Muslim do not stop praying

Allah in Quran explicitly and unambiguously authorized and endorsed slavery abductions human trafficking and grooming of children Muhammad violated the 10 commandments God gave Moses Quran does not mention 10 commandments Allah is the alias of Muhammad created to protect himself from the eternal and horrendous crimes committed by Muhammad

😅

🎉ok wait till EU shoes you off next week to Africa

@@moon2-nf8kz Alikum Alikum

Well not really impressive if the Qur'an claims to be from Allah Subhana Wataala. This is what you would expect from a preserved book from God Almighty.

this is what impressive looks like revelation 1:17 quran chapter 57 verse 3 Matthew 25:35-40 hadith qudsi 18 copy paste at its best

​@@balamb11dude did you even listen to the video

​@@balamb11 There's context between those two. We referring to our God, Allah. And your Bible are referring to Jesus. Like someone could say he's the strongest while someone on the other side of the globe could say he's the strongest too. The phrase " I am the first and the last " will always referred to God. Now on my DEFENSE, Jesus could've told the phrase to his people but because we believe he's a prophet but you guys miss understood it as a God instead.

​@MohamedAtef-mc9lp I did, it's bias from someone wanting it to be true. I've heard the same ting from pentecostal preachers in America proving the holy Bible as the true word of God. Basically jews wrote a powerful book 4000 year ago and Christian and Muslim used it as a template to build their society. Of course when Islam was being put together from thousands of written down sayings they would edit them together better than the original tora. I know I could no more convince you than I could convince my pentecostal preacher. God loves us. It's the dogma that has faults

Stupidity at best Pharaoh is the name for monarchs of ancient Egypt, who ruled from the First Dynasty (c. 3150 BCE😅😅😅) until the annexation of Egypt by the Roman Empire in 30 BCE.

Lies again? Dead Wife Ghost Bride

@@NazriB Thanks for helping this video rise in the algorithm woth your nonsensical comment

Ameen

The amount of lies and BS in this video is staggering. First off all Egyptian kings were preserved, saying that he will be mummified is like saying all kings were wealthy. Secondly you cant tell if a mummy drowned, because the way mummification works is by drying the body completely from any moisture. Any moisture would cause the mummy to rot and decompose away. Also the term pharoah is popularized by the bible itself. Ancient Egyptians called their kings rulers or just kings. The term pharaoh means 'Big House' which is like calling the US president Mr White House, or Mr Washington DC. Both the torah and quran got the titles wrong.

No the bible does

@@moon2-nf8kz did you not watch the video

Yeah keep doing quaran in africa , in eu u will be lined in chalk

I'm the Mujahideen and I'm making a scene / Now you's gonna feel what the boom boom mean 💥💥💥

​@@gamershub979wth

Matthew 25:35-40 hadith qudsi 18 revelation 1:17 quran chapter 57 verse 3 read and you might get enlighten

But Satan dwells within Islam, it's psychotic jihadists and it's child-raping Prophet.

​@@balamb11ok first hadith qudsi 18 this is authentic hadith [Narrated from Abu Hurairah r.a., he said that Rasulullah s.a.w said: "Indeed, Allah Azza Wa Jalla will say on the Day of Judgment: "O children and grandchildren of Adam, I was sick and you did not visit Me", there were those who said: "O my Lord, how can we visit You when You are the Lord of the Worlds", Allah says: "Don't you know, actually My servant named Fulan is sick, and you don't visit him? Don't you know, actually if you visit him, you will find Me near him. O children and grandchildren of Adam, I asked you for food, but you did not give Me food.” Some said: "O my Lord, how can we feed You when You are the Lord of the Worlds?" Allah SWT said: "Don't you know, actually my servant Fulan asked for food, and then you didn't give him food? Don't you know, if you give him food, you will truly find (the reward) for that deed with Me. O descendants of Adam, I asked you for a drink, but you did not give Me a drink." Some said: "O my Lord, how can we give You drink when You are the Lord of the Worlds?" Allah SWT said: "A servant of mine named So and So asked you for a drink, but you did not give him a drink, don't you know, if you gave him a drink, you would truly find (reward) that charity with Me"] this hadith is teaching us that God will give us his reward if we help others who is in need and fulan in islam is a man/woman who's name doesn't get specified so it could be anyone it could be the poor person who beg money to you it could be your friends it cold be anyone and now on matthew 25:35-40 [35 For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, 36 I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.’ 37 “Then the righteous will answer him, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink? 38 When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you? 39 When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?’ 40 “The King will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.’] while on Matthew it's showing that God or lord is only a human thay needs all of this while the hadith is teaching us to be kind and share to others

