And somehow it seems right.

That's actually a 4:3 ratio

​@@JWStreeterright. That's what he said?

Right? And floating skateboards.

😆

To quote Douglas Adams, time travel was discovered simultaneously at every point in the time continuum.

I love how his words are mainly used to justify more words and some more words . It’s kind of like he is just stood there chatting sh*t.

@@transatlanticsilkcottonfabrics the results of time travel are all decided by what type of imaginary time travel people are dreaming about!

technically you cannot here the voice of somebody outside your light cone, nor you have any information about them or their reality

@@Staarkalinou good one.

Dude…your light cone is showing..

rkalinou 😢H09=❤

You're fired

It's on the podium with him already lol

​@@joshuaadams3891 Wasn't there for a couple of months

On KZfaq 😂

And you weren’t able to do anything to change it 😅

@@dfv15 I just listened, had no questions..

It must have been a great trip and experience! Good for you, wish he would come to a place near me

What if you went back in recent time and killed yourself (before you lost all that crypto with FTX) and then replaced yourself and make a better financial decision?

Don't be a dick

I'm the same with audio books

Audio books Co.e with timers and u can save YT vids

Set a timer on your phone where the ‘When Timer Ends’ setting is “Stop Playing”. Then you always know it’s within 30 minutes or whatever your timer is.

You can probably do this with a device that can tell when you fall asleep. Doesn't apple watch do that?

I usually try to screenshot when i feel the sleepy coming. 😂

What are the laws of physics, exactly? Who wrote these so-called "laws?" Evolutionist athiests "believe" in this and often rely on the "Laws of Nature." But if you ask them, "What is "Nature?" they give the dumb buck look. It's a magical wall they cannot penetrate. Science is a circular reasoning mental exercise of futility designed to break your mind.

About 13 years younger to be exact…

😂

When you read this I'm in the past you are in the future .

@@bltn7469 🤣

and 30 years older than he will look next week, when he gets back to two years ago.

You are never the same matter from day to day because every molecule that we're made of gets replaced from day to day. Particle isn't at two places at once, it's either in the future or in the past.

@@AthenaShelly I don't think you understand what is being said here. You are made of matter, regardless of where it is now. You are not taking into consideration whether a person travels back in time for example only one second. Are the molecules the same as they were a second ago? If so, there are now two of you made from the same molecules, and you both exist for a second, until the other you disappears. Hence, you have two sets of you, made from the exact same molecules. Heart muscles for example don't get replaced in years. The water in your body right now might be somewhere else in a few days. Still, the water in your body has to change into water that exists in the universe. if it doesn't come from outside of the universe, it has to have existed in this universe since the beginning. It doesn't come from nowhere. Thus, if you take yourself into the past, have you brought back molecules that already exist somewhere in the past universe, or are molecules made out of particles that aren't actually the same, meaning, that is what we see actually an effect of something happening to our universe, or is everything the real concrete thing in this universe, not touched by any other effects?

My double will have to fight me for those atoms

@@Lawhnothing is being “created” in this situation. they aren’t new particles, they’re the same particles from the future. just because a particle’s future is contemporaneous with its present does not mean that it has been duplicated, or that the second particle is different, or that it’s stolen from some other universe. if this is to make sense, you should be able to draw a world line from past to future to past again. in doing so you will see that nothing is ever duplicated, the particle’s personal history simply folds over itself.

Simply? Using this word makes me doubt your understanding of your lack of understanding, or maybe you are a genius, I can't know since I'm not one. If I travel back in time one second, there will be two of me for one second. I would have aged one second more than otherwise. The two of me consist of what we would consider to be the same matter, separated by time and space as well. Has the matter somehow reversed it's linear directional travel through time, or has it been taken from time and space and placed back as a separate entity entirely, as you say folded. What does this reflection consist of? There is now for a moment more matter in the universe than there was before, and how will this affect the surroundings? Will there be a balance of matter outside of time, where if you take some matter from the future and put it in the past, that there is no resulting issue in that? This doesn't make sense but it's funny enough to say out loud. If I have to pay for a car and I have half of the money and a time machine, what theory would support the idea that I would go to the car dealership, wait for my time travelling self to come back with my money, hand the cashier two half stacks of money, and then I would take the car and leave. Of course in I guess my logic there is a problem here, since I would eventually have to get the money into the time machine, so the cashier would not be able to hold on to it without destroying the universe or something. But the point of this thought experiment is to go deeper into the balance of things. The doubling and removal of matter. @@tonoornottono

law is a strong word. its more like a suggestion really

Common sense

Spider-Man totally exists, good sir! Why, he saved me from falling out of a window yesterday. How dare you insinuate such a thing!

this spider verse had me wondering if there is a spider out there in the Simpsons universe that was bitten by Radioactive Man and if he teams up with spiderpig?

