The Real Story of How America Got Rich

Рет қаралды 60,196

13 жыл бұрын

New videos DAILY: bigth.ink/youtube
Join Big Think Edge for exclusive videos: bigth.ink/Edge
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ABOUT BIG THINK:
Smarter Faster™
Big Think is the leading source of expert-driven, actionable, educational content -- with thousands of videos, featuring experts ranging from Bill Clinton to Bill Nye, we help you get smarter, faster. Subscribe to learn from top minds like these daily. Get actionable lessons from the world’s greatest thinkers & doers. Our experts are either disrupting or leading their respective fields. We aim to help you explore the big ideas and core skills that define knowledge in the 21st century, so you can apply them to the questions and challenges in your own life.
Other Frequent contributors include Michio Kaku & Neil DeGrasse Tyson.
Michio Kaku Playlist: bigth.ink/kaku
Bill Nye Playlist: bigth.ink/BillNye
Neil DeGrasse Tyson Playlist: bigth.ink/deGrasseTyson
Read more at Bigthink.com for a multitude of articles just as informative and satisfying as our videos. New articles posted daily on a range of intellectual topics.
Join Big Think Edge, to gain access to a world-class learning platform focused on building the soft skills essential to 21st century success. It features insight from many of the most celebrated and intelligent individuals in the world today. Topics on the platform are focused on: emotional intelligence, digital fluency, health and wellness, critical thinking, creativity, communication, career development, lifelong learning, management, problem solving & self-motivation.
BIG THINK EDGE: bigth.ink/Edge
If you're interested in licensing this or any other Big Think clip for commercial or private use, contact our licensing partner, Executive Interviews: bigth.ink/licensing
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Follow Big Think here:
📰BigThink.com: bigth.ink
🧔Facebook: bigth.ink/facebook
🐦Twitter: bigth.ink/twitter
📸Instagram: bigth.ink/Instragram
📹KZfaq: bigth.ink/youtube
✉ E-mail: info@bigthink.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Пікірлер: 184

@farihoyuguru2224 3 жыл бұрын

By having one of the most vicious type of slavery humanity ever experienced

@karinkorenkova2059 3 жыл бұрын

Go to kindergarten

@nathan9901 2 жыл бұрын

Vicious types of slaves?? Slavery was always that bad stfu

@burhan8795 Жыл бұрын

@@karinkorenkova2059 you should

@burhan8795 Жыл бұрын

@@cosmicwanderer891 your wishful thinking

@africasoundoff1518 5 ай бұрын

@@cosmicwanderer891it would appear that way to the one unable to read between the lines & thanks to their mandatory laws about school for minors & my whole academic experience there growing up as a kid that's not a problem I suffer from when it comes down to tying it into one his key points & that being AGRICULTURE they always have had plenty of fertile land ensuring they'd never starve

@BMWWolf 5 жыл бұрын

How did this guy manage to say so much without saying anything?

@krunoslavbanovac4356 5 жыл бұрын

politican

@frogmanthelibertarian1482 5 жыл бұрын

Lmao

@kalechips5972 4 жыл бұрын

Um...it sounds to me like you just have lack ability to comprehend complex concepts. Which is funny because he was pretty straight forward.

@nobilesnovushomo58 4 жыл бұрын

@@kalechips5972 No, he means that man was supposed to talk about the primary foundation of wealth creation and accruement in the United States up until present day, when all he did was make examplistic expository in favor that weren't well explained with the precise mechanisms, methodologies, and counterparts, appropriation of resources, the revenue sources, what those sources were, and in the governmental usage methodologies and principles underlying thereof in what way they pertained to the making thereof. For example, the Transcontinental Railroad, specifically Union Pacific went bankrupt multiple times, and significant portions of the railroad had to be reconstructed after shoddy construction methods and materials were used after securing the contract from the Government, while James J. Hill built a sturdy railroad from St. Paul, Minnesota to Seattle, Washington, The Great Northern Railway with no Federal aid whatsoever which remained in Business for almost 100 years until 1970 when it was bought by other railroads, which most likely wasn't because the company wasn't unprofitable because that was the same exact year when Amtrak was initialized. When the US government was given the Telegraph system to own and operate from Samuel Morse himself, it succeeded in losing money every month. During 1845 expenditures exceeded 6 to 1 profit yield on the sole mechanism closest to instantaneous communication with numerous commercialistic applications, until Congress itself turned the Telegraph company over to Private Enterprise. The populace of the United States was majority rural until 1910, and you'd have to justify expenditures to them. How does industrialization justify taxing farmers and rural communities? Will individual revenue, for their families, wives, sons, daughters, and their dream of becoming a successful land-owning farmer, as well as countless others to be unaffected, be taken monetarily from their ability to heighten livelihoods?