​​@@balamb11and also i don't see anything wrong with Al-Hadid 57:3 so yeah there is never wrong in Islamic teaching

Pharaoh is the monarchs of ancient Egypt, who ruled from the First Dynasty (c. 3150 BCE) until the annexation of Egypt by the Roman Empire in 30 BCE.

Pharaoh is the monarchs of ancient Egypt, who ruled from the First Dynasty (c. 3150 BCE) until the annexation of Egypt by the Roman Empire in 30 BCE.

Pharaoh is the monarchs of ancient Egypt, who ruled from the First Dynasty (c. 3150 BCE) until the annexation of Egypt by the Roman Empire in 30 BCE.😂😂😂😂

Most scholars of the modern day place genesis’s authorship somewhere between 5th and 6th century BCE, centuries after Moses is supposed to have lived.

@@zudo5813 Funny, Muslims donot know, ignorance is beyond comparable. Mist of scholars say mosses in between 1200 to 1400 Bce. And 80 % of historians say it was Ramses 2. Because of the 10 plagues mentioned in bible. But His father's mummy face (Seti 1 ) is more preserved than Rameses 2 mummy.

i'd say this is untrue, since the many archeological finds in Israel. Also, the dead sea scrolls are dated to 2000 years ago in first century AD. @@zudo5813

@@zudo5813but the oral history is appointed to Moses.

Why Muslims are stupid?. There is nobody here to point out the mistake he said. This is called the miracle of reinterpetation. He is changing facts to look like it is miracle. Pharaoh is the monarchs of ancient Egypt, who ruled from the First Dynasty (c. 3150 BCE) until the annexation of Egypt by the Roman Empire in 30 BCE.

Who were called kings?

​@@AA-xk1uvAt the time of the prophet Joseph pbuh. They were ruled by an outside nation known as the Hyksos. It appears that the editors of the Bible had the misunderstanding that all the kings of Egypt were "Pharaohs." The modern research scholars who have made a comparative study of the Bible and the Egyptian history are generally of the opinion that Apophis was the Hyksos KING, who was the contemporary of Prophet Joseph. When you read the story in the Qur'an of Jospeh pbuh it always mentions King and never refers to him as a Pharoah. This is the level of detail we're talking about and evident for anyone to see.

Hahaha bits funny, because the quran also referred to pharaoh as king in another verse hahaha

​@@abdulmunim318You know that Pharaoh and King were used interchangeable

​@@justlisa9220Its cause pharaoh and King were used interchangeable

. Why Muslims are stupid?. There is nobody here to point out the mistake he said. This is called the miracle of reinterpetation. He is changing facts to look like it is miracle. Pharaoh is the monarchs of ancient Egypt, who ruled from the First Dynasty (c. 3150 BCE) until the annexation of Egypt by the Roman Empire in 30 BCE.

@@ACAnCzlol i pity your intellect 😂

Why Muslims are stupid?. There is nobody here to point out the mistake he said. This is called the miracle of reinterpetation. He is changing facts to look like it is miracle. Pharaoh is the monarchs of ancient Egypt, who ruled from the First Dynasty (c. 3150 BCE) until the annexation of Egypt by the Roman Empire in 30 BCE.

so your bible is a historian human-written book. Why do you then call it Holy?

Anwser @emmgee5092

christinity with lies

True.

What's important is that at the time of Joseph (peace be upon him) they didn't call the ruler pharaoh, so if the Qur'aan was copying the bible it would also say pharaoh but it doesn't.

@@BlueSaladid Sir (or Ma’am), I don’t think you read what I said otherwise you wouldn’t have commented what you did. Please re-read what I said.

