The son’s name is David; their father’s name was Antony.

@@etschmitz I came to say the same thing

@@etschmitz I came to say the same thing

Non-royal? They're Princess Margaret's children. How can they be non-royal?

Interesting, although you keep showing the wedding photo of Princess Anne,not Princess Margeret.

You'll never know unless you live with them under the same roof.

Shes an amazing lady & one of the best dressed

@derryg903 she doesn't have great jewels, her and David had to sell most of them to pay inheritance tax

Both aren’t attractive

Do you watch videos of Jim Nduruchi

David looks a lot like Margaret, too. He definitely has her smile.

How nice to share our great moments with our moms in our lifes beautiful to have our moms because when there gone only the wonderfull feeling of having such a caring n loving mother, your dedication to that women Will fill yr pain n you will have peace mark my word.

@chrissybrown9205 David is the 2nd Earl of Snowden and his son now has the courtesy title Viscount Linley

So interesting to read opinions from people who really know first-hand details- thank you!

You can truly tell the REAL royals by the way they comport themselves and hold themselves to a particular standard of behaviour. Lady Sarah seems the epitome of this.

Margaret was in the tabloids constantly.

Very royal what?

not all members of the royal family are royal, and they are part of the extended royal family and Peter and Zara are losing whatever status they had

P¹q😊😊q¹ 1 1

Princess Margaret didn’t have structure or given a role, she just floundered and of course that didn’t work out in the end.

I hope so. I get the feeling she felt a above everyone else. And thought she was supposed to be Queen. Kind of mad about it.

It seems so

Princess Margaret took a lot of her attitude from her mother, who behaved similarly at times it just wasn't reported on like Margaret's behavior. The Queen Mother was a snob. Margaret's children were raised out of all the royal nonsense and are stable normal people as a result, as are their children.

David sold the controlling interest in his furniture company in 2012 borrowing money from the company wouldn't have gone down well with his partner he stayed on as a director, but retired last year and he studied to be a craftsman in wood at Parnham House

@@lsmith9249 It's odd to think of him as retired when I see him still as fairly young, as I do his sister, Sarah.

Prince Andrew or Randy Andy was a wild child. The way things are going for him with the law and Epstein, he still might be.

Ikr? You could also go back to George lV and say he was. It’s like they think the monarchy started with Elizabeth 😂

Henry V was perhaps the wildest, a royal roisterer, the despair of his father. Charles II and his huge bevy of mistresses?

@@cinnow Oh totally! Like there's at least one in every generation😆

@@Scarlett59319 and successful kings would be succeeded by inefficient or wastrel or mentally unwell sons. But is Margaret the first female "wild child" among royals?

David looks a lot like Margaret to me.

Oww no​@@travelseatsyellowlab

@@abyssiniaatnafu4300 her split.

our Queen avoided being part of the decision making, its Winston Churchill and his government who said no, fortunately governments change and letters were released by the National Archives a number of years, showing the following Prime Minister Antony Eden and his government gave their permission and there is a letter from Margaret. it was her who wasn't sure how she felt she wanted to wait until she saw Peter who was still abroad and said she would know how she felt when she saw him thats not love, its infatuation

Would’ve been gorgeous kids

@@Serenityblu23 Wrong. Titles don't determine royalty. A person can still be royalty even without a title. Go study more.

@@reyconui you missed the point.

@@Serenityblu23 Then make your point more clear. You failed to send your message across.

@@Serenityblu23 you’re, not your. looks like you’re the special one.

No title doesnt make one non royal. Harry and Megans kids have no titles and they are still in the royal line of succession so like it or not Harry and his kids will always be Royal. And as such When Harry's kids grow up and have kids themsekves THEY TOO will be in the line of succession.

both have made money from it and they did need to work a living not every member of the family is wealthy

I wouldnt wish Margaret's life on anyone

Nor her good looks, unfortunately

I guess because they haven't got titles.

No of them are more Royal than you or me. Difference is the tax payers pay for that family, who created their own titles.

They have titles…her son is Viscount Linley and her daughter is Lady Sara…

​@@eileenmaschal9505 they're not like Their Royal Highnesses, I guess that's what was meant

@mrjay6483 just because they have royal ancestry doesn't mean they are classed as royal, they're part of the extended royal family and have aristocratic titles

That is an unkind comment

Wrong 😮

Right.

It's the daddy

It’s always a hit and miss in the looks dept with the children of royals. Andrew and Charles for ex. Even Edward when he was younger, very dashing

​@@thecreoleladyy7191and prince Harry and William and queen elizabeth and princess margaret

Their circumstances are entirely different from Harry's, so the comparisons don't apply.

Though you’ve managed to butcher the English language.

Princess Margaret was a lovely Person. And her Daughter Sarah and Son. David. Wonderful.sensible people

Who's the Harkles

@@kkristian8350 I think they were going for a mashup of Harry and (Meghan) Markle.

Lovely children

This not even about them why bring them up.

Troll

Lolllllllllll

61 and 58.

All of them, r u serious?

The British have a stereotype of having bad teeth. Similar to the myth that the French do not take many baths

Have you seen the enormous choppers on Edward, Anne, Queen Elizabeth, George VI, and his mother, Queen Mary?

@@kgspvgsp7569 buck teeth are teeth that stick out like a rabbit , just the 2 front teeth. They have big teeth like there is too many .

Are you kidding? The whole load of them do. Lol

Only if you value looks. From all accounts, both children of Princess Margaret are lovely people who have raised well grounded families of their own.

What a ridiculous comment.

@@misssophie7717 how so? they are a hideous family

@@misssophie7717 I absolutely agree with you Miss Sophie. Utterly stupid.

🙄 maybe he should just abdicate and there should be a United Republic instead of a United Kingdom.

Not likely gonna ever happen

​@@JohnSmith-uj6gx not likely gonna happen either

Leave Harry alone wth lol 😂 he’s not a big deal why does everyone pick at him? Lolll

inbred

Anne's children are in a pretty similar situation. Titles aren't passed down through the female line of the family.

@@travelseatsyellowlab They are her son is the Earl of Snowdon,his mother's title.

@@wbalkhair7369 he only has the courtesy title because it was passed through his father as a gift from the queen; otherwise, he would carry no title.

they had titles Lady Sarah Chatto and Viscount David Linley

She was misunderstood and misrepresented...she was a great lady...

Don't count Harry out he do have a mind he will be a billionaire

Harry will be a billionaire and it want be tax payer money