@halholland1637 6 жыл бұрын

So capitalism and property rights had nothing to do with it? WOW

@m.burgesszbikowski8049 6 жыл бұрын

This man is correct in pointing out the governments promotions within the economy. The largest difference for America from every other country that grew its’ economy, we had very little corruption. This causes such waste and misdirected resources the Country has real trouble growing.

@CONRADOSALASCANO 5 жыл бұрын

I don't care a lot about riches if I cannot have eternal YOUTH.

@CONRADOSALASCANO 3 жыл бұрын

@@andreapagano7967 My point is that I'd rather spiritually Ascend and develop an immortal, eternally-young body or light-body, than focus on riches. Of course I am mindful of money, but money brings energy attachments and sometimes I don't find it worthwhile to pursue more money.

@rshurn_ 3 жыл бұрын

he didn’t mention slavery that fueled most those industries. smh

@youtubesurfer134 3 жыл бұрын

Slavery was actually largely agricultural because it was very profitable for cotton farms this is why during the American civil war the union was eventually able to overwhelm the south. Because while the north who had banned slavery was industrializing the South had stagnated and stayed agricultural and this is largely why they ultimately lost. After the war the self actually started to boom and industrialize but only after there was no more slavery.

@shamalama29 3 жыл бұрын

And even though slavery was highly vested in agriculture down south. The South invested profits from slavery in Northern Industries.

@ytbmax9371 2 жыл бұрын

Slavery didnt make the America we know today rich

@darbyheavey406 6 жыл бұрын

The American Method of Manufacturing AKA the interchangeability of parts was perfected by Eli Whitney for the production of firearms. This is an often overlooked factor.

@GrumpyTinashe Жыл бұрын

🤝

@mrOga 4 жыл бұрын

i thought this guy is going to talk about the wars in iraq

@lylecosmopolite 6 жыл бұрын

Before WWI, which coincided with the founding of the Fed, and setting aside the emergency of the Civil War, the USA was a night watchman state with low taxes, and immense personal freedom. In most of America, the only law enforcement was a part-time sheriff. The main exception to what I have just written was the tariff wall the USA erected around itself. American manufactured goods were protected from (mainly British) foreign competition. I do NOT agree with Prestowitz when he claims that the USA before 1950 was more or less like China today. China is not at all a democracy, and has a heavy intrusive and punitive public sector.

@davidzapen8974 2 жыл бұрын

Immense personal freedom for most propertied white men.

@Lxx-tc4xc 2 жыл бұрын

@@davidzapen8974 Did the wives of property owning white men benefit from that property? Why have AA men not accumulated much property over the past 60-70 years?

@madisonave3622 4 жыл бұрын

He left out the part where black ppl (slaves) worked 20+ hours a day for 500 years. Can he say, reparations? Of course not

@nobilesnovushomo58 4 жыл бұрын

People had prices. Slavery was just a reiteration of Feudalism, in the sense that everyone paid the master, and slaves were given housing and food. In Europe, to no longer be apart of feudalism, their was a high struggle to have your labor accepted in a free-town or apply for apprenticeship of a tradesman, no one, the Lord included, held it against you if you moved, as the foundation of Feudalism in Europe was on mutual protection which evolved into systemic Feudalism. A tradesman becoming a blacksmith in one town was due to demand and ability to pay in bartering or currency. Villages weren't looked at as something to be micromanaged by the Lord. No one babied you. You were either good, or fired and moved on. Germany was the China of Europe at one time, producing cheap goods for the rest of Europe. Murder and high crimes carried capital punishment that at one point caused the systemic removal of those overwhelmingly from the bottom 1% on individualistic bases of capital crimes. Their was an understanding that as long as you didn't deliberately severely harm people, you were allowed to live.

@madelinecasiano4335 3 жыл бұрын

The thing is.... People don’t understand that Slavey has a bigger impact on the Caribbean islands more than America. If you dig deep enough you’ll see how laws in the south didn’t apply the same in the north. However, Caribbean islands had about a 90% higher slavery population than in America. Jim Crow was heavily pushed in southern states but the North had always had a history of “liberalism”

@stayfocused4324 3 жыл бұрын

Slaves were a minority of laborers , the majority of laborers , architects and engineers were white.

