fundamentals

That's incredibly sad lol

But there’s no cheating on Chesscom

I mean... If they both have engines is it really cheating one each other? Lol

It's incredible that people in 2023 still attempt to cheat.

And they both know the other one is also cheating during the match, lol.

Honestly, I'm surprised chess sites don't do a shadow ban type thing where they only pair cheaters together

​@@SoDamnMetalthey do once their system detects that they are likely cheating

if you paired with +-1000 rated people you are shadow banned easy to know also, they ban public ips like there is no tomorrow

I assumed he didn’t address the psychology. Literally 1% of videos on KZfaq actually discuss what’s in the title.

They feel like they are winning

So lame🤣

People who never experience the positive emotions associated with achievement/success/winning in everyday life sometimes resort to other methods to feel those feelings they crave but aren't able to attain on their own. If you could follow this person around for a day, you'd probably feel bad for them. In all likelihood their life objectively sucks.

It's a really strange phenomenon, for sure.

I think it’s bit similiar phenomena where people are so upset about losing that they accuse the enemy of cheating without any evidence.

@@aleksihiltunen7063 I'm only a 1200 and I still have the eye for a cheater. Most times I submit a claim I get an email back saying I got my rating points back. Out of 17,930 games 19 were banned for cheating. I'm assuming 200 or so didn't get caught

Yeah. And that is just the main line. There were other things to calculate. Very obvious and stupid cheater.

for real, the only way to validate Bxa7 was to bring the knight towards black's king and not to recapture with the queen but to centralize your queen and threaten a royal fork. Absolutely gorgeous game, nobody would be able to play like this versus Aman

Traps the bishop

Haha for real bro, edhe un e vura re

@@klismanibrahimllari7745 shum e cuditshme se nuk ja ndjek streamin edhe skam asnje ide pse mund ta ket vene emrin shqip, ndoshta ndonje shqiptar i ka shkruar ne chat e ja ka kerkuar...

Its well known that Bxf7 in the usual version and likewise Bxf2 in this case isnt as good as keeping the bishop. in both cases you get the pawn back. the only possible advantage of Bxf2+ is the loss of castling rights but the bishop pair and centre is worth more. the king just manually castles usually

If you find yourself with some time I would suggest going through the variations where Bxf2/Bxf7 happens. I believe it's worth learning because you're right, it's actually not straightforward how to play on from those positions with your king on the F file. Essentially taking the f pawn generally results in getting absolutely steamrolled in the centre and it's worth knowing how to handle your king's position if you find yourself with this tactic on the board.

Another big point is that you're leaving your opponent with two center pawns and removing their f pawn instead of the d pawn. Losing castling rights is never a problem in these lines, and you'll often find it's your opponent making use of the semi-open f file, not you, while enjoying their rock solid center. On top of losing the bishop pair, not a good path to go down.

white gets a big center and the bishop pair, engine says +1

I've gotten this line more commonly through 1. c4 e5 2. Nc3 Nf6 3. Nf3 Nc6 4. e4 Bc5 5. Nxe5 Bxf2+, there white has even a larger center but the same logic applies, my results are very good resulting from that position.

good

He was playing with an authorised speedrun account.

cuz c3 .. then you'd still have 2 pieces hanging and if you go bd6 after, you've only helped white develop

White plays c3 and they have a bigger advantage.

​@@bartholomewtheiiijr.386makes sense, thanks. I'm a chess newbie

wins the chess game, but doesn't Win. He either played the game of his life versus Aman or he was simply following engine moves. Turns out he was following engine guidance.. Lame.

Aged like milk 😳

@@Tocinos LOL

Move down, scales, please, don't say that, omg, scales, come on. Hicki.

Excuse my male emotional behind, ... because, here, I had to take 1:15 to come up with the psychological permission to say: Annoying. I didn't wanna!!!!! oooffff, life. Game, come on!

On something like 1:15 seconds up, and 40 to spare, just time dude, something you need to "get well soon" warrior, get Russianed, pff.

@@BumWatcher he was following engine moves not playing chess. time didn't matter

@@snared_ But.. were they f engine tho? Cause GOD forbid some pre engine type went through the line and made it play "legal"... vs human mind's acceptance rate and rating.

bro its a sponsor. It's just so aman can go out to eat and buy a nice house. It really ain't that deep

Can be automated probably

You don't

It has been easy to cheat in bullet for years and years

no I've told people about this for years. There are yt vids where people beat stockfish 8 in 1/4+0 on lichess. It moves the mouse for you.

I've also personally gotten rating refunds in 1/4+0 a day after a game where I got brutally brutally mated and taken out to lunch in 7 seconds.

yes its logical, BUT its finding the idea of trying to get that setup of the rook and queen barelling down the d6 pawn is what makes it suspicious, especially with limited time. That position at 4:08 is so obscure from the position at 3:48 and white played it so fast and cold blooded that its either the worlds godliest chess player playing or its a supercomputer

@@winterbreed7001 I thought the computer takes at least 4-10 seconds per move. But I see your point. I always assume people stew cheating against me and I'm only a lowly 1700 player.

400 elo comment, the 3 pawns wasn't the reason it was good, especially not in the middle game, no the reason it was bad, was because of some dank tactic where the lightsquare bishop pins the queen, and unpinning runs into a fork, otherwise trading your bishop for 3 pawns is just plain losing.

What's the use in seeing the top engine move when you can't see the ideas behind it? For a human, Bxf2 leads to a worst position

What's your rating?

If it isn't obvious to you from the video, no amount of explaining will help you understand 🤡

Hmm.. interesting take @@sam2725 - thanks for the insight. I'll give you a pass if you're 12 or younger but unfortunately juvenile ad hominem responses don't quite cut it when trying to point out the 'obvious'. Maybe next time try to point it out instead of ironically responding like a clown.

@@sam2725 did you not see how white played the literal only extreme fringe combination to validate Bxa7, a move which rarely if ever works, played instantly? It's obvious in hindsight that the opponent isn't playing chess rather just following engine lines with their d*ck in the other hand.

accuracy is not everything. Sometimes weak chess engines cannot find the full picture at just 1 second per move. You need to look at the insanely deep ideas (Bxa7, f5, Bb5, Qf4, Nd5, all just for the Bxc6 fork idea is near impossible to see; playing it in a pace of 2 seconds/move pretty much seals the deal). Furthermore there's risks that no human would ever take (e.g. Kd2 on move 29 would never be played by a human, as well as Bf3 in the endgame). If that isn't enough, you can look at their account and see they've lost several games against a 500, playing horribly. Then suddenly they become the strength of a 2800+, always playing at 2 seconds/move.

Mr. Hillcrest just told me the same thing

@@MWilsonME I found that just reading about emotional intelligence and watching the school of life on YT worked for me. also putting all what I learned into practice everyday. took awhile but I can have a normal relationship now.

bro its a sponsor. It's just so aman can go out to eat and buy a nice house. It really ain't that deep