Nice going

Can you do t 80 bvm please

Always, odd!

C'mon bro, you know you get the like before the fullscreen... As is tradition XD Thx for sharing tho frfr!

120th try. Please play the T-80(light tank) or the T-28e in the USSR 2.3 br. They are fun and you have no videos on both tanks. The T-28e is in the folder of the T-28.

Gaijin not letting an AMERICAN heavy be a heavy. Most Russian and German tanks still get to bounce 5 out of every 6 shells that hit them.

​@@alphastronghold715 Bullshit. My king tiger gets oneshot by atgms and heatfs all the time. Every ww2 tank suffers from this regardless of nation.

@@GHOST_CROATIA skill issue, the tiger 2 is easy to play

@@daskollektiv4593 🤡

@@GHOST_CROATIA the irony of that coming from a germany player, the group of people that will cry and bitch about balanced tanks until they get nerfed out of being usable

it was good, but also wayy to OP. the fact that it could face 6.0s was frankly broken

The heavy tank meta was the best time in WT for me. Now we have HEATFS slinging go-karts

I would love to see this at 7.3…7.7 is just too much

How to forget when US mains were stomping people way before they could access the M103 which was another beast back in the days. That lineup had me screaming "broken piece of sh*t" when i was playing other nations knowing damn good i just had a marathon of 7 hours with that lineup. Character development has not been in favor of US mains these past few years.

​@Hyperborean Feelz it still shouldn't be 7.7 nor should it have twice the reload of a long 88 with such similar shell performance. Plus back in the day at 7.0 it would have been super op but probably not as much anymore considering what has been placed at 6.0+. Atleast move it to 7.3

Skill issue

peepee tank

A CHAD 1 aka AC1 (definitely not its real name) is just built diferente.

And if not your turret roof, then your engine deck.

Yup. It’s a T A N K .

@@lunseren It looks like it's *the* tank

@@TRPilot06YT Even a blind person would be able to see it’s a T A N K .

That would be nice. One match you can face tigers and the next cold war go karts with thermals and apfsds, the power difference in those BRs is insane

I'd agree, mainly because if you took any 7.0 vehicle out you could face the IS-2 in one game and then the next game face the T-55A, which has 3BM-25 APFSDS with ~330 mm of pen and also has a HEAT-FS shell with ~390mm of penetration with the current +/-1.0 br intervals. With the +/-0.7 intervals, you could face at least the IS-2(1944) and at most the T-54(1951)/T-54(1947) which does have APDS, but no APFSDS and at best HEAT-FS which itself doesn't deal as much damage as APFSDS and can be countered by composite or spaced armour. So yes, it makes a lot more sense to have a +/-0.7 interval instead of +/-1.0 interval.

I think this solution is too easy and makes too much sense for the snail to every use it :/

yeah man i agree but i doubt the snail will change it

Ive been saying this to my squad buddies. You lay out the most obvious and true argument. When you get uptiered, you get uptierd hard and it makes 7.3 and up heavies honestly pointless bc heat alone. Why would you choose a slower vehicle with slower reloads over one with mobility if getting hit ends with the same results 😂

If GHPC keeps up with all the updates Gajin is in serious trouble! Even Modern Warfare is giving the Sail a run for it's money. It's with health points but still it's very fun to play. Anyway,GHPC will surpass Warthunder in no time if the devs' keep this up...

@@koenruysseveldt3848 Lmao nobody will ditch WT for that thing any time soon..

​@@CptAngelKGamingyeah lemme just compare Skyrim to WoW, they are both fantasy games right? Some people lol.

Totally balanced XD

I Kinda dont know what you mean, the IS6 can easily be pen'd by DM13 for example, the T32 cant. Also the reload of the is 6 is longer and it has less pen. Still i have to agree the IS6 should be 7.3

@@dodolul9016 in my experience it cannot be penetrated by dm13 that easily, i play a lot with the leopard 1 and i have to use heat in order to pen its frontal plate, but yeah i think the apcr in the t32 its useful in some situations... the is6 is much faster though

I personally think that the is-6 should be moved up a little bit, and the t32E1 should be moved down slightly. Maybe 7.3 is the happy medium, 7.0 is a little low considering what it can fight.

@@Actul_Trap an is6 at 7.0 is like a t34 at 3.0

Still feel like 7.7 is a bit much. It was horrendously OP at 7.0 but I think 7.3 is the happy medium

Not a blast to play at least in 2024 with all the new additions.

France at least has trolly armor, and insane reloads, on top of mobility. THEN you have PENETRATION to boot. The AMX M4 can chew through a MAUS turret from almost 1000km away, the T32 can’t even do that point BLANK. And Gaijin thinks it’s comparable to the MAUS. It just isn’t. Just like how Gaijin things a Sherman Jumbo is equivalent to a King Tiger…

thats 15 with an aced crew too lmao

That's an aced crew, stock it's closer to 20 seconds.

The anti American bias in War Thunder is just as bad as the Russian and German bias.

@@guanyin19 america doesn't suffer bias as bad as you think. what they lack in tanks here, they gain in ridiculous CAS and usually dumb enemies. the real nations that face any sort of anti bias are minor nations.