@AK-ug1md 2 жыл бұрын

@@madelinecasiano4335 he is speaking about the US .

@mohammedsadiq930 2 жыл бұрын

0:38 - 0:41 literally he jst said the truth in short form... Read economic hitman by John Perkins..

@EASYTIGER10 3 жыл бұрын

Outside of the actual fighting, did 1776 make that much difference to most American's lives? If you were a wheat farmer in Pennsylvania or a blacksmith in Massachusetts, were things in 1780 any different to what they were in 1770?

@TheKbrizzle81 6 жыл бұрын

Give this man some water

@JasonGafar 4 жыл бұрын

😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂

@anonygent 6 жыл бұрын

Crock of shit. Government financed operations, even land grant operations, operated much more inefficiently and failed far more often than privately financed operations did. And five separate studies now have found that infrastructure spending (canals, roads, rail, etc.) is a LAGGING indicator, it shows how rich the economy already is, not how rich it's going to be.

@ragnaroksora8129 7 жыл бұрын

petrodollar. nuff said

@noahm1379badazz 2 жыл бұрын

I can understand feeling completely undermined by him not mentioning slavery… However, I am confused why there are so many comments about it as if it has something to do with the wealth of America specifically. When asking why America is rich, we are also asking what did America do different that caused it to grow wealth in a way other nations didn’t. Considering how America didn’t really come into its own as we know it today until post WW2, slavery isn’t an explanation. Slavery existed everywhere before 1831 when the British made it illegal. Why isn’t Brazil as rich as the US if slavery explains it? They had far more slaves than we ever did and many more decades of the practice, not made illegal until 1881. Slavery doesn’t have really anything to do with the title of video or the underlying question of where did America get all of the money and influence and I think the number one thing is turning us into a society of ungrateful consumers who just want more, more and more when we were the only ones who could make the goods and buy them… This creates a positive feedback loop for businesses to invent things we don’t need but want and will enslave ourselves with debt to have.

@Lxx-tc4xc 2 жыл бұрын

The rise of the American economy is not an isolated instance. Other nations that have grown rich over the past 150 years include the EU (excepting parts of the Balkans), Scandinavia, Canada, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, New Zealand, Israel, and the oil sheikdoms. The USA "came into its own during the half century between the end of the Civil War, and its entry into WW1 in 1917. Brazil is a powerful counterexample to the contention that slavery, by allowing a significant fraction of the workforce to be underpaid, enabled slaveowners, and hence all of society to grow rich.

@jamesdeininger3759 6 жыл бұрын

Lots of reasons, but here are a few: 1640 - 1863: Free Labor (better known as “Slavery”) 1880 - 1920s: “The Great Wave” Immigration Boom, where the best, brightest, and most motivated people from around the world came to make better lives for themselves in America 1914 - 1945: US infrastructure left largely intact while supplying major European powers with war materials, so they could destroy themselves.

@deprogramm 6 жыл бұрын

Slavery wrong. "The Great Wave" wrong again, majority of them were blue collars and not "from around the world" they came from europe and we're not allowed to come from anywhere else. And wrong again, supplying war materials didn't get us that rich because in the end we were in the war and had accumulated a large debt

@jamesdeininger3759 6 жыл бұрын

Vasting You're kidding, right? The United States made ungodly amounts of money supplying war materials, especially in WWI: American industry in WWI boomed; in just four year, US exports to Europe rose from $1.479 billion dollars to $4.062 billion dollars. The private sector saw a significant increase in demand for supplies for the American army during the war. Contracts from the Army and Navy, for things like food, clothing, guns, and ammunition, increased rapidly. As a direct result, federal spending in the US also saw a swift increase, from $477 million in 1916 to its peak in 1918 of $8.450 billion.

@jamesdeininger3759 6 жыл бұрын

Vasting And what's wrong with European Blue Collars? They're the immigrants who wanted better for themselves and their families. They weren't forced to the USA -- They were motivated and chose to move there. To just childishly and blanketly sit there and just shout "False" doesn't add to the conversation. Bring some actual supporting data.

@deprogramm 6 жыл бұрын

Just because the country "made" that much money, does not mean the Government got all of it. Following the war, we were unable to even pay the WW1 Veterans the bonuses promised to them. This would escalate into mass riots all across D.C. I don't doubt the private sector made alot, but when the war was over they didn't need that many employees.

