The Reality of the DJI Ban - PiXL Drone Show #81

Рет қаралды 1,801

Күн бұрын

The PiXL Drone Show is a partnership between Pilot Institute (PI) and DroneXL (XL).
00:00 Introduction and Background of Guests
02:08 Rumors and Lobbying Against DJI
06:12 Data Security Concerns and Lack of Evidence
13:49 Impact on First Responders and Public Safety Agencies
16:29 Proposed Tariffs and Challenges of Building a Domestic Drone Industry
27:52 The Potential Impact of Banning DJI Drones in the US
31:13 Challenges of Developing a Domestic Drone Industry
32:07 The Need for Innovation and Investment in US Drone Companies
38:53 Exploring Government Subsidies to Kickstart the Industry
45:20 Licensing DJI Drones Under a Different Brand
52:07 The Importance of Software and Ease of Use in Consumer Drones
54:58 Consequences of a DJI Ban on Public Safety Agencies and Drone Training Programs
57:26 The Impact of the DJI Ban on Public Safety Agencies
01:02:03 The Role of Misinformation in the Perception of Chinese Drones
01:03:34 The Importance of Outreach and Communication with Decision-Makers
01:04:24 The Influence of Lobbying Efforts on Policy Decisions
01:05:48 The Need for More End-User Perspectives in Policy Discussions
01:08:13 Taking Action to Protect the Drone Industry
Free and paid drone courses:
pilotinstitute.com/
The latest drone industry news:
dronexl.co/
Follow the PiXL Drone Show on Twitter: / pixldroneshow

Пікірлер: 31

@starperformer7154 28 күн бұрын

Excellent discussion and great information! Appreciate it!

@billgrace9415 28 күн бұрын

A real conversation that needed to be said

@ivaneberle3972 29 күн бұрын

I air-gapped as much as possible from the beginning with an Autel Evo II, did not even register to upload air data for 3+ years of use. There's only ever a need to upload flight data to Autel if you have a warranty issue, but the flight logs are locally stored, so a non-issue to air gap

@ivaneberle3972 29 күн бұрын

It could be dealt with by a set of protocols rather than bans

@ivaneberle3972 29 күн бұрын

It could also be new Right-to-Repair laws like here in CA that crimp interest in bringing out consumer drones? Walled-garden vertically-integrated solutions have captured customers with brand loyalty. Open-source like Pix4 based firmware is an alternative

@ivaneberle3972 29 күн бұрын

Greg mentioned DJI having 90% of the market, and that being a $10B annual sales? That would have #2 company Autel a 9% close to being a $1B company. That sounds like a lot of money but it's chump change to try to peel away an increment from this relatively mature market if you're a VC. Hence the high-end tactical DHS & DOD grade manufacturing

@eprohoda 29 күн бұрын

Pixl! you made uesful dji- goodnight!

@jerseyshoredroneservices225 29 күн бұрын

10:07 " Would I be able to FOIA request that data?" The question should have been "Would I be able to get that data with a FOIA request?" The detective said that you can request it, he did not say that you can get it. BIG difference.

@UltraVegas76 29 күн бұрын

LVMPD in Vegas just announced purchasing a dozen or so new Skydio X10's...

@Youno954 28 күн бұрын

Can DJI fight back against a ban decision?

@femiomomo4467 29 күн бұрын

How popular is the Parrott USA drone with with responders as this drone, has been government approved ?

@ShermanKenB 28 күн бұрын

I've heard the argument that Skydio and Brinc lobbied for this. Industry and well monied business have lobbied Congress for years to make a more favourable environment for their business. Without large piles of cash and influence I'm afraid this will be a hard issue to successfully fight.