@@BlueSaladidwhy did Mohammed have a 6 year old wife

​@@lilfadeawayLAwhy did Joseph at 94 yrs old Marry 15 yrs old Mary answer that since u wanna ask questions

@@saltyfries88 where does it say Joseph was 94 ( genuinely asking )

it was about accuracy

true yet the term itself didnt exist at the time of the ibrahim, its like daying that a book from 1834 had the word smartphone in it, its illogical, which means that the book was changed

Amen

@@ET.1204 The Bible provides multiple accounts of the crucifixion of Jesus. Here are a few passages that describe Jesus' crucifixion: 1. Matthew 27:35 - "When they had crucified him, they divided up his clothes by casting lots." 2. Mark 15:24 - "And they crucified him. Dividing up his clothes, they cast lots to see what each would get." 3. Luke 23:33 - "When they came to the place called the Skull, they crucified him there, along with the criminals-one on his right, the other on his left." 4. John 19:18 - "There they crucified him, and with him two others-one on each side and Jesus in the middle." These passages clearly state that Jesus was crucified alongside two criminals. The crucifixion of Jesus is a well-documented event in both biblical and historical accounts.

@@ET.1204 Apart from biblical accounts, there are also historical references to the crucifixion of Jesus. While these sources are not as detailed as the biblical accounts, they still provide evidence for the crucifixion. Here are a few examples: 1. Tacitus (Roman historian, 56-120 AD): In his work Annals, Tacitus mentions the crucifixion of Jesus by Pontius Pilate during the reign of Tiberius. 2. Flavius Josephus (Jewish historian, 37-100 AD): Josephus makes a reference to Jesus and his crucifixion in his work Antiquities of the Jews, although some scholars debate the authenticity of certain parts of this passage. 3. Lucian of Samosata (Greek satirist, 125-180 AD): In one of his satirical works, Lucian alludes to the crucifixion of Jesus and the spread of Christianity. Although these historical references may not provide the same level of detail as the biblical accounts, they do confirm that Jesus was crucified and that this event was considered significant during that time.

@@ET.1204 Jesus willingly sacrificed himself on the cross to pay the price for our sins. Through his death and resurrection, he offers us forgiveness, salvation, and eternal life.

@@ET.1204 I don’t care what the Quran says. It goes against what Jesus says about himself

Per-Ah, which can be adapted as Pharaoh in English, Fir'aun in Arabic, was originally the title of the Home of the Egyptian King. It only became the title of the King later on.

​@@ammarahsan2157so Egyptians spoke Arabic?

@@ricardomelendezlll2870 No, Firaun is an Arabization of the Egyptian word Per-Ah. Just how Pharaoh is an Anglicization.

But the Quran still got it right and the argument is not what is said in the book the argument is that if it was written in the bible that they were pharaohs the Quran would call it pharoh too but it calls them kings that agrees with the modern history

the bible?

Planner, not deceiver. This is what happens when you cannot read or understand Arabic.

​@@paghal11abfol translate what al makr means .stop this wannabe arab they treat Indian subcontinent as szalves

I would respond if I could understand half of what you just spewed from your keyboard. Try taking an "English as a 2nd language" class and then get back to me. @@celindsouza1950

Bible is full of error. Jesus was semite not European or Aztec.

@@julybeeb4614 What a stupid answer.

Right

bible isnt word of god as it has been edited by the narcicisstic paul

sorry my brother itho you were a chitent then i saw you were talkign about quran

mashallah

Haman is mentioned in the bible but he is a character in the book of Esther that is set in Persia. Also the book is accepted by biblical scholars as a fictional story

what are you talking spreading reagino you said mashallah now you rtrying to spread bible shi@@harharharharharharharharha240

If that book is fictional then I think the bible should be fictional^2@@harharharharharharharharha240

Glory to God ✝️🗿

​@@Zygomatic_Boltyou Alright?

@@Muslim827i Yes

⁠@@ET.1204 Trying to criticize a Christian with the Quran is foolish, they do not believe in it.

Man worshipper 🤢

@@ET.1204 no

Idk u r muslim or christian but brother dont call anyone's religion worse. If your religion needs help of someone to be proved true then it cant be true

Undisputed

Well it’s clear that the Quran got something right which the Bible didn’t and if the both claim to be books from God, then the one which is factually incorrect is not from God. This also refutes the argument that Christians make saying the Quran copied the Bible .