@deprogramm 6 жыл бұрын

James Deininger I didn't say anything was wrong with them. It's just when you say "innovation" these aren't scientists and white collared rich men. The source of US wealth has always been within.

@creamydistortion 5 жыл бұрын

Lee Iacocca's long lost twin brother.

@HopperRox_Shaves 5 жыл бұрын

No mention of the slaves? You can get a lot more profit when the labour is free! When that falls out of favour, pay the slaves just enough to go back to work the next day.............wash rinse repeat

@thezebraherd8275 6 жыл бұрын

For those of you saying slavery Brazil had about 5 times as many slaves as the US so logicaly if slavery is what makes countries wealthy brazil would have 8 times the GDP but is the opposite with the US having 8 times the GDP of Brazil. Also the northern free states are richer than the southern states that used to have slaves. So it clearly wasn't slavery.

@sadieb9824 6 жыл бұрын

what about ongoing and perpetual wars?? huhhh? I s brazil currently engaged in wars? Use your logic idiot

@1MarkKeller 6 жыл бұрын

Anton Zuykov if you aren't going to read real history, then you need to stop commenting on what you think you remember or were told.

@TulliverS 6 жыл бұрын

The North is more powerful because the South basically refused to industrialize during the 19th century. Instead, southern cotton traveled northward to industrial and shipping centers like Boston and New York, who used cheap southern cotton to build up massive textile industries. America did benefit massively from slavery, the south didn't because it was just making the raw resources, not adding the value.

@ebsmith29 6 жыл бұрын

Slavery helped to build the American economy. He explains how and why. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ed1mn6mq3p7OeZ8.html&t

@anonygent 6 жыл бұрын

Brilliant. Slaughter 'em with logic.

@takatsu5 5 жыл бұрын

Government has funded basic research, which doesn't immediately benefit anyone, and when there is a breakthrough, private industry takes over.

@HSet77 6 жыл бұрын

audio editing to reduce the throat clearing would have helped this interesting video

@SoundSelector 5 жыл бұрын

or give the man a glass of water

@silvesby 6 жыл бұрын

And more recently the US sold many weapons to allied powers, in both world wars, which made the US extremely rich.

@Midironica 6 жыл бұрын

Weapons sales did not and has not made America rich. And if you want to get on to a country for being an arms dealer, look at the USSR and the prevalence of AKs and T-64s.

@KOZMOuvBORG 5 жыл бұрын

Still does today, out of the top 10 arms producing nations (total ~$29 Billion), the States produced $10 Billion

@mattslowikowski3530 5 жыл бұрын

Russia has been selling basically just as much weapons.

@nole8923 5 жыл бұрын

Товарищ Сильвио You know nothing about America. Listen to about 30 minutes from someone knowledgeable like Chris Hedges. America was only rich from 1946 thru 1980. Only the facade of the petro dollar makes it appear to be rich today.

@MrParlam 4 жыл бұрын

Ну ты и затупок Товарищ

@bradleyeric14 6 жыл бұрын

Capital formation took place by destroying forest and prairie and developing farm production.

@kansaswheatfarmer2777 5 жыл бұрын

I'll tell you it right now. Capitalism, free labor (unfortunately), so much raw materials and resources. But most importantly geography like the Mississippi river, ports, great plains, great lakes and much more.

@propane718 4 жыл бұрын

Another whiteboy watering down history...why call it free labor and not slavery?

@MatthewGraham027 10 жыл бұрын

I understand that people want to make a point about government being in peoples lives for the good of humanity; and there has never been a time in history where gov. was absent. But to try to make the 1800's appear as if there was this massive role of gov. in the shaping of America is weak. Leaving aside the crap that happened back then (slavery, Native Americans, etc.) We remember the 1800's as the wild wild west in terms of personal enterprise. And in comparison to today IT WAS! That's why most people don't want to go back and repeal all of the laws we have now (progressive income tax, social security, welfare, medicaid, etc.) If we did we would all raise our hands and say that we were going back to the 1800's! And our focus on consumption rather than investment is going to come back and bite us (that is unless you really believe the Keynesian garbage).

@Skoda130 2 жыл бұрын

Progressive tax? You mean, the poorer you are, the progressively more tax you pay?

