A comparison of the Oyster Cooler and the Yeti Hopper for gearjournal.com.
Пікірлер: 10
@Adam_NewmanАй бұрын
Awesome cooler
@L.G.productions27 күн бұрын
compare the yeti tundra 35 vs that. the soft cooler isn't a fair comparison
@Wittyusername8224 күн бұрын
But comparative size makes a difference. At not much bigger than the yeti this cooler is far more efficient. A hard sided yeti will be much better of course but it’s also much larger than the oyster.
@shokher9992 ай бұрын
Does the lid on the oyster stop itself when opened or does it flop all the way backwards if you let it go?
@KingShark26Ай бұрын
Does not flop over. Can be Opened either side
@kdlange6052Ай бұрын
The whole point of an oyster is to not use ice 🧊 you’re supposed to use their “thermal battery”
@thegaragejournal6584Ай бұрын
That’s not the case actually… In fact, I found that their ice pack replacements aren’t as efficient as ice. However, if you put cold cans in the Oyster without ice, they stay cold for a good 48 hours vs. the Yeti which keeps them cold for just under 24…
@qy05Ай бұрын
I don't think their thermal battery is the whole point. It's merely a suggested option. Ice is just as effective, with the only drawback being melted water.
@kdlange6052Ай бұрын
@@qy05 read their website of course you can use ice but it’s a “no ice needed” cooler and it’s why the gel packs are included. It’s optimized for use with ice packs
@thegaragejournal6584Ай бұрын
Yeti was kept zipped… Oyster can open from either side and stays in position.