So refreshing to read something logical on this thread...!!

My will to survive?

Ok! Let's do it!!

Liquid is quite flexible. Perhaps time is as well. There is a lot we do not know. Which is fine because it would be pretty dull with nothing left to learn.

Thanks, Michio Kaku.

Or go fast

Our preception of time flows only one way. Actual time doesn't exist

you dum

nope. think of yourself in a space ship that looks like any ship of days past with a mast and a figurehead, a sail and an anchor, as well as a deck and a crew. you're sailing on the outer boundary of the ergosphere, if you can define such a place. you have an anchor with a chain of near infinite strength, with a spot light shining directly up the chain. while that chain is in the ergosphere, you still expect the light to hit the bottom of your boat, regardless of the direction the ergosphere moves, because that chain will curve to match the movement at a certain point, the anchor and spotlight hit the event horizon and the light is no longer traveling fast enough to overcome the gravity from the singularity, just like if you were to spray a squirtgun at the moon, it's just going to fall back down. that doesn't mean the path to the moon doesn't exist, only that the propellant needed for your water is not sufficient. think about the chain, it hasn't broken, it just experiences spaghettification. a geometry that follows the chain would lead out the event horizon. the concept of the ergosphere is the embodiment of that geometry. as the black hole spins, the centrifugal force is an additional boost to the momentum of light, allowing it to break away from the singularity at a point where it would not have broken free otherwise. so while your ship may be able to pull the anchor out and see the spotlight again, the thing would have sent your ship spinning like a whip as it acted like a sail in the gravity and to pull it out, you would turn into a black hole. but a theoretical geometry does exist, it just doesn't come easy.

@@Mitchell_is_smart._You2bs_dumb I'm not reading all that shit, you dont even use physics you just use dumb analogies and there are no par breaks

There is no faster than light travel. The speed of light is the limit.

@@jhkuno88 Cherenkov radiation, tachyons

This is just more fantastical bs hiding behind poetry. Easy to spot. Eminem would crush you. Why are you posting about time travel on a truther site?

He makes physics entertaining.

Glad he doesn't mumble and lie .....

where you think dark matter comes from? 🤔

Your reply is interesting in that it is very book worm ish. Ask yourself this - what force or intelligence is it that tells a photon to change from a particle to a wave and back again? Of course, the answer is easy. Photons don't exist. No paradox. Just like electron probability clouds. Total nonsense. Physics is fake.

Perhaps the current state of the environment is just the most likely outcome of every possible interaction of "time travel."

What do you mean? Time travel is entirely possible. Many scientists concur with this. Not with the tech we have now mind you, but that could change. Just because you don't like it, doesn't make it fantasy.

@@mywifesboyfriend5558 yeah, scientists believe a lot of things are possible, (in theory) such as time dilation, when matter is caused to speed up to close to the speed of light. Einstein believed you could use the measurement of the speed of light multiplied times itself to calculate the amount of energy that is bound up in mass. But writing something on paper doesnt mean it's real. Time travel certainly isnt. Ghosts arent. Levitation isnt, unless you consider the short distance one magnet can repel another magnet. But maybe mind reading is real. Right now I can read your mind, and i can tell you believe ALL of those impossible phenomena.

Write it in your manifesto, jackass.

The light cone is a false demonstration. The light from the light source would radiate equally in all directions, therefore it would be impossible to go outside it!

the moment one clock travels a different distance

Gravity as a fictitious force. Main article: General relativity The notion of "fictitious force" arises in Einstein's general theory of relativity. The way all masses in free fall descend at the same rate led Albert Einstein to wonder whether gravity could be modeled as a fictitious force. When F = ma, the size of the force can be measured by the size of the mass and how much the mass is being accelerated at. But all masses in free fall accelerate at the same rate of acceleration, that would mean if gravity is a force then that force changes for each object. He noted that a free falling observer along with various items in a closed box would not be able to detect any force at all, for they would all have no weight. W = mg then W zero = mg zero. In other experiments using a scale various items have various weights. Therefore now when using a scale F = ma is true, where equal acceleration truly produces different real weight forces from different masses, and F can now be measured; hence, weightless free falling reference frames are equivalent to force free inertial reference frames (the equivalence principle). Developing this insight, Einstein formulated a theory with gravity as a fictitious force, and attributed the apparent acceleration of free fall due to observers watching from a non-inertial reference frame while they are being accelerated by a force, and to the curvature of spacetime, which is a force free inertial reference frame. This idea underlies Einstein's theory of general relativity. NIST WTC FAQ 31. How could the WTC towers collapse in speeds that approximate that of a ball dropped from similar height in a vacuum (with no air resistance)? NIST --> "Since the stories below the level of collapse initiation provided little resistance the building section above came down essentially in free fall."