@@shronkler1994 Those planes have been nerfed heavily. Compare American CAS to German/Soviet jets at 6.7-7.3. America doesn't have any sort of one-shot-kill planes like the others in question. American repairs are also miserable. It took Gaijin several years until they just recently made the 5.7 Corsair (a fucking prop fighter) not be 13k SL to repair, instead 7k. The F9F-8 at 8.3 is 21,000 to repair when it can;t turn, can't climb, guns suck for its BR, etc. 6.0-6.7 American props cost more than 8.0 German jets that beat them and every American plane at the BR with ease. The only reason CAS is redeeming for America is because the tanks are so horrible. A dung beetle would look appetizing if you haven't eaten in 2 weeks

Do you recommend XM-803/MBT-70? I've been on a fence about crewing any of the US tanks at that BR. My plan so far is to get a full 8.0 lineup and grind the 10.0 vehicles and then go from there.

Hangar view has pre volumetric physics i think. They didnt bother to update the hangar test fire physics

@@va5780 no its shit

playing the brits is the most boring thing you can do. I jumped ship after getting to 7.7 but Low tier is still fun.

@@iftikarrot8034 yeah they can have good tanks but they are just so slow a heavy for them is as fast a medium and their side armor sucks ass

@@iftikarrot8034 the comet and such are amazingly fun. Everything after is disapointmemt. Except the conway. That level of lulpen and velocity is amazing. The fv4202 is also a good hull down sniper. It shows all the centurions wouldnt be far more enjoyable with a rangefinder.

gaijin doesn't hate the US tree. if anything, smaller non-big three trees like the UK or France are hated... the US does suffer from the same problem they do, though (to a somewhat lesser extent) with relatively worse USSR and German players and Gaijin's dumb balancing methods... so many german tanks in particular are way undertiered... a panther at 5.3? fr? meanwhile the closest things to a US equivalent sit at .7-1.0 BR above it. that's all true, but the US does make up for it in CAS and some soft advantages over just hard stats that can give them the edge and allow them to succeed - and they do. I'd argue that where you see the US tree suffer the most is just in this 5.0-6.0 bracket, where they face many undertiered tanks with a stale variety of... just 76mm cannons save for the occasional 90mm (which should be able to UFP things like the panther)

Um

My obj120 in my backpack:

ermm aggshually ☝️ 🤓 that's not how the meme works

No? Because nukes happen in like 1 in 20 games at 9.7 and it would mean there would be no maps

@AviationGeek I am curious how many nukes get dropped per day, do they publish that info

I’ve spaded all of Sweden! :)

I've got similar problems. I pointed out a T-34-85 Gai behind my team spawn up by the church for a solid 5 mins and he killed about 14 of my teammates. I had to go up and try to deal with him myself and even then I couldn't seem to penetrate him no matter what I did (Panther D), he ate four shots to the hull with minimal damage Sure, skill issue and all but it was just really wierd

@@just_a_username8979 - yeah right... A lot of really odd non-pens lately. I non-penned an Ontos and a Marder in a T54 😅😅😅 Good times

@@canned__meat Don't worry, I have a clip of me non-penning the low BR Puma. With an su-100...

I use OBS and record the mic on a separate track. There's loads of tutorials I learned from! :)

Battle of the prototypes

Toyota Hilux with a turbo and a .50 in the bed.

Yes yes it is

maybe this is more of personal experience, but unless you're in 8.3 territory and most of the tanks are 8.3s then... you won't face too many tanks that can pen you easily, especially if you angle right

@@shronkler1994 7.3, Leopard Is, T-54s, BMPs, etc. can all pen the T32 frontally. 7.7, Maus can pen it frontally and you can only side pen the Maus in one small spot. 8.0, no explanation needed. 8.3, no explanation needed. 8.7, Leopard A1A1s, TAM 2s, etc, all melt your frontal armor.

8.0 is wild bro, you know what is driving at this br?

8.0 is crazy for no apfsds no stabiliser etc 7.7 makes sense

8.0 is maddd crazy, you probably haven't played the leo 1 have you? it's understandable and easy to form some very negative about things that seem to kill you all the time, but the leo is a HEAT-FS/APDS slinging vehicle with no stabilizer... not something that should see 9.0

@@shronkler1994 Hmmm, sounds exactly like 8.0 America, except with 120mm less pen than the Leo.

I think stock HEAT-FS just sucks at that tier, I just got to the Leo 2A5 and I'm not looking forward to grinding that tank or the 2A6 out. They're all I need to finish German ground so I can move on to a different Tech Tree. At least give something like DM-13

@@just_a_username8979 That or have it be a tier 1 unlock for a useable round. The types at least have a 4s reload so you can chew through all the ERA

@@MrSharkswith that would be actually decent. I can get around not having a rangefinder and sometimes not having even NVG's but give me a round that I can do at least SOMETHING with aside from tickle ERA and get volumetric'd or ghost shelled when I aim for a turret neck or barrel (had a lot of the barrel ghost shells recently and nonpens on a 2A4 side with darts)