@Barca25644 5 жыл бұрын

What he is saying is out of context for example Yes Woodrow Wilson oversaw the acceleration of the aviation industry but No.1 that was in order to get an edge during the War and No.2 the government projects yielded absolutely nothing ......it was the wright brothers who came from nowhere with personal savings who invented the first successful aeroplane at kitty hawk

@SilkySmooth02 2 жыл бұрын

Agriculture???? What were we growing back then? Pretty easy to make money when you labor is free.....

@SkaffaS 7 жыл бұрын

america is over 20 trillion in debt, i wouldn't call that rich

@antivorg1239 7 жыл бұрын

government debt is mostly irrelevant in this topic if we're talking about America as a whole (especially considering most of that debt is owned by America lol), gross GDP is a figure more useful to look at

@thezebraherd8275 6 жыл бұрын

You think i'm funny? US has over 93 billion is wealth so that's still 73 billion dollars equity over twice any nations gross wealth that's pretty rich en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_wealth_per_adult

@pebblepod30 6 жыл бұрын

Doesn't really matter, if your a country that creates our own fiat currency. See MMT E.g. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/iqp8Z8Zpy7OzdJ8.html kzfaq.info/get/bejne/o6l_ic-Vzq3JgY0.html

@singing_bellman1255 5 жыл бұрын

@@antivorg1239 US debt is mainly foreign owned!

@romandarius6041 6 жыл бұрын

With a 20 Trillion Dollar debt, how can you say America is rich?

@Midironica 6 жыл бұрын

Because the entire world's economy is built on debt and because America's debt isn't as imposing compared to its GDP.

@ashish6345 4 жыл бұрын

Because it has more weath then GDP. You only give debt to someone if they have assets to pay it back.

@jasoncho554 3 жыл бұрын

He needs to clear that damn throat next time you make a video

@djtan3313 5 жыл бұрын

Dude, Strepsils...? Anyway, no matter wat d Chinese do, we'll always b hated...

@jeffro7856 6 жыл бұрын

Damn, 2011 video sucked.

@nole8923 5 жыл бұрын

Onlly a small elite became rich. There was a span of about 3 decades where the average “white” American actually had a fair chance at a good life from the end of WWII to about 1980. That was due to new deal policies by FDR. The death spiral of the middle class began with Reagan when they started dismantling the New Deal. Today we are in the death throws of late state capitalism. Today the average American suffers under corporate totalitarianism where the state and its politicians are under total corporate control. It’s unsustainable and America will be lucky to survive another 10 years. Americans know that their press lies to them everyday.

@fourtywater77 2 жыл бұрын

I think it's arrogant not to mention that the US economy benefited from 400 years of free labor from slavery creating that agriculture and infrastructure.

@africasoundoff1518 5 ай бұрын

He did mention it just in a clever way

@DipakBose-bq1vv 5 жыл бұрын

Without Imperialism the USA could not be founded and prospered. From the beginning it was the occupation of the lands belonged to the Native Indians that had promoted American capitalism, which was supported by Britain by both investments and army. Later Latin American countries became virtual colonies of the USA. After the Second World War, direct invasions of countries after countries stimulated profits of the American companies.

@pooi-hoongchan8680 5 жыл бұрын

Agree with you.

@miamimo70 5 жыл бұрын

It's trillions in debt for fk sake

@youtubesurfer134 3 жыл бұрын

We acted economically the same way China does today . . . . Red flag

@Viodoxy 6 жыл бұрын

That's was a bunch of nonsense. The railroads were built by the railroads they were given federal land but, that's a very minor part of the industry. Vanderbuilt made his fortune by not being part of the government shipping programs. The early part of America was giving out loans to build industry. There where tariffs on imports a) was the only way the federal government was funded b) they were intentionally made to be low enough to make American companies compete. The massive wealth production of America was its private propety/ free market economy. This guy is lying to confuse you all.

@chevyakacommas5961 4 жыл бұрын

He said nothing at all... He never once said the word Steal Land, Slave, Exploitation, Dishonesty, Violence, Force, Manipulation, etc. He keeps coughing because he doesn't want to acknowledge the truth... When he says "We" who is he talking about? These Documents alone mean nothing... Who was actually doing the Work? Who received most of the profits? This is the Worst explanation since Sliced Bread... 🍞 He mentioned Woodrow Wilson but, Woodrow Wilson also signed the FEDERAL RESERVE ACT Which he expressed regret in doing... Everyone is fucked today in part because of him...