@@josuearana4733 See brother bible isnt a book itself. It's a collection of books. It's the collection of Jewish prophets. All of them changed. The gospel god gave jesus is not found anymore. The new testament isnt words of Jesus. And these were written by his followers who never saw jesus. And the old testament is the collection of jewish prophets before jesus. Many people changed those or else itd be the same thing

They also said that David is not a Prophet but a KING.

@@sofiansulaiman4308 David/Daud was both a king and a messenger getting the book of Zabur

​@@sofiansulaiman4308Jesus is not only king of sings, jesus is true god and almighty . Bible is word of god. your quran is not word of god. bible shows clearly how to go heaven (Eternal life ). Eternal life only possible with true god(Jesus) Only. allah is not god that is baal (Satan). With out jesus, you muslims not go to heaven , that is 100 Percent truth. jesus is equal to yahweh(Almighty). But Allah is equal to baal(Satan). in bible , many verses said jesus is god and almighty. your prophet is false prophet. but in bible jesus is different and in your quran jesus is different. with out proofs about jesus , your muhammed written a false statement in your quran. your muhammad will not go to heaven, because he shown many people in wrong path. jesus was crucified on the cross , there is eye witnesses on that 1St century, but ur muhammee mention about jesus in quran , that is not same jesus in bible. both jesus are different. your going in wrong path. true god (Jesus or yahweh) Never give his glory to Allah(Satan)

No bible has too many contradictions

Numbers 23:19 “god is not a man”

hi, christian here

there is no need to comment somethink like this, the bible is not about pharaons than its not important how you call egypt kings.

@@mirocotadotoho5799 muslims sometimes think they can debunk our entire religion

@@DemonSlayer_Anime second one now💀

@@Longestcomment... huh?

Waalaikumsalam 👍

And, if one is writing during Moses' day, one would use the word "pharaoh" to refer to an Egyptian king regardless of the time of his reign. Subhumanallah.

Thats easy, read genesis 1:22. obviously chicken first, since eggs cannot procreate. 😂

Ever seen a rooster impregnate a hen?

​@@ridhuan2335nope eggs existed first because there was animals that layed eggs before chickens existed

​@@makeawish9346SO THE CHILD EXISTED BEFORE THE MOTHER?? MY FRIEND😮😮...THE CHICKEN COMES FROM THE EGG BUT THE EGG IS A CHILD OF A CHICKEN..CHICKEN IS NO CHILD OF THE EGG SO THE EGG CANT EXIST 1ST

@@azoladusubana9488 he said the chicken or the egg he didn't say the chicken or the chicken egg so

Yeah of the times when Abraham was alive. It's historically proven.

Nope, the Quran got it right for joseph and Abraham, it called them kings, also when you want to call your father, do you call him by using his real name, or his title(father)? Your logic is corrupted.

@@Nero-F121 The Arabic word "Al" only appears before the name of an individual, but not before the title of an individual. Quran calls Pharaoh to be a name of an individual. This is one of the errors of the Quran. Mohammad didn't even know what the word "Pharaoh" actually was when he plagiarised Jewish and Christian writings. Pharaoh is actually the title of an individual, not the name of an individual. Only the Bible got it correct.