​@@davidmudry5622 Your principal premise is wrong. Mass matters. In space, two 10 gram weights will attract each other with a force 4 times as strong as two 5 gram weights, provided that all external influenceces are excluded.

@@davidhess6593 Newton said all objects in free fall have the same acceleration because a big mass might be heavier but it's also harder to push. Einstein laughed his head off, LOL, and said there is no weight in free fall, what an idiot Newton is. Any comments ?

@@davidhess6593 Q. 3 different sizes of drones are hovering inside a bus at the same distance from the back of the bus, and suddenly the bus accelerates. F = ma, what forces are on the drones during this acceleration?

@@davidmudry5622 Virtually none until the drones hit a passenger, a seat or the bus windshield.

It's all ready happened.and a mind boginnigly large #of almost identicle parallel realities that have differant consistent histories is where we seem to be.😮

@@rudedawg2495 You're referring to alternate time-lines a.k.a. the "many worlds" interpretation of quantum mechanics. That's not quite what I mean. I'm talking about traveling forward in our current time-line. Although traveling to THE future may not be possible because of quantum indeterminance. Perhaps we'll only be able to visit a sheaf of the most probable futures.

This is 13 years ago in a school library in Missouri…. I’m sure “parametric equalizers” weren’t top priority

@@JohnnyNiteTrain Tell the kid to use a notch filter lol.

That's like saying going to the toilet is traveling. I mean sure, but what an uninteresting way to look at it.

Interstellar is a science fiction movie.....the operative word being fiction.

@notfiveo time travel decisions are only relative to the person traveling except in the universe’s that are affected due to unlimited possible universes…does that make sense?

@Dracarys yeah except, when you bring about the changes to the parallel universe by changing the past, the one thing that changes in the original universe that does affect others is that you are no longer present in the original universe, right?

@@raheelsarvana I suppose that would be the case though it wouldn’t change the original timeline for you to be gone and would only have an effect on the future that hasn’t happened yet.

Yeah that's what the videos saying dummy

No it doesn't, get your head out of your ass, there is no time travel. @@MadBull.34

The GPS receiver has a stable quartz clock. It constantly sets its time by using at least 4 satellites. By using at least 4, the overlapping signal spheres means it can pinpoint itself and calculate and correct for its own clock inaccuracy (because it can trust the satellite clocks) Therefore, all gps receivers are as accurate as an atomic clock. Otherwise, they would be very inaccurate

I think it's fascinating that we have to adjust the time on GPS satellites (in order to compensate for the relativistic effects of time dilation and frame-dragging), not because time is flowing any differently on-board the satellites, but because it _appears_ to be flowing differently from our perspective here on Earth. Relativity is weird!

@@simesaid We have grown up thinking time is unwavering- maybe in our experience we think it is, although 'time flies' is a great hint. Once you realise that the speed of light is fairly constant - and that different observers experience time _relatively_ which makes this true - it makes far more sense.

@@simesaid According to the experiment on an airplane flying around the earth time is really flowing different at a higher speed and different gravity. If it is time that is flowing different or the clock that is behiving different at speed is a question though in my oppinion. There is often two sides to a coin.

It is fascinating but with GPS we are talking micro seconds. When you get into the time dilation effects from near light speed travel that is when things get really interesting. Einstein's thought experiments were able to simplify mind boggling concepts. Then, he could math it.

Good question. I can't think of a way to stop moving though. It might be impossible.

@@whichgodofthousandsmeansno5306 Absolutely it's impossible. we'd need to factor The size location and trajectory of every atom in the cosmos just for a reference point to start with. and that's not to mention that we don't know if the same sheet of time travels through multiple dimensions. and if we can stop relative to this dimension. that maybe its not gonna stop relative to another dimension. And in effect void any attempt to measure it.

I would think everything to do with theoretical physics is incomplete. My take is that multiverse theory solves all paradox. However, I see no way to verify it.

and maybe they'll be able to create a perfect simulation of our time that people will get plugged into. and maybe people inside this simulation forget that they're in one. and they create simulations of their own. which eventually create simulations of their own...and so on ;]

Don't hold your breath. People have been working on Fusion power for well over 70 years and its still just a dream.