@DD_MENEN 5 жыл бұрын

Slavery had shit all to do with it i guess😮✋🤔😑😯

@noahm1379badazz 2 жыл бұрын

No, slavery did not make America rich… the only wealth slavery produces is the kind of wealth that made the Romans relatively wealthy, cultivating and farming land. Slavery has been a constant for all of human history and within all cultures and civilizations. The freedom we grant to humans generally conceptually today is so new historically speaking, we are the weird ones to think of each other as we do. ,The kind of wealth we know today is only possible because of the elimination of slavery. Slavery hindered economic progress for all of humanity because it killed incentives to industrialize and get more efficient. It got the job done. It’s not until mechanization and the industrial revolution where eventually it becomes more economically viable to use technology. This frees up human capital which increases the likelihood of someone creating something even better. It is why the richest countries today are facilitators and service economies. The facilitating is so efficient one company can have a process like Apple to make iPhones where the involvement becomes basically having the know-how of the process and reaping the profits. Slavery makes all of this impossible and keeps societies largely agrarian.

@Skoda130 2 жыл бұрын

@@noahm1379badazz or suppiers of goods to rich countries..

@chrisfuller9510 2 жыл бұрын

This guy oozes the impression of lying

@sammybray5346 8 жыл бұрын

😕

@maxberre 6 жыл бұрын

That was brilliant! Who is this guy.

@riossamuel14 6 жыл бұрын

This guy is wrong! Yes the gov started to fund these but they failed! Only when these were left to capitalism is when they thrived so, Government does not help. Free market is the bases for a thriving economy

@teamtoken 5 жыл бұрын

Samuel Rios HAHAHAHA

@otaviodelucca3573 4 жыл бұрын

What is free market anyway? I know A LOT of poor countries with free market the same way I know a lot of rich countries with free market. Free market is good only if you have strong institutions to protect it. If you don’t have it, the country will be all sold for a really small amount of money and none of it will be left to make it rich, investing in education and infrastructure. That is what happened in a lot of countries in Latin America, Asia and Africa (And I didn’t even talked about corruption).

@Barca25644 5 жыл бұрын

Commi

@haroonaboo368 4 жыл бұрын

Two world wars

@dredoc1 6 жыл бұрын

Capitalism.

@roseofsharon4872 2 жыл бұрын

Before he did this interview, he should have consulted with the descendents of enslaved family's that was dehumanize and force to work this land for free which enable their white masters to get rich!

@KevinWall426 6 жыл бұрын

Individual liberty, social and economic mobility, you prosper on the fruits of your labor gave wealth. This guy talked for 5 minutes and didn't say anything insightful.

@imrankhan-oe2go 4 жыл бұрын

why America so rich...........?????

@jayeljh6638 4 жыл бұрын

If you notice he said nothing about the 300 years of slavery of free labor as if it never happened as if white people did everything on their own and they didn't have people enslave to do the work the hard Duty work and they just magically had this great economy what a piece of shit

@2REAL4MOST 3 жыл бұрын

@@jayeljh6638 Exactly!!!

@Lollol-ci7mc 4 жыл бұрын

The great America The great American building city's The great Hollywood The great new York city American technology changed our life America, new Zealand, Australia are great country love from India

@Eric-ye5yz 6 жыл бұрын

So you are saying what China is doing is OK, contrary to trump ?

@Skoda130 2 жыл бұрын

This video was made when Trump wasn't even in the picture yet.

@akashgupta-bw5vo 4 жыл бұрын

America is powerfull rich country because Americans deserves it

@resonant.interval 4 ай бұрын

no slave labor? 😶

@gorio01237 5 жыл бұрын

Lmfao hey avoid the free labor for 250 something years of slavery

@garyodriscoll7988 5 жыл бұрын

Gregorio Perkins there was no money in Slavery, that’s why they let it go

@olumorganjoe 4 жыл бұрын

@@garyodriscoll7988 that's not true. Slavery became less profitable.

@garyodriscoll7988 4 жыл бұрын

@@olumorganjoe that's what I said...

@Skoda130 2 жыл бұрын

@@olumorganjoe or to put it more accurately: The steam engine became more profitable. It's no coincidence that slavery started to wane while the steam engine moved up.

@beansmith2465 3 жыл бұрын

Said nothing of slavery lol 😆

@Tattedespiritista Жыл бұрын

Yep I taught high school. I have quit jobs. Now I teach overseas. I will NEVER Ever teach in America again. There is no amount of money. These children are out of control especially black children and it's gotten worse.