof is somehow a professional look?

these shitty dark zooms are so useless. you need perfect sun to shoot at f8 especially on crop sensor what a joke

4.5 = garbage