@kenburge6276 29 күн бұрын

Vote out the stupid politicians

@richiebricker 28 күн бұрын

First responders and public safety have nothing to do with this bill. A couple rich guys want a weapons type contract on the local level with astronomical price like $700 tack hammers and $6000 toilet seats. Plus the fact that theyre all fricken racist. Skydio has camera technology but are still a young company that has already restructured, maybe ready to colapse. How many First Responders will be injured while waiting for some start up company to copy a DJI drone then make and send these drones all across the country. First Responders still have to get the job done even without a drone. Some can afford helicopters for seach and rescue but what about barricaded subjects, The first responder will have to go in with no info of whats around the corner and put thier lifes on the line. Thier is also the Power grid and Agriculture that uses DJI, Are they suppose to stop farming for 5 years and the elecric high voltage lines will have to be de-iced by a guy hanging out of a helicopter breaking ice with a metal pole. Wonder what the wind chill factor is underneath a helicopter after a winter storm? Did you know congress can buy and sell stockd before and after signing these kinds of bills? they are also allowed to accept stocks as gifts (or bribes is what it used to be called)

@jerseyshoredroneservices225 28 күн бұрын

One of them is ironically called the drones for 1st responders act. How do first responders and public safety have nothing to do with this bill?

@richiebricker 28 күн бұрын

But cant they all be replaced by a Brinc Ball?

@kradk 29 күн бұрын

How do you get members of Congress to see this discussion?

@lindseyjohn4789 29 күн бұрын

Can the USA us AI to develop a drone?

@jerseyshoredroneservices225 29 күн бұрын

36:00 RE mandatory USA manufacturing for DJI That's very similar to the Anzu solution. An American company with American software and the hardware is assembled in Malaysia, not China. With our phones and almost everything else manufactured offshore why wouldn't we trust this solution?

@jerseyshoredroneservices225 29 күн бұрын

17:50 Correct me if I'm wrong, on the topic of the DFR tax plan... The way I understand it the first responder drones are not the only ones being taxed. All CHINESE unmanned aircraft systems are being taxed so when the detective says that "we're paying for that" he's only partially correct. To be fair he does say "It's going to be public safety, it's going to be everybody" but he seems to brush over the everybody part while emphasizing the public safety part. Chinese RC model aircraft, hobbyist drones and private DSP drones for real estate, construction monitoring and any other purposes are included in the tax plan. Ironically a lot of those purchases that would be taxed just aren't going to occur because a lot of UAS users would be put out of business/ hobby due to the tax plan. And let's not forget that over time the tax plan becomes a full Chinese ban, right?

@lindseyjohn4789 29 күн бұрын

So is Dji ban now?

@jerseyshoredroneservices225 29 күн бұрын

No and even if it goes through it wont have any effect for some time. At first it would be an additional tax and over time become a ban.

@themissinglightninglink 28 күн бұрын

@@jerseyshoredroneservices225 no offense, seriously, but if and/or when it does or does not go through, is ALL in the future..we have LITERALLY ZERO idea what is actually going to happen and/or how. The legislators can and most likely will change the bill(s) before it passes or fails to pass. The likelihood of it remaining 100% the same as introduced, all the way thru the legislative process is almost zero, pass or no pass. Not trying to be a jerk-man (or man-jerk), but NOBODY has any idea what the future holds, esp as specific as this bill with all its nuances etc. We can just 🙏🤞hope🙏🤞 for the best every day and do everything in our power, both individually and collectively, to thwart or at the very least "de-fang" this ridiculous initiative, so even if it does somehow go thru, it will have as little 'real' effect on American droners as possible. 🙏🙏🙏🤞🤞💯💯💯🤞🤞🙏🙏🙏 "I said GOOD DAY, sir!"

@jerseyshoredroneservices225 28 күн бұрын

@@themissinglightninglink I don't take Offense when somebody has a reasonable disagreement and there is nothing jerk-man about disagreeing lol However, I do think that we have an idea of what will happen if the bills are passed. You're right that they could be altered before being passed but they won't be changed dramatically from their stated intention. I think we can agree, it's highly unlikely that an actual ban would be implemented anytime soon. If one of the other bills are passed. I think the most likely scenario would be an increased tax on current DJI models and possibly new releases not being available in the US because of the FCC licensing issue included in the cccpda HR 2864