​@@Nero-F121 The narrator in this video is lying. He claimed that the Bible does not say king of Egypt for rulers of Egypt before Moses. But he is lying. As examples Genesis 40:5 says: ‘Then the cupbearer and the baker for the king of Egypt, who were confined in jail, both had a dream the same night, each man with his own dream and each dream with its own interpretation.’ וַיַּֽחַלְמוּ֩ חֲלֹ֨ום שְׁנֵיהֶ֜ם אִ֤ישׁ חֲלֹמֹו֙ בְּלַ֣יְלָה אֶחָ֔ד אִ֖ישׁ כְּפִתְרֹ֣ון חֲלֹמֹ֑ו הַמַּשְׁקֶ֣ה וְהָאֹפֶ֗ה אֲשֶׁר֙ לְמֶ֣לֶךְ מִצְרַ֔יִם אֲשֶׁ֥ר אֲסוּרִ֖ים בְּבֵ֥ית הַסֹּֽהַר׃ The phrase מִצְרַ֔יִם לְמֶ֣לֶךְ, lə-me-leḵ miṣ-ra-yim, is King of Egypt! Also Genesis 41:46 says : ‘Now Joseph was thirty years old when he stood before Pharaoh, king of Egypt. And Joseph went out from the presence of Pharaoh and went through all the land of Egypt.’ וְיֹוסֵף֙ בֶּן־שְׁלֹשִׁ֣ים שָׁנָ֔ה בְּעָמְדֹ֕ו לִפְנֵ֖י פַּרְעֹ֣ה מֶֽלֶךְ־מִצְרָ֑יִם וַיֵּצֵ֤א יֹוסֵף֙ מִלִּפְנֵ֣י פַרְעֹ֔ה וַֽיַּעְבֹ֖ר בְּכָל־אֶ֥רֶץ מִצְרָֽיִם׃ Here the Hebrew word פַרְעֹ֔ה, p̄ar-‘ōh, AND מֶֽלֶךְ־ מִצְרָ֑יִם, me-leḵ- miṣ-rā-yim; So during the happening of Jospeh the Bible calls the ruler of Egypt: King of Egypt AND p̄ar-‘ōh. Because ‘p̄ar-‘ōh’ is according to the Bible a NICKNAME. A nickname with a negative background, a Hebrew word derived from "loudmouth" or "big mouth". So the Hebrew ‘p̄ar-‘ōh’ has another meaning than the Egyptian pr-ˤ3 "per aa" which means "great house". The Egyptian term had various aplications in Egyptian history such as palace, king or royal family. So the Bible is more accurate than the Quran because the Bible calls the rulers of Egypt by what they realy were: kings of Egypt, and a nickname about their character: just look at stories on the temple walls how these rulers of Egypt present and behaved themselves.

Sure, the author of the Quran plagiarised some stories from the Bible and some later made-up fantasy stories stories from apocryphia. Just a few examples of the later made up fantasy stories: The story of the baby Isa speaking found in Suras 19:29-31 and 3:46 is a parallel of the apocryphal Arabic Infancy Gospel from beginning of the fifth century. The many times misquoted verse Surah 5:32 is originated from the Talmud Sanhedrin 37a, in which is just a commentary written by a Jewish Rabbi The raven and the burial of Abel in Surah 5:31 is based on Jewish folklore e.g. Pirke De-Rabbi Eli'ezer Isa and clay birds in Surah 3:49 is also originated from Arabic Infancy Gospel from the fifth century. The story of Mary, Isa and the palm tree in Surah 19:23-26 is originated from the Gospel of Pseudo-Mathew from the fourth century. The fantasy story that Jesus was not crucified appeared in the Second Treatise of the Great Seth from the third century. Surah 4:157 is based on this story. The author of the Quran was really confused and could not distinguish between these later fantasy stories and what was actually mentioned in the Bible.

They also need to keep the titles reasonably short, fitting a certain amount of space. People have short attention spans and there are many competing titles, you have a short space to get their attention. VS is fairly common. If it was uncommon I would agree that it could be problematic. VS is also a sign to compare and contrast two things, but it is shorter.

@@jewelweed6880 : Agree. Maybe, a title : "AL-Quran mentions Paraoh *ONLY* in Moses" would have stirred more *CURIOSITY* and research. Or maybe : *Pharaohs were ONLY in Moses*

exactly that is the point. The bible is less accurate because there could be so much modification from the original text. That doesnt happen to Quran..the quran you read today is the exact copy of one from the time of Mohammad.

There are many more than that, it just can't fit in a short video

they are all correct tho?

it was an arab that showed it and clearly showed haters or thoose who trying to find wrongs about quran will translate the word to backbone instead of lower rib, and all thoose things you said have being proven to be correct

@@hahaloser3914 none of these things have been proven correct.

@hahaloser3914 the translation then says between lower rib and lower rib? Mohammed prayed at a temple in Jerusalem even though it had been destroyed years earlier. Yes everything proven wrong.